COMMONLY CITED SURFACE M/NM STANDARDS. #1 Lack of Guarding 56/57.14107(a)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forklift Safety.
Advertisements

Mobile Equipment Hazards
Developed by Western Iowa Tech Community College This material was produced under a grant (SH F-19) from the Occupational Safety and Health.
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHM’s commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Powered Haulage January 31, 2005 (Kentucky) January 31, 2005 (Kentucky) Crushed Stone Operation Crushed Stone Operation.
Front-End Loader Training.
MSHA Haulage Safety.
Mobile Equipment Hazards
OSHA Office of Training and Education
OSHA Office of Training & Education1 Cranes. 2 Major Causes of Crane Accidents Contact with power lines Overturns Falls Mechanical failures.
Have We Really Learned From Our Mistakes? Jon Montgomery Ken Heintz Kevin Jones.
Stairways and Ladders 1926 Subpart X - Stairways and Ladders
1 Walking-Working Surfaces This material was produced under grant [SH20856SH0] from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department.
Work Place Examinations & Employee Education “Do you have your MSHA eyes on??”
Walking-Working Surfaces
1 Telecom Cabling Ladder safety. 2 OSHA Office of Training & Education ation Telecom Cabling Stairways and Ladders.
MSHA Machine Guarding. Introduction to Guarding l Many accidents result from persons working on or around moving machinery. These accidents could have.
National Mine Safety and Health Academy John G. Tyler
MSHA’s“Rules to Live By” Initiative. They’ve gotten the word. And now… so do you!
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Accident Powered Haulage Accident January 26, 2010 (California) January 26, 2010 (California) Cement Operation Cement.
Guidelines for Traffic Control at Surface Mines
Conveyor Systems GUARDING Protecting Life & Limb.
MINE HAZARD TRAINING FOR CONTRACT TRUCKERS A safety presentation for over-the-road contract truck drivers working at surface mines.
Mine Fatalities Involving Conveyors. Mining Fatality On August 1, 2005, a 30- year old laborer, with eight weeks mining experience, was fatally injured.
 Guarding of Moving Machine Parts  2940 (2007)  13.9%
Machines used in Forest Activities Section H of the Logging Code.
MOBILE EQUIPMENT SAFETY
Scissor Lift Safety Training Working Safely on Scissor Lifts 29 CFR OSHA Scaffolding Safety Requirements.
Forklift and Lift Truck Safety. Survey: Fatalities.
OSHA Office of Training and Education - Revised by TEEX 12/04/07 1 Walking-Working Surfaces.
Machine Guarding. Moving Machine Parts 30 CFR § (a) Moving machine parts shall be guarded to protect persons from contacting gears, sprockets,
Rules to Live By III 2001 – 2010: 609 Fatalities in Coal and Metal Non–Metal Mines Fatalities: 8 Coal Mine standards contributed to 75 fatalities 6 Metal.
MNM Fatal Machinery Accident Machinery Accident July 2, 2009 (Pennsylvania) July 2, 2009 (Pennsylvania) Dimension Stone Operation Dimension Stone.
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Accident Powered Haulage Accident May 2, 2009 (Georgia) May 2, 2009 (Georgia) Clay Operation Clay Operation Contractor.
Organization of 30 CFR The Mine Health and Safety Act A Look at General Provisions ©Feb 2003 Dr. Bradley C Paul.
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Powered Haulage February 1, 2014 (Utah) February 1, 2014 (Utah) Iron Ore Mine Iron Ore Mine Conveyor Operator Conveyor.
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Accident Powered Haulage Accident October 24, 2012 (Nebraska) October 24, 2012 (Nebraska) Underground Crushed Stone Operation.
Mechanized Equipment. Subpart G, Most Frequently Cited (1999) (a)(9)(ii) No reverse alarm signal on earthmoving equipment (a)(9)(I) No.
Struck-By Hazards. Crane Tip Over and Failure Incidents Soft Ground Inadequate outrigger support Overload Crane out of level Boom strike.
OSHA Office of Training and Education 1 Walking-Working Surfaces.
STRUCK BY EQUIPMENT FATALITIES 7 miners have died in 2010 when struck by equipment. 6 of these 7 have occurred since April, which is alarming. 4 have been.
ROGERS GROUP, INC.. Rogers Group History Founded 1908, Bloomington, Indiana by Ralph Rogers Grew with nation’s interstate system, infrastructure growth.
Traffic Rules Clarity February 2013 Mine Operations.
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Powered Haulage September 13, 2005 (Pennsylvania) September 13, 2005 (Pennsylvania) Crushed Stone Operation Crushed Stone.
This presentation is for illustrative and general educational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for the official MSHA Investigation Report.
Bluestone Industry MSHA Inspection Violations. -Berms -Blasting -Electrical -Fire -Guards -HAZCOM Labeling -Health Violations.
Workplace Examinations. Daily Workplace Examinations Who is responsible for making workplace examinations?
This presentation is for illustrative and general educational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for the official MSHA Investigation Report.
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Accident Powered Haulage Accident December 8, 2011 (Minnesota) December 8, 2011 (Minnesota) Crushed Stone Operation Crushed.
Rules To Live By. MSHA’s Fatality Prevention Program.
Excavation & Trench Safety
Aerial Lift Safety Today, we’re going to talk about aerial lift safety. You may know this type of equipment by commonly used names such as “cherry pickers”
Haulage Safety Training NCMAQB. Objectives To understand the proper way to pre-shift equipment To understand the proper way to pre-shift equipment Learn.
Ground Control. Working Place Exams (a) – competent person examine each work place at least once per shift for conditions that adversely affect.
Powered Industrial Trucks: Forklifts—Overhead Transparencies © 1998 Comprehensive Loss Management, Inc. 1 Powered Industrial Trucks.
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Accident Powered Haulage Accident September 15, 2009 (Arkansas) September 15, 2009 (Arkansas) Sand & Gravel Operation.
Mechanized Equipment 1.
TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE MINING LAW 1 NCMAQB 1. Before operating self-propelled mobile equipment, you must: A. Conduct a pre-shift inspection B. Make.
Mine Fatalities Involving Conveyors
MINE HAZARD TRAINING FOR CONTRACT TRUCKERS
Walking and Working Surfaces
Subpart O Motor Vehicles EO 11.1 Describe requirements in Subpart O that protect workers from common motor vehicle hazards 1.
Rules To Live By.
Click anywhere to get started…
Conveyor Systems.
Conveyor Systems.
MNM Fatal Powered Haulage Accident
Workplace Examinations
Conveyor Systems.
Conveyor Systems.
Presentation transcript:

COMMONLY CITED SURFACE M/NM STANDARDS

#1 Lack of Guarding 56/ (a)

On June 1, 2002, a 32 year-old conveyor attendant with 5 years mining experience was fatally injured at an open pit copper operation. The victim became entangled in a tripper conveyor pulley.

On September 23, 2002, a 43 year-old plant operator with 17 months experience was fatally injured at a crushed stone operation. The victim was removing fines that had packed around a winged tail pulley of a belt that had been buried by spillage. As the spillage was removed, the bound conveyor belt moved backward a short distance and caught the victim's arm between the belt and the tail pulley.

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance:   Are moving machine parts guarded?   Is the equipment or machinery in service?   Does the guard prevent contact by persons?   Does the guard extend a distance sufficient to prevent a person from reaching behind and making contact?   Is the guard close enough to the machine part to prevent a person from getting behind the guard and making contact?

#2 Horns/backup Alarms Maintained 56/ a On October 30, 2003, a 22-year-old equipment operator, with 1½ years experience, was fatally injured at a surface stone operation. The victim was following a front-end loader in his personal pickup truck on a single lane mine road. The front-end loader stopped and backed over the pickup, fatally injuring the driver.

On January 24, 2002, a 62 year-old laborer with 20 years mining experience was fatally injured at a crushed stone operation. The victim exited a building during a heavy rain and was crossing a plant roadway when he was apparently struck by the bucket edge of a front-end loader. Should he have used his horn??

On September 29, 2003, a 55-year-old dredge operator, with 32 years experience, was fatally injured at a surface sand and gravel mine. The victim exited a control booth, located adjacent to a dump hopper, and walked down the hopper ramp. At the same time, a front end loader operator dumped a load at the hopper, backed down the ramp, and struck the victim

Was a manually operated horn provided on this equipment? Does the mobile equipment have an obstructed view to the rear? If yes, was one of the following provided: Automatic backup alarm; or Wheel mounted bell alarm (metal and nonmetal); or Discriminating back-up alarm; or An observer Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Can the horn and backup alarm be heard over the surrounding noise? Was the self-propelled mobile equipment operated at night? If yes, does the equipment have a functional reverse-activated strobe light in lieu of an audible backup alarm of the type described above?

And even if back-up alarms do work, there are still other hazards!

#3 Failure to Correct defects in a Timely manner 56/ (b) #3 Failure to Correct defects in a Timely manner 56/ (b)

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Does the defect create a hazard to persons? Does the defect affect equipment, machinery, or tools? Would the defect create a hazard if the equipment, machinery, or tools were placed into operation in this condition? If left uncorrected, would the defect create a hazard to someone at some future time under certain conditions? Has the defective equipment, machinery, or tools been scheduled for repair before the defective condition(s) noted above would occur? Was the equipment inspected prior to being placed into operation? Has the defect been recorded? Would continued operation of the equipment, machinery, or tools be hazardous to persons? Has the equipment, machinery, or tools been taken out of service?

#4 Parking brakes not maintained 56/ (a)(2) When you park it, will it stay parked?

Hope these parking brakes are in good condition. This is not the way to chock a wheel!

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Are the parking and service brakes capable of stopping and/or holding the equipment with its typical load on the maximum grade it travels? Are all braking systems functional and maintained in good condition? Does the air or hydraulic pressure bleed off after one or more applications to the point where the braking system will no longer stop or hold the equipment on the maximum grade it travels? Are all brake cylinders and system devices functional and hooked up? Are all in-cab brake actuators (levers, buttons, etc.) functional? Are all in-cab gauges, indicators, low-air lights functional? Do brake retarders function properly?

#5 Guards not Securely in Place 56/ (b)

Is this securely fastened? Could it withstand the vibrations of normal operation?

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Was the guard built to retain its integrity during normal operation? Was substantial material used to construct the guard? If the guard was removed for maintenance, was it replaced and secured? Was the guard secured properly to prevent persons from contacting moving machine parts? Was the guard designed, constructed, and installed to prevent the creation of hazards to persons?

#6 Insulation & fittings around Power Wires & Cables 56/

Is this YOUR power tool?

What's wrong with this picture?

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Are wires and cables adequately insulated where they pass into or out of electrical compartments? Are wires or cables free of chafing, nicks, or wear where they enter into or exit electrical compartments? Was insulation replaced on wires or cables following installation or a repair? Do cables enter metal frames of motors, splice boxes, or electrical compartments through fittings designed for that purpose? Is a substantial bushing installed where wires, other than cables, pass through metal frames?

#7 Lack of Berms 56/ a Berms need to be mid-axel height of largest vehicle on roadway.

Elevated roads need berms or guardrails. An elevated road is any road with a drop-off of sufficient height to cause a vehicle to tip over.

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: If the drop-off is of sufficient grade or depth to cause a vehicle to overturn or endanger persons in the equipment: Is a berm or guardrail installed? Is the berm or guardrail mid-axle height to the largest vehicle that usually travels the road? If there are openings in the berms for water drainage: Are the openings small enough to impede vehicles using the road? If the roadway is infrequently traveled or used only by service or maintenance vehicles? If berms or guardrails are not installed on roads traveled by service or maintenance vehicles, does the roadway have locked gates at all entry points?

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Continued Are signs posted at appropriate locations to indicate that berms or guardrails are not present? Are delineators installed and visible along the perimeter of the elevated roadway in both directions of travel? Are reflective surfaces of at least three delineators along each elevated shoulder always visible to the driver and spaced at intervals sufficient to indicate the edge and height of the roadway? Is a maximum speed limit posted and observed for any elevated, unbermed portions of the roadway? Is the speed limit being observed? Have measures been taken to provide traction in inclement weather?

#8 Electrical Conductors of Sufficient size

Are Conductors also protected from mechanical damage?

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Are conductors large enough so that they will not heat up and damage the insulating materials? Are conductors protected from mechanical damage such as vehicular traffic, chafing points on conveyor frames, motors, etc.? If conductors are exposed to mechanical damage, are they protected with suitable conduit, bridging, outer jackets, slings, etc.?

#9 Testing Grounding Systems

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Are electrical grounding systems being installed? Are electrical grounding systems being repaired? Are grounding systems being modified? Are the above grounding systems tested annually or after one of the noted events? Are the most recent resistance test results available to an Authorized Representative of the Secretary of Labor?

#10 Safe Access to Workplace 56/

So, who is safer?

Hazardous Stairs?

Tripping hazard (Housekeeping Violation, too.)

Issues to Consider in Determining Compliance: Is permanent or temporary access provided to all working places? Are miners climbing the equipment or machinery to access work places? Are fall-of-person hazards created by a lack of a stairway, ladder, ramp, etc.? Are handholds provided, if necessary? Are crossovers or crossunders provided where needed?