The world is too big for us. Too much is going on, too many crimes, too much violence and excitement. Try as you will, you get behind in the race in spite.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PUBLIC SPEAKING DEFINITION
Advertisements

Education Policy Advocacy Objectives: 1.To learn why advocacy is one of the roles of CSOs. 2.To learn the process for developing an effective strategic.
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion.
Debating Case and Disadvantages CODI 2014 Lecture 1.
THE IMPORTANCE OF PHRASING Understanding the Resolution.
Critical Thinking. Definition: Evaluating whether we should be convinced that a claim is true or that an argument is good. It’s also about formulating.
+ Debate Basics. + DEBATE A debate is a formal argument in which two opposing teams propose or attack a given proposition or motion in a series of speeches.
Introduction To Debate and Building an Effective Argument.
The Persuasive Process
Stock issues I LL B LAME C URE C OSTS B ENEFITS. Stock issues ILL: What is the current problem? – Significant (quantitative) – Harmful (qualitative)
Building Government Cases. Preliminary Steps Follow critical decision making. –Analyze the proposition. Look at all alternatives with as much knowledge.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Topicality. Our Focus Significance Harms Inherency Topicality Solvency.
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University Constructing a Case for the Proposition 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and.
Almost all material in this presentation is from Christine Feak & John Swales, Telling a Research Story: Writing a Literature Review, which I strongly.
Debate Notes: Arguments Building the Affirmative and the Negative Constructive Arguments.
A rgument, Counter-argument, Refutation Drills Doris L. W. Chang Debate III:
Structuring an essay. Structuring an Essay: Steps 1. Understand the task 2.Plan and prepare 3.Write the first draft 4.Review the first draft – and if.
Critical Thinking Skills for all Subjects
Campaigning & Advocacy. Group Discussion What is Advocacy? When & Where to Use Advocacy 7 Steps in Advocacy Case Studies Closing Questions.
Preparing your argumentative essay / speech may seem overwhelming. Doing these little things will pay off big!
 Organizing and Presenting a Persuasive Message.
Propositions A proposition is the declarative statement that an advocate intends to support in the argument. Some propositions are stated formally, some.
ToK ESSAY The instructions tell you to: Remember to centre your essay on knowledge issues and,where appropriate, refer to other parts of your IB programme.
 The 2 nd stock issue is Inherency.  The term INHERENCY is a noun derived from the base word “INHERENT” which is an adjective and means: “…EXISTING.
Stock Issues of Proposition of Policy. Stock issues: are hunting grounds for arguments. They provide the general phrasing of potential issues that correspond.
Critical Thinking What are the perspectives? Can I verify their statements? How do I build my own understanding? What are the perspectives? Can I verify.
Speech and Debate W11.
And other things… DISADVANTAGES. BUT FIRST, LETS REVIEW FOR THE QUIZ The quiz on Wednesday will be open note and will cover the two primary topics and.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
Qualitative Research January 19, Selecting A Topic Trying to be original while balancing need to be realistic—so you can master a reasonable amount.
The Stock Issues of Debate 5 Things Every Debater Needs, and Needs to Know!
11/12/2015 Aim: To determine qualities of a good argument Topic: The Stuff of Good Argument.
 End of the marking period is next week!  Check infinite campus for missing assignments  I will give late credit for SOME assignments – see me if you.
The Disadvantage Provides an added measure to vote against the affirmative plan and vote for the present system.
Central Core CD Unit B 2-5 Employability in Agriculture/Horticulture Industry.
The Joy of Debate “A friend of mine once described himself as “hungry for rational opposition.” The words seemed to me to hit off very happily the state.
Logic and Persuasion AGED 520V. Logic and Persuasion Why do scientists need to know logic and persuasion? Scientists are writers and must persuade their.
Position Paper Writing about The Heart of Darkness.
Elements of Debate Hence, for all practical purposes, the term proof means those items of evidence and reasoning which tend to make an audience agree with.
Debate Ch. 18 Group One.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.
Persuasive Speaking. The nature of persuasive speeches Persuasive Speeches attempt to influence audience members Speakers want to: –have audience adopt.
Write down 3 sentences 2 sentences should be truths about yourself. 1 sentence should be a lie about yourself. For example: I was raised in Houston. I.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate. Resolutions: The resolution is a statement with which one contestant must agree (affirm) and the other contestant must disagree.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards & Russell Kirkscey June 2015.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY.
Introduction To Debate and Building an Effective Argument
AP Seminar IWA Directions & Rubric
Putting Knowledge into Practice
The Literature Review 3rd edition
Hegemony (Heg) Economic, military, and political influence a nation has. It’s America’s street cred Soft Power + Hard Power= Heg Amount of Soft + Amount.
1AR 4 minutes for the win.
Debate: The Basics.
Debate as a pedagogical tool
Types of Claims and Evidence
The Affirmative Adapted from:.
Policy Analysis in Cross-ex Debate
Chapter 16 Persuasive Speaking.
How to structure an answer
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
Negative Attacks.
Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric
Topicality Casey Parsons.
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I)
Getting To Know Debate:
Presentation transcript:

The world is too big for us. Too much is going on, too many crimes, too much violence and excitement. Try as you will, you get behind in the race in spite of yourself. It's an incessant strain to keep pace... and still, you lose ground. Science empties its discoveries on you so fast that you stagger beneath them in hopeless bewilderment. The political world is news seen so rapidly you are out of breath trying to keep pace... Everything is high pressure. Human nature cannot endure much more. Editorial in the Atlanta Constitution, Some things change, others....

Stock Issues and the Research Process “Stock issues, very simply, are hunting grounds for arguments. They provide general phrasing of potential issues that correspond to the inherent obligations of the advocate of change” --- Ziegelmueller and Kay Argumentation: Inquiry and Advocacy

Some Context Remember that the clash is over issues implied by the proposition/resolution Some issues will be unique to the specific topic being debated Others will be manifestations of generic or stock issues that arise in almost any significant decision

Stasis—The Historical Roots of Stock Issues Points of clash are known as points of stasis Facts Definitions Quality or significance Objection or interpretation

Basic Stock Issues: Questions of Fact Definition: What does the proposition or claim mean? Criteria: What standards should be used to determine if the proposition is true? Application to the Case: What information & evidence confirms or denies the relationship(s) asserted in the proposition?

Basic Stock Issues: Questions of Value What are the relevant values on this issue? What value hierarchy is most appropriate among these values? How can we tell when the value has been met?

Core Values What are some core values that we strive for generally? Truth Peace Life Justice Courage National Sovereignty Health Wealth Liberty/Freedom Success Knowledge Spiritual Maturity

Basic Stock Issues: Questions of Policy Ill or Need for Change Blame Cure Cost

Ill or Need for Change Inadequacies or problems in current system Ill is the current wrong or harm that the advocate for change is trying to resolve Qualitatively demonstrate impact of ill: how bad? Quantitatively demonstrate extent of ill: how big? Goal for affirmative is to establish significance of ill and that a change is necessary

Blame Blame is similar but not synonymous with cause Focus is on shortcomings of present system Cannot solve problem or achieve desired goal  Structure of the current system Will not solve problem or achieve desired goal  Deeply held attitudes, beliefs, values of people Should not solve problems or achieve desired goals  Flaws in overriding philosophy of system

Cure The Cure is the new policy that will remedy the ill There is no merit in changing the current policy if the change will not solve the problems identified with the current policy Two parts to the cure Plan of Action Discussion of its effects on the Ill

Plan of Action Plans must have at least the following An agent or mechanism A mandate or clear set of actions to perform

Cost What are the costs, disadvantages or harms of the proposed change? Qualitative Quantitative

Other Stock Issues Practicality: is the plan workable? Cost-Benefits analysis Comparative Advantage

It’s True.... “The advocate who is thorough, creative, and thoughtful in the application of the stock issues perspective will crate better arguments than will the advocate who is sloppy, indifferent, or uncreative.” Thomas A. Hollihan and Kevin T. Baaske: Arguments and Arguing: The Products and Process of Human Decision Making

Stock issues as Guiding Questions What is the problem? How big is the problem? What’s causing the problem? What should be done to correct the problem? How well will that action solve the problem? Will the action create other benefits or harms?

Let’s Talk... What do stock issues have to do with the research process?

Citing Sources Cue us before citing any critical evidence. “According to...” Establish credibility of author a publication “Dr. Martin Smith, a leading expert on child development.... Need only give year of information not page number, etc.

Application Review each of the stock issues discussed with a partner. Be sure you understand them. Do you have any clarification questions? Can you identify how the opposing team will address each issue? Can you give an example of each stock issue as it applies to your topic? Which stock issue is most critical?

Next Time Quiz on CT 8, 9 and DG 4, 5 Workshop for upcoming debates Contest to determine speaking order for round one! Come in with agreed near-final draft of resolution you will debate.