DRS 2 one in a series of periodic updates Harvard University Library Andrea Goethals October 21, 2009 DRS = Digital Repository Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-Content Service Group Virtual Meeting Digital Preservation: How to Get Started.
Advertisements

An Introduction to Repositories Thornton Staples Director of Community Strategy and Alliances Director of the Fedora Project.
October 28, 2003Copyright MIT, 2003 METS repositories: DSpace MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology MIT Libraries.
The future’s so bright…. DAITSS DIGITAL PRESERVATION SYSTEM: RE-ARCHITECTED, RE- WRITTEN, AND OPEN SOURCE Priscilla Caplan Florida Center for Library Automation.
“Can you digitise this for me please?” The University of Auckland's approach to managing digitisation proposals John Garraway Digital Services & Information.
More Better Metadata SAA 2014 Panel: Metadata and Digital Preservation: How Much Do We Really Need? Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library Even v.
DRS 2 Metadata Migration June 25, Agenda Introduction Preliminary results - content analysis Metadata options Next steps Questions.
Introduction to metadata for IDAH fellows Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Digital Library Program.
Digital Preservation - Its all about the metadata right? “Metadata and Digital Preservation: How Much Do We Really Need?” SAA 2014 Panel Saturday, August.
Workflows for Digital Curation and Preservation Stacy Kowalczyk PASIG Dublin 2012 October 17, 2012.
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
PREMIS in Thought: Data Center for LC Digital Holdings Ardys Kozbial, Arwen Hutt, David Minor February 11, 2008.
Fedora 3.0 and METS: A Partnership for the Organization, Presentation and Preservation of Digital Objects Open Repositories Georgia Tech, Atlanta,
MIT’s DSpace A good fit for ETDs Margret Branschofsky Keith Glavash MIT LIBRARIES.
R.Jantz, August 31, Two-day forum on PREMIS Preservation Metadata and the Trusted Digital Repositories August 31, September 1 National Library of.
3. Technical and administrative metadata standards Metadata Standards and Applications.
WMS: Democratizing Data
THE RUTGERS WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Mary Beth Weber Cataloging and Metadata Services Rutgers University Libraries August 3, 2007.
Harvard’s Digital Repository Service (DRS) Architecture Harvard University Library (HUL) Andrea Goethals, Randy Stern December 10, 2009.
A Preservation Repository in Prose Being a Story of the DRS Past, Present and Future By Andrea Goethals, Wendy Gogel In Cambridge, Massachusetts 2009.
The New DRS (DRS 2) Introduction. What is DRS? Digital repository for preservation and access –Maintains integrity of deposited content –Preserves content.
Digital Repository Service (DRS) Harvard University Library OIS presented by: Wendy Gogel & Andrea Goethals.
A Digital Preservation Repository for Duke University Libraries Jim Coble Digital Repository Developer Open Repositories 2013.
System Design/Implementation and Support for Build 2 PDS Management Council Face-to-Face Mountain View, CA Nov 30 - Dec 1, 2011 Sean Hardman.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Registry of Digital Masters A joint project of the Digital Library Federation and OCLC Taylor Surface, OCLC ALA Annual.
Metadata standards, tools and processes for audio preservation at the British Library: An overview of new systems for audio description, preservation and.
Adventures in Digital Asset Management: Fedora at the National Library of Wales Glen Robson National Library of Wales
City of Seattle Office of the City Clerk Open Government = Access Challenges and Opportunities with Digital Records.
Dspace 1 Introduction to DSpace Mukesh Pund Scientist NISCAIR, New Delhi.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center CONTENTdm ® Digital Collection Management Software Ron Gardner, OCLC Digital Services Consultant ICOLC Meeting April.
FITS: The File Information Tool Set
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Indiana University Digital Library Program.
Implementing an Integrated Digital Asset Management System: FEDORA and OAIS in Context Paul Bevan DAMS Implementation Manager
1 XML as a preservation strategy Experiences with the DiVA document format Eva Müller, Uwe Klosa Electronic Publishing Centre Uppsala University Library,
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
Choosing Delivery Software for a Digital Library Jody DeRidder Digital Library Center University of Tennessee.
Migrating Repository Metadata & Users: The Harvard DRS 2 Project Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library IS&T Archiving 2014, May
The Global Video Grid: DigitalWell Update & Plan For SRB Integration Myke Smith, Manager Streaming Media Technologies University of Washington / ResearchChannel.
DAITSS: Dark Archive in the Sunshine State Priscilla Caplan, Florida Center for Library Automation DCC Workshop on Long-term Curation within Digital Repositories.
DRS 2 Orientation Harvard University Library September 30, 2010 DRS = Digital Repository Service.
EPrints 10 Years of Digital Preservation. What is EPrints For?  EPrints offers a safe, open and useful place to store, share and manage material in the.
HathiTrust’s Past, Present and Future. Short- and Long-term Functional Objectives Short-term Page turner mechanism (and Mobile!) Branding (overall initiative;
Library Repositories and the Documentation of Rights Leslie Johnston, University of Virginia Library NISO Workshop on Rights Expression May 19, 2005.
The FCLA Digital Archive Joint Meeting of CSUL Committees, 2005.
The Canadian Information Network for Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities Tim Au Yeung and Mary Westell Libraries.
PREMIS Implementation Fair – SF 2009 PREMIS use in Rosetta Yair Brama – Ex Libris.
Introduction to metadata
Digital library infrastructure -- systems Repositories for storing digital resources protect, manage, deliver, and preserve digital resources over time.
DRS 2 Project (2008 – Present!) Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library Digital Preservation Management Workshop, MIT June 13, 2013.
Rights Metadata in DRS Basic Rights Functions in: – Batch Builder – EAS – DRS Web Admin.
Selene Dalecky March 20, 2007 FDsys: GPO’s Digital Content System.
The New DRS Introduction. What is DRS? Digital repository for preservation and access – Maintains integrity of deposited content – Preserves content for.
DAITSS: Dark Archive in the Sunshine State Priscilla Caplan Florida Center for Library Automation (FCLA)
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
GPO’s Future Digital System (FDsys) November 2, 2006 LS&CM CENDI Presentation.
The library is open Digital Assets Management & Institutional Repository Russian-IUG November 2015 Tomsk, Russia Nabil Saadallah Manager Business.
Implementing PREMIS in DigiTool Michael Kaplan ALA 2007 Update.
DAITSS and the Florida Digital Archive Priscilla Caplan Florida Center for Library Automation iPRES 2006.
Managing live digital content with DuraSpace services Bill Branan PASIG Spring 2015.
Developing a Dark Archive for OJS Journals Yu-Hung Lin, Metadata Librarian for Continuing Resources, Scholarship and Data Rutgers University 1 10/7/2015.
Building Digital Archives Mark Phillips Cathy Hartman June 6, 2008.
Joint Meeting of CSUL Committees,
Preserving Digital Collections
Building A Repository for Digital Objects
DAITSS: Dark Archive in the Sunshine State
DAITSS and the Florida Digital Archive
Archiving and Delivery of Student Portfolios
Library Technology Conference: Building Exhibits
Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library
Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University Library May 2004
Presentation transcript:

DRS 2 one in a series of periodic updates Harvard University Library Andrea Goethals October 21, 2009 DRS = Digital Repository Service

Agenda 1. DRS 2 context 2. DRS vs DRS 2 3. Current work: DRS Next set of work: DRS Questions & comments

1.DRS 2 context …

HUL’s Digital Preservation Program  A continuation of HUL’s mission to provide current and future access to research materials and resources, with recognition that preserving access to digital content requires different strategies, tools and skills  Centerpiece of the preservation program: the DRS

Shapers of the DRS  Digital Preservation Community Best practices, standards, lessons learned, experiments Collaborative projects, member organizations, interest groups, meetings, conferences, correspondence, conversations, shared tool development  Harvard needs Increasing amount of digital content  DRS growth has been fueled by large projects……  Require services to store, preserve, manage, make discoverable, etc. New formats and genres, born-digital material  Bring new requirements Support changing user expectations  Print on demand, e-readers

DRS growth 10/1/09: 118 TB in the DRS (Counting all backups: 378 TB)

2.DRS vs DRS 2

DRS  Set of professionally managed services storage & monitoring service creation & format guidelines, training, ingest service delivery services, access restrictions, persistent names preservation planning & activities, administration, management tools use creation/ acquisition

DRS 2  Same services, but much improved storage & monitoring service creation & format guidelines, training, ingest service delivery services, access restrictions, persistent names preservation planning & activities, administration, management tools use creation/ acquisition

DRS 2  Improvements richer data model, more robust and scalable storage system, better monitoring and recovery processes more guidelines, acceptance of more formats and metadata additional access restrictions, redundant delivery servers, additional delivery services revamped management tools, adding reporting, more preservation planning use creation/ acquisition

3.Current work: DRS 2.1

DRS 2.1 Scope 1. Redesign of conceptual foundation 2. Release to a QA environment

DRS 2.1 Scope 1. Redesign of conceptual foundation Modified data model Content models Object descriptors New and different metadata schemas 2. Release to a QA environment New and enhanced tools for creation and deposit of objects for depositor testing

Modified Data Model  Current DRS: file level All metadata is associated at the file level  Even if the same metadata applies to a group of files All management has to be done at the individual file level  Non-intuitive and unwieldy  DRS 2: adding 2 more levels objects (files) bitstreams

Objects?  Aggregations of files that together represent a coherent unit of content All the files that make up a single digital book All the master and use copies representing a single photograph  Useful for management, reporting and searching “How many PDS document objects do I have in the DRS?”  Hook for new metadata Administrative categories (projects, exhibits, collections, etc.) Descriptive metadata, catalog records

Bitstreams?  A subset of a file  Hooks for metadata that apply to part but not all of the file To characterize the audio portion of a video file To describe the contents of a ZIP file  Allow fine-grained description and management  May save storage space some types of content can remain compressed and still be described

Content models  Object types  Define valid file formats and relationships known delivery and rendering applications associated assessments and preservation plans  Enforces conformity - we know what we have  Tie directly to technology watches and preservation plans

DRS 2.1 content models – deposit & delivery 1. Still image Image objects, delivered by IDS 2. PDS document Page-turned documents, delivered by PDS 3. Document Initially just PDF files, delivered by FDS 4. Opaque Files in any format 5. Text Text, XML, etc. delivered by FDS

Object descriptors  A METS metadata file per object on the file system alongside content files Descriptive, administrative, preservation, technical and structural metadata Describes the object, all its files and bitstreams and related significant events Gives the metadata the same secure storage as the content files  Self-contained, portable objects

Peering into a METS object descriptor  For the object MODS PdsMD (for PDS document objects)  For the object, each file and bitstream PREMIS HulAdminMD  For each applicable file and bitstream MIX TextMD DocumentMD …

Deposit tools  Currently: BatchBuilder DRS Loader  DRS 2.1: Enhanced BatchBuilder New! File Information Tool Set (FITS) New! Object Tool Set (OTS) Enhanced DRS Loader New! DRS Services

Enhanced BatchBuilder  Will build batches of objects rather than batches of files  Will automatically determine all technical metadata (using FITS)  Will automatically create all object descriptors (using OTS)

DRS Services  New back-end service to centralize and control access to DRS objects Simplifies front end applications Secures content and metadata  DRS 2.1 services 1. Object ingest 2. File delivery

June 2010: QA release to depositors  Depositors will be able to test new workflows in QA New BatchBuilder and DRS Loader to create and deposit objects into the DRS Enhanced IDS, FDS and PDS to view the deposited content

4.Next set of work: DRS 2.2

DRS 2.2 Scope  DRS Web Admin Easier discovery, batch updates, reporting, etc. Repository administration and monitoring  Additional content models Audio, Web Harvest, Dark PDS Document, various Google, MOA2 document, Biomedical Image, Target Image and  Improved audio support MP3, MP4/AAC BatchBuilder support  Rights and access management metadata Rights metadata stored in DRS with content Analysis of need for more granular access restrictions

June 2011: Production release  Creation, deposit and management of objects  All delivery services integrated with the DRS Services  All DRS files will have been migrated to objects

Many people in OIS working on DRS 2  Digital Library Projects Group  Systems Operations Group  Systems Development Group  Metadata Analyst

More information  HUL’s Digital Preservation Program  DRS 2 Enhancements 

5.Questions & Comments