SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Advertisements

Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
March 13, 2013 Day-Ahead Market (DAM) Clearing Process follow-up from February WMS Matt Mereness, ERCOT Manager DAM & CRR.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Real-Time Transmission Congestion Management & Market Effects
John Dumas Director of Wholesale Market Operations ERCOT Operating Reserve Demand Curve.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
IMO Market Evolution Program Drew Phillips Market Evolution Program
March 30, 2015 SCED Event Follow up: Proposed Improvements QMWG, May 08, 2015.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
1 Ancillary Services Requirements for Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis FAS/SIRS Meeting September 21, 2015.
August 17, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting Updated Analysis of Non-Spin Deployments and RUC John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
SCED Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Linear vs. Quadratic Programming Model.
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
April 28, 2008 Constraint Competitiveness Tests, an Overview Congestion Management Working Group.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Slack Bus Change and Impact to Market Market Analysis, ERCOT QMWG Sep. 4, 2015.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
Ramping and Demand Shifting: A Case Study Tim Mount Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Demand Response.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
July 10, 2008 ROS Early Delivery Systems Status – R6.3 2 Hour Test John Dumas and Jeff Gilbertson.
GTBD Forecasting Using SCED to Produce Projections of Future LMPs Floyd J. Trefny February 17, 2011.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
ERCOT Public 1 Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services Co-ordination of Power Balance Penalty Curve, VOLL, SWOC for AS Demand Curves.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
WMS Meeting, October 10, RCWG Continuing Efforts  NPRR 747 Price Correction No consensus on this issue  RCWG needs additional guidance on the.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
Analysis of August 13, 2015: ORDC, RRS & PRC Changes Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) November 13, 2015.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS October 8, 2013.
RDTF June 1, Purpose “The effect of the Shadow Price cap for the Power Balance Constraint is to limit the cost calculated by the SCED optimization.
NPRR 520 Resmi Surendran ERCOT. Current CCT Process Annual CCT (ACCT) is run every year to feed the results to Monthly CCT (MCCT) MCCT is run every month.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt.
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Updates SAWG Sean Chang Market Analysis February 22, 2016 ERCOT Public Version
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Valley Import Constraint Resmi Surendran. Valley Import Constraint Range of SFs – to in valley area – 0.03 to outside valley area Not.
Non-Spin Deployment Resmi Surendran. RUC Awarded Ancillary Service Bring Resources On-Line if awarding REG or RRS When awarding Non-Spin – First award.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
NPRR784 Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units Protocol Revision Subcommittee June 16,
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Hourly Offers Schedule Update Examples
Wind Management at MISO
NPRR833 Workshop: Contingency Processing in CRR, DAM and SCED
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
LMP calculations Congestion evaluation
Reserve Products Interaction
Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher
Presentation transcript:

SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve Resmi Surendran

Objective Explain the Power Balance Penalty Curve Discuss the values for the Power Balance Penalty Curve MW break points Penalty for violation up to the MW break point Not to discuss the optimal mechanism for setting scarcity pricing.

Power Balance Penalty System Lambda is the change in the objective value obtained by relaxing the Power Balance constraint by 1MW Power Balance Penalty is the maximum cost paid for one addition/less MW of generation to meet the Power Balance constraint.

SCED Constraints Power Balance Constraint Transmission constraint sum (Base Point) + under gen slack – over gen slack = Generation to be dispatched Transmission constraint sum( Shift Factor * Base Point) – violation slack ≤ limit Ramp Limit constraint LDL ≤ Base Point ≤ HDL

SCED Objective Minimize + Cost of dispatching generation integral (offer cost * MW dispatched) + Penalty for violating Power Balance constraint sum (Penalty cost * violation amount) + Penalty for violating transmission constraint

PB Violation with no Transmission Constraints Only constraints active will be System demand & ramp Given enough SURAMP, PB will not be violated as long as the aggregated offer curve required to meet demand is less than PB penalty If PB Penalty is lower than SWCAP then PB will be violated in SCED1 before dispatching Resources on Output Schedule

PB Violation with Transmission Constraints Gen with +ive SF SF * TC_Penalty + Offer cost PB_penatly If (a) > (b) - moved down for resolving constraints If (a) < (b) - moved up for meeting Power Balance Example Violated TC penalty $3500; 0.2 SF; $100 0ffer cost ; $500 PB penalty 1 MW reduction in generation will reduce TC violation by 0.2 MW will reduce objective by 0.2 * 3500 due to reduction in TC violation and $100 by not providing 1MW energy violate PB by 1 MW Will increase objective by 1* $500 During scarcity if a transmission constraint is violated then transmission constraint and Power Balance constraint will interact with each other to determine whether to move up or move down a resource with +ive SF to the violated constraints if there are no other resources available.

Power Balance Penalty Curve - Implementation 10 segment step curve MW break points Sets amount violated for a given price Penalty for violation up to the MW break point Sets system lambda for a given amount of violation

Factors affecting Power Balance Violation Ramp limited scenarios Operational Philosophies Extend of ramp being reserved for regulation Amount of capacity on Output Schedule Telemetry errors Capacity Scarcity

Current Power Balance Penalty Curve Values Over Generation Penalty ($/MWh) -3,001 -5,000 MW Cap Segment (MW) 10,000 100,000 Under Generation Penalty ($/MWh) 3,001 5,000 MW Floor Segment (MW) equivalent to having extra capacity for meeting power balance violation at (+/-) 3001 $/MWh for violated MW from 0MW to 9999.999MW, and (+/-) 5000$/MWh for violated MW from 10000MW to 99999.999MW

Proposed Power Balance Penalty Curve MW Price 1 200 5 250 10 300 20 400 30 500 40 1000 50 2250  100000  3001

Factors Considered Extend of regulation that can be sacrificed Operational philosophies System Wide Offer Cap - $3000 Interaction with transmission constraints Interaction with proxy offer curves Market Trials and close loop test results

Future Areas of Improvement for Better Scarcity Pricing Prices not reflective of scarcity during UFR Load Resource deployment Reduction in prices due to Output Schedule adjustments during Non-Spin deployment from Resources on Output Schedule Dependence on MP submitted EOC to set scarcity pricing during Non-Spin and RRS deployment

Appendix

SCED Objective Min { Cost of generation dispatch + Sum ( Max Shadow Price * Slack variable)} Generation dispatch cost + Power Balance Penalty Curve value Slack Variable Slack Variable + Slack Variable Max Shadow Price

SCED constraints Power Balance Constraints: Transmission Network Constraints: Resource Constraints: Ramp Rate Constraints (HDL, LDL):

Offer Mitigation for SCED2 (1)Cap the Energy Offer Curves at the greater of the Reference LMP at the Resource Node or the Mitigated Offer Cap curve (2) Bound it at the lesser of the Reference LMP at the Resource Node or the Mitigated Offer Floor.

Proxy Offer Curve for Output Schedule

Resource moved down for congestion LMP during Congestion Resource moved down for congestion

Resource moved up for congestion LMP during Congestion Resource moved up for congestion

Transmission Constraints Penalty Current Values Maximum Shadow Price for Transmission Constraints Base Case:  $5,000/MW Generic constraints :  $5,000/MW Post Contingency 345 kV:  $4,500/MW 138 kV:  $3,500/MW 69 kV:  $2,800/MW