Domestic Antitrust Laws and Exemptions Regarding International Membership Donald A. Frederick USDA Rural Development Cooperatives Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2007 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 10 Antitrust Law-Restraints of Trade.
Advertisements

© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Legal Background.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller Cross BUSINESS.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Chapter 46 Antitrust Law.
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Antitrust Law.
1 COPYRIGHT © 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
Antitrust Does Google have monopoly power? Microsoft? On what? Why? Why Not? Is that bad? Why? Can you name monopolies in other industries? Is Monopoly.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
1 ANTITRUST POLICY l Principles of Microeconomic Theory, ECO 284 l John Eastwood l CBA 247 l l address:
Georgetown University. The Efficiency Properties of Competitive Markets Q $/q S D MC ATC P P=MC Allocative efficiency P=minAC Productive efficiency IndustryFirm.
Introduction to Antitrust Law n Always two questions in any antitrust case: –What is prohibited according to the antitrust statutes? –Will the actions.
Miller Cross 4 th Ed. © 2005 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Chapter 47 Antitrust Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Antitrust Kim C. Stanger Compliance Bootcamp (5/15)
Good Trusts, Bad Trusts, & Trust Busting
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
10 th American History Unit IV- U.S. Economic History to 1945 Laws to Regulate Business and the Economy under President Wilson.
ASME C&S Training Module C10 LEGAL ISSUES C1. Conflict Of Interest/Code Of Ethics C2. Antitrust C3. Torts C4. Intellectual Property C5. Speaking For The.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
Antitrust Policy & Government Regulation. What is a Trust, and Why Don’t we Want one? Trust defined: a combination of firms aimed at consolidating, coordinating,
© 2008 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 BUSINESS LAW TODAY Essentials 8 th Ed. Roger LeRoy Miller - Institute for University.
 “Market power” is the power of company to control the market for its product.  The law does allow for market monopolies when a patent is issued. During.
TYPES OF COMPETITION Perfect Competition – a large number of companies all producing essentially the same product. No company has any control over price.
The Law of Cooperative Corporations University of Arkansas LLM Program, Agricultural Law, 2007 Fayetteville, Arkansas April, 2007 James R. Baarda Antitrust.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Antitrust Law 1. Learning Objectives: 1.The three major pieces of federal antitrust legislation 2.Monopoly power vs. monopolization 3.Horizontal vs. Vertical.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts relate to each other? What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts.
Employment Law History of Labor Laws. Early American Law Common Law Compilation of previous decisions and principles that judges base decisions Early.
Legal Environment for a New Century. Click your mouse anywhere on the screen when you are ready to advance the text within each slide. After the starburst.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Laws and Unfair Trade Practices
More on Competition and Government Policy. Cartels l A cartel is an agreement among a group of sellers to regulate prices or restrict output l To be successful.
Aim: Review for Test on Industrialization 40 Multiple Choice Questions Extra Credit: Castlelearning- 80 or better (5 points).
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Monopoly and Antitrust Policy. Imperfect Competition and Market Power An imperfectly competitive industry is an industry in which single firms have some.
Chapter 23 Promoting Competition. 2 Chapter Objectives 1. Explain the purpose of antitrust laws, and identify the major federal antitrust statutes. 2.
Standards Anti-Trust Compliance Briefing August 31, 2004.
Ch THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil Browne Nancy K. Kubasek.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 26 Antitrust and Monopoly.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Government Regulation of Competition and Prices Twomey Jennings.
1 Chapter 13 Practice Quiz Tutorial Antitrust and Regulation ©2000 South-Western College Publishing.
Chapter 10 Antitrust Law. Chapter Objectives After reading this chapter, you will know the following: The federal antitrust laws and how they apply to.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
12.1 Chapter 12 Antitrust © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
CHAPTER 42: ANTITRUST LAW
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Chapter 27: Antitrust and Monopoly
Ch. 18 “The Progressive Reform Era”
CHAPTER 38 Antitrust.
PowerPoint Slides to Accompany ESSENTIALS OF BUSINESS AND ONLINE COMMERCE LAW 1st Edition by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 21 Antitrust Law Slides developed.
What is the Sherman Anti-Trust Act?
Reforming the Regulatory Process
Customized by Professor Ludlum December 1, 2016
© 1999 Michigan State University. All rights reserved.
Market Structure & Competition
Dr. Rajesh Kumar Lecture-1
Section 30.1.
2017 AFL-CIO LCC Union Lawyers Conference
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices
Enforcing Competition: the United States Antitrust Laws
Presentation transcript:

Domestic Antitrust Laws and Exemptions Regarding International Membership Donald A. Frederick USDA Rural Development Cooperatives Program

What is the Capper-Volstead Act? A limited shield that protects agricul- tural producers from antitrust liability when marketing their production on a cooperative basis

3 Thoughts Capper-Volstead is a “Producer” law Capper-Volstead is a “Producer” law Capper-Volstead has never been amended Capper-Volstead has never been amended Fishermen have similar protection Fishermen have similar protection

Sherman Act of 1890 Sec Every contract, combination or conspiracy that restrains trade is illegal Every person who signs a contract or participates in a combination or conspiracy that restrains trade, in interstate or foreign commerce, is guilty of a felony

Sherman Act of 1890 Sec Every person who monopolizes, or attempts to monopolize, or combines or conspires with any other person to monopolize any part of interstate or foreign commerce, is guilty of a felony Sec Every person who monopolizes, or attempts to monopolize, or combines or conspires with any other person to monopolize any part of interstate or foreign commerce, is guilty of a felony

Sherman Act of 1890 Senator Sherman introduced an amendment to provide a general exemption for labor unions and farmer cooperatives Senator Sherman introduced an amendment to provide a general exemption for labor unions and farmer cooperatives Adopted by a voice vote in the Senate, but dropped from the Judiciary Committee rewrite of Senator Sherman’s bill that became law Adopted by a voice vote in the Senate, but dropped from the Judiciary Committee rewrite of Senator Sherman’s bill that became law

Sherman Act of 1890 “Literal meaning” decisions shock business “Literal meaning” decisions shock business Business reacts with merger mania Business reacts with merger mania Courts hold farmer cooperatives are “illegal combinations in restraint of trade” Courts hold farmer cooperatives are “illegal combinations in restraint of trade”

Teddy the “Trust Buster” Roosevelt ascends to Presidency in 1901 Roosevelt ascends to Presidency in 1901 Urges “Big Business” to recognize a social responsibility Urges “Big Business” to recognize a social responsibility

Teddy the “Trust Buster” Sues Northern Securities Company, and wins Sues Northern Securities Company, and wins Sues two holding companies known for predatory tactics against competitors, American Tobacco and Standard Oil of New Jersey Sues two holding companies known for predatory tactics against competitors, American Tobacco and Standard Oil of New Jersey

Supreme Court Interprets Sherman Rule of Reason – Only agreements that “unreasonably” restrain trade are illegal under the Sherman Act

Supreme Court Interprets Sherman Rule of Per Se Illegality -- Some conduct is so inherently unreasonable that it is illegal “per se” Price fixing Price fixing Territorial allocations Territorial allocations Group boycotts Group boycotts Tying arrangements Tying arrangements

Congress Responds Federal Trade Commission Act (1914) creates the Federal Trade Commission to investigate and order an end to “unfair methods of competition”

Congress Responds Clayton Act (1914) prohibits certain business practices when the effect may be to substantially lessen competition Sec Price discrimination Sec Price discrimination Sec Tying agreements Sec Tying agreements Sec Mergers and acquisitions Sec Mergers and acquisitions

Congress Responds Section 6 of the Clayton Act provides that the antitrust laws shall not forbid the existence and operation of labor or agricultural organizations, instituted for the purposes of mutual help, without capital stock and not conducted for profit

Farm Leaders React Dairy cooperatives and others argue Sec. 6 of the Clayton Act is adequate for labor unions, but not producer marketing cooperatives Dairy cooperatives and others argue Sec. 6 of the Clayton Act is adequate for labor unions, but not producer marketing cooperatives In 1922, Capper-Volstead becomes law In 1922, Capper-Volstead becomes law Includes “stock” cooperatives Includes “stock” cooperatives Spells out what producer associations can do Spells out what producer associations can do

Capper-Volstead Act Sec Describes the scope of the limited antitrust protection provided Sec Describes the scope of the limited antitrust protection provided Sec Authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to prevent producers from abusing their collective power to the detriment of the general public Sec Authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to prevent producers from abusing their collective power to the detriment of the general public

Capper-Volstead Sec. 1 Persons engaged in the production of agricultural products may Persons engaged in the production of agricultural products may Act together in associations, corporate or otherwise, with or without capital stock Act together in associations, corporate or otherwise, with or without capital stock In collectively processing, preparing for market, handling and marketing their farm products In collectively processing, preparing for market, handling and marketing their farm products

Capper-Volstead Sec. 1 Such associations may Such associations may Have marketing agencies in common Have marketing agencies in common Enter into contracts and agreements necessary to carry out their collective marketing activity Enter into contracts and agreements necessary to carry out their collective marketing activity

Capper-Volstead Sec. 1 Such associations must Such associations must Operate for the mutual benefit of their members as producers Operate for the mutual benefit of their members as producers Either use one-member, one-vote or limit dividends on equity to 8 percent per year Either use one-member, one-vote or limit dividends on equity to 8 percent per year Handle more products produced by members each year than by nonmembers, measured by value Handle more products produced by members each year than by nonmembers, measured by value

Capper-Volstead and International Memberships Both the Capper-Volstead Act and its legislative history are silent as to whether non-domestic producers may join a U.S. cooperative without jeopardizing its antitrust protection

Capper-Volstead and International Memberships However, both the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act define “person” and “persons” to include “corporations and associations… existing under…the laws of either the United States, …the territories, …any State, or the laws of any foreign country.”

Capper-Volstead and International Memberships The statutes which define the antitrust liability from which Capper-Volstead cooperatives are exempted include foreign entities in their definition of “persons” The statutes which define the antitrust liability from which Capper-Volstead cooperatives are exempted include foreign entities in their definition of “persons” It is logical to assume that when Congress used the term “persons” in Capper-Volstead it also meant to include foreign entities It is logical to assume that when Congress used the term “persons” in Capper-Volstead it also meant to include foreign entities

Capper-Volstead and International Memberships The Fisherman’s Collective Marketing Act only protects cooperative marketing of aquatic products raised or caught in the several States, territories, insular possessions, “or other places under the jurisdiction of the United States” The Fisherman’s Collective Marketing Act only protects cooperative marketing of aquatic products raised or caught in the several States, territories, insular possessions, “or other places under the jurisdiction of the United States” Congress could have placed the same territorial restriction in the Capper-Volstead Act, but did not do so Congress could have placed the same territorial restriction in the Capper-Volstead Act, but did not do so

Capper-Volstead and International Memberships The Webb-Pomerene Act antitrust exemption for export associations also doesn’t mention foreign memberships The Webb-Pomerene Act antitrust exemption for export associations also doesn’t mention foreign memberships A Federal court of appeals refused to limit the term “associations” under Webb-Pomerene to associations of American-owned firms A Federal court of appeals refused to limit the term “associations” under Webb-Pomerene to associations of American-owned firms

Capper-Volstead and International Memberships The McCarren-Ferguson Act antitrust exemption for the insurance industry also doesn’t mention foreign memberships The McCarren-Ferguson Act antitrust exemption for the insurance industry also doesn’t mention foreign memberships The Supreme Court refused to rule that domestic insurers waived their antitrust protection by working in concert with foreign insurers The Supreme Court refused to rule that domestic insurers waived their antitrust protection by working in concert with foreign insurers

Capper-Volstead and International Memberships One last thought: There was no Wal-Mart in 1922 There was no Wal-Mart in 1922