Decision Making: Not as Easy as One Thinks The Power and Problem of Groups and Groupthink 09/25/14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GROUPTHINK in Archived Chapter, 3rd ed.
Advertisements

Chapter 12 Group Dynamics Groups and Social Groups and Social Exchanges Exchanges The Group Development The Group Development Process Process Roles and.
Groups © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998 Group: “Two or more freely interacting individuals who share collective norms and goals and have a common.
Group Problem Solving & Decision Making. Group Decision Making Two effectiveness dimensions: – –Attaining organizational and/or group goals – –Satisfying.
Psychology in Action (9e)
Social Scientists define a social group as a group of two or more people who have four characteristics: * They interact regularly and influence each other.
Themes in 12 Angry Men Groupthink Obedience to Authority Conformity
Leadership under stress Gerry Larsson. Themes General leaderhsip models Leadership under stress Trust, swift trust and temporary groups Decision making.
Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach 7/E Joyce S. Osland, David A. Kolb, and Irwin M. Rubin 1 ©2001 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 15.
Organizational Behaviour Individual and Social Behaviour
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Learning Outcomes.
Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach 7/E Joyce S. Osland, David A. Kolb, and Irwin M. Rubin 1 ©2001 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 15.
Group and Social Influence on Behavior and Decision Making.
Chuck Millstead – Master Student University of Michigan, Flint
Chapter 17 Decision Making
Chapter 15 Decision Making and Organizational Learning
Bipartisan Reports Cite Groupthink
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 1: Oct. 21, Groups and Social Processes Groups are 2 or more people who interact and perceive themselves as a unit/”us”
Re-designing Decision-Making Processes (Kennedy Cases) Prof. Morten Hansen MIIC, April
Groups in Process Decision Making Pitfalls, Foibles, and Techniques.
Prepared by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama © 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning All rights reserved. Group and Interpersonal Behavior.
Knowledge Objectives Define the term group.
Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach 7/E Mgt 4310 Topic 8.
The Nature of Managerial Decision Making
Copyright Liwana S. Bringelson Extending Human Systems Engineering Beyond the Individual Liwana S. Bringelson, Ph.D., PMP Research Associate Professor.
“Patrice Zagame’s Team Leadership of Novartis Brazil” Case Study for Chapter 11 “Developing and Leading Teams” by Mohammad Khadim.
Chapter 7 The Manager as Decision Maker.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
1414. CHAPTER 14 Decision Making Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman 2 Definition Decision Making: The process by which members of an organization.
DECISION MAKING Chapter 10. Groups Decision Making None of us alone is as smart as all of us together (Myers, 2002)  more people = more information 
No, this is not a guide on how to get a date..  Persuasion  Obedience  Group dynamics  Prejudice  Culture Formation  Stereotyping.
How Teams Work. Task and Maintenance Needs  Task Activities – Any activity a team member does that contributes to the group’s performance purpose. 
TEAM PRESSURES AND CHALLENGES MEETING THE CHALLENGES.
Information Overload: Too Much of a Good Thing What is information overload? Information overload occurs when the rate of information flow into a system.
GroupThink Embracing the Power of the Group Elaine Seat, PhD, PE.
Groupthink What is it? Why should we care about it? What can we do about it?
Abilene Paradox Group members adopt a position because they feel that other group members desire it Team members do not challenge suggestion because they.
Team Presentation Working in Small Groups. Overview of Team Presentation Assignment minutes (i.e. 6-7 mins/team member) 10 minutes for Q & A (audience.
Decision Making in Groups. Outline I. Problems in Decision Making Failure to share information Risky shift/polarization II. Video: GroupThink.
Perception, Cognition, and Emotion in Negotiation
Team Development Objectives To know the stages in the development of teams To understand team roles To understand about team decisions To learn how to.
Defective Decision Making & Problem Solving Small Group Communication.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Making Decisions The purpose of this module is to develop participants’ facilitation and training skills to enable them to enhance.
Conformity and Groupthink MAR 3503 February 14, 2012.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8-1 Chapter 8 Participative Management and Leading Teams.
GROUP DECISION MAKING ADVANTAGES BROAD REPRESENTATION TAPS EXPERTISE MORE IDEAS GENERATED EVALUATION OF OPTIONS COORDINATION HIGH ACCEPTANCE DISADVANTAGES.
Leadership in Groups and Teams Chapter 7. “When building a team, I always search first for people who love to win. If I can’t find any of those, I look.
Groupthink Clip art.
Abilene Paradox Group members adopt a position because they feel that other group members desire it Team members do not challenge suggestion because they.
Foundations of International Foreign Policy.  Definition  Issues – Group versus individual genius  Issues – individual versus group acceptance  Issues.
Listening in Groups. Listening - HURIER Hearing Understanding Remembering Interpreting Evaluating Responding.
Groupthink When group members striving for agreement (norm for unanimity), fail to realistically appraise alternative courses of action A means for a group.
Eight Main Symptoms of Group Think.
Chapter 15: Decision Making and Organizational Learning
Chapter 6: Social Influence and Group Behavior
Processes that Occur in Group Decision Making
Groupthink: The Desperate Drive for Consensus at Any Cost Irving L
GROUPTHINK in Archived Chapter, 3rd ed.
Characteristics of Effective Teams
Decision Making in Groups
Why should we care about it?
Team Dynamics Chapter 16.
Group Behavior and Influence
Groupthink What is Groupthink?
“it is impossible to understand human behaviour without considering the role that groups play in people’s lives” (eg families, friendship groups,
Group Communication.
Re-designing Decision-Making Processes (Kennedy Cases)
Fundamental Group Dynamics
GROUPTHINK in Archived Chapter, 3rd ed.
Group Behavior and Influence
Presentation transcript:

Decision Making: Not as Easy as One Thinks The Power and Problem of Groups and Groupthink 09/25/14

The Art and Science of Decision Making May 8, 2014

Noel Tichy & Warren Bennis October, 2007 Making Judgment Calls The ultimate act of leadership A leader’s most important role in any organizations is making good judgments. p. 94

“... half the decisions made in business and related organizations fail” (p. 3) A twenty-year study of 400 decisions 2002 Not because of poor planning, but rather poor thinking!

billion neurons & trillion connections For the average adult, the brain can read 300 wpm, listen to 450 wpm, speak up to 180 wpm and instantaneously construct meaning and generate insights from a string of symbols that makes communication possible. (Ley & Chang, 2008)

The mind is easily tricked...

The mind is makes up things... FAE Fundamental Attribution Error

While the brain can process information and make inferences at tremendous rates, it has at least two limitations when it comes to making decisions. 1.The brain is self-referencing. – The brain relies on itself to make inferences and judgments. As a result, biases, expectations, experiences, and values knowingly and unknowingly shape perceptions. 2. All knowledge is bounded. The brain is incapable of omniscience.

As a result, we are stuck with our own interpretation of the data when making knowledge claims and rendering decisions

Extensive research from cognitive psychology indicates humans are inherently flawed and biased information processers. (Avolio and Gardner, 2005, p. 317).

~50% saw the unexpected event. (Simons and Chabris, 1999)

60 plus sources of interference 1.Failure to listen 2.Inattentional blindness / Bounded awareness 3.Overreliance on what is available 4.Overreliance on what is representative 5.Misleading anchors 6.Hindsight bias 7.Non-rational escalation of commitment

Be an expert on what is shaping the inference. Be more systematic in gathering and evaluating relevant data Assume alternative perspectives Ask the why and why not – keeps it ethical

Educate your instincts* “Go with your gut.” “Follow your intuition.” “Trust your feelings, Luke.” We’ve all heard the sayings. But do your instincts make good decisions? *From Fortune Magazine, June 27, 2005 pg. 102 It depends – some guts are better educated

Heart – 40,000 neurons Gut – 100 million neurons Think Twice: How the Gut's "Second Brain" Influences Mood and Well-Being The emerging and surprising view of how the enteric nervous system in our bellies goes far beyond just processing the food we eat Feb 12, 2010|By Adam HadhazyAdam Hadhazy

.... every a judgment requires a judgment call on what type of judgment to make.

Social dynamics influence individual decisions and behavior We are not as independent thinkers as we think we are!

supervised the deportation of 6,000,000 Jews to Nazi gas chambers I was doing my job! A highly decorated public administrator

The Influence of the Group on Decision Making 09/25/14

Ethical Decision Making November 13 4 Scenarios 4 to 5 minutes on each

Social Capital A Pillar of Trust and High Performance September 19, 2014

Decision Making: Not as Easy as One Thinks The Power and Problem of Groups and Groupthink 09/25/14

The Urn Game Review contents of two urns (pitchers). o Urn W: Two white balls and one yellow ball o Urn Y: Two yellow balls and one white ball Select an urn with a coin flip. Select two participants from each table. Participants see one ball from the urn and review the list of previous guesses. Participants identify the color of the ball they selected from the urn. Each participant guesses either Urn W or Urn Y. Review contents of two urns (pitchers). o Urn W: Two white balls and one yellow ball o Urn Y: Two yellow balls and one white ball Select an urn with a coin flip. Select two participants from each table. Participants see one ball from the urn and review the list of previous guesses. Participants identify the color of the ball they selected from the urn. Each participant guesses either Urn W or Urn Y. Source: Professor David McAdams

Groupthink (Janis) Defined: “A mode of thinking involving a cohesive group in which the members’ striving for unanimity overrides their motivation to appraise realistically alternative courses of action.” (Viotti and Kauppi)

Groupthink (Janis) Symptoms of Groupthink o Type I: Overestimation of the group Illusion of invulnerability Belief in inherent morality of the group o Type II: Close-mindedness Collective rationalization Stereotyped views of out-groups Symptoms of Groupthink o Type I: Overestimation of the group Illusion of invulnerability Belief in inherent morality of the group o Type II: Close-mindedness Collective rationalization Stereotyped views of out-groups

Groupthink (Janis) o Type III: Pressures towards uniformity Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity Direct pressure on dissenters Self-appointed ‘mindguards’ Consequence: Low probability of success o Type III: Pressures towards uniformity Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity Direct pressure on dissenters Self-appointed ‘mindguards’ Consequence: Low probability of success

Groupthink (Janis) Example: Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 o Overview o Symptoms Illusion of invulnerability Illusion of unanimity Example: Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 o Overview o Symptoms Illusion of invulnerability Illusion of unanimity

“Our meetings took place in a curious atmosphere of assumed consensus” (Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.)

Groupthink (Janis) Example: Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 o Overview o Symptoms Illusion of invulnerability Illusion of unanimity Self-censorship Example: Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 o Overview o Symptoms Illusion of invulnerability Illusion of unanimity Self-censorship

“In the months after the Bay of Pigs I bitterly reproached myself for having kept so silent during those crucial discussions in the Cabinet Room, though my feelings of guilt were tempered by the knowledge that a course of objection would have accomplished little save to gain me a name as a nuisance. I can only explain my failure to do more than raise a few timid questions by reporting that one’s impulse to blow the whistle on this nonsense was simply undone by the circumstances of the discussion.” (Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.)

Groupthink (Janis) Example: Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 o Overview o Symptoms Illusion of invulnerability Illusion of unanimity Self-censorship Self-appointed ‘mindguards’ Example: Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 o Overview o Symptoms Illusion of invulnerability Illusion of unanimity Self-censorship Self-appointed ‘mindguards’

“You may be right or you may be wrong, but the President has made his mind up. Don’t push him any further. Now is the time for everyone to help him all they can.” (Attorney General Robert Kennedy)

Groupthink (Janis) Possible remedies o Encourage discussion within the group o Assign the role of “critical evaluator” to every member o Avoid stating their preferences at the beginning of the process o Invite one or more outside experts to each meeting o Ask at least one member to play the role of devil’s advocate Possible remedies o Encourage discussion within the group o Assign the role of “critical evaluator” to every member o Avoid stating their preferences at the beginning of the process o Invite one or more outside experts to each meeting o Ask at least one member to play the role of devil’s advocate

Thank You Questions Comments Concerns Objections

Ethical Decision Making: Deceiving Ourselves Why Do Good People Do Bad Things? November 13