DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS (DFMEA) PURPOSE OF DFMEA Identify, quantify, and reduce design risk (especially for critical systems) Provide a traceable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medical Device Software Development
Advertisements

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
1 ITED /2/2003 Introduction to Failure Modes and Effects Analysis From: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis(FMEA), by Kenneth Crow, DRM Associates.
Revision from last week  Assumptions are potential failure points in a project. They need to be monitored and managed. At the start of the project they.
Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Module 3 UNIT I " Copyright 2002, Information Spectrum, Inc. All Rights Reserved." INTRODUCTION TO RCM RCM TERMINOLOGY AND CONCEPTS.
Failure Effect Mode Analysis
FMEA Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis Tom Hannan & Kevin Kowalis Eastern Illinois University School of Technology Total Quality Systems INT 5133 (FMEA)
Recall The Team Skills 1. Analyzing the Problem 2. Understanding User and Stakeholder Needs 3. Defining the System 4. Managing Scope 5. Refining the System.
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
SQM - 1DCS - ANULECTURE Software Quality Management Software Quality Management Processes V & V of Critical Software & Systems Ian Hirst.
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)
 Individually  Given your sample of M&Ms, build a Pareto diagram by color  Before you destroy the evidence, be sure you have an accurate count.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Lucas Phillips Anurag Nanajipuram FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS.
Program Management Satisfy requirements of all individual projects with minimal resources Human resource is the most expensive Leadership Methods of documenting.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis FMEA
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Presented to: [Date] By (Insert Name) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis Adam Adgar School of Computing and Technology.
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 7 Quality and Innovation in Product and Process Design.
1. Infection Control Risk Assessment Terrie B. Lee, RN, MS, MPH, CIC Director, Infection Prevention & Employee Health Charleston Area Medical Center Charleston,
Analyze Opportunity Part 1
Product Safety Consulting, Inc.© Failure Mode and Effects Analysis - FMEA.
Eng.Mosab I. Tabash Applied Statistics. Eng.Mosab I. Tabash Session 1 : Lesson 1 IntroductiontoStatisticsIntroductiontoStatistics.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA). 2 Definition of FMEA Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to: Predict failures and prevent.
© ABSL Power Solutions 2007 © STM Quality Limited STM Quality Limited Failure Mode and Effect Analysis TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT F.M.E.A.
Lecture 7 Risk Analysis CSCI – 3350 Software Engineering II Fall 2014 Bill Pine.
Lecture # 17 PRM 702 Project Risk Management Ghazala Amin
1 Safety - definitions Accident - an unanticipated loss of life, injury, or other cost beyond a pre-determined threshhold.  If you expect it, it’s not.
Design Documentation Clint Kehres, Brian Krouse, Jenn Shafner.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Joel Gerber Zachary Reaver Kurt Schilling.  Provides physical proof of development  Maintains product design knowledge base  Meets government and corporate.
Team Assignment 10 K15T02-Team Scope 2.Risk Management Process 3.How to determine the impart of risk 4.Top 10 risk of Viking.
1 Criteria for a Successful FMEA Design & Process.
(Project) RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS SEPTEMBER 5, 2008.
Using Total Quality Management Tools to Improve the Quality of Crash Data John Woosley Louisiana State University.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
AVTC Model Based Design Curriculum Development Project.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Concept Selection and DFMEA Heidi Ploeg Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering.
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. 2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) ● Purpose – Systematically, prospectively, identify ways in which a process.
FMEA Training.
Medical Device Software Development
Six Sigma Greenbelt Training
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA)
PRA: Validation versus Participation in Risk Analysis PRA as a Risk Informed Decision Making Tool Richard T. Banke– SAIC
11.3 Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis
FMEA.
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Causes/ failure mechanisms Product definition
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Determine Causes/ mechanisms failure
DSQR Training Control Plans
Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
DMAIC Analyze, Improve, Control
The benefits to perform FMEA
RISK REDUCTION PROCESS
Tools and Techniques for Quality
Unit I Module 3 - RCM Terminology and Concepts
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Potential Failure Mode Analysis 4th Edition
PFMEA Summary Process Steps
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis
Presentation transcript:

DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS (DFMEA) PURPOSE OF DFMEA Identify, quantify, and reduce design risk (especially for critical systems) Provide a traceable document for making design decisions Prioritize which design activities to pursue next NOTE: A DFMEA is not a one meeting activity (It needs to evolve with the product)

DFMEA INPUTS Product Design Requirements –List of Specifications –Legal and technical regulations Bill of Materials (BOM) and Specific Hardware –List of components –Components and/or samples as supplied by the customer Product Definition –Drawings, sketches, animations, and simulations –Description of systems and components Previous Experience –Experience with similar concepts, designs, and DFMEA –Customer and supplier inputs –Design guides and design standards (for example ASME codes)

DFMEA OUTPUTS Risk Priority Number (RPN) –RPN = (Severity) x (Occurrence) –Systems/components with high RPNs represent high risk items. Select/Define Remedial Actions based on design risk (where to focus additional development/implementation work)

DFMEA METHODOLOGY (1.) List components, subsystems, and/or functions –Start with the system, then subsystems, and finally components (2.) Document symptoms of failure –How could the design potentially fail to meet the design intent –Consider all types of failure (normal operation, start up, shut down, maintenance, user experience) (3.) Document the potential effects of failure –How would the design potentially fail to meet the design intent. –Some symptoms may have multiple effects (make an entry for each)

DFMEA METHODOLOGY: (CONTINUED) (4.) Document potential causes and mechanisms of failure –Failure causes and mechanisms are an indication of design weaknesses –Potential failure modes are the consequences of the failure causes –A single failure mode may have multiple failure mechanisms –Don’t be afraid to identify as many potential causes as you can (5.) Rate the severity of the failure effect (linked to the effects) 4 = Catastropic – failure causes substantial damage to the product itself or related items (including people), requiring remanufacturing 3 = Critical – failure causes significant damage to the product itself or related items, requiring repair of existing components 2 = Marginal – failure causes some damage to the product itself or related items, but limited operation is still possible 1 = Negligible – failure causes no significant damage but could be a nuisance to the operator/user

DFMEA METHODOLOGY: (CONTINUED) (6.) Rate the occurrence of the failure 5 = Very Probable – observed every time 4 = Probable – observed most times 3 = Occasional – observed multiple times during the project 2 = Remote – observed once or twice during the project 1 = Improbable – could be predicted to occur after hand-off (7.) Calculate the RPN of each potential failure effect –RPN = (Severity) x (Occurrence) –What are the highest RPN items? (8.) Classify failures by RPN (9.) Select and describe remedial actions –These could be design changes, tests, or revised operation procedures

DFMEA METHODOLOGY: (CONTINUED) (10.) Assign remedial actions (11.) Reassess severity/occurrence of anticipated failures and update RPN values Notes: Revise your DFMEA frequently! Make your DFMEA an ongoing instructor/team meeting item. Document your design changes and the rationale behind them.