OR-1 20151 Simplex method (algebraic interpretation) Add slack variables( 여유변수 ) to each constraint to convert them to equations. (We may refer it as.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operation Research Chapter 3 Simplex Method.
Advertisements

Chapter 6 Linear Programming: The Simplex Method
The Simplex Method The geometric method of solving linear programming problems presented before. The graphical method is useful only for problems involving.
Dr. Sana’a Wafa Al-Sayegh
Copyright (c) 2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Computational Methods for Management and Economics Carla Gomes Module 6a Introduction to Simplex (Textbook – Hillier and Lieberman)
Linear Inequalities and Linear Programming Chapter 5
Computational Methods for Management and Economics Carla Gomes Module 6b Simplex Pitfalls (Textbook – Hillier and Lieberman)
The Simplex Method: Standard Maximization Problems
Operation Research Chapter 3 Simplex Method.
Solving Linear Programs: The Simplex Method
5.6 Maximization and Minimization with Mixed Problem Constraints
D Nagesh Kumar, IIScOptimization Methods: M3L1 1 Linear Programming Preliminaries.
MIT and James Orlin © Chapter 3. The simplex algorithm Putting Linear Programs into standard form Introduction to Simplex Algorithm.
1 1.1 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Linear Equations in Linear Algebra SYSTEMS OF LINEAR EQUATIONS.
LINEAR PROGRAMMING SIMPLEX METHOD.
Learning Objectives for Section 6.2
Chapter 3 Linear Programming Methods 高等作業研究 高等作業研究 ( 一 ) Chapter 3 Linear Programming Methods (II)
1. The Simplex Method.
Chapter 6 Linear Programming: The Simplex Method
The Two-Phase Simplex Method LI Xiao-lei. Preview When a basic feasible solution is not readily available, the two-phase simplex method may be used as.
8. Linear Programming (Simplex Method) Objectives: 1.Simplex Method- Standard Maximum problem 2. (i) Greedy Rule (ii) Ratio Test (iii) Pivot Operation.
Simplex method (algebraic interpretation)
Simplex Algorithm.Big M Method
Chapter 6 Linear Programming: The Simplex Method Section 2 The Simplex Method: Maximization with Problem Constraints of the Form ≤
Chapter 3. Pitfalls Initialization Ambiguity in an iteration
Topic III The Simplex Method Setting up the Method Tabular Form Chapter(s): 4.
Barnett/Ziegler/Byleen Finite Mathematics 11e1 Learning Objectives for Section 6.4 The student will be able to set up and solve linear programming problems.
Pareto Linear Programming The Problem: P-opt Cx s.t Ax ≤ b x ≥ 0 where C is a kxn matrix so that Cx = (c (1) x, c (2) x,..., c (k) x) where c.
Chapter 6 Linear Programming: The Simplex Method Section R Review.
Solving Linear Programming Problems: The Simplex Method
OR Perturbation Method (tableau form) (after two iterations, optimal solution obtained) (0+2  1 ) (0+2  2 ) (1+  3 )
OR Chapter 2. Simplex method (2,0) (2,2/3) (1,2)(0,2)
4  The Simplex Method: Standard Maximization Problems  The Simplex Method: Standard Minimization Problems  The Simplex Method: Nonstandard Problems.
Chapter 4 Linear Programming: The Simplex Method
Chapter 6 Linear Programming: The Simplex Method Section 4 Maximization and Minimization with Problem Constraints.
OR Chapter 8. General LP Problems Converting other forms to general LP problem : min c’x  - max (-c)’x   = by adding a nonnegative slack variable.
University of Colorado at Boulder Yicheng Wang, Phone: , Optimization Techniques for Civil and Environmental Engineering.
OR Simplex method (algebraic interpretation) Add slack variables( 여유변수 ) to each constraint to convert them to equations. (We may refer it as.
OR Chapter 7. The Revised Simplex Method  Recall Theorem 3.1, same basis  same dictionary Entire dictionary can be constructed as long as we.
An-Najah N. University Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology Department of Management Information systems Operations Research and Applications.
(i) Preliminaries D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M3L1 Linear Programming and Applications.
Business Mathematics MTH-367 Lecture 16. Chapter 11 The Simplex and Computer Solutions Methods continued.
 LP graphical solution is always associated with a corner point of the solution space.  The transition from the geometric corner point solution to the.
Linear Programming: Formulations, Geometry and Simplex Method Yi Zhang January 21 th, 2010.
OR  Now, we look for other basic feasible solutions which gives better objective values than the current solution. Such solutions can be examined.
Copyright © 2006 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Linear Programming: An Algebraic Approach 4 The Simplex Method with Standard Maximization.
Business Mathematics MTH-367 Lecture 14. Last Lecture Summary: Finished Sec and Sec.10.3 Alternative Optimal Solutions No Feasible Solution and.
Chapter 4 The Simplex Algorithm and Goal Programming
The Simplex Method. and Maximize Subject to From a geometric viewpoint : CPF solutions (Corner-Point Feasible) : Corner-point infeasible solutions 0.
EMGT 6412/MATH 6665 Mathematical Programming Spring 2016
Solving Linear Program by Simplex Method The Concept
Simplex Algorithm.Big M Method
Chap 10. Sensitivity Analysis
Perturbation method, lexicographic method
The Two-Phase Simplex Method
Chap 9. General LP problems: Duality and Infeasibility
Chapter 5. Sensitivity Analysis
Solving Linear Programming Problems: Asst. Prof. Dr. Nergiz Kasımbeyli
Well, just how many basic
Chapter 8. General LP Problems
Chapter 5. The Duality Theorem
Chapter 8. General LP Problems
Chapter 2. Simplex method
Simplex method (algebraic interpretation)
Chapter 8. General LP Problems
Chapter 2. Simplex method
Chapter 3. Pitfalls Initialization Ambiguity in an iteration
Presentation transcript:

OR Simplex method (algebraic interpretation) Add slack variables( 여유변수 ) to each constraint to convert them to equations. (We may refer it as an augmented LP) (1) (2)

OR   Every feasible solution of (1) can be extended, in the unique way as given above, into a feasible solution of (2). Every feasible solution of (2) can be restricted, by deleting slack variables, into a feasible solution of (1). The correspondence between feasible solutions of (1) and (2) carries optimal solutions of (1) onto optimal solutions of (2), and vice versa. So solve (2) instead of (1) and disregard the values of slack variables to obtain an optimal solution to the original problem.

OR

4  Next let Then find solution to the following system which maximizes z (tableau form) In the text, dictionary form is used, i.e. each dependent variable (including z) (called basic variable) is expressed as linear combinations of indep. var. (called nonbasic variable). (Note that, unlike the text, we place the objective function at the top. Such presentation style is used more widely and we follow that convention) (zeroth equation) (first equation) (second equation) (third equation) (nonnegativity constraints)

OR  From previous lectures, we know that if the polyhedron P has at least one extreme point and the LP over P has a finite optimal value, the LP has an extreme point optimal solution. Also an extreme point of P for our problem is a basic feasible solution algebraically. We obtain a basic solution by setting x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = 0 and finding the values of x 4, x 5, and x 6, which can be read directly from the dictionary. (also z values can be read.) If all values of x 4, x 5, and x 6 are nonnegative, we obtain a basic feasible solution.

OR  Now, we look for another basic feasible solution (extreme point of the polyhedron) which gives a better objective value than the current solution. Such solution can be examined by setting 7 – 4 = 3 variables at 0 (called nonbasic variables) and solve the equations for the remaining 4 variables (called basic variables). Here z may be regarded as a basic variable and it remains basic at any time during the simplex iterations.

OR

8 (continued) x 1  (5/2) most binding (called minimum ratio test), get new solution x 1 = (5/2), x 2, x 3 = 0, x 4 = 0, x 5 = 1, x 6 = (1/2), z = 25/2 This is a new basic feasible solution since x 4 now can be treated as a nonbasic variable (has value 0) and x 1 is basic. (We need a little bit of caution here in saying that the new solution is a basic feasible solution since we must be able to obtain it by setting x 2, x 3, and x 4 at 0 and obtain a unique solution after solving the remaining system of equations)

OR  Change the dictionary so that the new solution can be directly read off x 1 : 0  (5/2), x 4 : 5  0 So change the role of x 1 and x 4. x 4 becomes independent (nonbasic) variable and x 1 becomes dependent (basic) variable. Why could we find a basic feasible solution easily? 1) all independent(nonbasic) variables appear at the right of equality (have value 0) 2) each dependent (basic) variable appears in only one equation 3) each equation has exactly one basic variable appearing ( z variable may be interpreted as a basic variable, but usually it can be treated separately since it always remains basic and it is irrelevant to the description of the feasible solutions) So change the dictionary so that it satisfies the above properties.

OR

OR 

OR Equivalent to performing row operations

OR

OR

OR

OR  Moving directions in R n in the example x 1 = (5/2), x 2, x 3 = 0, x 4 = 0, x 5 = 1, x 6 = (1/2), z = 25/2

OR Geometric meaning of an iteration  Notation x1x1 x3x3 x2x2 x 1 =0 x 2 =0 x 3 =0

OR  Our example : assume x 2 does not exist. It makes the polyhedron 2 dimensional since we have 5 variables and 3 equations (except nonnegativity and objective row) x 1 =0 x 4 =0 x 3 =0 x 6 =0 d A B

OR Terminology

OR

OR

OR Remarks

OR Obtaining all optimal solutions

OR  Another example

OR Tableau format 

OR  Tableau format only maintains coefficients in the equations. It is convenient to carry out simplex iterations in the tableau by performing elementary row operations.