Alignment of Teacher Evaluation to the School Improvement Process Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Almost Former Director of the Office Of School Improvement Retiring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roosevelt Complex Improving Student Achievement. Complex Journey One Vision One Vision High School Graduate High School Graduate 6 GLOs.
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
What is your definition of descriptive feedback?
Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works Session 1.
A Guide to Implementation
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Provisions for Training and Professional Development 1 Florida Digital Instructional Materials Work Group November 13, 2012.
COSA Assessment Conference Mickey Garrison Tony Alpert Jon Wiens Beth LaDuca.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Applying Research to Increase Student Achievement Meredith Greene, Ph.D.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Evaluating the Alignment and Quality of the Taught Curriculum Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
Tier 1: Core, Instructional Interventions All Students, All Settings Preventive, proactive support (e.g. school-wide behavior support, high quality.
To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Click Send to Back.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Planning and Conducting Instruction
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
A Systematic Approach to Improving Instruction & Learning. Di Leonardo Sr. Director of Curriculum & Instruction Fresno County Office of Education
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Overview to Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook & Madeline Negron For Windham Public.
The Ugly Truth… Most school principals think they are “effective instructional leaders” but few really are.
What Does Great Teaching Look Like? Professional Learning Communities USD #443 Secondary Schools.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session Technical Assistance.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
© 2005 McREL.  Know generalizations from research and recommended classroom practices related to the nine categories of instructional strategies.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session 4 Technical Assistance.
Formative assessment and effective feedback at Manor Lakes College
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
Welcome and Introductions. Two Year Time-Line for District Year One- Introduce All Nine Strategies & Buildings Will Design Implementation Process Marzano.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Sara Hagen August 31,  Summer Institute Observation - August  Interview teachers – September & November  Survey to sample of teachers - December.
Cutting-edge research concrete strategies sustainable success Formative Assessment & Standards-Based Grading Robert J. Marzano.
Descriptive and Corrective Feedback Miami Jackson Senior High December 12, 2011.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Impact of Instructional Strategies
Marzano’s Essential 9 Instructional Strategies Engaged Time = Student Gains.
Connecting Classroom Walkthrough to High Yield Strategies
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Documenting Objective Evidence & Providing Effective Feedback Stronge Teacher Performance Evaluation System ©Stronge, 2014 All Rights Reserved.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Curriculum and Instruction
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presented by: Amanda M. White, MA, MBA WS/FCS Behavior Support Team
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Alignment of Teacher Evaluation to the School Improvement Process Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Almost Former Director of the Office Of School Improvement Retiring July 31, 2014

Introduction How were the academic reviews different this year? What were the findings of the academic reviews held throughout the state last year? How can the findings of the academic review be used to implement action steps? What are the barriers to implementing these steps? What will happen if the steps are not implemented?

How were the academic reviews different? Focus was on the alignment of the written, taught and tested curricula. Reviews were not on site at each school but held at the division with core division teams selected by the division. Examined and evaluated, against a set of rubrics designed by Stronge and Associates, a core collection of documents from the division’s schools accredited with warning (lesson plans, completed observation forms, observation schedules, curricula guides, unit tests). Why not benchmark tests?

How many divisions received an academic review? 97 divisions 403 schools Including divisions with focus schools not accredited with warning or other schools accredited with warning Cost = $790,000 Related Web Links: ovement/academic_reviews/index.shtml ovement/academic_reviews/index.shtml

What “dipstick” was used to gauge that the collection was sufficient enough to draw conclusions throughout the state? Unfortunately, we did not keep track of how many documents were reviewed or how many of each type of documents were collected. We usually finish academic reviews in two to three days, these took at least a week and in some divisions two weeks. We usually finish academic reviews by December, we didn’t finish until March. Generally, the cost is about $580,000.

What were the overall findings? Teachers were teaching. Students were learning. Unit tests sampled were frequently not aligned to the new standards. What does this mean?

What were the overall findings? There were plenty of summative assessments – benchmark tests. Lessons lacked true classroom day to day formative assessment. What does this mean?

What were the overall findings? There was evidence that principals spent time in classrooms completing observations. There was limited evidence on the observation forms reviewed that feedback from principals provided to teachers would clearly enable the teachers’ understanding of how to change practice. What does this mean?

What were the overall findings? Professional development was provided. Monitoring of new professional development skills was not evident. What does this mean?

What were the overall findings? Lesson plans were reviewed by the principal. When the team reviewed the lesson plans, there was little alignment to the new standards. What does this mean?

This is the $1,000,000 question How do we impact the planning and delivery of instruction so that what teachers teach and students learn is aligned to the new standards?

Focus on the first five teaching standards. Align school improvement activities to teacher evaluation. 1. Professional Knowledge 2. Instructional Planning 3. Instructional Delivery 4. Assessment of and for Student Learning 5. Learning Environment

Strategies & Average Effect Sizes on Achievement* Strategies Percentile Gain Identifying similarities and differences45 Summarizing and note taking34 Reinforcing effort and providing recognition29 Homework and practice28 Nonlinguistic representations27 Cooperative learning27 Setting objectives and providing feedback23 Generating and testing hypothesis23 Questions, cues, and advance organizers22 Building vocabulary20 Interactive games20 Student discussion/chunking17 *Haystead, M. W. & Marzano, R. J. (2009). Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Studies Conducted at Marzano Research Laboratory on Instructional Strategies

*Hattie, J (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Strategies & Average Percentile Gain on Achievement* Strategies Percentile Gain Feedback to Students37 Instructional Quality34 Instructional Quantity30 Direct Instruction29 Graded homework29 Acceleration27 Remediation/feedback24 Personalized instruction21 Challenge of goals20 Peer Tutoring19 Mastery Learning19 Questioning16 Advance Organizers14 Simulation and games13 Computer-assisted instruction12 Instructional media12

The Power of Formative Assessment “…the most powerful single influence enhancing achievement is feedback.” Feedback from teachers to students (e.g., specific feedback on strengths and areas for improvement) Feedback from students to teachers (e.g., what they know and do not know, effectiveness of strategies) *Hattie, J (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement.

Basic Component: Assessment (Lesson Observation)

Why is Lesson Observation by the Principal Important? “…[T]he purpose of supervision should be the enhancement of teachers’ pedagogical skills, with the ultimate goal of enhancing student achievement.”

Teacher evaluation is not an end in itself, but a means to an end — TEACHER IMPROVEMENT. Davis, D. R., Ellett, C. D., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), p Why Evaluation Only Is Not Enough

Making Permanent Changes: The Importance of Leadership Explicit Training and Expectations on Needed Skills Explicit, Sustained Emphasis and Monitoring of New Skills Change in Practice This Same Results as Last Year

Focus of Evidence STANDARDS & INDICATORS Teacher Practice Student Learning (Evidence is the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.)

Main Areas for Evidence Collection during Observations Standard 1: Professional Knowledge Standard 3: Instructional Delivery Standard 4: Assessment of and for Learning Standard 5: Learning Environment Strong Evidence

Documenting Evidence Tips Avoid terms that express judgment (“neat classroom,” “fun activity,” “caring attitude”) Avoid words that imply, but do not specify, quantity (“most,” “few,” “several”) Stick to the five senses Remember Who, What, When, Where, How

How can this evidence for Instructional Delivery be improved? 3.3Differentiates instruction to meet students’ needs. Spent the majority of the time on whole class instruction for math though several of the students demonstrated proficiency on the long division process in the first few minutes of class.

How can this evidence for Learning Environment be improved? 5.1Arranges the classroom to maximize learning while providing a safe environment. Classroom neatly arranged so students can work in small groups.

School Leadership Basic Components Evaluation Tool

Division/School Professional Development Evaluation Tool

Student Behavior vs Teacher Behavior Spend more time providing evidence of what kids are doing and what kids are learning and less time explaining what the teacher is doing

Periodically Collect Evidence of How and Why a Lesson was Planned Where is the alignment to the most rigorous part of the standard? What teaching strategies did you select and why? Why these resources? How will you know if a student mastered the objective? Standard 1 Standard 2: Planning the Lesson Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5

Barriers to Improvement The biggest barriers to improvement are not using the right words to influence change; not evaluating often enough; and, not collecting strong, reliable, and explicit evidence. What happens if I tell you that you work hard? Would it cause you to provide feedback to students more often? What if you only provide me with feedback three times during the year? Would I begin using high- yield teaching strategies? What if you check my lesson plans as “being in on time each week?” Would my lesson plans target more rigorous content? What if you tell me I did a great job of explicitly modeling how to solve a problem, but the students failed the SOL assessment questions with similar problems?

What will happen if the barriers aren’t overcome?

Questions Dr. Kathleen M. Smith, Retired August 1 Office of School Improvement (804)