Date ▪ Educational Program - History - Automotive Options ▪ Practice Fields - Construction Phasing - Construction Options - Relocation Options Agenda – Rebuild Stafford High School

Date School Campus Site Plan

Date ▪ Educational Program

Date Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School FY CIP Development (Feb 2011) Used HS 2010 Building & SHS Site Cost Estimate HS 2010 = 267,561 Gross SF CTE Programs included (No Automotive) Detailed Development of Educational Program April – July, 2011 Majority of program similar to HS2010 CTE - Compared HS2010 to SHS Program Could not replicate entire program

Date Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School Cliff Farm267,561 SF Current SHS287,836 SF Difference 20,275 SF Rebuild Cost Estimate Taken from this Project for CIP

Date Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School CTE CLIFF FARMCurrent SHSRebuild SHS Health & MedicalXXX Carpentry (T&I)XX Electrical (T&I)XX Masonry (T&I)XX Small Engine (T&I)XX AutomotiveX Business & Info TechXXX MarketingXXX Family/ConsumerXXX Culinary ArtsXX CosmetologyXX Criminal ScienceX Technical DrawingsXXX TV Studio/Video ProductionXXX Technology LabXXX HorticultureX 26,600 SF45,000 SF30,000 SF *JROTC Stays In Amiee Building

Date Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School SB ApprovedSeptember 27, 2011 Information MeetingsJuly 12, 2011 August 9, 2011 September 13, 2011 Work Session September 13, 2011 PresentationMay 8, 2012 *All Information Posted on Web Site

Date Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School Automotive Program Requirement for SHS 9,000 SF Facility 6 Lifts 2 Classrooms Lockers, Toilets and Storage Options: #1 - Replace Current Program Space #2 - Add to Main HS Building #3 - Detached Building on Campus #4 - No Change from Approved Program

Date Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School Option #1 - Replace 9,000 SF of Current Program Space with Automotive Program Pros: Restores Automotive Program Cons: Adds an estimated $150K for redesign & $750K for construction Delays school opening 1 year (Sep 2016) Will reduce CTE and/or Core Programs

Date Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School Option #2 - Add 9,000 SF to New HS Main Building Pros: Restores Automotive Program Cons: Adds an estimated $4M for design & construction Re-siting of building Delays school opening 1 year (Sep 2016)

Date Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School Option #3 - Add 9,000 SF as a Detached Building on School Campus Pros: Restores Automotive Program Proposed siting close to CTE Wing Maintains current construction schedule Cons: Adds an Estimated $3.5M - $4M for design & construction Reduces parking spots in staff parking Change Order to Construction Contract

Date OPTION 1 PROS: Able to provide a façade that matches and respondsto proposed building. Closer to proposed CTE program. CONS: Lose 64 parking spaces (161 to 97 spaces). Tighter turning radius for access to Lab.

Date PROS: Lose only 46 parking spaces (161 to 115 spaces). Comfortable turning radius for access to Lab. CONS: Garage doors on façade may be visible from school. Farther away from proposed CTE program. OPTION 2

Date *The current # of students enrolled in Auto Tech I, II & III at all three participating schools within the division is 275 (Levels II & III are taught in a double block). Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School Option #4 - No Change from Approved SHS Educational Program (No Automotive SHS) Maximize Lab use at Brooke Point & North Stafford, and use Germanna Space Change Travel Allocation #’s to transport to 3 sites – BPHS, NSHS & GCC SCPS can service 160 students for Auto Tech I and 80 students for Auto Tech II/III (Max 240), if we use both the labs at NSHS and BPHS all four blocks – this would mean utilizing a floating teacher to teach one block at each school. GCC could service 40 students for Auto Tech I and 40 students for Auto Tech II/III – Max 80

Date Stafford High School Automotive Student Enrollment ( ) Auto. Tech. I Sec Total EnrollmentSHSCFHS Totals Auto. Tech. II & III Combined courses Sec. Total Enrollment Total Enrollment (AT II/AT III) SHS Enrollment (AT II/AT III) CFHS Enrollment (AT II/AT III) / 3 /11 / 2 /1 / / 2 / 0 / / 4 /11 / 2 /2 / Totals4940 / 9 /37 / 6 /3 / Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School

Date ▪ Practice Fields

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices SHS Construction Challenges Building on Existing Campus SHS Remains Operational Environmental Constraints Phased Construction

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Option #1 – (Current Plan) Phase I – Main Building Phase II – Building Demo, Parking Lots and Fields Balanced Site – No off Site Soil Hauling

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Option #2 Phase I – Main Building & Fields Phase II – Building Demo and Parking Lot Non Balanced Site Soil import during Phase I Soil export during Phase II Estimated additional cost $3M

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Assuming Phased Construction with Practice Fields Constructed in Phase II Maximize existing field use Maintain current Academic Program Limit off site busing of students Provide equivalent practice opportunities

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Ground Truth: All Team practices can be accommodated on the existing SHS Campus or at their current locations with the exception of the following: Fall: Football (Varsity, JV & Freshman) Spring: Soccer (Boys Varsity & JV) Spring: Lacrosse (Varsity & JV) Spring: Tennis (B/G Varsity)

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Ground Truth: All proposed options require boys/girls Tennis to be relocated off campus Option A – Install Turf Field Option B – Stagger practice times on existing fields Option C – Stagger practice times on existing fields w/Chichester Park Option D – Cliff Farm Option E – Relocation displaced practices off campus

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options A – Turf Field B/G Tennis off BPHS & CFHS Lacrosse - Competition Football Field Spring 2013 Convert Football Field to Turf Field (Jun 15 – Aug 1) Includes expansion of track (8 Lanes) Cost = $1.5M Fall: Football Practice - Turf Field & Baseball/Softball Fields Spring: Boys Soccer and Lacrosse - Turf Field (stagger practice times)

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options A – Turf Field Pros: Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus Installs All Weather Turf Field Expands SHS track to 8 lanes Cons: Additional $1.5M for Turf Field Project Summer construction will be tight Staggered practice times in Spring Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall Limited Fall Baseball/Softball

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options B – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields B/G Tennis off BPHS & CFHS Fall: Football Practice – Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields Spring: Lacrosse – Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) Spring: Boys Soccer – Competition Football Field and/or Field Hockey Field (stagger practice times)

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options B – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields Pros: Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus Cons: Field Conditions will be Poor Practice & Games Weather will have compounding effect Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance Staggered practice times in Spring Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall Limited Fall Baseball/Softball

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options C – Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park B/G Tennis off BPHS & CFHS Fall: Football Practice Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields 2013 Spring: Lacrosse Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) 2013 Competition Football Field Spring: Boys Soccer Competition Football/Field Hockey Fields (stagger practice times) 2013 Chichester Park

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options C - Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park Pros: Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus Cons: Field Conditions will be Poor Practice & Games Weather will have compounding effect Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance Staggered practice times in Spring 2013 Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall Limited Fall Baseball/Softball Park Field used for Soccer

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options D – Build Cliff Farm B/G Tennis Off BPHS & CFHS Fall: Football Practice – Cliff Farm Spring: Lacrosse – Cliff Farm Spring: Boys Soccer – Cliff Farm

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options D – Build Cliff Farm Pros: All Displaced One Location Cons: Requires Construction Project Spring/Summer Fields w/Temp Parking - $300K Irrigation - $100K No Support Facilities No Potable Water Requires $40K for annual Field Maintenance Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year Requires scheduling late Activities Bus Could impact future school construction

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options E – Relocated Displaced Practices Off Campus B/G Tennis Off BPHS & CFHS Fall: Football Practice – Gari Melchers Spring: Lacrosse Gari Melchers 2013 DSMS Spring: Boys Soccer – GMS

Date Relocation of Athletic Team Practices Options E – Relocate Displaced Practices Off Campus Pros: Practices held in the Attendance Zone & at SCPS Facilities Existing Competition SHS are not over stressed Cons: Practices will be delayed 45 minutes after school for tutoring opportunities Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year Requires scheduling late Activities Bus