1/26 Content of lecture 18.1 Waste Composition 18.2 Site Selection 18.3 Groundwater 18.4 Slope/topography 18.5 Distance to settlement/ Public Involvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRP Chapter Chapter 6.8 Site selection for hazardous waste treatment facilities.
Advertisements

Alert: Waste Spill Environmental Science. Artesian well.
PREPARED BY- NABANITA SHARMA M.E. 3 RD SEMESTER ROLL NO.-10/12.
1 Results Based Regulation Implications for Municipal Solid Waste Management Presented By: Blake E. Nesbitt Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment SUMA Convention.
 ideally the disposal methods should meet the following condition:  environment friendly  cause no health hazard  economically less demanding  maximum.
Solid Domestic Waste IB Syllabus 5.5.1, AP Syllabus Ch 21 Personal Waste Audit Trashed video.
Environment Engineering I
Part III Solid Waste Engineering
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
Environmental Impact Assessment
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Global Warming Climate Change Ozone Layer Resource Depletion Population Growth Waste Disposal Effects.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Lecture(2) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
OPEN DUMPS Oldest and most common way of disposing solid waste
G3 – Environmental Geomechanics (Dr Sam Yuen)
TRP Chapter Chapter 1.1 Introduction. TRP Chapter Why raise hazardous waste management standards? To reduce risks of inadequate controls on.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
Environmental Engineering
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Environmental Risk Analysis
The phased approach to the groundwater monitoring programme for the Drini River Basin.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment Summary from CSM on Human Action And Intrusion.
Prioritize Contaminated Sites With a Known Release and a Pathway That Poses the Greatest Threat of Exposure  Pathways to surface water Freshwater wetlands,
Overview of Land Use Compatibility between Sensitive Land Uses and Nuisance Sources Peter Piersol A&WMA/OPPI Land Use Compatibility.
EnE 301: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Landfill. ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS 7 essential components are: (a) A liner system at the base and sides of the landfill which prevents migration.
20 – Operation and Maintenance 1/45 “There is no sensible reason to design and prepare for a better engineered landfill if it is not operated in a better.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Decision making process / basic options assessment Mercury Storage and Disposal LAC Two Countries Project Gustavo Solórzano Ochoa, Consultan t Montevideo,
Landfill acceptance criteria: justification and background Heijo Scharff FEAD Workshop Implementation of the Landfill Directive Budapest, Hungary, 11 May.
Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
EU Water Policy Sustainable water management for generations to come.
Synopsis EIA Purpose of EIA Origin Key Elements NGO Participation Content Analysis 1.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
Professor Peter Styles Keele University United Kingdom.
West of England Joint Waste Development Plan Document Allan Davies Planning Policy Officer North Somerset Council West of England Partnership Office North.
Italy: developments in the new legislation and progress in the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting.
Case study: SEA for land-use plan amendments of Krasna Hora municipality.
What is a policy strategy paper Kaupo Heinma 13 June 2013 Estonian, Latvian & Lithuanian Environment OÜ (ELLE)
ERT 319 Industrial Waste Treatment Semester /2013 Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Understanding Activities, Aspects, and Impacts in the EMS.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Environmental Toolbox. Technical Module Introduction.
Country presentation Netherlands First Eionet NRC Soil- Adhoc WG Meeting Netherlands|
South Australia’s Environment Protection Authority Articulating aesthetics Monday 24 August 2015 Andrew Pruszinski.
Recommendations for Developing Effective Risk Management Policies for Contaminated Site Cleanup An Overview of Risk Management Concepts and How Risk Management.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
GO C3Analyze and Evaluate Mechanisms Affecting the Distribution of Potentially Harmful Substances within an Environment. Transport of Materials Through.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
Using Insurance to Fund Brownfield Development Technical Issues Geoff Glanders, President August Mack Environmental, Inc.
Islamic Republic of IRAN’s Training Course: Waste Management Auditing Based on INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing Handbook: Towards Auditing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
OBJECTIVES Understanding what food chemicals are?
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Lecture (5): Waste treatment and disposal
Numfon Eaktasang ,Ph.D Thammasat University
GEOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BRIDGE PROJECTS
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
Planned risk assessment in Sweden
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

1/26 Content of lecture 18.1 Waste Composition 18.2 Site Selection 18.3 Groundwater 18.4 Slope/topography 18.5 Distance to settlement/ Public Involvement 18.6 Impact assessment 18.7 Legal Requirement 18: Planning a landfill

2/26 18: Planning a landfill General Up to 1970s –waste was a non-issue on political agenda, –unnoticed even by environmentalist groups. Proximity to waste producers was the most important criterion for selection of a site for a waste disposal. No consideration was given to public health or environmental issues. In the 1970s –cases of adverse health effects near waste dumps occurred. Response came from authorities (Politicians, legislators, environmentalists).

3/26 18: Planning a landfill Response from Authorities Setting up policy regarding waste management in order to protect human health and environment in the future –Regulatory requirements to reduce contaminant emissions from waste disposal/treatment facilities Allocating resources to clean up abandoned (hazardous) waste dumps –e.g. Superfund in USA

4/26 Nowadays siting is very much of an issue Due to opposition from the general public, we often see that almost any site is taken if readily available! It seems that the siting process focuses exclusively on getting public consent, rather than include consideration of any other relevant aspect. 18: Planning a landfill

5/ Waste Composition Waste from industrialized countries Characteristics: high content of packaging made of paper, plastic, glass and metal Moisture Content: Low Density: Low Waste from developing countries Characteristics: large amounts of inerts such as sand, ash, dust and stones and high moisture levels because of the high usage of fresh fruit and vegetables. Moisture Content: High Density: High 18: Planning a landfill

6/ Site Selection  … is the most important decision in developing and implementing a waste management plan  A poorly chosen site will require high cost on:  waste transport  site development  site operations  environmental protection 18: Planning a landfill

7/ Site Selection 18: Planning a landfill Chronological development business as usual response from politics public outcry cases of pollution legislationtechnology siting procedure waste characteristics

8/ Site Selection 18: Planning a landfill Stages of a siting process Introductory stage –making key decisions about area to be served type and composition of waste to be landfilled target lifetime (minimum 10 years) –developing a work plan for site selection Main stage –Preliminary site selection –Identification of the selection criteria –Decision of relative importance of the selection criteria –Establishing a ranking of the sites –Final selection

9/ Site Selection 18: Planning a landfill Making the key decisions Establish current situation –review existing facilities –calculate remaining capacity & find waste composition Define future needs –estimate future waste quantities –estimate future (changes of) waste composition Introductory Stage Work plan for site selection Elements of the plan are dictated by legal and administrative procedures and requirements in force within the area. These elements as well as their sequence may differ from country to country.

10/26 Preliminary site selection - Define search area based on natural and administrative constraints hauling distances. - Make use of maps and visit the sites. - Apply preliminary selection criteria. - Estimate costs involved (economies of scale play a role). - Prepare a list of sites, along with their pros and cons - Size of the site and access - Safety (proximity of airport etc.) -Country planning constraints (drinking water aquifer, protected nature area etc. ) - …… 18: Planning a landfill 18.2 Site Selection

11/26 Final site selection criteria 18: Planning a landfill 18.2 Site Selection Geological aspects Hydrogeological aspects Public health/public acceptance -near residential area -near places of religious, cultural or historical importance -near agricultural sites land -near drinking water wells, ponds, river (in criteria of country planning as well) near airport

12/ Groundwater  Depth of the water table  Permeability of Geological strata  Type of Geological strata  Toxicity of the leachate contaminants  Groundwater flow direction The groundwater contamination by landfill is determined by following factors 18: Planning a landfill

13/ Slope/Topography 18.4 Slope/Topography (Geological aspects) - extreme topography - unstable subsoil areas - geologically active faults - seismic impact zones Following potentially unstable geological conditions are to be avoided by Landfill developers 18: Planning a landfill

14/26 Ranking the sites  Constraint mapping (using selection criteria)  Walkover surveys using a checklist  Conceptual design for each site  Site investigations  Feasibility report and EIA (environmental impact assessment) 18: Planning a landfill 18.4 Slope/Topography

15/26 Homogeneous geology with no fractures Geotechnically stable subsoil Base of the site naturally impermeable Thick unsaturated layer below the base Site far from an aquifer Site far from surface water bodies (sea, lake, river) Site that people accept What is an ideal site 18: Planning a landfill 18.4 Slope/Topography

16/ Distance to Settlement 18.5 Distance to Settlement/Involvement of public Nuisance caused by a landfill –nuisance by lorry traffic –nuisance by odours, birds, littering, scavengers Economic impacts - decrease of economic value of houses near a landfill Health and environmental impacts Social impacts - diminished quality of life 18: Planning a landfill

17/ Public Involvement 18: Planning a landfill Involvement of public: objectives Public understands needs and proposals. Issues raised by public are heard and addressed. Authority is responsive to public. Opportunity is provided for public to participate in decision-making process.

18/ Public Involvement 18: Planning a landfill Disadvantages of public involvement Public may become completely consumed by some details or issues of relatively lesser importance. Disinformation can be spread. It can cause damaging delays. Project can be misused by politicians.

19/ Public Involvement 18: Planning a landfill Advantages of Public Involvement People can express their concerns and get answers to their questions. It effectively ensures that authorities take opinions of public into account. Important information may be gathered from people, that may otherwise be missed. It usually results in increased likelihood of gaining public support for the landfill.

20/ Pollution risk 18.6 Impact Assessment/Pollution risk Pollution risk impact assessment is a process of estimating the likelihood of occurrence of harmful effects by landfills Example Risk analysts say: At 0.1µg/L of certain chemical in drinking water (e.g. heavy metal) risk of adverse effect on human health is : Planning a landfill

21/ Pollution risk HAZARD  PATHWAY  RECEPTOR / TARGET WASTE  MIGRATION  PEOPLE AND through soil, water, air ENVIRONMENT Basic concept of risk 18: Planning a landfill

22/ Pollution risk Risk of pollution by landfills depends on site characteristics, landfill technology and waste composition. Landfills can cause pollution if waste constituents (or products of their decomposition and reactions) reach the environment. This occurs mainly by migration of –liquid (leachate) into subsoil, groundwater and adjacent surface water bodies –gas (landfill gas, biogas) into atmosphere. 18: Planning a landfill

23/ Impact Assessment Risk source release assessment –What is the risk of failure of landfill control measures? Exposure assessment –How can contaminant migration take place? Consequence assessment –What effects might an exposed individual experience? Risk estimation –How can results of previous stages be integrated? –What are the uncertainties? Risk assessment for a landfill 18: Planning a landfill

24/ Legal Requirements- JOKO? 18: Planning a landfill

25/26 Landfill planning involves the most important decision to reduce cost of waste disposal and environmental impacts The potential impact on the groundwater is one of the most important aspects Landfill planning and site selection are best carried out as a systematic stepwise process Conclusion 18: Planning a landfill

26/26 18: Planning a landfill Thank you for your kind attention!