Институт прикладной математики им. М.В.Келдыша РАН Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miusskaya pl. 4, Moscow, Russia Lavochkin Research and Production Association,
Advertisements

The ballistic support of the “SPECTR-RG” spacecraft flight to the L2 point of the Sun-Earth system I.S. Ilin, G.S. Zaslavskiy, S.M. Lavrenov, V.V. Sazonov,
GN/MAE155B1 Orbital Mechanics Overview 2 MAE 155B G. Nacouzi.
Dr. Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 3 MAE 5595
Space Engineering I – Part I
More Satellite Orbits Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
To the adaptive multibody gravity assists tours design in Jovian system for the Ganymede Landing. Grushevskii A.
Golubev Yu.F., Grushevskii A.V., Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G. A Method of Orbits Designing Using Gravity Assist Maneuvers to the Landing.
Golubev Yu.F., Grushevskii A.V., Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G. A method of orbits designing using gravity assist maneuvers to the landing.
M. R. Tetlow and C.J. Doolan School on Mechanical Engineering
Advanced method of virtual trajectories for the preliminary design of gravity-assist missions Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics.
Prince William Composite Squadron Col M. T. McNeely Presentation for AGI Users Conference CIVIL AIR PATROL PRESENTS The CAP-STK Aerospace Education Program.
Ballistics and navigation support for the Venera-D mission V. A. Shishov 1, V. A. Stepaniants 1, A. G. Tuchin 1, S. M. Lavrenov 2 (1)Keldysh Institute.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Sizing and Trajectory Design for 100 g/10kg Payloads [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] March 12,
Unit 2 GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT & SPACE SEGMENT
Satellite Motion Monika V Sikand Ph.d Student Stevens Institute of Technology Department of Physics. Light and Life Laboratory. Hoboken.
2006: Assoc. Prof. R. J. Reeves Gravitation 3.1 P113 Gravitation: Lecture 3 Escape speed from orbit Planets and satellites: Keplers Laws Orbital energy.
Gravitational Potential energy Mr. Burns
Satellites What keeps them in orbit?. Satellites A satellite is any projectile given a large enough velocity so its path follows the curvature of the.
Method of Virtual Trajectories for the Preliminary Design of Multiple Gravity-Assist Interplanetary Trajectories Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied.
Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Samara 2015 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OPTIMIZATION TRAJECTORY OF MOTION OF ELECTRIC PROPULSION SPACECRAFT.
AE 1350 Lecture #14 Introduction to Astronautics.
Understand the factors and requirements associated with a spacecraft launch Understand the dynamics of Gravity Assist and the basic principles of placing.
1 Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Modern methods of analysis of the dynamics and motion control of space tether systems Practical lessons Yuryi.
Optimal Low-Thrust Deorbiting of Passively Stabilized LEO Satellites Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, RAS Moscow Institute of.
Physics 201: Lecture 25, Pg 1 Lecture 25 Jupiter and 4 of its moons under the influence of gravity Goal: To use Newton’s theory of gravity to analyze the.
8. Gravity 1.Toward a Law of Gravity 2. Universal Gravitation 3. Orbital Motion 4. Gravitational Energy 5. The Gravitational Field.
Newton’s Law of Gravitation. Newton concluded that gravity was a force that acts through even great distances Newton did calculations on the a r of the.
IPPW-9, Toulouse 2012A. Sánchez Hernández, UPC D YNAMICAL STUDY OF THE AEROBRAKING TECHNIQUE IN THE ATMOSPHERE OF M ARS Alberto Sánchez Hernández ETSEIAT.
© Lavochkin Association, 2013 Ganymede Lander mission overview.
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
What keeps them in orbit?
Gravity Review.
Radiation environment estimates for Europa lander mission M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I. S. Veselovsky 1,2, A. A. Sukhanov 2 1.
Chapter 13 Gravitation. Newton’s law of gravitation Any two (or more) massive bodies attract each other Gravitational force (Newton's law of gravitation)
Team 5 Moscow State University Department of Mechanics and Mathematics I.S. Grigoriev, M.P. Zapletin 3rd Global.
Gravitational Field Historical facts Geocentric Theory Heliocentric Theory – Nicholas Copernicus (1473 – 1543) Nicholas Copernicus – All planets, including.
8. Gravity 1.Toward a Law of Gravity 2. Universal Gravitation 3. Orbital Motion 4. Gravitational Energy 5. The Gravitational Field.
Modelling and Open Loop Simulation of Reentry Trajectory for RLV Missions Ashok Joshi and K. Sivan Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute.
Low Thrust Transfer to Sun-Earth L 1 and L 2 Points with a Constraint on the Thrust Direction LIBRATION POINT ORBITS AND APPLICATIONS Parador d'Aiguablava,
The Third Moscow International Solar System Symposium. Moscow, 8-12 October MS 3 -MN-11 LANDING DYNAMICS ON THE «LUNA-GLOB» PROJECT Sikharulidze.
Space platform and Orbits Introduction to Remote Sensing Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth Sciences National Cheng Kung.
1 SATELLITESSATELLITES 2 Newton’s Law of Gravitation M1M1 M2M2 r F F.
CHAPTER 6 CIRCULAR MOTION AND GRAVITATION Goals for Chapter 6 To understand the dynamics of circular motion. To study the unique application of circular.
SKOBELTSYN INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS, LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY, RUSSIA Radiation Conditions of a Mission to Jupiter ʼ s Moon Ganymede M. V.
Proportionality between the velocity V and radius r
Sea Launch/Zenit Thrust: 8,180,000 N Fueled Weight: 450,000 kg Payload to LEO: 13,740 kg Cost per launch: $100,000,000 Cost per kg: $7,300 Launches: 31/28.
TRACKING OF PHOBOS-GRUNT MISSION IN LOW EARTH ORBIT Alexander S. Samotokhin, Andrey G. Tuchin M.V. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian.
ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Interplanetary Prof. Jeffrey S. Parker University of Colorado – Boulder Lecture 29: Interplanetary 1.
The Solar System Missions. planets not shown to scale >> MercuryVenusEarthMarsJupiterSaturnUranusNeptunePluto Mean Distance from the Sun (AU)
Mission Development: Putting It All Together ASEN 6008 Interplanetary Mission Design.
Satellite Climatology - Orbits Geostationary orbits Sun synchroneous orbits Precessing orbit Discussion.
Categories of Satellites
Chapter8: Conservation of Energy 8-7 Gravitational Potential Energy and Escape Velocity 8-8 Power HW6: Chapter 9: Pb. 10, Pb. 25, Pb. 35, Pb. 50, Pb. 56,
Different scenarios of the “Venera-D” mission KIAM Ballistic Center Team (Keldysh Institute Of Applied Mathematics RAS)
Newton’s thought experiment: orbital velocity. Surface escape velocities Planet V escape, ft/sec Mercury13,600 Venus33,600 Earth36,700 Moon7,800 Mars16,700.
Lunar Trajectories.
Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation
Mikhail Koptev Yaroslav Mashtakov Mikhail Ovchinnikov Sergey Shestakov
Universal Gravitation
Remote sensing platforms
Three-Body Trajectory Model and Spiral Transfer Matching
Universal Law of Gravitation
Gravitational Potential energy Mr. Burns
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
Orbits and How They Work
Solution... Click for answers.
Try Lam Jennie R. Johannesen Theresa D. Kowalkowski
1. What is the force of gravity between a 3
Presentation transcript:

Институт прикладной математики им. М.В.Келдыша РАН Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences

“Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013 Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences Alexey Golikov, Andrey Tuchin

Essential objectives “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013 Orbit measurements: interpretation, information processing, ballistic and navigational mission support, etc. o ground supported trajectory measurements (GSTM): range range rate o measurements by the strup down Orbit determination: determination of all orbital parameters taken into account essential orbit perturbations Maneuver optimization: planning the scheme of maneuvers, error estimation of maneuver realization Landing on the surface of Ganimede: optimal scheme of descent session by using of thrusters

Ganymede Lander: Ganymede Lander: Mission Stages  gravitational maneuvers about Earth & Venus “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013  gravitational maneuvers around Ganymede & Callisto  preliminary elliptical orbit  circular polar orbit at the altitude of 100 km  prelanding orbit with low pericenter  session on Ganymede’s surface  Artificial satellite of Jupiter  Artificial satellite of Ganymede (ASG)  Launching of the spacecraft (SC)  Interplanetary flight Earth → Jupiter

Scheme of the stage ASG “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013 Preliminary orbit Orbital corrections GSTM Orbit period Inclination Eccen tricity Descent Prelanding orbit

Scheme of the stage ASG “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March Transition to preliminary elliptical orbit after braking at approach to Ganymede 2.Series of GSTM for orbit determination 3.Orbital corrections of orbit period & inclination to form circular polar orbit at the altitude of 100 km 4.Series of GSTM within 2 days for orbit determination 5.Bound orbital corrections (consisting of 2 corrections of the orbit period) to precise circular polar orbit 6.Circular polar orbit with science experiments 7.Orbital maneuver to form prelanding orbit 8.Series of GSTM on 2-3 adjacent circuits of prelanding orbit 9.Descent maneuver into given point on the surface of Ganymede

Perturbing forces “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Essential perturbating factors “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013 Gravitational field of Ganymede (2×2): 2 nd zonal harmonics 2 nd sectorial harmonics Jupiter’s gravity attraction: circular equatorial orbit Rotation of Ganymede is synchronized with its orbit around Jupiter, there are resonance effects

Preliminary orbit “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March )Near equatorial and high eccentric orbit 2)Take into account the orbit evolution (perturbations) 3)Preliminary orbit with high eccentricity is very unstable: for e=0.5 it will destroy in 2 hours 4)For eccentricity e<0.3 equatorial elliptical orbits are stable 5)Polar elliptical orbits are unstable for e>0.01

Evaluation of preliminary orbit Evaluation of preliminary orbit (e=0.5) “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Evaluation of preliminary orbit Evaluation of preliminary orbit (e=0.5) “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Evaluation of preliminary orbit Evaluation of preliminary orbit (e=0.5) “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Evaluation of preliminary orbit Evaluation of preliminary orbit (e=0.3) “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Evaluation of the polar orbit Evaluation of the polar orbit (e=0.3) “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Evaluation of preliminary orbit Evaluation of preliminary orbit (e=0.1) “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Transfer to circular polar orbit “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013  Series of maneuvers to change the orbit period & inclination 1)Maneuver optimization by using Lambert’s problem with unfixed finite constraints 2)Solution of this problem is achieved by iterative procedure 3)Take into consideration an essential condition: polar orbit at high altitudes is unstable! 4)Supplementary constraint: to form polar orbit only on low heights & using “quasiequilibrium points”

Circular polar orbit “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March )Altitude 100 km 2)Series of GSTM within 2 days for orbit determination 3)Bound orbital corrections (consisting 2 corrections of the orbit period) to precise circular polar orbit 4)Science experiments (with orbit keeping corrections) 5)It needs to take into account the orbit evolution (perturbations) 6)Orbital maneuvers to form prelanding orbit with low pericenter

Circular polar orbit “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013 Long-periodic perturbations of the orbit: where

Evaluation of polar circular orbit “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Evaluation of polar circular orbit “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Prelanding orbit “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March )Altitude of the pericenter 15 km 2)Altitude of the apocenter 100 km 3)Eccentricity )Series of GSTM on 2-3 adjacent circuits of prelanding orbit to precise orbital parameters 5)Limit errors of GSTM are non greater than 0.2 mm/s and 20 m 6)Preliminary estimated errors of orbit prediction at the start of descent are non greater 2.5 m/s and 5 km

Evaluation of prelanding orbit “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Descent Session “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March variants depending on the start time of descent: 1)24 hours => 16 hours of measurements GSTM 2)12 hours => 6 hours of measurements GSTM Nominal program of the thrust direction corresponds to the solution of the problem optimization Using Pontryagin’s principle of maximum Constraints depend on the problem definition Navigation is provided by the strup down

Mass before descent maneuver900 kg Mass of propulsion system215 kg Total burn4200 N Specific thrust319 s Dry mass385 kg Ganymede Lander module “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Example of solution “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013 Solution by Pontryagin’s principle of maximum First stage of the descent session: from 15 km to 2 km Results of solution:  vertical velocity: 10 m/s forward to center of Ganymede  descent duration: 320 sec  fuel expenses: 422 kg  angle distance of descent: 7.4 deg

Direction of the Thrust “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Altitude vs. Distance “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Velocity vs. Time “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Radial velocity “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Transversal velocity “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013

Contacts Alexei R. Golikov Andrey G. Tuchin Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences “Ganymede Lander: scientific goal and experiments”, 5-7 March 2013