Charlotte Y. Alverson, Ed. S. Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008 Blueprint for Success: Helpful Hints for Writing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.
Advertisements

What is Indicator 14 and why is it important?
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco,
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Part B Indicators 1 & 2 Graduation and Dropout Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San Francisco, California.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound check.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Welcome!! Aligning Current Practices with Predictors of Post-School Success: Helping Teachers Plan for Action With Project Skills Presented By: Melissa.
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
Are your C4 data reflective of the families you serve? Joy Markowitz, Director Jean Dauphinee, TA Specialist Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference,
OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.
11th Annual NDE Transition Conference
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
1 Oregon Post School Data Collection Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education (ODE) Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute (TRI)
Clarification Week…. How’s it going? Do you need anything from us?
Got Data! Now What? Charlotte Y. Alverson April 14, 2011.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Indicator 13 Highlights “a coordinated set of activities for a child with a disability that is designed within a result-oriented process, that is focused.
Center for Change in Transition Services Improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities in Washington State Cinda Johnson Sue Ann Bube.
Working with Your RRC to Improve Secondary Transition Education Presented by: Lucy Ely Pagán, NERRC and Jeanna Mullins, MSRRC.
CCTS 1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound.
Do We Have all the Workers? Strategies for Gaining Representativeness Loujeania W. Bost, Ph.D. NDPC-SD & Deanne Unruh, Ph.D. NPSO State Planning Institute.
Everyone Counts, Everyone In: Essentials for Participation in the 2015 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Requirements, Data Collection, and Results Spring.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
( ':~
Practical suggestions to increase the response rate when gathering post-school outcomes data. OSEP Approved January 2007 On the web at:
Collecting Post-school Data Webinar #2 November 18, 2009 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko,
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
1 Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008 Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute.
July 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report Indicators 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14 July 2009.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
A Transition Vision for Louisiana: Clues in the Postschool Outcome Data Dr. Lynda Price -Temple University Dr. Paul Bole -University of New Orleans Dr.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
1.  Mapping Terms  Security Documentation  Predictor Table  Data Discussion Worksheet 2.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Pennsylvania Post School Outcome Survey (PaPOS) Utilizing the Data Results for Longitudinal Planning.
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8 Transition Services.
1 State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator # Measurement 1Graduation 2Dropout 3Statewide Assessments 4Suspension and Expulsion 5Least Restrictive Environment.
1)Type your name, address, and zip code (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS will conduct a.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
North Carolina Post-School Outcomes (Indicator 14) January 14, 2016 David W. Test, UNC Charlotte.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Indicator 14 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Report
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
October REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESCHOOL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data
Transition Resources for Youth
Trend Data Guest Speakers: Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE
Al Daviso, Ph.D. The University of Akron
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Wisconsin Transition Improvement Grant (TIG) Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Tools to Improve the Postsecondary education and employment outcomes.
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Frequently Asked Questions (Revisions indicated in red font)
Utilizing Indicator 14 data and Evidence Based Resources 2017
Post-School Outcome Data Review
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up
CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Charlotte Y. Alverson, Ed. S. Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008 Blueprint for Success: Helpful Hints for Writing the SPP/APR

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 2 Session Purpose To share tips for ensuring you have the information need to successfully organize and complete the SPP for Indicator 14.

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 3 Helpful Hints for SPP Submission Primary Sources: Instructions Measurement Table Secondary Sources: Teleconferences Conversations Experiences

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 4 Part B - SPP/APR Requirements for Indicator #14 Percent of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or both, within one year of leaving high school. (20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B))

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 5 NPSO Charge...to assist State Education Agencies to develop practical, yet rigorous data collection systems so that the SEA can describe the further education and competitive employment experiences of youth with disabilities as they transition from high school to adult life.

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 6 Data Collection System Data collection Reporting Use

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 7 Common stumbling blocks Definitions Representativeness Calculations

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 8 Definitions Competitive employment –VR, –includes military Post-secondary education –type of school or program –whether enrollment is full- or part- time –defining full- and part-time

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 9 Definitions Census = all leavers from the state Define the sample: –Who are the leavers in the sample? graduates, age outs, dropouts, etc. –Is the sample representative of the school leavers disability, race/ethnicity, age, gender, exit status

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 10 Writing suggestions Avoid assume-icide –Don’t assume others (i.e., OSEP, external reviewers) know what you mean –include definitions Provide meaningful details –50,000 ADM –data collection between April – Sept.

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 11 Representativeness 1. If sampling, need to select a representative sample from the target leaver group –disability category - age –race/ethnicity- gender 2. For both sampling and census, need to determine whether the respondents are representative of the target leaver group

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 12 Selection Bias Systematic difference in characteristics between those who are selected for study and those who are not. Occurs when selecting who will and will not be in the data collection efforts: –exiters- age outs, dropouts, –disability categories –time, day or method of contact

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 13 Response Rate No set minimum or ideal response rate Not primary concern Describe how representative the respondents are to the target leaver group

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 14 Writing Suggestions Describe the similarities and differences between the respondents and total leaver group Define the denominator –eligible for the survey –ineligible for the survey

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 15 Missing Data Occurs when data are not collected –geographic segments of the state do not return data (could also be selection bias) –the right questions were not asked –interviewers miskey information –questions are skipped

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 16 Writing Suggestions Look at missing data –who did not respond? –what questions were not answered Talk about what you do not know as a result of missing data Describe what precautions readers of the SPP should be aware of

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 17 Calculations Measurement – I-14 Response rate -

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 18 PSO Measurement: Percent = [(the number of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or both, within one year of leaving high school) divided by the (# of youth assessed who had IEPs and are no longer in secondary school)] x 100.

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 19 Calculation Calculating 1 number- –employed only –enrolled in school or training only –both working AND in school Results in an unduplicated count

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 20 PSO Measurement: % = competitively employed only + enrolled in postsecondary school + both (working and enrolled in school) # of respondents to the survey or interviews OSEP requires that States provide actual numbers used to calculate this percent.

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 21 Response Rate (RR) Ratio of number of completed surveys : total number of surveys intended to be completed (target leaver group) RR = completed surveys ÷ (total number of surveys intended to be completed – ineligible) (ineligible b/c returned to school) RR = completed surveys ÷ (completed surveys + contacted & refused +no contact)

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 22 Writing suggestions Writing team –person/s responsible for data collection is different from the person/s writing the SPP –Share resources with others on the writing team Describe what was done –who, what, when, how, who collected data

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 23 Writing suggestions Acknowledge problems –if you discover, in October, that you were missing accurate exit information for 50% of your leavers– acknowledge it and describe what you will do differently next year (Improvement Activities) Describe what you don’t know and what you’re going to do differently Write for the audience who doesn’t know about SPPs & APRs

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 24 Improvement Activities OSEP –how will State improve performance for Indicator 1-14 Two Primary areas: –improving data collection system –improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 25 Writing suggestions Use the NPSO resources: –Helpful Hints –Sampling and Response Calculators –Community of Practice teleconferences –Post-School Outcomes: Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias, Roberta Garrison-Mogren, Westat –Call with questions

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 26 Helpful Hints for SPP Submission Primary Sources: Instructions Measurement Table Secondary Sources: Teleconferences Conversations Experiences

May 8, 2008Blueprint for SuccessPage 27 Contact Information Director: Mike Bullis OSEP Project Officer: Selete Avoke Coordinator: Jane Falls