MODIS/AIRS Workshop MODIS Level 2 Cloud Product 6 April 2006 Kathleen Strabala Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A New A-Train Collocated Product : MODIS and OMI cloud data on the OMI footprint Brad Fisher 1, Joanna Joiner 2, Alexander Vasilkov 1, Pepijn Veefkind.
Advertisements

METO621 Lesson 18. Thermal Emission in the Atmosphere – Treatment of clouds Scattering by cloud particles is usually ignored in the longwave spectrum.
Radiation and the Planck Function Lectures in Benevento June 2007 Paul Menzel UW/CIMSS/AOS.
AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) Level 1B data.
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Introduction to Remote Sensing Stan Kidder COMET Faculty Course Boulder, CO August 9, 2011
Cloud Masking and Cloud Products MODIS Operational Algorithm MOD35 Paul Menzel, Steve Ackerman, Richard Frey, Kathy Strabala, Chris Moeller, Liam Gumley,
MOD06 Cloud Top Properties Richard Frey Paul Menzel Bryan Baum University of Wisconsin - Madison.
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
Clouds and Climate: Cloud Response to Climate Change ENVI3410 : Lecture 11 Ken Carslaw Lecture 5 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and.
METR180: Remote Sensing Lecture 14 – On Water Vapor.
Cloud Top Height Retrieval From MIPAS Jane Hurley, Anu Dudhia, Graham Ewen, Don Grainger Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford.
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison South Africa, April 2006.
1 Remote Sensing Fundamentals Part II: Radiation and Weighting Functions Tim Schmit, NOAA/NESDIS ASPB Material from: Paul Menzel UW/CIMSS/AOS and Paolo.
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Benevento, June 2007.
MODIS/AIRS Workshop MODIS Level 2 Products 5 April 2006 Kathleen Strabala Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Meteorolojik Uzaktan Algılamaya Giriş Erdem Erdi Uzaktan Algılama Şube Müdürlüğü 7-8 Mayıs 2012, İzmir.
Extending HIRS High Cloud Trends with MODIS Donald P. Wylie Richard Frey Hong Zhang W. Paul Menzel 12 year trends Effects of orbit drift and ancillary.
HIRS Observations of Clouds since 1978 Donald P. Wylie & W. Paul Menzel Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies NOAA/NESDIS University.
MODIS Products 2011 IMAPP Training Workshop: Satellite Direct Broadcast for Real-Time Environmental Applications ECNU, China 3 June 2011 Part 1 Kathleen.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
Infrared Interferometers and Microwave Radiometers Dr. David D. Turner Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin - Madison
New Products from combined MODIS/AIRS Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Allen Huang, Xuebao Wu, and Liam Gumley Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite.
Summary of Radiation and the Radiative Transfer Equation Lectures for the Regional Training Course in Costa Rica 15 March 2005 Paul Menzel NOAA/NESDIS/ORA.
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
Cloud Top Properties Bryan A. Baum NASA Langley Research Center Paul Menzel NOAA Richard Frey, Hong Zhang CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison MODIS Science.
Atmospheric Soundings, Surface Properties, Clouds The Bologna Lectures Paul Menzel NOAA/NESDIS/ORA.
Optical properties Satellite observation ? T,H 2 O… From dust microphysical properties to dust hyperspectral infrared remote sensing Clémence Pierangelo.
WATER VAPOR RETRIEVAL OVER CLOUD COVER AREA ON LAND Dabin Ji, Jiancheng Shi, Shenglei Zhang Institute for Remote Sensing Applications Chinese Academy of.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
Pat Arnott, ATMS 749, UNR, 2008 CH 8: ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION: PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SCHWARZSCHILD EQUATION FOR RADIATION TRANSFER WHEN SCATTERING.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
Jinlong Li 1, Jun Li 1, Christopher C. Schmidt 1, Timothy J. Schmit 2, and W. Paul Menzel 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies.
Radiation and the Radiative Transfer Equation Lectures in Bertinoro 23 Aug – 2 Sep 2004 Paul Menzel NOAA/NESDIS/ORA.
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
Using MODIS and AIRS for cloud property characterization Jun W. Paul Menzel #, Steve Chian-Yi and Institute.
Bryan A. Baum, Richard Frey, Robert Holz Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Paul Menzel NOAA Many other colleagues MODIS.
Initial Analysis of the Pixel-Level Uncertainties in Global MODIS Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Size Retrievals Steven Platnick 1, Robert.
MODIS Atmosphere Data Products and Science Results Steven Platnick 1,2 Michael D. King, 2 W. Paul Menzel, 3 Yoram J. Kaufman, 2 Steve Ackerman, 4 Didier.
1 Atmospheric Radiation – Lecture 9 PHY Lecture 9 Infrared radiation in a cloudy atmosphere.
Within dr, L changes (dL) from… sources due to scattering & emission losses due to scattering & absorption Spectral Radiance, L(, ,  ) - W m -2 sr -1.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
S. Platnick 1, M. D. King 1, J. Riedi 2, T. Arnold 1,3, B. Wind 1,3, G. Wind 1,3, P. Hubanks 1,3 and S. Ackerman 4, R. Frey 4, B. Baum 4, P. Menzel 4,5,
Michael D. King, EOS Senior Project ScientistMarch 21, Early Results from the MODIS Atmosphere Algorithms Michael D. King, 1 Steven Platnick, 1,2.
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Benevento, June 2007.
Retrieval of cloud parameters from the new sensor generation satellite multispectral measurement F. ROMANO and V. CUOMO ITSC-XII Lorne, Victoria, Australia.
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison South Africa, April 2006.
Developing a Dust Retrieval Algorithm Jeff Massey aka “El Jeffe”
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
1 Atmospheric Radiation – Lecture 13 PHY Lecture 13 Remote sensing using emitted IR radiation.
May 15, 2002MURI Hyperspectral Workshop1 Cloud and Aerosol Products From GIFTS/IOMI Gary Jedlovec and Sundar Christopher NASA Global Hydrology and Climate.
MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
Preliminary results from the new AVHRR Pathfinder Atmospheres Extended (PATMOS-x) Data Set Andrew Heidinger a, Michael Pavolonis b and Mitch Goldberg a.
Summary Remote Sensing Seminar Summary Remote Sensing Seminar Lectures in Maratea Paul Menzel NOAA/NESDIS/ORA May 2003.
MODIS, AIRS, and Midlevel Cloud Phase Shaima Nasiri CIMSS/SSEC, UW-Madison Brian Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory MURI Hyperspectral Workshop 7-9 June, 2005.
AIRS Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Validation Bob Knuteson Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson, Chia Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison Space.
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli SSEC University of Wisconsin-Madison Monteponi, September 2008.
Early Results from the MODIS Cloud Algorithms cloud detection optical, microphysical, and cloud top properties S. Platnick 5,2, S. A. Ackerman 1, M. D.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
SPLIT-WINDOW TECHNIQUE
Summer 2014 Group Meeting August 14, 2014 Scott Sieron
Winds in the Polar Regions from MODIS: Atmospheric Considerations
HIRS Observations of a Decline in High Clouds since 1995 February 2002
In the past thirty five years NOAA, with help from NASA, has established a remote sensing capability on polar and geostationary platforms that has proven.
AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) Level 1B data
Presentation transcript:

MODIS/AIRS Workshop MODIS Level 2 Cloud Product 6 April 2006 Kathleen Strabala Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison USA

Day 3 Lecture Outline Review of MODIS atmosphere products MODIS Level 2 product theory and algorithms –MODIS Cloud Top Properties Product –MODIS Cloud Phase Product –MODIS Aerosol Product Example of MODIS aerosol application –MODIS Atmospheric Profiles Product MODIS Ocean Products –SeaDAS

MODIS Standard Products Atmosphere MOD 04 - Aerosol Product MOD 05 - Total Precipitable Water (Water Vapor) MOD 06 - Cloud Product * (CTP & IRPHASE only)MOD 06 - Cloud Product MOD 07 - Atmospheric Profiles MOD 08 - Gridded Atmospheric Product MOD 35 - Cloud Mask

Cloud Top Properties Menzel, Wylie - CIMSS Cloud Top Pressure, Temperature, Emissivity derived using CO 2 “slicing” MODIS product utilizes 4 spectral channels in the 13 – 14  m region. 5x5 1 km pixel retrievals where at least 5 of the 1 km pixels are cloudy as determined by the cloud mask Cloud properties retrieved both day and night

Inputs MODIS L1B (MOD021KM) and geolocation file (MOD03) MODIS Cloud Mask (MOD35) 6 hourly Global Data Assimilation System T126 resolution analysis from NCEP (Vertical Profiles of Temperature and Moisture) ex : gdas1.PGrbF z Weekly Optimum Interpolation (OI) Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analysis ex: oisst Latest 7 days ancillary data and documentation available from: ftp://aqua.ssec.wisc.edu/pub/terra/ancillary

CO2 channels see to different levels in the atmosphere 14.2 um 13.9 um 13.6 um 13.3 um

Radiative Transfer Equation The radiance leaving the earth-atmosphere system sensed by a satellite borne radiometer is the sum of radiation emissions from the earth-surface and each atmospheric level that are transmitted to the top of the atmosphere. Considering the earth's surface to be a blackbody emitter (emissivity equal to unity), the upwelling radiance intensity, I, for a cloudless atmosphere is given by the expression I =  sfc B ( T sfc )  (sfc - top) +   layer B ( T layer )  (layer - top) layers where the first term is the surface contribution and the second term is the atmospheric contribution to the radiance to space.

When reflection from the earth surface is also considered, the Radiative Transfer Equation for infrared radiation can be written o I =  sfc B (T s )  (p s ) +  B (T(p)) [d  (p)/ dp ] dp p s where F (p) = { 1 + (1 -  ) [  (p s ) /  (p)] 2 } The first term is the spectral radiance emitted by the surface and attenuated by the atmosphere, often called the boundary term and the second term is the spectral radiance emitted to space by the atmosphere directly or by reflection from the earth surface. The atmospheric contribution is the weighted sum of the Planck radiance contribution from each layer, where the weighting function is [ d  (p) / dp ]. This weighting function is an indication of where in the atmosphere the majority of the radiation for a given spectral band comes from.

Radiative Transfer Equation I =  sfc B (T s )  (p s ) +  B (T(p)) [d  (p)/ dp ] dp RTE in Cloudy Conditions I λ = η I cd + (1 - η) I clr where cd = cloud, clr = clear, η = cloud fraction λ λ o I clr = B λ (T s )  λ (p s ) +  B λ (T(p)) d  λ. λ p s p c I cd = (1-ε λ ) B λ (T s )  λ (p s ) + (1-ε λ )  B λ (T(p)) d  λ λ p s o + ε λ B λ (T(p c ))  λ (p c ) +  B λ (T(p)) d  λ p c ε λ is emittance of cloud. First two terms are from below cloud, third term is cloud contribution, and fourth term is from above cloud. After rearranging p c dB λ I λ cd - I λ clr = ηε λ   (p) dp. p s dp

Cloud Properties from CO2 Slicing RTE for cloudy conditions indicates dependence of cloud forcing (observed minus clear sky radiance) on cloud amount (  ) and cloud top pressure (p c ) p c (I - I clr ) =    dB (T). p s Higher colder cloud or greater cloud amount produces greater cloud forcing; dense low cloud can be confused for high thin cloud. Two unknowns require two equations. p c can be inferred from radiance measurements in two spectral bands where cloud emissivity is the same.  is derived from the infrared window, once p c is known.

Different ratios reveal cloud properties at different levels hi /13.9 mid /13.6 low /13.3 Meas Calc p c (I 1 -I 1 clr )  1   1 dB 1 p s = p c (I 2 -I 2 clr )  2   2 dB 2 p s

BT in and out of clouds for MODIS CO 2 bands - demonstrate weighting functions and cloud top algorithm S. Platnick, ISSAOS ‘02

MODIS Cloud Top Properties Level 3 Products March 2004

Cloud Top Temperature Plymouth Marine Lab, UK 10 October :57 UTC

Output Product Description

MOD06 Key Output Parameters 5x5 pixel (1km) resolution Surface_Temperature (GDAS input) Surface_Pressure (GDAS input) Cloud_Top_Pressure Cloud_Top_Temperature Tropopause_Height Cloud_Fraction Cloud_Effective_Emissivity Cloud_Top_Pressure_Infrared Brightness_Temperature_Difference_B29-B31 Brightness_Temperature_Difference_B31-B32 Cloud_Phase_Infrared Cloud Optical Depth (daytime – 1 km product) Cloud Effective Radius (daytime – 1km)

Known Problems Low cloud –Vantage point of satellite means more sensitive to high cloud than low cloud. New algorithm address this Solution converges on highest pressure level – Addressed with latest algorithm

Validation - Comparison of HIRS/ISCCP/MODIS High Cloud Frequency July 2002December 2002

Cloud Phase Dr. Bryan Baum CIMSS Based upon the differential absorption of ice and water between 8 and 11 microns Simple brightness temperature difference (8-11 BTDIF) technique Included as part of the MOD06 product

Imaginary Index of Refraction of Ice and Water 8 – 13 microns

High Ice clouds BTD[8.5-11] > 0 over a large range of optical thicknesses  T cld = 228 K Midlevel clouds BTD[8.5-11] values are similar (i.e., negative) for both water and ice clouds T cld = 253 K Low-level, warm clouds BTD[8.5-11] values always negative T cld = 273 K Ice: Cirrus model derived from FIRE-I in-situ data ( Nasiri et al, 2002) Water: r e =10  m Angles   = 45 o,  = 20 o, and  40 o Profile: midlatitude summer Simulations of Ice and Water Phase Clouds  m BT Differences  =

Ice Cloud Example

Water Cloud Example

IRPHASE Thresholds Ice Cloud –BT K Mixed Phase –BT11 between 238 and 268 K and –BTD8-11 between –0.25 and –1.0 K Water Cloud –BT11 > 238 K and BTD8-11 < -1.5 K or –BT11>285 and BTD8-11 < -0.5 K

Output Product Description 4 categories 1 – Water Cloud 2 – Ice Cloud 3 – Mixed Phase Cloud 6 – Undecided

MOD06 Key Output Parameters 5x5 pixel (1km) resolution Surface_Temperature (GDAS input) Surface_Pressure (GDAS input) Cloud_Top_Pressure Cloud_Top_Temperature Tropopause_Height Cloud_Fraction Cloud_Effective_Emissivity Cloud_Top_Pressure_Infrared Brightness_Temperature_Difference_B29-B31 Brightness_Temperature_Difference_B31-B32 Cloud_Phase_Infrared Cloud Optical Depth (daytime – 1 km product) Cloud Effective Radius (daytime – 1km)

Temperature sensitivity, or the percentage change in radiance corresponding to a percentage change in temperature, , is defined as dB/B =  dT/T. The temperature sensivity indicates the power to which the Planck radiance depends on temperature, since B proportional to T  satisfies the equation. For infrared wavelengths,  = c 2 /T = c 2 / T. __________________________________________________________________ Wavenumber Typical Scene Temperature Temperature Sensitivity 700 (14  m) (11  m) (8.3  m) (6.5  m) (4.4  m) (4.0  m)

MODIS IR Spectral Bands MODIS

Cloud edges and broken clouds appear different in 11 and 4 um images. T(11)**4=(1-N)*Tclr**4+N*Tcld**4~(1-N)*300**4+N*200**4 T(4)**12=(1-N)*Tclr**12+N*Tcld**12~(1-N)*300**12+N*200**12 Cold part of pixel has more influence for B(11) than B(4) Warm part of pixel has more influence for B(4) than B(11)

Ice Cloud Example

Broken clouds appear different in 8.6, 11 and 12 um images; assume Tclr=300 and Tcld=230 T(11)-T(12)=[(1-N)*B11(Tclr)+N*B11(Tcld)] -1 - [(1-N)*B12(Tclr)+N*B12(Tcld)] -1 T(8.6)-T(11)=[(1-N)*B8.6(Tclr)+N*B8.6(Tcld)] -1 - [(1-N)*B11(Tclr)+N*B11(Tcld)] -1 Warm part of pixel has more influence at shorter wavelengths N=0 N=0.2 N=0.8 N=0.6 N=0.4 N=1.0

Known Problems Mid-level cloud (BT ~ 250 K) –Ambiguous solution Surface Emissivity Effects –Not always the same over the IR window (granite) Mixed phase cloud category –should be considered as undecided

Cloud Phase Level 3 Product March 2004 Water Ice