Fiscal Year 2009 4th Quarter ADR/Investigation Findings (Data Source: I-trak Complaint Management System as of 10/13/2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
Advertisements

Director, Civil Rights Division
Surety Bond Claims State of Colorado 05/15/2013. State of Colorado Surety Bond Overview Construction Contract Surety Bonds  Bid – Guarantees bidder will.
Committee on Ways and Means Briefing on Proposed 501(c)(4) Regulations.
1 Workplace ADR Evaluation Tracey Therit ADR Manager Department of Veterans Affairs June 18, 2008.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
FOS’s Dispute Resolution Process Jack Furphy, ERT General Manager – Early Resolutions Bae Bastian, Legal Counsel – Banking & Finance.
F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F B U S I N E S S A N D P R O F E S S I O N A L R E G U L A T I O N Division of Regulation Complaint Process Division.
N AVIGATING THE F EDERAL EEO P ROCESS Presentation by: Joseph A. Salazar, Esq.
Presentation for State Advisory Committee December 4, 2013.
Discrimination Complaint Processing. Complaints of Discrimination Part I Complaint Processing Procedures Part II Maintaining a Discrimination Complaint.
LACES Cohorts. Cohort #1: Enter Employment The most important thing to remember regarding employment cohorts for 12/13 is that most of the employment.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Tax Update for Alumni Classes September 29, 2012 Hanover, NH Dartmouth College.
Treasury Tax & Loan Investment Program Term Investment Option (TIO) Program Overview Updated September 2009.
Consortium & Contractual Agreements Jonna Marholz Brittany Tweed.
Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint (EEOC) Procedure Know Your Rights USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service WIsconsin.
E qual E mployment O pportunity (EEO), D iversity, D iscrimination and H arassment.
DRAFT Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Drug Establishment Registration and Drug Listing Denise Sánchez, J.D.,
1 Treasury Offset Program NASC PRESENTATION. 2 What is TOP? TOP = Treasury Offset Program A centralized process that intercepts federal payments of payees.
1 Workforce Investment Act Methods of Administration Two-Year Recertification Presenters: Julia Mankata-Tamakloe, Chief of the Office of Compliance Assistance.
James Whitehorne Chief (Acting), Census Redistricting Data Office Briefing for State Data Center Conference June 2nd, Redistricting Data Program.
Neutral Confidentiality DON ADR Program Office NOTE: These slides are just an overview and not intended as legal advice. People seeking legal advice on.
The Tobacco Buyout Scott Sanford September Outreach 500,000 official signup letters sent to quota holders and producers (6,000 printed in Spanish)
Review of Data Validation Results for PY 2004 We’ve come a long way, baby!
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
Lisa Babcock & Tim Post Expedited Claim Account Program (ECAP) State Water Resources Control Board April 20, 2015 (modified June 2015)
1 Federal Sector Discrimination Complaints Process for Individuals Incident/Alleged Discrimination (1) Employee Contacts EO Counselor (Rights & Responsibilities)
Code of Conduct Complaints Local Assessment Framework (08 May 2008 – 30 June 2009)
Federal Human Capital Survey: A Closer Look - FY 2008 The Department of the Treasury Building our Workforce for the Future April 2009.
EO Policy and Procedures
November 15, 2012 Visit us at Agenda 8(a) Program Overview SBA Partnership Agreement SBA Acceptance Contract Award.
E qual E mployment O pportunity (EEO) Module 11 N ational G uard T echnician P ersonnel M anagement C ourse.
Default Management Tips For Managing Delinquencies CAASLAR Conference April 23, 2015 Lisa Koniuto, Director of Business Development.
Tax Update for Alumni Classes Rachel L. Williamson, CPA Joined Dartmouth College in June.
1 MANDATORY OUTPATIENT TREATMENT Jane D. Hickey Office of the Attorney General June 5, 2008.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 8 Complaint Processing Procedures.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Commercial Enforcement and Investigations Division Complaint Handling Moving Fraud Meeting November 14, 2012.
What is REDRESS? REDRESS® mediation is a transformative mediation program for Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) disputes at the informal stage of the.
FDR – Financial Dispute Resolution Presented by: Stuart Ayres and Derek Pullen Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
Georgia Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission 29 TH BIENNIAL INSTITUTE FOR GEORGIA LEGISLATORS TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2014.
DOI Complaint Response Timeline Claims Services 2015 This timeline is applicable to DOI Inquiries/Complaints for all states where we do business. The dates.
CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research M. Nonis – ACCU Meeting – 3/12/2008 HOSTEL BOOKING SOFTWARE.
“CONSENT AGREEMENTS:LET US SHOW YOU HOW IT CAN WORK” Rhonda O’Hagan Competence Assurance Coordinator, SASKATCHEWAN REGISTERED NURSES ASSOCIATION Presented.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Presented by: Liz Hayes Take A Look Into: The Virginia Fair Housing Office.
Eligibility and Process
Fiscal Year rd Quarter ADR/Investigation Findings (Data Source: I-trak Complaint Management System as of 7/14/2009)
N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N O F I N T E R C O L L E G I A T E A T H L E T I C S Academic Eligibility 9 & 24/36 Hour Rules.
Quality Work Group Report Report to: Member Services Committee January 21, 2011.
1 Management Directive 715 Broad Based Deficiencies and Recommended Actions (Bureau Name) This template is for your use to create your bureau State of.
“Strong Chapters, Strong Association” “Channel Partners” Luis Barcón MBA, CPIM, CIRM, CQM, C.P.M., PMP, CSCP, CPF, CTL, CS&OP APICS Master CPIM and CSCP.
“Strong Chapters, Strong Association” “Channel Partners Scorecards” Luis Barcón MBA, CPIM, CIRM, CQM, C.P.M., PMP, CSCP, CPF, CTL, CS&OP APICS Master CPIM.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Other Complaint Processes. Appeal Processes Other presentations this week: Other presentations this week: Grievance (NGP) Grievance (NGP) Negotiations.
Washington State Collection Agency Board: Regulatory Process Grace Hamilton, Investigator Department of Licensing – Collection Agency Board Complaint Process.
Compliance Update Allergenic Products Advisory Committee Meeting March 15, 2002 Teddi Lopez DCM/OCBQ Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Information Commissioner
Alleged Incident/Personnel Action
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Federal Sector COMPLAINT ROCESSING
IComplaints Internet Complaints Tracking Army User Training.
Defense Human Resources Activity
For more information call the EEO Office at
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Neutral Confidentiality
GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation
Patient disposition, weeks 24–128.
Title IX Proposed Regulations
New Construction Program
The Office of Consumer Relations
Presentation transcript:

Fiscal Year th Quarter ADR/Investigation Findings (Data Source: I-trak Complaint Management System as of 10/13/2009)

Completed EEO Investigations The measure for FY 2009: –50% of investigations will be completed within the regulatory time frames. Regulatory time frames are under 180 days, unless extended by amendment (360 days) or extension (270 days). Definition: A completed Investigation is an investigation where the notice of election is sent to the complainant. Measure is being met with 66% of investigations completed within the regulatory time frames.

Treasury Complaint Center FY th Quarter Investigation Closure Statistics STATUS OF COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS MEETING REGULATORY TIMEFRAMES TIMELY COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS UNTIMELY COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS

Informal ADR Measures The measure for FY 2009: –30% of informal complainants will participate in ADR. –ADR participation refers to when both the complainant and management officials agree to enter the ADR process. Only complainants whose counselings closed during the quarter are included in the calculation of participation rate. Effective June 2009, Treasury no longer excludes informal EEO counselings that are ineligible to participate in ADR from the total completed counseling counts. Measure is being met: 40% of informal complainants participated in the ADR process. (Had management not declined, 48% of informal complainants may have participated in the ADR process.)

Completed/Ended Counselings For 4th Quarter FY 2009 BUREAU COMPLETED COUNSELINGS ADR OFFERED ADR PARTICIPATION BEP12 7 BPD553 DO331 FMS321 IRS COUNSEL210 IRS MINT20 4 OIG000 OCC331 OTS100 TTB211 TIGTA000 FINCEN000 Treasury Total

TOTAL INFORMAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGS IN 4th QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGSADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED ADR Offer Rate of Completed Counselings in the Informal Complaint Process During 4th Quarter FY 2009 Note: Calculation of offer rate includes completed counselings that did not meet ADR participation criteria. This change in offer rate calculation was effective in June 2009 and was done to mirror EEOC’s offer rate calculations.

TOTAL INFORMAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGS IN 4th QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGSADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED ADR Participation Rate of Completed Counselings in the Informal Complaint Process During 4th Quarter FY 2009 Note: Calculation of participation rate includes completed counselings that did not meet ADR participation criteria. This change in participation rate calculation was effective in June 2009 and was done to mirror EEOC’s participation rate calculations.

ADR Declinations by Management or Contact in the Pre-Complaint Process During 4th Quarter FY 2009 TOTAL ADR DECLINATIONS IN 4th QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL ADR DECLINATIONS DECLINED BY CONTACT DECLINED BY MANAGEMENT

Formal ADR Measures The measure for FY 2009: –ADR is offered to 80% of complainants who file complaints, and of those offered, achieve a 30% participation rate. –Participation rate refers to when both the complainant and management officials agree to enter the ADR process. Only complainants whose complaints closed during the quarter are included in the calculations of participation. The measure is not being met. ADR was offered to 45% of complainants who filed complaints, and of those offered, achieved a 9% participation rate. There were a total of 44 ADR declinations in the quarter, 29 (66%) declinations by the complainant and 15 declinations by management officials (34%). Had management not declined, a total of 26 complainants (21%) offered ADR may have participated in ADR.

TOTAL FORMAL COMPLAINT CLOSURES IN 4th QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL CLOSURESADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED ADR Offer Rate in Complaint Closures in the Formal Complaint Process During 4th Quarter FY 2009 Note: Calculation of offer rate includes completed counselings that did not meet ADR participation criteria. This change in offer rate calculation was effective in June 2009 and was done to mirror EEOC’s offer rate calculations. 45% ADR OFFERED 55% ADR NOT OFFERED

ADR Participation Rate of Complaint Closures in Formal Complaint Process During 4th Quarter FY 2009 TOTAL FORMAL COMPLAINT CLOSURES IN 4 th QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL CLOSURESADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED Note: Calculation of participation rate includes completed counselings that did not meet ADR participation criteria. This change in participation rate calculation was effective in June 2009 and was done to mirror EEOC’s participation rate calculations.

ADR Declinations by Management or Complainant in the Formal Complaint Process During 4th Quarter FY 2009 TOTAL ADR DECLINATIONS IN 4th QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL ADR DECLINATIONS DECLINED BY COMPLAINANT DECLINED BY MANAGEMENT