The Use of Data and Effective Transition in Providing Individually Tailored Academic and Behavioral Support Services for Youth in the Juvenile Justice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Advertisements

JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Alternative School Processes
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk PROGRAM OVERVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORTS.
Early Achievers Overview Starting Strong – August 15, 2012.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
1 Child Welfare Reform Council August 5, 2014 Transition of Children in Foster Care, Receiving Adoption Assistance and Select Youth in Juvenile Justice.
Supporting At-Risk Youth in the Development of Programs of Study The Facts About ALS’ Dropout Prevention and Recovery Programs Jan Spivak Director of Student.
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Chicago Public Schools Office of High School Programs Department of Dropout Prevention and Recovery Dr. Darreyl M. Young, Manager ConfidentialNot for Publication.
Introductions Social Issues Historical Overview Purpose and Goals Program Eligibility Legislation Permanent Connections Resources to Promote Permanency.
EFFECTIVE TRANSITION THROUGH SYSTEMS OF CARE: COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY SUPPORTS AS A MEANS TO SUCCESS FOR SYSTEM – INVOLVED YOUTH Simon Gonsoulin, Reyhan.
Mentoring for Success: Essential Elements for and Models of Mentoring Programs.
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency An Overview.
CONDUCTING PROGRAM EVALUATIONS FOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS Brooke Blair, ALSDE Mark Ward, ALSDE Erin McCann, SEDL Mary Lou Meadows, SEDL.
Systems Change 3 Integrated Jobs Strategy Policy Funding Outcome Data Capacity Development Innovation Leadership Values Collaboration Hall et al (2007)
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
May 17, 2010 IES Practice Guide Dropout Prevention Russell W. Rumberger University of California, Santa Barbara.
ND Topical Call Innovative Uses of Title I, Part D, Funds: Blending and Braiding (Call 3) September 22, 2014.
Neglected & Delinquent (N&D) Foster Care Program School Mental Health Component Javier Zuniga License Clinical Social Worker 13+ years LAUSD 5TH. year.
ENCIRCLE: A COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP FOR OUR YOUTH Led by Center for Learning & Development thanks to a grant from the Office of the Governor Criminal.
Overcoming Common Challenges: Tips on Engaging Families at Juvenile Justice Facility Schools.
1 Components of Educational Programming in Secure Long-Term Settings Tom O’Rourke, Consultant and NDTAC Expert Panelist; Victoria Rankin, AIR, NDTAC ND.
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 What’s It All About?
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Neglected & Delinquent Support and Transition from Residential Placement 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 27, 2015.
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
Professional Development: Implementation at the Orange County Department of Education, California Rick Martin Director of Curriculum, Learning, Accountability,
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability N or D Application.
CREATIVE USE OF FEDERAL TITLE 1D ASSISTING HIGH-RISK JUVENILE OFFENDERS.
Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
Collaborative Practices: Transition Toolkit 2.0 – Meeting the Educational Needs of Youth Exposed to the Juvenile Justice System Simon Gonsoulin.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Washington State – Juvenile Detention National STD Prevention Conference
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 2 LEAs and TACF Neglected,
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 1 State Agencies Neglected,
Arizona Department of Education September
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
Title I, Part D and the Common Core Simon Gonsoulin.
School Counselor for At-Risk Youth. Services aimed at students identified as “Neglected or Delinquent” or otherwise “at-risk”
1 Essential Components of an Effective Educational Program Overview Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
New Hampshire Mental Health TA Project IDEA Partnership National Community of Practice on Collaborative School Behavioral Health Share Fair Presentation.
Second Chance Act 2015 Conference Washington Marriott Wardman Park Hotel Washington DC December 17, 2015 Kathleen Sande, OSPI Juvenile Justice Education,
WASHINGTON CONNECTION COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP. Washington Connection Update 2 New Features for May 19, 2013 Release  Add State or Federal food benefit.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
The Juvenile Justice System & K-12 Education in Washington State
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
Session Outcomes Overview of Project STAY OUT
Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016 Katie Deal.
A GREAT PLACE TO BEGIN AGAIN...
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Data Collection and Reporting
Programs for Corrections Education and the Education of Other Institutionalized Individuals Sean Addie.
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Consolidated district performance report (CDPR)
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency
Title I Part D Reporting
Title I Part D Reporting
Presentation transcript:

The Use of Data and Effective Transition in Providing Individually Tailored Academic and Behavioral Support Services for Youth in the Juvenile Justice and Child Welfare

Introductory Remarks Simon Gonsoulin Director, NDTAC

3 About NDTAC  Neglected-Delinquent TA Center (NDTAC)  Contract between U.S. Department of Education (ED) and the American Institutes for Research  John McLaughlin Federal Program Manager, Title I, Part D Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Program  NDTAC ’ s Mission:  Develop a uniform evaluation model  Provide technical assistance  Serve as a facilitator between different organizations, agencies, and interest groups

4 Agenda and Presenters NDTAC Practice Guide  Nicholas Read, NDTAC Technical Assistance Team, AIR Using Data to Develop Individual Tailored Academic & Behavioral Support Plans in Washington  Kathleen Sande, Institution Education Program Supervisor, Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction  Kristin Schutte, Lead Project Director for Education Advocate Program, Olympic Education Services District 114 Question and Answer Session

NDTAC Practice Guide: Providing Individually Tailored Academic and Behavioral Support Services for Youth in the Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice Systems Nicholas Read, NDTAC Technical Assistance Team, AIR

6 Origins of NDTAC’s Practice Guide

7 CJJR Monograph: Principles and Practices 1 2

8 NDTAC Practice Guide: Individually Tailored Academic and Behavioral Supports

9 Education Across Multiple Settings 1.Community-Based Traditional and Alternative Schools 2.Day Treatment Centers 3.Group Homes 4.Residential Treatment Centers 5.Detention and Correctional Facilities

10 Practices and Strategies

11 Collect and Use Data To Identify Student Needs and Develop Plans Strategies: 1.Provide a systematic process for using data to identify, screen, monitor, and make educational decisions 2.Develop and maintain personal learning plans 3.Share information to facilitate students’ success and well being

12 Implement Procedures To Ensure Smooth Transitions Strategies: 1.Include transition activities in student PLPs. 2.Establish formal mechanisms for the exchange of educational data and records. 3.Prioritize and allocate funds for transition supports and programs. 4.Conduct ongoing monitoring and continuous quality improvement of transition efforts.

USING DATA TO DEVELOP INDIVIDUALLY TAILORED ACADEMIC & BEHAVIORAL SUPPORT PLANS IN WASHINGTON STATE Success Plans for Youth in Transition in the Juvenile Justice and Child Welfare Systems

Washington State Title 1 Neglected-Delinquent (Title I D) Program  Subpart 1 Title I D funding provides academic improvement inside state long-term facilities  Subpart 2 Title I D funding provides transition and dropout interventions inside & outside local short-term detention centers  October 2006 annual count (554) generated $885,000  Method of counting corrected  October 2007 annual count (2834) generated $3.4 million

Utilizing Data to Change Business Practices  2007 DATA  Total Youth Population ages million  Youth Population in Detention 27,408  Dropout rates:  9 th grade 3.71%  10 th grade 4.36%  11 th grade 6.19%

Washington State Education Advocate (EA) Program  Vision: Increase Title I D services, addressing the needs of both incarcerated and at-risk youth.  Result: Provided youth across WA with Education Advocates, utilizing the 9 Educational Service Districts, one in each region of the state.  Education Advocates coordinate with detention staff to work with youth releasing from local detention centers as well as youth in middle and high schools at risk of dropping out or entering juvenile justice system.

 Whatcom Detention (Bellingham) Lewis County Detention & Green Hill Academic (Chehalis)   Remann Hall, Project Choice, and Region V Learning Center (Tacoma) EA PROJECT  Oakridge Group Home (Clover Park)  Island County Detention (Coupeville)  Grant County Detention (Ephrata) EA PROJECT  Charles Denny Detention & Northwest Regional Learning Center (Everett) EA PROJECT  Cowlitz County Detention (Kelso) EA PROJECT  Benton-Franklin Justice Center (Kennewick) EA PROJECT  Parke Creek Treatment Center (Kittitas)  Skagit County Detention (Mount Vernon)  Naselle Youth Camp (Naselle-Grays River)  Okanogan County Detention (Okanogan) EA PROJECT  Twin Rivers Group Home (Richland) Mason County Detention (Shelton)   Grays Harbor Detention (Aberdeen) EA PROJECT  Kitsap County Detention (South Kitsap) EA PROJECT Thurston County - Tumwater West (Tumwater) EA PROJECT   Clark County Detention (Vancouver) EA PROJECT  Walla Walla County Detention (Walla Walla) EA PROJECT  Yakima County Detention, Region 2 Learning Center, EA PROJECT and Ridgeview Group Home (Yakima)  Martin Hall Detention Center (Medical Lake) Camp Outlook (North Franklin)  Spokane Juvenile Detention, Structural Alternative Confinement, Healing Lodge, Morning Star, and Excelsior School (Spokane) EA PROJECT  Echo Glen Children’s Center (Issaquah)  Chelan County Detention (Wenatchee)  Canyon View Group Home (Eastmont)  Clallam County Detention (Port Angeles) EA PROJECT  King County Detention and Interagency School (Seattle) EA PROJECT Woodinville Treatment (Northshore) Griffin Home (Renton)  Maple Lane Detention (Rochester)  Washington State Detention Centers, Juvenile Facilities& Education Advocate Sites

Education Advocates in Middle and High Schools Targeting At-Risk Youth  Transition Services for  Youth coming out of long-term JRA facilities  Youth coming out of short-term detention  Intervention services for middle/high school students  Transition/Intervention Wrap-around Services in alternative schools SERVICES: 3-Tiered Case Management Strength-based assessment Risk/protective factor screening Alcohol, drug screening Mental health screening Referrals to community services Attendance/grade monitoring Tutoring GED testing Career coaching Academic Testing Mentoring

State- Level Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) Data Services  The Comprehensive Education Data and Research System (CEDARS)  A longitudinal data warehouse of educational data  Student data includes demographics, enrollment information, schedules, grades, and program participation  Early Warning Information System (EWIS)  Data is used to identify those at greatest risk and in need of service

The Value and Use of Data  Data is helpful in guiding the Education Advocate to:  Making decisions  Providing tailored individualized support in helping youth succeed  Navigate multiple systems  Confront in a caring way about areas of concern  Celebrate achievement (small steps)

Using Data to Identify & Prioritize Services  Re-entry  School information current status and risk of failing  Criminal history & risk of offending  Soft Skills – social, work, peer relationships and communication  History of behavioral health concerns/issues  Living arrangements  MS/HS  Persistent low grades  Failing grades in one or more classes  Falling behind in course work  Being held back one grade level  Lack of educational engagement  Health risk

Individualized Student Needs Assessment (intake)  Standard Intake form includes questions about  Demographics  School/Education History  History of Juvenile Justice Involvement  Community Resources/Linkages needs  Personal History (MH, abuse, peer involvement, sexual history, extracurricular activities)  AOD History (those qualified screen)  GAIN-SS screening tool Strength-based questionnaire

Student/Youth Success Plans (manual referred to as re-entry plan) School Specific Goal(s) Behavior Improvements  Attendance  Self management  Peer relationships  Study skills Academic Improvement  Reading, Writing, Math, Science & Health/ Fitness Assistance with  GED prep/GED test  College Enrollment Vocational Specific Goal(s): Behavior Improvement  Attendance  Self management  Conflict management/relationships Job placement assistance  Vocational program  Link to WorkSource/Job Corp  Resume, Interview skills, Career planning/Job Search Life Skills  Banking/Finances  Parenting Skills  Housing

Student/Youth Success Plans (manual referred to as re-entry plan)  Plan of Action for: (Write in goal)  Identify steps to assist youth to achieve identified goal Step 1: Step 2: Step 3:  Community Resource Referral Referral made to: Appointment scheduled for: Attended Completed

Comments From EAs in the field  “I routinely check their grades and meet with them individually to discuss their progress or lack of and we brainstorm ways for them to make improvements”.  “What I try to do is celebrate each and every small success I see along the way. Sometimes I have to look hard to see any real change but I celebrate anything I can find no matter how small it seems”.  One “young man is currently working in a service department at Sears doing some customer service (he is a natural) but mostly he uses the training he received to install and repair products that Sears sells”. I used a reading and math testing tool (WRAT4) to monitor student achievement. Over the two years of serving this student he “showed a steady upward...” “The data mirrored the academic progression… The way he viewed himself and how others viewed him in the community shifted…” it was positive image of how his life would turn out and a smile for everyone”.

Case-management - Ongoing Monitoring  Enrolled in/returned to school  Academic grade-level improvements in reading and math  Obtained high school diploma  Earned high school credit  Enrolled in a GED program  Obtained GED  Accepted & enrolled into a post-secondary school  Enrolled in job training courses  Obtain employment  Other (e.g. soft skills training, assistance with resume and job searches, WIA services) School RelatedPost Secondary & Job/Vocational

Academic Outcomes

GED & Vocational Outcomes

Resources  Education Advocate Manual – nAdvocate.aspx  Dropout Early Warning Systems Guide cs/DEWISGuide-Final.pdf  Research Review School-based Health Interviews and Academic Achievement  Information Sharing s/KingCoResourceGuideInformationSharing.pdf s/KingCoResourceGuideInformationSharing.pdf

Contact Information Title I D Education Advocate Program  Kathleen Sande, WA OSPI Institution Education Program Supervisor  Kristin Schutte, WA Olympic Educational Services District 114, Director of Student Services (Lead Project Director for Education Advocate Program)