UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch 2014-2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Advertisements

BYU Rocket Team Special thanks to:
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
“ The Other Woman ” National Association of Rocktry Level Three Certification Project By Steve Laird NAR #86948.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Critical Design Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Team Members:Tony Guzzo Eric Jacob Bill Liewehr Alex Schlaupitz Design of a Level 2 Rocket for the Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium Advisor: Dr. William.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Final Readiness Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Dual-Deploy Launch Checklist
Plantation High SL team 1
University of Iowa USLI
Presentation transcript:

UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch

Launch Vehicle 1

Vehicle Dimensions ● Overall Length 77.7 inches ● Body tube diameter 4 inches and inch thickness 2

Vehicle Materials ● 4 inch 5:1 VonKarmen Filament wound nose cone ● Filament wound ProFusion body and coupler tubing 3

Vehicle Materials ● Fins and centering rings cut from inch structural fiberglass ● Motor tube made from wound G12 fiberglass tubing ● Bulkheads and payload compartment CNC cut from inch structural fiberglass 4

Vehicle Materials ● ¼”-20 stainless steel full threaded rods ● Grade-8 ¼ ”-20 Nylon- insert flanged locknuts ● 0.25 inch foged steel Eyebolts 5

Vehicle Materials ● Epoxies o West System 105 Epoxy Resin o Henkel Loctite o JB Weld 6

Vehicle Justifications ● Conventional configuration: Nose cone/Payload Compartment, Central Section, and Booster Section ● Aft Nose Cone/Payload section serves as payload ejection mechanism ● Dual deployment; drogue and payload ejections simultaneous to simplify design 7

Safety Testing Plans ● AGSE components will be constructed with ample time left to thoroughly test system safety, effectiveness, and consistency ● Extensive ground testing performed to ensure ejection charges perform deployment operations safely and consistently ● Subscale and full-scale launch vehicles will be test launched early and often at Alaska Northstar (NAR) launch events 8

Motor Selection Preliminary Motor Selection: Aero Tech J415W 54 mm Diameter 326 mm Length 9

Justification for Selected Motor 10

Stability Analysis ● Center of Pressure: inches from nose ● Center of Gravity: inches from nose ● Static Stability Margin: 1.95 ● Thrust-to-Weight Ratio: 5.5:1 ● Rail Exit Velocity: 33.4 feet/second 11

Test Plan Overview ● AGSE components to be constructed and tested at UAA Design Studio ● Ejection Charges to be tested outdoors adjacent to Design Studio ● Subscale and full scale launch events at Lake Louise and Big Lake 12

Launch Pad Drawing 13

Launch Pad Discussion ● Launch rail is Aluminum extrusion 180 inches in length ● Feet are adjustable to level the apparatus ● Declination of launch rail is calibrated to 5 degrees from vertical ● Blast pad safely deflects exhaust gases away from grass 14

Motor Compartment Dimensions/Discussion ● 54 millimeters in diameter and 13 inches in length to accommodate J sized motor ● Motor compartment is G12 wound fiberglass made by ProLine Rocketry Inc. ● Compartment is bonded to centering rings using JB Weld 15

Drouge Parachute System Drawing 16

Drogue Parachute Discussion ● Located between booster and central sections ● Parachute is a 2 foot Rocketman Parachute ● Tethered to rocket with ¼” Aramid rope 17

Deployment System Drawing 18

Deployment System Discussion ● Entire aft section will deploy simultaneously with main chute at 1000 feet AGL ● Aft section will descend under a 3 foot Rocketman Parachute 19

Payload Compartment Drawing 20

Payload Compartment Discussion ● Payload compartment is CNC cut from 0.125” structural fiberglass, bonded with West Systems Epoxy ● Hatch is actuated by two servos at opposite ends of the compartment ● Over-center geometry of hatch respective to servo motor prevents hatch from opening 21

Main Parachute/Shock Cord Compartment Drawing 22

Main Chute Discussion ● The main chute will deploy at 1000 feet AGL ● Chute is a 60 inch Iris Ultra Parachute made by Fruit Chutes ● Parachute is sized to allow central and booster sections to descend with kinetic energy ≤ 75 ft-lbf ● Chutes and rocket sections tethered with ¼ inch Aramid Rope 23

Recovery System Drawing 24

Recovery System Discussion ● First ejection charge at apogee; booster section and central section separate to deploy drogue chute ● Second and third ejection charges at 1000 feet AGL: o Aft nose cone/payload section descend separately o Central and booster sections descend under drogue chute and main chute 25

Nose Cone Drawing/Discussion Image credit to performancehobbies.com [1] ● 4 inch 5:1 Von Karmen Filament Wound Nose Cone ● Connected to payload compartment 26

Tail Fin Drawing/Discussion ● Fins cut from inch structural fiberglass ● Delta-style shape ● Dimensions: o 12 inch root cord o 8 inch tip cord o 5 inch height o 2 inch sweep length 27

AGSE Overview Control – Spatial Constraints – Degrees of Freedom – Precision and accuracy Components – Base Structure – Arm – End Effector 28

Base Structure Control Overview – Spatial Constraints Retain rocket during payload insertion – fixed dimensional relationship – Precision and accuracy Primary mounting point for the arm structure Contains all electronics and power systems 29

Arm Control Overview – Spatial Constraints Of sufficient height to remain clear of Launch Vehicle – 1 degrees of freedom Boom: Rotation – Yaw – Precision and accuracy Position switches/sensors 30

Linear Motion System Control – Spatial Constraints Of sufficient length to clear the base station Of sufficient length to reach the ground – 1 Degree of Freedom LMS: Translation - Heave – Precision and accuracy Ground sensing capability 31

End Effector Control – Spatial Constraints Of sufficient width to capture a 6” area – Precision and accuracy Closing pressure detection Orientation of capture 32

AGSE Integration and Testing 3D component models Assembly checks – QC Iterative testing at subsystem and system levels Sensor/program testing de-bugging 33

References [1]