1 2001 Oakland Industrial Park Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by A service of Hampton Roads Transit Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (TMA) GREATER IRVING-LAS COLINAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AUGUST 25, 2009.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
1 Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC. A service of Hampton Roads Transit Hampton Area Transportation Needs Assessment Study October 2001.
Car Sharing.  History  Types  Demographics  Dedicated Model / B2B  Ride Matching  Total Transportation Solution 2.
THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC 2000 Lynnhaven/Oceana Area Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by.
Interim Review of the MBTA Late-night Service Pilot Program February 5, 2015.
1 HOV Attitudinal Research Among Hampton Roads Commuters Sponsored by Conducted by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC August 2002.
Transportation Initiative A project of the Skyline College President’s Council.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
March 14, 2013 CSSC Transportation Update. APG Traffic Counts Tuesday (2/26/13)Wednesday (2/27/13)Thursday (2/28/13) 6:00 – 7:00 AM :00 –
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
Think. Learn. Succeed. Getting College Students on Board George Mason University Office of Parking & Transportation VTA 2008 Annual Conference May 20,
Prepared for Hampton Roads Transit July 2002 Greenbrier Transportation Needs Assessment Study Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE.
1 Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC. A service of Hampton Roads Transit Downtown Norfolk Transportation Needs Assessment Study January 2002.
Providing Travel Choice Through Employee Shuttles Association for Commuter Transportation of Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit 2012 Suzanne Charbonneau,
Alternative Transportation: Carpooling at Niagara College
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
1 Providing Commute Choices to Employees Krute Singa.
Transportation Operations/Mobility in the Baltimore Region Customer Satisfaction Survey AMPO Operations Work Group September 28-29, 2006 Las Vegas.
South Park Business Outreach By Melanie Mayock, Outreach Coordinator Duwamish TMA.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC Naval Station Norfolk Transportation Needs Assessment Study Final Report Sponsored by February 13, 2001.
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law.  The CTR Law requires major employers - in Urban Growth Areas throughout Washington - to implement an employee.
Connie Ruth, EPA Best Workplaces for Commuters The Advantages of Excellent Commuter Benefits Why your University or College Should Achieve the Best Workplaces.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
October 29, 2013 Calgary flood 2013 – Resilience of City’s workforce supports Continuation of operations Ron Schafer, Transportation Planning Sandy Virgo,
Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission and WinFred MPO Regional Commuter Survey Southeastern Institute of Research, Inc.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
TAG 2012 Survey Data. Survey sent to 16, responded.
How to comply with the ____ Transit Benefit Ordinance [City Seal]
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC.
Florida Department Of Transportation District IV Office of Modal Development Commuter Choices 2004 Summit 2004 Summit.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
10/22/021 Recent Innovations in Transportation Demand Management Peter Valk Transportation Management Services 12 th Annual UCLA Symposium on the Transportation/Land.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Transportation 101 February 18, CommuteInfo Introducing… a better way to work.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
UFCU Employee Mobility Program. Did you know?  Mobility programs can be marketed as part of employee benefits packages. Companies that offer these options.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Placer County Rural Transit Study Expanding Public Transit Service for Rural Placer County.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.
December 3, 2013 NJTPA Plug it In Event Wayne Wittman - PSEG PSEG’s View on Electric Transportation for New Jersey.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
10 by 10 Initiatives. 10% by 2010 Achieve a 10% increase in the use of “alternative transportation modes” by the year Stepped approach: Convert.
One Team, One Mission: Your Success! Joint Base San Antonio: The Premiere Installation in the Department of Defense! JBSA RideShare Program Vanpool system.
Burlington Transportation Alternatives Presented by: UVM Service Learners May 2004.
OneCommute People Vanpool Management Contacts Program Management Accounts Surveys Meetings/Events Transit Passes Program Plan Actuals Mode Counts Vehicle.
The BART System Map.
A Better, Greener Way to Work!
75% of Hudson Valley residents drive alone to work
Treasure Island Mobility Management Program
Parking and Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary
Our Suite of Services.
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC
TRAFFIX Subcommittee Meeting
2000 Lynnhaven/Oceana Area Transportation Needs Assessment Study
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Oakland Industrial Park Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by A service of Hampton Roads Transit Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC.

2 Study Area Oakland Industrial Park

3 About the Study Area  Heavy manufacturing.  Few local services (restaurants, shops, etc.).  Large Wal-Mart Distribution Center 2.5 miles from Park.

4 Overall Study Objective To help reduce traffic congestion to and from Oakland Industrial Park.

5 Specific Objectives  Determine the perceived impact of area traffic on congestion.  Identify current transportation modes used.  Determine parking concerns.  Measure how willing employers and employees are to adopt and implement alternate transportation programs.

6 Study Components Employer Commuter Interviews Surveys

7 Methodology Commuter Surveys  402 completed surveys  Conducted March to April  Self-administered Employer Interviews  12 one-on-one interviews  Conducted February to March  Interviews conducted with:  small, medium, and large employers  Plant mangers and human resource personnel

8 Whom did we interview? Employer Interviews

9 Participating Employers employees  Opton, Inc.  Evercel  Kinyo Virginia, Inc.  Pepsi Bottling Group  Wal-Mart Distribution Center 500+ employees  AAFES (Dan Daniels Distribution Center) <51 employees  Swisslog  Silicone Technology employees  Iceland Seafood Corporation  Pliant Corporation  Amcor Rigid Plastics  Custom Integrated Technologies

10 About the participating employers  Many are manufacturers.  Most have:  daily truck deliveries to their business site.  adequate parking for employees.  work in 8/9 or 12-hour shifts.  Majority of employees live in the Newport News area.

11 Employer Interviews Key Findings

12 Key Finding #1 Employers do not believe that area traffic congestion is a current problem. At study onset, no employer offered commute programs to employees.

13 Currently, employers do not perceive traffic as a problem.  Traffic is only a problem in the evening (3:30-4:00 p.m.).  Currently causes few problems for their business.  Parking is not a problem.  However, there is concern for the future.

14 Employers point out problem areas during peak travel times. Warwick Road (Route 60) and Enterprise Dr. Warwick Road and Pickett’s Lane

15 Key Finding #2: Most employers feel some responsibility to help employees with their work commute. Most are willing to take action.

16 What are businesses willing to do?  Stagger shift schedules and offer flextime  Promote alternate modes  Offer transit subsidies  Work together with area businesses

17 Employers are beginning to act.

18 Whom did we survey? Commuter Surveys

19 Many of the commuters surveyed hold production or warehouse positions. (Base = 402)

20 The vast majority of area commuters live in Newport News.

21 Place of residence (Base = 402)

22 Commuter Surveys Key Findings

23 Key Finding #3 Currently, single-occupant vehicle (SOV) usage is average compared to other areas, but willingness to occasionally use alternate modes is higher.

24 Drive alone 85% Carpool 10 Bus 3 Combination 2 Current Commute Mode Area SOV % Oceanfront area66% Naval Station Norfolk 81% Oakland Industrial Park85% Norfolk Commerce Park 86% Oyster Point area88% Lynnhaven Mall area91%

25 Willingness to occasionally rideshare % Willing Area to Rideshare Naval Station Norfolk 42% Oakland Industrial Park39% Norfolk Commerce Park 33% Oyster Point 26% Oceanfront area26% Lynnhaven Mall area24%

26 SOV commuters interested in ridesharing  Begin work between 6:00- 7:00 a.m.  Have previous rideshare experience.  Be more influenced by employer-sponsored incentives.  Be more willing to ride the bus to and from work.

27 Most of the the SOV commuters interested in ridesharing live in Newport News.  52% live in Newport News  21% live in Hampton

28 Employer transit subsidies and vanpool most interest commuters. 34% 27% 33% 24% 22%

29 Key Finding #4 There is interest in improved and expanded bus service.  More stops within the Park (and at the Wal-Mart Distribution Center)  More frequent service

30 Of these, 22% have taken the bus regularly for their work commute. (Base = 391 Commuters) A third (34%) of commuters indicate that bus service is currently available from home to work.

31 Current Morning Bus 6:35 Bus Time arrive at work

32 4:10 Bus Current Evening Bus Time leave work

33 Willingness to Ride the Bus  12% SOV commuters say they would be willing to take a bus for work commute.  But many need more information.  Over a quarter (26%) don’t know if bus service is available from their home to their workplace.

34 Recommendations

35 Recommendations  Focus employer outreach on larger area businesses.  Iceland (have already re-established contact)  AAFES (DOD Transit Reimbursement Program recently implemented; interest in bus)  Consider expanding bus service.  Examine current ridership.  Meet with AAFES and Wal-Mart to determine needs (stop locations and times of operation) and their demand potential.  Advertise current bus stops and times.

36  Re-established contact with Iceland and AAFES.  AAFES is offering DoD transit reimbursement program.  Fort Eustis has requested full study.  TRAFFIX is working with Newport News City Planning and area employers to discuss:  Sidewalks, bike paths, light signals, parking improvements Accomplishments to Date

Oakland Industrial Park Transportation Needs Assessment Study Sponsored by A service of Hampton Roads Transit Prepared by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC.