CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Advertisements

CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner 1 Structures for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator Rolf Wegner.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
July Alexej Grudiev, Improvement of CLIC structure. Possible improvement of the CLIC accelerating structure. From CLIC_G to CLIC_K Alexej.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS Vasim Khan
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS Vasim Khan. 24 cells No interleaving 48cells 2-fold interleaving ∆fmin = 32.5 MHz ∆tmax =30.76 ns ∆s = 9.22 m 24 cells No interleaving.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN AND FORTCOMING Vasim Khan & Roger Jones V. Khan LC-ABD 09, Cockcroft Institute /14.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
Proposals for conceptual design of the CLIC DR RF system at 2 GHz 20/10/2010 A.Grudiev.
Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.
RF structure design KT high-gradient medical project kick-off Alberto Degiovanni TERA Foundation - EPFL.
Drive Beam linac structures and RF power sources Erk Jensen, BE-RF with major contributions from: Jean-Bernard Jeanneret, Rolf Wegner 6th CLIC Advisory.
New RF design of CLIC DB AS Alexej Grudiev, BE-RF.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure.
Considerations on Drive Beam Klystrons and Phase Stability Erk Jensen, BE-RF RF and Beam Physics Meeting on CLIC Drive Beam Generation12-August th.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
TWO-BEAM, MULTI-MODE, DETUNED ACCSELERATING STRUCTURE S.Kazakov 1,2, S.Kuzikov 3, V.Yakovlev 4 J.L. Hirshfield 1,5, 1 Omega-p,Inc., 199 Whitney Ave., New.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
P. Urschütz - CTF3 Collaboration Meeting 2007 CTF3 commissioning & operation in 2006 P. Urschütz for the CTF3 operations team  Commissioning of the Delay.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
Multi-stage pulse compressor
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS
Optimisation of single bunch linac for FERMI upgrade
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
TESLA Damping Ring: Injection/Extraction Schemes with RF Deflectors
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
Review of rf structure test results
Developments on Proposed
Summary of the test structure design
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
Progress in the design of a damped an
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance versus gap size
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance versus gap size
Presentation transcript:

CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner2 Outline CLIC drive beam complex, 3 GHz DBA structure design of 1 GHz DBA structure optimisations for efficiency and filling time damping and detuning summary

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner3 CLIC RF power source f acc = GHz I pulse = 4.2 A V acc = 2.37 GV P peak,RF ≈ 12 GW P avg,RF ≈ 90 MW

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner4 3 GHz DBA structure f acc = 3 GHz P in = 33 MW n cell = 33 Length= 1.22 m Ø outside = 17.4 cm weight ≈ 200 kg 17.4 cm

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner5 3 GHz DBA structure SICA = Slotted Iris – Constant Aperture

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner6 1 GHz DBA structure SICA principle but no direct scaling possible 3 GHz: Ø= 17.5 cm, L= 1.2 m, weight= 200 kg 1 GHz: Ø= 52.5 cm, L= 1.2 m, weight= 1800 kg klystron P RF ~ 10 to 15 MW (optimising klystron cost per MW and per operating hour and modulator cost) noise, phase error reduction if t fill = 240…250 ns (combination scheme => multiplication of phase noise, t DL ≈ 245 ns, t CR I ≈ 2*245 ns, t CR II ≈ 6*245 ns)

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner7 basic cell geometry RbRb gap b LbLb gap a LaLa R BP RaRa R 6 R basic cells typical dimensions

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner8 simulations of basic cells variations: R BP gap vgr/c tuning R a => f 0 = GHz vgr/c range: min ~ 0.4% to 0.5%

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner9 design of TWS gap n R BP E 0 T V acc Ncells P out P in PbPb PbPb constant aperture η= ΔP b /P in t fill mode spectrum

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner10 design of TWS example: P in = 10 MW I b = 4.21 A N cells = 10 R BP = 39 mm vgr/c (gap) const η= 97.7% t filling = ns vgr/c lin. distribution η= 98.0% t filling = ns

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner11 design of TWS example: P in = 10 MW I b = 4.21 A N cells = 10 R BP = 39 mm vgr/c const η= 97.7% t filling = ns vgr/c lin. distribution η= 98.0% t filling = ns

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner12 design of TWS example: P in = 10 MW I b = 4.21 A N cells = 10 R BP = 39 mm vgr/c const η= 97.7% t filling = ns vgr/c lin. distribution η= 98.0% t filling = ns

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner13 optimisations P in = 10 MW I b = 4.21 A R BP = 39 mm Ncells= 10 vgr/c lin. distribution vgr/c= [2.2% to 0.86%] vgr/c= [1.7% to 0.86%] vgr/c= [1.7% to 1.28%]

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner14 optimisations - efficiency P in = 10 MW I b = 4.21 A R BP = 39 mm Ncells= vgr/c lin. distribution optimised for efficiency efficiency

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner15 noise damping => D, t fill combined optimisations DBA structure tasks: acceleration => η RF Drive Beam Accelerator Delay Loop  2 gap creation, pulse compression & frequency multiplication 1 st Combiner Ring  3 2 nd Combiner Ring  4 pulse compression & frequency multiplication t DL ~ 245 ns appropriate t fill => noise suppression at f = 1/t DL

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner16 t fill [ns] damping factor D 245 ns D ≈ 1/ ns D ≈ 1/4 124 ns D ≈ 1/4 combined optimisations 245 ± 8.5 ns D ≈ 1/17 t 0 = 245 ns Δt= 8.5 ns α= 2% combination for optimisation C(η RF,t fill )= f 1 (η RF ) + f 2 (t fill ) DBA structure tasks: acceleration => η RF noise damping => D, t fill f 1 (η RF )= 1- η RF f 2 (t fill )= α ((t fill -t 0 )/Δt) 2 appropriate t fill => noise suppression at f = 1/t DL

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner17 optimisations

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner18 optimisations

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner19 optimisations

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner20 optimisations η RF ≥ 97.5 % |t fill – 245 ns| ≤ 5 ns

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner21 damping and detuning reduction of transverse wakefields by damping and detuning Alexej Grudiev’s suggestion: dampers in web (~18 mm tick) acc. mode Q 0 = 2.2 ∙10 4, Q ext = 3.7∙10 7 distorted, 0.1° 0.1 nose Q ext = 1.5 ∙10 6 P ext,peak = 110 W, P ext,avg = 0.83 W (P cell,peak = 30 kW, d.c. 0.75%) Ø≈ 25 cm

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner22 damping and detuning reduction of transverse wakefields by damping and detuning beam may excite multiples of 0.5 GHz (only every other bucket filled) 11 cell structure R BP = 41 mm

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner23 damping and detuning reduction of transverse wakefields by damping and detuning Q_11= 28 Q_07= 34 Q_01= 33 Q_11= 31

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner24 next steps wakefield calculation optimisation of damping RF design beam dynamics mechanical design => iterations

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner25 summary travelling wave structure for CLIC DBA efficiency ≥ 97% filling time 245 ns ± 5 ns input RF power 5 to 40 MW degree of freedom: no of cells BP radius transverse wakefield reduction by detuning and damping compact and effective damping

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner26 additional slides

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner27 additional slides

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner28 additional slides

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner29 additional slides

14-Oct-2009CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner30 additional slides