MPI Forum Suggestions for Additions to the Voting rules March 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OGSA ByteIO WG Status of working group © 2006 Open Grid Forum.
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT RULES COMMITTEE 15 MARCH 2012 ON THE PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PANEL ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED.
REGIONAL NEWSLETTERS ONE YEAR ON. Evelyn Alves Digital Communications Executive 02 April 2014.
E-Portfolio July2014 Managing Multi-source Feedback.
1 The Path to the Ph.D. in IS: Part 3, Advanced coursework and dissertation research.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IEEE Down Selection Process Date Submitted: January 18, 2005.
SharePoint document libraries III: Work with version history MICROSOFT ® OFFICE SHAREPOINT ® SERVER 2007 TRAINING ADVANTAGE TALENT, INC. “Professionals.
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Transmission Workstream 7 th August 2008.
AUDITS Process and Corrective Actions OIG RolesGAO ROLES – OIG –OIG Lead Auditor –OCFO – owner of MATS and Agency Audit Process –OEI AA – Designated OEI.
ISO Current status of development
Development and Quality Plans
Software Documentation Written By: Ian Sommerville Presentation By: Stephen Lopez-Couto.
Test Reporting Best Practices By Gabriel Rodriguez.
Translator Module Overview The new Translator Module for WebIEP offers a means for producing high quality IEP forms printed in Spanish. The module is.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
S ECRETARIAT Division Secretariat Advisory Preparing Meeting Agendas & Minutes Presented by Myron Iseminger.
PROPOSALS THE REVIEW OF THE 1958 AGREEMENT AND THE INTRODUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL (IWVTA) IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session.
Welcome to the Southeastern Louisiana University’s Online Employment Site Applicant Tutorial!
Event Manager Training Part 3.  Edit Event Options - Customize FY11 Sites  Edit Event Webpages  Sending s (Recruitment/Engagement)  Help and.
Congestion Revenue Rights Activity Calendar Update Donald House CMWG September 19, 2014.
WPM What’s behind the icon? Work Programme Management.
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
© 2011 wheresjenny.com Minutes of meeting. © 2011 wheresjenny.com Meeting minutes are the written or recorded documentation that is used to inform attendees.
Monograph Development Process for the European Pharmacopoeia: How to participate in the work programme of the European Pharmacopoeia Dr Claude Coune Head.
ISDA ® 2009 ISDA CREDIT DERIVATIVES DETERMINATIONS COMMITTEES AND AUCTION SETTLEMENT CDS PROTOCOL International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
Monitor & Control Risks 1 MEC-4. What is Monitoring & Controlling Risks? 2 » Monitoring & Controlling Risks is the process of: implementing Risk Response.
BRIEFING TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SERVICES ON THE MENTAL HEALTH CARE AMENDMENT BILL 11 June 2013.
TEXAS NODAL Board of Directors Austin, Texas July 15, 2003.
Networking the World TM IEEE: Networking the World.
The Office Procedures and Technology Chapter 4 Communicating in Written Form Copyright 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning.
Topic 1Topic 2Topic 3Topic 4Topic
Topic 1Topic 2Topic 3Topic 4Topic
MA Thesis/Papers-In-Lieu Overview and Process. Thesis: What is it?  A thesis is a scholarly manuscript that reports on a significant in-depth investigation.
QA Methodology By Rajib Roy Independent Consultant Qcon.
Submitting Course Outlines for C-ID Designation Training for Articulation Officers Summer 2012.
DICOM to ISO-DICOM Report to joint ISO TC215/WG2 – DICOM WG10 meeting January 24, 2004, San Diego.
ISO Current status of development ​ ​ ISO development process ​1​1.
1 ISO/PC 283/N 197 ISO Current status of development November 2015.
1 The Sakai Community Practice Work Group: Progress Statement Mark J. Norton, Chairman.
Monitor & Control Risks 1 MEC-4. What is Monitoring & Controlling Risks? 2 » Monitoring & Controlling Risks is the process of: implementing Risk Response.
GitHub and the MPI Forum: The Short Version December 9, 2015 San Jose, CA.
Darmstadt, October 9th 2007ECSS/CCSDS Coordination meeting 1 ECSS/CCSDS cooperation.
Doc.: IEEE /0792r0 Submission July 2008 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide TGn Editor Report July 2008 Date: Authors:
1 An RFC Stream for the IRTF Wednesday, 12 March 2008 Scalable Adaptive Multicast RG.
Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Editor’s Best Practices Terry Cole, AMD WG Technical Editor & Simon Barber, Devicescape.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Early Delivery System Testing Environments & Planning – Involving Market Participants TPTF May.
“Discovering institutions that work for poor people” APPP Sharepoint training 30 July – 1 August 2008: CDD, Accra, Ghana “Discovering institutions that.
Review of System – Best Practice Danielle Horne Best Practice University of Hull.
Learning Technology Development. edgehill.ac.uk/ls David Callaghan September 2013 “How I engaged my students” One tutor’s experience that produced outstanding.
TDR end game. Timeline constraints We need to use the current momentum to conclude the TDR work Needed by all funding agencies to support funding requests.
June 3, 2016 BANNER HR FORUM.  To receive credit on your LMS transcript, please be sure you have indicated your attendance.  As a courtesy to others,
KSK Rollover Update David Conrad, CTO ICANN 59 – ccNSO Members Meeting
Editor’s Guideline Version 1.0
Overview of Documents for Third Earth Observation Summit
Software Documentation
Standards Development: An Overview
to the Fort Worth Chamber’s Member Information Center
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Writing an Effective Proposal
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Point 6. Eurostat plans for Time Use Survey data processing and dissemination Working Group on Time Use Surveys 10 April 2013.
EC Update on TV Whitespace ECSG
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Adrian Stephens nominee statement for Working Group Chair
Compact Office Staff Training
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
Presentation transcript:

MPI Forum Suggestions for Additions to the Voting rules March 2015

Goals I  Define rules for passing a final MPI standard  Voting on chapters and the final document  Currently not covered by the Forum rules document  Enable fixing of problems found in the final review  Even after the T-2 weeks deadline  Ticket 0 changes  Fixes to errors in implementation of tickets  Fixes to the contents of voted tickets  Provide “clean” rules that don’t seem arbitrary  Consistent with current practices  Allows for sufficient discussion / deliberation by the Forum  Document changes properly

Goals II – The Escape Hatch  Need a mechanism to fix problems found in reviews  These has to be limited to errata-like items  Allow for changes that get immediately added to the standard  Currently undefined  Should be previously identified issues  Proposal: Split into two meetings  Release Candidate (RC) reading  What we did here  Voting Meeting  Super Escape Hatch – Separate discussion  Ability to suspend the rules

Goals III – The Big Vote  Get rid of chapter votes  Senseless to leave out one chapter’s changes and take the rest  Cross-cutting tickets like #388 make individual chapter votes somewhat meaningless  Institutional vote on the whole standard  Reading at previous meeting (incl. full white space check)  Review period with possible changes  Publish complete draft 2 weeks before meeting  Should it be longer?  Two meanings for this vote  Correct implementation  Standard approval

Proposed sequence of events  Milestones 1. T-2 weeks to release candidate (“RC”) meeting 2. RC meeting 3. T-2 (?) weeks to voting meeting 4. Voting meeting 5. Publish standard T-2 weeks RC meeting T-2 (?) weeks Voting meeting Publish Normal ~3-month meeting internal

When are (sizeable) problems found?  When are problems found?  A: Regular errata  B: Allows for no “no-vote” vote on existing A errata  C: Requires review before Forum + groveling  D: Requires review before Forum + free beer for all T-2 weeks RC meeting T-2 weeks Voting meeting Publish AB C D

T-2 weeks to RC meeting  Chapter authors:  Publish final PDF of their chapters  Publish list of tickets applied to their chapters since the last publication  Publish list of issues still being debated

RC meeting  Full reading of all chapters  Highlight all changes since last publication  Highlight all changes since the 2-week deadline  Highlight all issues still being debated  Full whitespace / major content check by Forum members  Make final list of pending issues for the entire document  Only these issues can be addressed  New issue would reset the clock  After the meeting, document is now in “RC” status  Editor / chapter authors can still make whitespace / formatting / latex changes  Chapter authors can still make ticket 0 changes  Need to keep track of all changes  All other changes must be on the “pending issues” list  Possibility of doing a final vote during that meeting if no issues were found

T-2 (?) weeks to voting meeting  Before the T-2(?) week deadline  Commit all resolutions to open issues  White space (chapter author and editor job)  Ticket 0 changes (chapter author)  Progress on outstanding issues (ticket author needs to coordinate with chapter authors)  What is the right lead time for this?  Editor  Publish final PDF of entire document (minus publication date)  Publish changes from RC to Final document

Voting meeting  Chapter authors identify relevant changes made since last meeting, such as:  Major formatting changes and ticket 0 changes  Progress on outstanding issues since last meeting  Changes since T-2 weeks to voting meeting  New issues discovered since last meeting / since T-2 week deadline  Institutional vote on each issue change before T-2 week deadline  Regular vote  Institutional vote on each issue change since T-2 week deadline  Same criteria as ticket/errata:  No “no” votes  Meet individual vote quorum  If vote fails, must use text from T-2 week deadline  Editor produces final final final PDF  Includes results of this meeting  Includes (expected) final publication date  Institutional vote on the entire document (at least one night between votes)

Publish standard (after voting meeting)  Publish PDF on web site  Party