HUME ON THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (Part 2 of 2) Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, parts 2-8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 1. Claims A claim takes the form of a proposition. A proposition has a similar relation to a sentence as a number does to.
Advertisements

FATE v. FREE WILL. Fatalism The idea of fatalism coincides with destiny. This means that everything in our lives is predestined by fate. In other words,
Immanuel Kant ( ) Theory of Aesthetics
The Fine-Tuning Argument One common response to this argument goes thus: Of course the universe is of a sort suitable for life. If it were not, no one.
The Subject-Matter of Ethics
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The Design Argument for the Existence of God
A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God
Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
Hume’s Problem of Induction 2 Seminar 2: Philosophy of the Sciences Wednesday, 14 September
Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) Quick Review: The Issue: What can we know, by reason and experience alone, about the nature and attributes.
NOTE: CORRECTION TO SYLLABUS FOR ‘HUME ON CAUSATION’ WEEK 6 Mon May 2: Hume on inductive reasoning --Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, section.
The Problem of Evil Hume’s Dialogue.  The problem of evil is a challenge posed to theists committed to the claim that there is an perfectly benevolent,
Our aims in this last part of the course: To understand and evaluate the specific arguments advanced in this book. To consider how this work, taken as.
The Argument from Design. The Argument Famously presented by William Paley, who imagined stumbling across a watch in a wilderness Famously presented by.
The argument from design: Paley v. Hume Michael Lacewing
Critical Thinking: Chapter 10
The Design Argument. * The Design Argument is a relatively recent contribution to the philosophical/theological attempt to prove God exists. * Though.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum. Cogito #1 Cogito as Inference □ (Ti→Ei). Not: □ (Ei)
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
PHIL/RS 335 Arguments for God’s Existence Pt. 1: The Cosmological Argument.
The Teleological Argument October 7 th The Teleological Argument Learning Objective: To analyse the argument from Design, considering its strengths.
The Teleological Argument also known as “ the argument from design ”
The Cosmological Argument (Causation or ‘first cause’ theory)
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
Chapter 8 Hypothesis Tests. Hypothesis Testing We now begin the phase of this course that discusses the highest achievement of statistics. Statistics,
HUME ON THE PROBLEM OF EVIL Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, part
BIODIVERSITY, CHANGE AND CONTINUITY Evolution Introduction –Why evolution – Nature of Science.
‘The only serious philosophical question is whether to commit suicide or not…’ Albert Camus 7 November 1913 – 4 January 1960 ‘The Myth of Sisyphus’ What.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Evolution Vs Intelligent Design G-d Versus Science.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
It is reasonable to infer the existence of God from the fact that the world is as it is; just like the cosmological argument. We are going to consider.
BERKELEY’S CASE FOR IDEALISM (Part 1 of 2) Text source: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, sectns. 1-21,
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
Teleological Argument Also Known As The Argument From Design.
Criticisms of the Teleological Argument By Becky, Katherine, meli and mimi.
1.The argument makes it likely that there are lots of worldmakers. Strength: Man made things often require many creators. For example a house needs many.
“A WISE MAN PROPORTIONS HIS BELIEF TO EVIDENCE”
The Problem of Induction. Aristotle’s Inductions Aristotle’s structure of knowledge consisted of explanations such as: Aristotle’s structure of knowledge.
CLARKE & ROWE (pp ) IS A NECESSARY BEING REALLY NECESSARY?
HUME ON THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, part 9.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
John Wisdom’s Parable of the Gardener AS Philosophy God and the World – Seeing as hns adapted from richmond.
The secondary quality argument for indirect realism R1.When I look at a rose, I see something that is red. R2.The red thing cannot be the rose itself (since.
Fact and Opinion: Is There Really a Difference Every man has a right to be wrong in his opinions. But no man has a right to be wrong in his facts. -Baruch,
HUME’S ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL RELIGION --Summing up Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, part 12.
HUME ON THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (Part 1 of 2) Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, parts 2-5.
LECTURE 23 MANY COSMOI HYPOTHESIS & PURPOSIVE DESIGN (SUMMARY AND GLIMPSES BEYOND)
Miracles: Hume and Howard-Snyder. * For purposes of initial clarity, let's define a miracle as a worldly event that is not explicable by natural causes.
LOCKE ON KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXTERNAL WORLD Text source: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, bk. 4, ch. 11; see also bk. 4, ch. 2, sec. 14.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
L/O: To explore Hume’s criticisms of the Design Argument.
Two central questions What does it mean to talk of, or believe in, God? –Is talk about God talk about something that exists independently of us? Or a way.
The Cosmological Argument Today’s lesson will be successful if: You have revised the ideas surrounding the cosmological argument and the arguments from.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Understanding Fallacy
The Argument from Design
Inductive Argument Forms
The secondary quality argument for indirect realism
Cosmological Argument: Philosophical Criticisms
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Inductive and Deductive Logic
The Teleological Argument
What is the difference between a cabbage and a machine?
Or Can you?.
Part II – Cleanthes’ design argument and Philo’s opening salvo
God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error
Presentation transcript:

HUME ON THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (Part 2 of 2) Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, parts 2-8

THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (advocated by Cleanthes) 1. The Universe and many of the things in it resemble artifacts. (In that they show order in complexity, and a high degree of apparently purposive organization.) 2. Artifacts are created by designers Therefore 3. The Universe and the things in it were created by a designer.

SOME INITIAL OBSERVATIONS First note that the argument isn’t deductively valid. Its logically possible that the premises are both true but the conclusion false. Rather it has the character of a probabilistic inference. The idea is that, given premises 1 and 2, its probable (perhaps very probable) that the conclusion is true. Hume says that the argument rests on analogical reasoning.  X is similar to Y in such-and-such respects (showing order and complexity), so X is most likely similar to Y in so-and-so other respects (being designed) as well.

PHILO’S CRITICISMS OF THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (1) Just how similar is the Universe to an artifact? The weaker the similarity, the less compelling the analogy between them. The closer A resembles B-type things, the more likely it is they have the same sort of cause. But if A is not so similar to B-type things, then the analogy is thus far undermined. (DCNR, part II, p.435)

PHILO’S CRITICISMS OF THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (cont.) (2) These arguments from experience are stronger when a whole series of similar previous cases have been seen to match the inference. But the Universe is a one-off case. (DCNR part II, pp.438) (3) Moreover, in this case the analogy is between a whole (the Universe) and some its parts (artifacts). But “can a conclusion, with any propriety be transferred from the parts to the whole”? (DCNR part II, pp.437-8)

PHILO’S CRITICISMS OF THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (cont.) (4) There are many other analogies that fit the Universe as well as that of an artifact. We have to consider all of these before deciding that the design hypothesis is the best available explanation.  The Universe seems to resemble an animal or a vegetable as much as it does an artifact. So there is as much reason to suggest that the Universe was born or grew like an animal or vegetable as there is to say it was designed.  Notice also other rival hypotheses like the “old Epicurean hypothesis” that the ordered Universe arose through a random chaos of atoms falling into self-recreating patterns over time (p.455). (Note the similarity here to evolutionary theory).

PHILO’S CRITICISMS OF THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (cont.) (5) If the structure and organization of the material world requires explanation in terms of a designer, doesn’t the same go for the structure and organization of the posited designer? A regress looms. (“Let us remember the story of the Indian philosopher and his elephant.”) If the Universe and the things in it resemble artifacts in that they show order in complexity and a high degree of (apparently purposive) organization, doesn’t the same go for the mind that is posited to explain them? But if so, and if the order of the Universe indicated that it must have a designer, then surely just the same thing goes for the designer Himself: He too must have a designer, and so on! (DCNR, part IV, p.443-4)

PHILO’S CRITICISMS OF THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (cont.) (6) Even if the argument works, and we do have reason to infer from the Universe to a designer, the argument still provides no reason to think that that designer is (i) infinite, (ii) perfect, or (iii) unitary (rather than design-by-committee). (DCNR part V, p.446-7)

PHILO’S CRITICISMS OF THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (cont.) “In a word, Cleanthes, a man, who follows your hypothesis, is able perhaps, to assert, or conjecture, that the universe, arose from something like design: But beyond that position he cannot assert one single circumstance, and is left afterwards to fix every point of his theology, by the utmost license of fancy and hypothesis. This world, for aught he knows, is the first rude essay of some infant Deity, who afterwards abandoned it, ashamed of his lame performance; it is the work only of some dependent, inferior Deity; and it is the object of derision to his superiors: it is the production of old age and dotage in some superannuated Deity; and ever since his death has run on at adventures … You justly give signs of horror, Demea, at such strange suppositions: But these, and a thousand more of the same kind, are Cleanthes’s suppositions [given his argument from design]. And I cannot, for my part, think, that so wild and unsettled a system of theology is, in any respects, preferable to none at all.” (DCNR,part V, p.448)

WHAT, ULTIMATELY, IS HUME’S ATTITUDE TO THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN? Does Hume think that Philo’s various criticisms of the argument from design refute it altogether? Or does Hume think that points merely weaken the force of the analogy and thereby weaken the probabilistic inference to a cause of the universe somewhat like the cause of artifacts?

PHILO’S FAMOUS (HIGHLY QUALIFIED) ACCEPTANCE OF THE DESIGN ARGUMENT “If the whole of natural theology, as some people seem to maintain, resolves itself, into one simple, though somewhat ambiguous, at least undefined proposition, that the cause or causes of order in the universe probably bears some remote analogy to human intelligence: If this proposition be not capable of extension, variation, or more particular explication: If it afford no inference that affects human life, or can be the source of any action or forebearance: And if the analogy, imperfect as it is, can be carried no farther than to the human intelligence; and cannot be transferred, with any appearance of probability, to the other qualities of mind: If this really be the case, what can the most inquisitive, contemplative and religious man do more than give a plain, philosophical assent to the proposition, as often as it occurs” (DCNR part 12, p.479)