DELAMINATION DETECTION OF HMA AIRPORT PAVEMENTS WITH NDT DEVICES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma DOT Perpetual Pavement Test Sections at the NCAT Test Track
Advertisements

Basic Ground Penetrating Radar Theory
29 th Annual Airport Conference February 28 – March 2, 2006 Hershey, Pennsylvania An IPRF Project Overview of Acceptance Criteria Based on Innovative Testing.
NDT Technologies for Pavement Evaluation: FHWA Directions and Initiatives H. Thomas Yu Office of Asset Management, Pavement, and Construction Federal Highway.
Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)
Pulse Phase Thermography and its Application to Defects in Adhesively Bonded Joints R. C. Waugh, J. M. Dulieu-Barton and S. Quinn Faculty of Engineering.
New Technologies for NDT of Concrete Pavement Structures
Rick Collins (TxDOT).  Historically segregation thought of as mechanical (gradation) phenomenon  1996 – WSDOT discovered thermal imaging could detect.
Surface Penetrating Radar Simulations for Jupiter’s Icy Moons Thorsten Markus, Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes NASA/GSFC,
Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar Dwayne Harris P.E. L.P.G Presented for Final Exam.
EVALUATION OF FWD DATA FOR DETERMINATION OF LAYER MODULI OF PAVEMENTS Dr. Yusuf Mehta, P.E. Rowan University Dr. Reynaldo Roque, P.E. University of Florida.
PORTABLE SEISMIC PAVEMENT ANALYZER- PSPA 498-EXPERIMENTAL METHODS Professor: Daniel Kuchma Speaker: Sara Alzate INSTRUMENTATION PROJECT University of Illinois.
Houston, TX | May 2, 2012 Finding blind faults using ground roll reflection Craig Hyslop Robert Stewart.
Near-surface Imaging at Meteor Crater, Arizona Soumya Roy, Ph. D. Student Advisor: Dr. Robert R. Stewart AGL Annual Meeting University of Houston, 2 nd.
Use of Ground Penetrating Radar to Review MN Roads
SURFACE WAVE SURVEYS LIMITED
Ultrasonic Testing This technique is used for the detection of internal surface (particularly distant surface) defects in sound conducting.
Module 2-5 Field Sampling and Testing.  Identify reasons for conducting field sampling and lab testing  Describe typical field sampling and testing.
Profilers. Wind profilers are phased array radars that measure the wind as a function of height above a fixed location. Characteristics: Wavelength: 33.
Analyses of tunnel stability under dynamic loads Behdeen Oraee; Navid Hosseini; Kazem Oraee 1.
1Xxxxxx Titre xxxx © NDT expert © NDT expert - The ultimate control INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY ON AIRCRAFT.
GG450 March 20, 2008 Introduction to SEISMIC EXPLORATION.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Nondestructive Testing and Data Analysis Module 2-3.
Safety assessment of weathered slopes by measuring shear wave velocity Mohsin U. Qureshi, Ikuo Towhata and SuguruYamada Department of Civil Engineering,
Shinta Kisriani.  INTRODUCTION  THEORY LITERATURE  METHOD DESIGN  ANALYSIS & RESULT  CONCLUSION  FUTURE WORK.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
Evaluation of NDTE Technologies for Airport Pavement Maintenance and Acceptance Activities Imad L. Al-Qadi John S. Popovics Wei Xie Sara Alzate University.
Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar Dwayne Harris Dwayne Harris Presented for Final Exam.
APPLICATIONS OF ENERGY CONCEPTS FOR FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF AIRPORT PAVEMENTS FAA Fatigue Project Briefing October 7th, 2004 Urbana, IL Samuel H. Carpenter,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 19 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 21 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Reflection Data Processing Step.
EMLAB 1 Examples of One ‐ Dimensional FDTD. EMLAB 2 Typical FDTD Grid Layout.
SASW – an in situ method for determining shear modulus
Physical Properties of Permafrost: The Impact of Ice in the Ground to Geophysical Surveys Brian Moorman Department of Geology and Geophysics and.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Seismic Methods Used To Check Strength of Concrete Runway Reconstruction Dean Rue, P.E. CH2M HILL 2010 FAA Airport Technology Transfer Conference Atlantic.
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
Ground Penetrating Radar Gonzalo Gallo CEE 498KM.
NS/V noise NS/H noise NS/H earthquakes The use of a very dense seismic array to characterize the Cavola, Northern Italy, active landslide body. By P. Bordoni.
INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY
3/26/08 Field Testing and Modelling of the Italian Smart Runway Instrumentations Silvia Portas Imad L. Al-Qadi Mauro Coni Hao Wang Jongeun Baek Italian.
Vibroacoustics Academics: Jen Muggleton, Emiliano Rustighi Researchers: Michal Kalkowski, Michele Iodice.
Harold L. Von Quintus, P.E., ARA Jagannath Mallela, ARA
Parameterising road construction in route-based road weather models: Can GPR provide the answer? Dr Lee Chapman & David Hammond School of Geography, Earth.
Feng Hong, PE, PhD, TxDOT Darhao Chen, PE, PhD, TxDOT September 16~19, 2013, RPUG Meeting, San Antonio, TX USE GROUND PENETRATING RADAR TECHNOLOGY TO EVALUATE.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
Investigation of Subsurface Magma Feeders Taryn Serwatowski Dr. Sven Morgan Department of Geology CMU.
1 Field validation of constructed sub-grade and pavement John S. Popovics Jeffery Roesler Marshall Thompson David Lange Yi-Shi Liu John Ramirez Department.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
M. Iorio 1, F. Fois 2, R. Mecozzi 1; R. Seu 1, E. Flamini 3 1 INFOCOM Dept., Università “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy, 2 Thales Alenia Space Italy, Rome,
GROUND PENETRATING RADAR
Asphalt Technology Course
Use of Ultrasonic Phased Arrays for Examination of Austenitic Steel Welds Santanu Saha Technical Manager, Non-Destructive Testing Intertek INSPEC.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
Presented to: REDAC By: Navneet Garg, Ph.D. Date: March 15, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration RPA P2: National Airport Pavement & Materials Research.
Quality Control/Quality Assurance of Asphalt Mixtures Using Surface Wave Methods Shibin Lin, PhD Student Jeramy Ashlock, Major Professor (PI) Christopher.
Evaluation of Cracking Resistance and Durability of 100% Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixtures Hesham Ali, PhD, PE. Mojtaba M. Afzali.
Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar
Surface Preparation before laying Hot Mix
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Update on the current APT Project in Texas
CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE INFORMATION
Creating a Conference Poster
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
Estimation of Subsurface Moisture Variation in Layered Sediments Using Ground Penetrating Radar By Matthew Charlton King’s College London Ground Penetrating.
Presentation transcript:

DELAMINATION DETECTION OF HMA AIRPORT PAVEMENTS WITH NDT DEVICES Manuel Celaya, MSCE, Soheil Nazarian, Ph.D., PE, Chetana Rao Ph.D., PE, and Harold Von Quintus, MSCE, PE The University of Texas at El Paso, Texas

Introduction Delamination in Hot Mix Asphalt Delamination in Airport Pavements NDT Methods for Delamination Detection Controlled Study NDT Results Conclusions and Recommendations

Delamination in Hot Mix Asphalt Bonding between pavement layers is essential. Poor bond usually manifests as slippage cracking. Poor bond may develop into delamination or debonding, reducing serviceability and performance. If delamination goes undetected, it can result in the peeling away of thin overlays from the surface. Slippage

Delamination in Airport Pavements Delamination is more severe on airfield pavements, due to higher traffic loads (aircrafts). Situation is critical where airplanes brake and turn, or on areas under large horizontal load (slippage) . May develop into foreign object debris (FOD), leading to runway closures. Slippage in Airports FOD in Airports

NDT Methods for Delamination Detection Ground-coupled Penetrating Radar (GPR) Impulse Response (IR)Portable Seismic Pavement Analyzer (PSPA) Thermography (Infrared Camera) Six other less successful alternatives

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Based on transmission of electromagnetic waves. Reflections of these waves at interfaces used to determine thickness/depth, and to determine some properties of material. Surface Reflection Asphalt Layering Ground-coupled (GPR) Typical GPR Scan

Portable Seismic Pavement Analyzer (PSPA) High-frequency pulses are generated by source and propagate through material Modulus of top layer is calculated without an inversion algorithm (USW Method). Dispersion Curve (variation of velocity /modulus vs. wavelength/depth) is obtained using signal processing. Sensor 2 Range Used for average Modulus Measured Source Sensor 1 Time Records Dispersion Curve

Impulse Response (IR) Time Records Frequency Response An impulsive load is applied to pavement surface with an instrumented hammer. Vertical deformation of pavement is measured with a geophone. Ratio between load cell and geophone amplitudes or the frequency responses using a Fast-Fourier Transform (FFT) is calculated. Time Records Frequency Response

Thermography: Infrared Camera Infrared Thermography measures temperature distributions across the surface of the pavement. Used to detect the presence of shallow subsurface flaws in HMA. Infrared Image

Controlled Study 11 Different Sections constructed. Two mixes: Fine (P-401) and Coarse (P-403) Three levels of bonding between HMA: bonded, partially-bonded and debonded. In addition, severe debonding was reproduced. Two depths of debonding: shallow (2.5 in.) and deep (5 in.). Different extents of delamination.

Typical Section Layout Controlled Study Selection of debonding agents based on laboratory tests (direct shear). Each Section was 10x9 ft. Delaminations of 4x9, 2x2, 1x1 and 0.5x0.5 ft were placed. Typical Section Layout Debonding Agents Used

Test Setup A grid of 5x5 points was selected for PSPA, IR and Infrared. 5 Lines were evaluated with GPR.

GPR Results Intact Severe Debonded

GPR Results GPR detected the severely debonded area within the transition zone and some debonded areas primarily on talcum powder or clay perhaps because of the significant contrasts in their dielectric constants and HMA. GPR may be most suitable when the debonding is in severe stages or when moisture is present along the interface.

PSPA Results Time Records Dispersion Curves Intact Severe Debonded

PSPA Results. Dispersion Curves Reductions in modulus can be observed in most sections below depths of prepared debonding. This demonstrates that the USW method might be able to identify delaminated areas reasonably well, especially the shallow ones.

PSPA Results. Overall Coarse Mix (P-403) Fine Mix (P-401) Average and standard deviation of control sections (1 and 6) used as reference

IR Results Time Records Frequency Response The ratio (load/displacement) of the maximum values of the FFT amplitudes (stiffness) used to compare the results

IR Results. Temperature Influence Coarse Mix (P-403) Fine Mix (P-401) Temperature at the time of testing affects the outcome of this method

IR Results. Overall Average and standard deviation of control sections (1 and 6) used as reference

Infrared Results Only severely debonded area within transition zone was clearly detected Passive source (sunlight) used to create the temperature differentials

Conclusions and Recommendations GPR (best for severe debonding with moisture) detected 33% of debonded areas, primarily on talcum powder or clay. Impulse Response (best for fully debonded, especially deep) detected 59% of debonded areas with majority of defects detected on fully-debonded areas (shallow and deep). Ultrasonic Surface Waves (best for shallow partial or full debonding) The USW method as implemented in the PSPA detected 53% of debonded areas. Thermography was not as successful as reported in the literature. FWD detected 46% of debonded areas, best during cold weather testing. The IR, FWD and USW methods require temperature adjustments. IR and FWD temperature adjustment is site dependent and should be considered in the field protocol.

Acknowledgments Monte Symons Rodney Joel Kathleen T. Hall Gary Harvey Luis Rodriquez PDX BOS The University of Texas at El Paso, Texas

Questions?