BRAC: GETTING THE NEXT ROUND RIGHT BASE REDEVELOPMENT FORUM NOVEMBER 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 4, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable. June 4, 2003 A Strategic Course for the Future Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable June 4, 2003.
Advertisements

+ African Legal Support Facility Negotiations of natural resource contracts : Role of ALSF 2013 African Legal Support Facility Stephen Karangizi Director,
Research Administration Capacity Building in an Established Institution Presenter: M.M.Aboud, MD Director of Research and Publications, MUHAS.
Responsible Resource Development April 17, Context Government focussed on responsible development of Canada’s natural resources to create jobs and.
Civilian Property Realignment Act The need to reform defined.
COLLABORATION STRATEGIES Northern Virginia Energy Innovation Forum John Emond Innovative Partnerships Program NASA Headquarters October 1, 2008.
THE BRAC PROCESS – Not Your Usual Brownfields Redevelopment Mary K. Ryan.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Air Force Civil Engineer Center I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Stephen TerMaath Chief, BRAC Program Management Division 5 June.
BRAC UPDATE DoL Veterans Employment & Training Service Conference August 1, 2006 Bryant Monroe Office of Economic Adjustment Department of Defense.
PMOBRAC Ms. Kimberly Kesler Director, BRAC Program Management Office March
2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 2 Legal Authorities for Partnerships and Shared Services Jennifer Curtin January 16, 2013.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF DOE POLICY -- USE OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS COLLEEN OSTROWSKI (202)
Hyatt Regency Miami Wednesday, February 29, 2012 – Orchid C.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
1 LAND USE CONTROLS THE ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Presented by MGP Partners LLC December 7, 2000.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Defense Communities Town Hall U.S. Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment June 22, 2014 Washington, DC.
Air Force Civil Engineer Center I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Dr. Stephen TerMaath Chief, BRAC Program Management Division 22.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 “To BRAC or Not to BRAC” What happens if there is not a BRAC? ADC.
Office of Infrastructure Investment 1 Jeffrey A. Simon Director of Infrastructure Investment.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
A Commitment to People The Land Grant University Mission in the United States.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
State Financing Programs for Brownfield Redevelopment.
LOCAL BUFFER SUPPORT PROGRAM 1 May 2014 MAV. Liveability, growth and waste As Melbourne continues to grow, we need secure the right mix of resource recovery.
Legacy Management Strategic Plan 2010 David Geiser Director, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or Department) Office of Legacy Management (LM) November 2010.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Environmental Protection in the United States Christopher Green U.S. Embassy July 13, 2006.
Engaging Communities in Developing a Sustainable Wood Products and Biomass Energy Industry By Gerry Gray Vice President for Policy American Forests.
Headwaters Communities in Action Building A Better Quality of Life Together.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE? The Water Resources Management Committee of the American Public Works Association.
Advancing Cooperative Conservation. 4C’s Team An interagency effort established in early 2003 by Department of the Interior Secretary Gale Norton Advance.
Sec. 5 RE-REGULATION- EPAct 1992 FERC Orders 888 and 889 (1996) EPAct 2005 In short these three laws move the power industry towards an increase in competition.
VI. EUROSAI Training Event Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies November 2006, Prague1 SUPREME AUDIT OFFICE CZECH REPUBLIC Audititing of.
ESOP Advisors, Inc. Reston, Virginia June National Marine Mammal Foundation Environmental Enterprise Group is an environmental consulting and analytical.
Public-Public Partnerships February 27, ADC WINTER FORUM | PAGE 2 Public – Public Partnerships Boot camp for Defense Communities Craig Zgabay.
The Defense Economic Adjustment Program Responding to BRAC 05 The Counselors of Real Estate November 14, 2005 David F. Witschi Associate Director.
Can Offsets Deliver a Conservation Gain for Koalas in Queensland? Malcolm Eadie Director of Netgain Environments.
VERMONT PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL (VTPSC) Meeting #1 SEPTEMBER 8, 2008.
Infrastructure Development Bill [B ] Submission by the Centre for Environmental Rights to Portfolio Committee on Economic Development 14 January.
Saving lives, changing minds. Disaster Laws Overview of the disaster law topics Male, Maldives, 11 October 2011 David Fisher, IFRC IDRL Programme.
Solano County Office of Education Jay Speck Solano County Superintendent of Schools.
1 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) The Army’s Approach to Managing Resources 10 August 2005 Mr. Jeff Giangiuli Vice President CALIBRE.
Alexandra B. McGoldrick Director, Central Grants Office City of Bridgeport Bill Finch Mayor.
Office of Economic Adjustment Department of Defense National Governors Association BRAC Briefing May 10, 2005.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
JOINT CLUSTER PRESENTATION CINDI BOARD 18 June 2008.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 4C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
Virginia’s Brownfield Program - An Attitude of Success Presented by: Delegate Terrie Suit Member - Virginia House of Delegates 81st District & Chris Evans.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
MCCORMACK BARON MANAGEMENT Lisa Beffa, Senior Vice President.
Redeveloping Environmentally Challenged Property: Taking RCRA Corrective Action Sites and Creating Economic and Environmental Opportunities Todd Fracassi,
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Office of Environmental Management Presentation to Regulators March 6, 2009 Cynthia V. Anderson, EM Recovery Act Program.
New and Exciting Opportunities for Federal Property Transfers Michael P. Comodeca Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP
Identifying Needs & Resources for Base Reuse Tony Gallegos Western Regional Director Office of Economic Adjustment Department of Defense
2016 ADC TRANSITION POLICY DOCUMENT FORUM. Key Policy Issues.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
A TOUR OF FLORIDA’S BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Session Plan Objectives & means of engagement – CBC, PSC, IDI
Program Manager, Resource Conservation and Resiliency (RCR)
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee - Labour
WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE?
The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (the “DFC”)
Presentation transcript:

BRAC: GETTING THE NEXT ROUND RIGHT BASE REDEVELOPMENT FORUM NOVEMBER 2014

INTENT Congress has vowed that if there is ever another BRAC round, it will definitely not be like the last one. Concern that DOD’s proposed legislation for a new BRAC authorization does not include new ideas to fix problems experienced by local communities from previous rounds with property disposal delays, disagreements in environmental clean-up efforts, and bureaucratic hurdles. Building upon ADC’s work to date to identify those issues and to propose remedies, this session is intended as a storming session to clarify and prioritize specific goals for legislative changes in the BRAC law to improve the support provided by DOD to communities.

ADC’S CURRENT POSITIONS ADC POLICY STATEMENT, JUNE 3, 2014

THE NEXT BRAC PROCESS NEEDS TO: Focus on expediting communities’ economic recovery by reducing bureaucratic steps that cause major delays. Set aside the Redevelopment Act/McKinney Act or develop a method to calculate a total contribution to homeless providers based on a percentage of land sale proceeds. Require improved environmental site characterization and access to information so that redevelopment planning can occur with full knowledge of the risk and opportunities. Enable environmental services cooperative agreements to manage costs, expedite transfer of property, and accelerate community planning. Ensure federal environmental and resource protection laws do not impede economic recovery.

THE NEXT BRAC PROCESS NEEDS TO: Reinforce the government’s commitments before and after property is transferred to the community. Require DOD to maintain minimum levels of maintenance on closing installations until the point of transfer. Protect and ensure federal indemnification and similar environmental protections remain in place and prevent attempts to weaken or circumvent this obligation.

THE NEXT BRAC PROCESS NEEDS TO: Recognize the uniqueness of base closure property actions by sustaining DoD property disposal leadership, but consolidating the services’ separate activities into a single entity in order to: Create a clearly identified single mission which sunsets upon mission completion Increase property disposal institutional capacity through a single professional entity Ensure consistency and common regulatory interpretation Conserve federal resources by reducing administrative costs

THE NEXT BRAC PROCESS NEEDS TO: Provide adequate financial support to recognize the hardships communities face and provide investment to jumpstart a speedy recovery Strengthen the role of OEA Prioritize the relief of community impacts for Congress and the Administration throughout the process. Develop a separate BRAC pool for economic development programs to ensure a priority for federally impacted communities Bring together agency programs into a joint effort (i.e. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) that ensures federal coordination Include facility maintenance and caretaker costs as part of base closure funding; create a single fund for all BRAC sites Ensure adequate environmental funding that allows redevelopment projects to move forward

NEW IDEAS? SPEAK UP

THE NEXT BRAC PROCESS NEEDS TO: What is the single biggest cause of delays to economic recovery? What is the single biggest cause of delays to economic recovery? What can be done to accelerate the LRA’s masterplan development? What can be done to accelerate the LRA’s masterplan development? How quickly can planning grants be provided? How quickly can planning grants be provided? Should the LRA run the federal screening process? Should the LRA run the federal screening process?

THE NEXT BRAC PROCESS NEEDS TO: Reinforce the government’s commitments before and after property is transferred to the community. Require DOD to maintain minimum levels of maintenance on closing installations until the point of transfer. Protect and ensure federal indemnification and similar environmental protections remain in place and prevent attempts to weaken or circumvent this obligation. Where do the commitments waver? Where do the commitments waver? Who determines a safe condition? Who determines a safe condition? When does the Government responsibility for security of the property and infrastructure cease? When does the Government responsibility for security of the property and infrastructure cease?

THE NEXT BRAC PROCESS NEEDS TO: Recognize the uniqueness of base closure property actions by sustaining DoD property disposal leadership, but consolidating the services’ separate activities into a single entity in order to: Create a clearly identified single mission which sunsets upon mission completion Increase property disposal institutional capacity through a single professional entity Ensure consistency and common regulatory interpretation Conserve federal resources by reducing administrative costs Should OSD set up a central office with regions? Should OSD set up a central office with regions? What Service-unique factors would need to be considered? What Service-unique factors would need to be considered? What is the advantage of allowing the Services to maintain their respective BRAC property disposal offices? What is the advantage of allowing the Services to maintain their respective BRAC property disposal offices?

THE NEXT BRAC PROCESS NEEDS TO: Provide adequate financial support to recognize the hardships communities face and provide investment to jumpstart a speedy recovery Strengthen the role of OEA Prioritize the relief of community impacts for Congress and the Administration throughout the process. Develop a separate BRAC pool for economic development programs to ensure a priority for federally impacted communities Bring together agency programs into a joint effort (i.e. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) that ensures federal coordination Include facility maintenance and caretaker costs as part of base closure funding; create a single fund for all BRAC sites Ensure adequate environmental funding that allows redevelopment projects to move forward What or who defines “adequate”? What or who defines “adequate”? How should Economic Development Conveyances be enhanced? How should Economic Development Conveyances be enhanced? What limitations on financial support actually help LRA’s? What limitations on financial support actually help LRA’s? What can be done to ensure financial support is not wasted? What can be done to ensure financial support is not wasted? Should the federal government provide tax incentives? Should the federal government provide tax incentives?

DISCUSSION TIM FORD CEO, ASSOCIATION OF DEFENSE COMMUNITIES SEAN MCGRAW DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. LUCIAN NIEMEYER PRESIDENT, THE NIEMEYER GROUP