AUDITING COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN SLOVENIA Nataša Prah Ljubljana, 20.11.2014 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden First level controls - Certification of Expenditure INTERREG IIIC.
Advertisements

EN Regional Policy - Finance & Budget EUROPEAN COMMISSION Annual Meeting with managing authorities of crossborder programmes Brussels - 25 Octobre 2011.
CLEARANCE OF ACCOUNTS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES RICHARD CROFT.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________ Workshop.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY for the 2007 – 2013 programming period
2 Slovenia Signed Contract of Confidence for the period Compliance assessment for one programme for the new period Experience of a Certifying.
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Financial aspects of closure European Commission Felix LOZANO, DG Agriculture and Rural Development.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 FOURTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
“Train the trainers” seminar
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
1 Managing Authority Conducting a self assessment 10 June 2008 A. Badrichani – DG Regional Policy – Audit Unit J3.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
European Union Cohesion Policy
Financial Institute for Regional Development, PI Understanding the roles and functions of Certifying and Audit Authorities in European Territorial Cooperation.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Annual Examination Meeting Audit Authority 13 September 2011.
Single Audit Strategy LATVIA. Audit System The Audit Authority functions are carried out by the Internal Audit Department of the Ministry of.
MEETING WITH 28 th April 2011 Portuguese Certifying Authority ERFD and CF.
Financial Management and Auditing First Level Controls 3 rd round operations Rostock, Elise Oukka.
Large Scale Projects Aleksejs Šaforostovs LSP Project Manager Joint Technical Secretariat.
ESPON 2013 Programme 3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010.
Audit of Public Procurement
Risk analysis (UVER) Luigi Guerci. Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) The organisational principles at the foundation of the management and control.
Financial management Management and control systems Training for Programme Operators March 2012.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 System evaluation and sampling – first.
Financial management and control
Croatian Experience with Management of EU Funds Nataša Mikuš, Deputy State Secretary Central Office for Development Strategy and Coordination of EU Funds.
SANEDI. INDEX  KEY ACTIVITIES DURING FINANCIAL YEAR  DISCUSSIONS ON KEY ACTIVITIES  CONCLUSION  APPRECIATION.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Audit of the Cohesion Fund Lena.
Fulfillment of conditions and contracting Līga Kalvāne Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 15 October 2009, Siauliai.
Regional Policy Management and control systems Draft Delegated Act Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 TWENTY-FOURTH.
Regional Policy Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT.
29 March 2011 Audit Authority Audit Department Ministry of Finance 1.
Closure of the Programming Period ESF TWG Luxemburg 2 nd December 2015.
24 March 2011 Management and control system 1. Contents 1.Changes in the management and control system in The progress of the control/audit activities.
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.
1 Fraud indicators for ERDF, ESF and CF Leif HÖGNÄS, DG Regional Policy “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
Financial Implementation of the Assistance from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund of the EU Sylvia Indjova Head of Certifying Authority Director.
Residual Risk Rate: Concept and implications for the AA and the Commission at closure Carmine Mollica DG Regional and Urban Policy – Unit C1.
Improve 1st level control for greater efficiency of Structural Funds José Santos Soeiro President Financial Institute for Regional Development.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
AUDITING PUBLIC TENDERS
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
  EXPERIENCE OF SLOVENIAN AUDIT AUTHORITY WITH FRAUD SUSPICON CASES Nataša Prah Prague, 3. November 2016.
Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification
Role & Responsibilities
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
the Public Procurement Audit Practical Guide
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Commission Regulation (EC)
ESF Training Seminar Reinforced role for the Audit Authority
Presentation transcript:

AUDITING COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN SLOVENIA Nataša Prah Ljubljana, 

1.Audit Authority 2.Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds 3.Frequent findings 2 INTRODUCTION

3 Audit Authority

Basis:  Legal framework (EC Regulations, National Regulations)  Guidelines EC (methodology, content of report, financial corrections,…)  Audit Strategy for the whole period and its confirmation by EC Work of AA:  System Audits  Audits of operations Results of AA work:  Audit Opinion, accompanied by  Annual Control Report 4 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

System Audits:  Selection of the bodies who will be the subject of system audit review, on the basis of risk assessment  Evaluation of audited bodies for each financial year, using the methodology with key requirements 5 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

Key requirements (MA/IB): 1.Clear definition, allocation and separation of functions between and within the managing authority / intermediate body/ies 2.Adequate procedures for the selection of operations 3.Adequate information and strategy to provide guidance to beneficiaries 4.Adequate management verifications 5.Adequate audit trail 6.Reliable accounting, monitoring and financial reporting systems in computerized form 7.Necessary preventive and corrective action where systemic errors are detected by the audit 6 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

Key requirements for CA: 1.Clear definition, allocation and separation of functions between and within the certifying authority / intermediate body/ies 2.Adequate audit trail and computerized system 3.Adequate arrangements for the certification of expenditure to be reliable and soundly based 4.Satisfactory arrangements for keeping an account of amounts recoverable and for recovery of undue payments 7 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

System audits results:  Brief report on the system audit performed (no opinion): draft report, replay of the auditee, final report,  Findings and recommendations,  Evaluation of the system as a whole and definition of the assurance gained from the system influencing the sample size. 8 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

Audits of operations:  Statistical sampling,  Selection of the operations (cca 70 to 80 per financial year),  Performing audits of operations. 9 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

Audit of operation (areas covered): 1.Selection of the operation; 2.Operation performance; 3.Eligibility of expenditures; 4.Public Procurement; 5.Audit trail and keeping the documents; 6.Irregularities and reimbursements; 7.Information and publicity rules; 8.Compliance with the Community policies. 10 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

Audits of operations results:  Brief report of each audit of operation (no opinion) :  Draft report,  Auditee reply,  Final report.  Possible findings on irregular expenditure. 11 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

Audit opinion and Annual Control Report:  Summary of findings from system audits and audits of operations,  Error evaluation in accordance with the sampling method,  Comparison of the Most likely error with the materiality (tolerable error),  Expressing an audit opinion, taking into account overall conclusions  Submitting an opinion and ACR to EC till N+1 for the year N,  Acceptance and confirmation of the ACR by EC. 12 Auditing Cohesion and Structural Funds

Audits of operations: 1.Fraud suspicions 2.Public Procurement irregularities 3.Irregularities related to selection of operation 4.Irregularities related to performance 5.Ineligible expenditure 6.Insufficient audit trail 7.Incompliance with information and publicity rules 8.Incompliance with Community policies 13 Frequent findings

 Fraud suspicions:  Double financing of the same equipment – related parties  Issuing fictive invoices (equipment prices!)  Purchase of the old equipment instead of the new one (equipment prices!)  Non-existence of the investment 14 Frequent findings

 Public Procurement irregularities:  Improper procurement procedure  Non-respecting the rules related to submission deadlines and types of publicity  Annexes for additional work  Irregularities related to selection of operation:  Non-respecting the entrance criteria from the tender 15 Frequent findings

 Irregularities related to performance:  Improper selection of the supplier  Equipment foreseen was not delivered  Relevant changes of investments approved  Ineligible expenditure:  Wrong calculation of labour costs  Wrong calculation of depreciation Frequent findings 16

 Reimbursements of discounts not paid  Reimbursements of invoices which are not in compliance with the contract  Reimbursements of invoices already reimbursed in other projects  Reimbursements of invoices for advance payments  Reimbursements of invoices after the expiring period  Reimbursements of ineligible costs  Non-economic use of assets 17 Frequent findings

 Insufficient audit trail  No proofs of payment execution  No proofs of services implemented  Offsetting: not sufficient proofs  Incompliance with information and publicity rules  No signs on the investments or tangible assets of EC co- financing 18 Frequent findings

 Incompliance with Community policies  Incompliance with the State Aid Rules 19 Frequent findings

 Reactions in case of irregularities found:  Who finds irregularities  Who is responsible for corrective measures  Withdrawal of the funds requested from the Statement of expenditure  Debtors ledger 20 Frequent findings

 QUESTIONS  COMMENTS ? THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 21