A Quick Infomercial.  Development of College’s Action Plan on Planning and Assessment, vetting through College Senate, and approval by President’s Cabinet.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Advertisements

National Academic Reference Standards
Basic Concepts of Strategic Management
Southwest Texas Junior College Core Curriculum Dr. Cheryl Sanchez, Dr. Mark Underwood, Dr. Renee Zimmerman, and Bobby Ayala Southwest Texas Junior College.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
A. ABET Update i. Overview of documents submitted to ABET (Self-Study) EWRE Retreat 8/2/2005 ii. What we need to do between now and ABET visit in November.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
College of Natural and Applied Sciences Master of Science in Environmental Science Master of Science in Environmental Science Degree 21 Faculty: From CNAS,
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Texas Tech University College of Human Sciences Lubbock, TX.
Formulating objectives, general and specific
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.
Basic Concepts of Strategic Management
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
University Assessment Committee Comprehensive Standard (CS) The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves.
Curriculum Mapping: Assessment’s Second Step Office of Institutional Assessment & Effectiveness SUNY Oneonta Fall 2010.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report Brody School of Medicine.
ASSESSMENT SYED A RIZVI INTERIM ASSOCIATE PROVOST FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
Empowering Student Services Staff to Become Learning Centered Bette M. Simmons, Ed. D. County College of Morris July 13, 2007.
R EFINING Y OUR A SSESSMENT P LAN : S ESSION 1 Goals and Learning Outcomes Ryan Smith and Derek Herrmann University Assessment Services (UAS)
University of Central Florida S.O.S.: Student Outcomes Solutions for Program Assessment Paula S. Krist, Ph.D. Director, OEAS December 5, 2005 CS-55.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Graduate Assistant compiles raw data for Assessment Committee by survey (where appropriate) and by curricular objective Assessment Committee reviews compilation.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
“Outcomification”: Development and Use of Student Learning Outcomes Noelle C. Griffin, PhD Director, Assessment and Data Analysis Loyola Marymount University.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Business and Management Research
Program Review – Assessing the Health of Curriculum Programs Mark Lupton Director, Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness South Piedmont Community.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT PLAN/REPORT By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report January 2009 WASC Accreditation.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Identifying Outcomes Peggy Maki Senior Scholar Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education
Developing Program Learning Outcomes To help in the quality of services.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Developing and Linking Objectives at the Program and Course Levels Presentation to Fulton-Montgomery Community College October 5, 2006.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
WASC Orientation and Discussion September 2, 2009 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Reading and Literacy M.Ed. Program.  Graduate programs across the university require some sort of exit option that shows that the student has mastered.
Incorporating Program Assessment into Your Annual Program Review June 29, 2006.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
Facult Retreat January 2010 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
Criteria Rollout Meeting October 30, 2016
Academic Program Review
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
Assessment Plan Tune-up
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Creating Meaningful Student Learning Outcomes
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
How do current core learning goals integrate into courses?
Presentation transcript:

A Quick Infomercial

 Development of College’s Action Plan on Planning and Assessment, vetting through College Senate, and approval by President’s Cabinet in Spring 2009  Called for development by APAC of “guidelines and prototypes for academic programs to follow in developing assessment plans”  Development of guidelines, approval by President’s Cabinet, and distribution to programs in December 2009

 Focus of guidelines is assessment of student learning, or student learning outcomes, in all undergraduate major and graduate programs  Programs will clearly have other goals and objectives (e.g., curriculum development, faculty achievements)  Assessment planning process intentionally tailored to fit easily into:  Program review (i.e., self-study)  Annual reporting process  Not necessary to assess all student learning outcomes every year  In fact, better to stagger these assessments, assuring some take place each year

I. Establishing Objectives II. Curriculum Mapping III. Assessment of Program Effectiveness Specific to Stated Outcomes IV. Closing the Loop

 Process to begin this semester  5/3/10 – Step 1 completed  12/1/10 – Step 11 completed  Plans reviewed by APAC, with deans responsible for approving plans or requiring revisions  Programs can also submit existing plans to their dean for approval, with deans responsible for approval

 Goal is for program faculty to reach consensus about desired student learning outcomes  Recommended actions:  Review existing outcomes  Elicit and discuss faculty perceptions of these (both actual & aspirational)  Compare with:  Institutional statements of student learning  Statements from programs at comparable institutions  Criteria from certification/accreditation agencies or national associations as appropriate

1. Student understands and can explain major theories of social behavior. 2. Student understands the nature and purposes of social research and understands different methodological techniques. 3. Student can apply theories and research methods to real-world situations. 4. Student can describe these issues effectively in oral and written form.

Students will:  Achieve an introductory understanding of the major figures and movements in both ancient and modern philosophy;  Achieve an introductory understanding of symbolic logic;  Attain knowledge, beyond the introductory level, of the literature in each of the four major areas of philosophy (History of Philosophy, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology, and Value Theory);  Demonstrate the ability to evaluate philosophical positions critically and systematically;  Demonstrate the ability to formulate and defend philosophical positions;  Master the ability to write well-reasoned, well-integrated essays about materials recently studied;  Master the ability to conduct and present philosophical research in written form; and  Master the ability to orally defend positions taken in written work.