Florida Department of Education Presented to FAMIS Summer Conference By: Charlie Hood, Director FDOE School Transportation Office June 13, 2012 STUDENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Advertisements

Class Size Calculated by-school in , but scheduled to move to by-classroom in Calculated as of Friday, Date Certain, by period, during.
1 IMPROVING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES IN EARLY EDUCATION AND CARE SETTINGS EEC Board Meeting – November 8, 2011.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, November 20, 2013 Presented by Charlie Hood Ensuring Transportation Success: Staying in Compliance AND Doing.
Project Narratives Colorado Department of Education June 2011.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
VAPT June 24,  Data can be used for future projections  Data is used in determining the funding for transportation, which is included in Basic.
PDE Transportation Formula and Subsidies
New Transportation Guideline— Effective July 1, 2014 Don’t miss the bus! Arizona Department of Education, Audit Unit Brian Lockery, Audit Manager
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
1 PASBO – 52 nd Annual Conference David L. Lawrence Convention Center - Pittsburgh March 2007 How APS Deductions Are Calculated Presented by: Anita Gonzalez,
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Public School Finance Contacts: Tim Hill, Deputy Superintendent Myrna Holgate,
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) FUNDING
2011 FAPT Summer Symposium Ocala, FL June Statutes, Regulations, Compliance & Monitoring: What You Need To Know Presented By: Karen Strickland, Osceola.
NC Department of Public Instruction Division of Financial Business Services School Allotments Section.
Presenter: Dr. Ruth Jones Florida Department of Education June 2012.
FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) FUNDING Charter School Funding November
UNDERSTANDING SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING How to account for IDEIA funds.
SCHOOL FINANCE EA756. Finance The budget is one of the most important legal documents of a school district. It is not a static document, but rather a.
TRANSPORTATION IN A FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) EXAMINATION April 9,
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, November 9, 2010 Presented by Ronnie H. McCallister Charter School Transportation 101: Providing Transportation.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOL CHOICE PROGRAMS Presenters: Jean Ammel, Deputy Executive Director Independent Education and Parental Choice and Kim Ward,
Certification of Market Values STEB PROGRAM Briefing Points 2011 Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General Thomas E. Marks, CPA Deputy Auditor General.
1 FTE SELF-REVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Attendance Services Ms. Mary Lee Snipes Administrative Director Ms. Yvette Senior-Stewart Coordinator.
1 The Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP) and Charter Schools Florida’s Charter School Conference November 15, 2012 Office of Funding and Financial.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Student Transportation Funding and Reporting 1 Pursuant to Section.
Getting the Data Right! Presenter: Andrew (Andy) C. Binns, Ed.D. (561)
Noneducational Community-based Support Services Funding Education Service Center Region 11 Fort Worth, Texas.
Georgia Special Needs Scholarship Understanding the Program 2014 – 2015 School Year.
Charter School Finance School Business October 2012.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOL CHOICE PROGRAMS Presenters: Jean Miller, Deputy Executive Director Independent Education and Parental Choice and Kim.
1 The FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) and Charter Schools Florida’s Charter School Conference November 18, 2009.
Florida Charter Schools Conference Orlando, November 20, 2008 Presented by Charlie Hood Transportation 101: Providing Transportation to Charter Schools.
Transportation Services Report and TCCAP Update March 5, 2014.
NC CFW Expenditure reports How to complete and submit an expenditure report Expenditure reports How to complete and submit an expenditure report.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
TRANSPORTATION FEFP PREPARING FOR THE “DREADED” OFFICIAL STATE AUDIT.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, November 16, 2011 Presented by Charlie Hood Ensuring Transportation (or lack thereof) is NOT a Barrier to Equal.
Revenue. Objectives Participants will learn: Sources of special education funds Purpose of special education funds Federal funding sources State funding.
Exceptional Children Division Special Projects and Data Team Exceptional Children Special Project Funding Programs Presented by Lori Peterson, Special.
Introducing A New Process For Reporting Financial Data to DPI A Revised Format For The PI-1505 AC.
Charter School Facilities Funding 2010 Florida Charter School Conference November 9, 2010 William E. Fontaine Office of Educational Facilities.
April 2009 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Extended School Year.
ISES UPDATES April 16, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
Transportation Reporting Presented to: 2008 DOE Database Workshop Orlando By: Charlie Hood, June 19, 2008.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education 1 SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
Charter School Finance School Business Alexis Schauss, Director October 2015.
Coordinating Nonpublic School Services Jack Clark Allentown City School District Cindy Rhoads Regional Coordinator, DFP.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Leadership/ communication and commitment O Safety Busing O Rules and Guidance O Reporting.
School Transportation Unit Charter School Transportation: Danny Sanchez, Tel: (512) School Transportation Funding.
Charter School New Applicant Workshop May 2, 2016.
Florida Department of Education Transportation Directors Meeting – February 10, 2011 Presenter: Ruth Jones Education Information & Accountability Services.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) FAMIS Summer Conference June 11, 2012.
State Reporting---”Student Count”
Impact Aid Training September 25, 2017.
CAPE Top Ten (plus a few more) List
( Annual Financial Report) Updated
Antonio Ortiz – Director, Student Services & Transportation
Antonio Ortiz – Director, Student Services & Transportation
Attendance Conference Murfreesboro Embassy Suites April 20, 2018
FTE Recalibration Kendra Jahnke June 2018.
Antonio Ortiz – Director, Student Services & Transportation
Transportation Reporting
Antonio Ortiz – Director, Student Services & Transportation
Student Transportation: Update
Auditor General FEFP Student Transportation Attestation Examinations
Presentation transcript:

Florida Department of Education Presented to FAMIS Summer Conference By: Charlie Hood, Director FDOE School Transportation Office June 13, 2012 STUDENT TRANSPORTATION FUNDING and REPORTING

Florida’s Numbers ( ): 1,020,798 students transported (39% of total enrollment in public schools) 84,348 ineligible (7.63% of riders) 34,359 with disabilities (ESE; 3.37%) 36,400 hazardous walking (3.57%) 14,810 buses in daily service

Florida’s Numbers ( ): $975,911,389 Total Expenditures for Student Transportation (from AFR) $953 Expenditures per Student $365 FEFP Funding per Student $1,387 ESE Supplement 44% FEFP Trans. Funding (overall) 263,137,594 Total Route Miles

Charter School Students ( , October Survey) 43,760 transported in school buses 87 in school cars or small vehicles 5,067 in public transit 262 in private cars 49,176 total transported (27% of enrollment) 133,154 not claimed for transportation 45,723 Non-weighted 419 Weighted

Student Transportation S , F.S. 8 The Student Transportation funding formula provides funds for school district transportation based on each district's pro rata share of state transported students. Additional funding is provided for the transportation of certain disabled students. Adjustments are made for cost of living differences, percent of population outside of urban centers, and an efficiency factor that is based upon the average number of eligible students transported per bus in daily service to encourage greater bus utilization.

and Later Transportation Funding 9 Prior to , Student Transportation was funded as a Categorical Program. In 2009, the Legislature made Student Transportation a component of the Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP). The FEFP is funded with state and local dollars.

Legislative Appropriations for Student Transportation : $493,566, : $460,903, : $428,931, : $430,693, : $415,449, : $420,362,675 (-15% vs )

Funding Formula Two components  Base Transportation Allocation Provides funding for all fundable transported students, including certain disabled students  ESE Transportation Allocation Fully funded with the balance prorated as the base allocation component. 11

ESE Weighted Funding Allocation: Who’s Eligible? ESE student eligibility for weighted trans. funding is limited to students requiring additional specialized transportation services. Eligible students transported by private vehicles and eligible students for whom the district pays public transit fares are treated as any other transported students.

Florida Price Level Index (FPLI) Adjustments are made for cost of living differences  The purpose of the FPLI is to measure the differences from county to county in the cost of purchasing a specific market basket of goods and services at a particular point in time. 13

Rurality Index Adjustments are made for the percent of population outside of urban centers (Rurality Index).  Number of urban and rural inhabitants for each Florida county is based on US Census data 14

Average Bus Occupancy (ABO) Index Adjustments are made based upon the average number of eligible students transported per bus (category B) in daily service In , ABO ranged from high of 118 (ABO = 1.10) to low of 35 (ABO =.90) 15

Calculating the Bus Occupancy Index Uses a formula which rewards efficiency. Efficiency factor is based upon the average number of eligible students transported per bus in daily service. Encourages greater bus utilization. 16

Average Bus Occupancy Index (sample) October Students 11,920 + February Students 11,934 Average Students 11,927 = October Buses February Buses 140 = Average Buses 139 Average Students 11,927. ___. Average Buses 139 = Average Bus Occupancy

Effect of the 3 “indices” Rurality and ABO adjustment factors are designed to affect the base allocation within a range of plus or minus 10 percent. FPLI is more limited in its range (about.98 to

Sequence of Surveys Survey Period 1 (July) - from the beginning of the fiscal year (July 1) to the beginning of the defined 180 day school year. Survey Period 2 (October) - the first 90 days of the 180 day school year. Survey Period 3 (February) - the second 90 days of the 180 day school year. Survey Period 4 (June) - from the end of the 180 day school program to the end of the fiscal year (June 30). 19

Transportation Calculations First Calculation  Completed immediately after the annual legislative session  Based on district’s number of eligible students transported from the transportation surveys for: July, preceding fiscal year; October, preceding fiscal year; and June, second preceding fiscal year. 20

Transportation Calculations Second Calculation  Completed upon receipt of student data from district’s transportation surveys for: July, current fiscal year; October, current fiscal year; and June, preceding fiscal year.  Prior Year Amendments are incorporated in the 2nd, 3rd and Final Calculations 21

Transportation Calculations Third Calculation  Completed upon receipt of student data from district’s transportation surveys for: July, current fiscal year; October, current fiscal year; February, current fiscal year; and June, preceding fiscal year. 22

Transportation Calculations Final Calculation  Completed upon receipt of student data from district’s transportation surveys for: July, current fiscal year; October, current fiscal year; February, current fiscal year; and June, current fiscal year. 23

Base Allocation Students Adjusted July Students Adjusted October Students 5, Adjusted February Students 5, Adjusted June Students = Total Adjusted Students 11, Example: Alachua

Base Allocation Factor Total Adjusted Base Students 11, Florida Price Level Index Average Bus Occupancy Index Rurality Index X XX= Base Allocation Factor 11,

Exceptional Allocation Students Adjusted July ESE Students Adjusted October ESE Students Adjusted February ESE Students Adjusted June ESE Students = Total Adjusted ESE Students Factor of 1.8 Weighted Adjusted ESE Students X = 26

ESE Allocation Factor Total Weighted Adjusted ESE Students Florida Price Level Index Average Bus Occupancy Index Rurality Index X XX= ESE Allocation Factor

Funding Summary: State Base Allocation District ESE Allocation Factor x Prior Year State Average Cost per Student $837 District ESE Allocation $454,516 = Example: Alachua Total State Allocation $428,931,491 Total State ESE Allocation $54,673,571 _ = Total State Base Allocation $374,257,920 28

29

Florida Transportation Funding FEFP funds for student transportation are appropriated and distributed as authorized by Sections , , , , and , Florida Statutes. Locally maintained records must document the following three basic areas:  Student eligibility to receive state FEFP regular or weighted transportation funds (based on criteria such as distance from school, programs attended, and disabilities status and services, if applicable); and,  Student ridership and school attendance during approved transportation survey periods (to verify that transportation service was actually received); and,  Transportation in approved conveyance (i.e., in an approved mode of transportation or vehicle type)

Eligibility Categories Membership Category A: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) - K-12, Weighted IEP must contain information documenting need for and provision of one or more specialized transportation services:  Medical equipment required. Medical equipment is defined as wheelchair, crutches, walker, cane, tracheotomy equipment, positioning or unique seating devices.  Medical condition that requires a special transportation environment as per physician’s prescription (for instance, tinted windows, dust-controlled atmosphere, temperature control).  Attendant or monitor required due to disability and specific need of student.  Shortened day required due to disability and specific need of student.  School assigned is located in an out-of-district school system.

Eligibility Categories (cont’d): Membership Category B: IDEA, K-12, Unweighted Membership Category C: IDEA, PreK, Weighted Membership Category E: IDEA, PreK, Unweighted

PreK IDEA or Teen Parent ONLY: PreK only eligible for funding under s , F.S. if transported student is:  PreK with disabilities (IDEA) under Rule 6A , FAC, regardless of distance, who meets criteria for weighted funds (Weighted) or not (Unweighted)  PreK age child of a student parent enrolled in a Teenage Parent Program under s , F.S. IMPORTANT NOTE: PreK children not enrolled in IDEA programs, or whose parent or parents are not enrolled in a TAP program are not eligible for state transportation funding. Ineligible programs include: PreK Title I, federally-funded PreK Migrant Programs, PreK Early Intervention, Head Start, VPK, and Readiness Coalition programs.

Eligibility Categories (cont’d): Membership Category F: Teenage Parents and Infants, Unweighted Membership Category G: Hazardous Walking, Elementary, Unweighted  FDOE implemented data element in for HazWalk Location code  Code must match code used in web-based HazWalk databaseweb-based HazWalk database

Eligibility Categories (cont’d): Membership Category H: All Other Students Living Two Miles or More, Unweighted  District or charter school must verify walking distance from residence to the assigned school (Rule 6A , FAC)  If using automated mapping system must document accuracy of mapping system  Districts and charter schools must maintain adequate student transportation records for each survey period to avoid having to reassemble unreliable data that could have a negative impact on district or school resources

Eligibility Categories (cont’d): Membership Category N: Non-Eligible K-12 Students Living Less Than Two Miles and all Non-eligible PreK Students

Eligibility Categories (cont’d): Membership Category I: Center To Center or Non-center IDEA, Weighted Membership Category J: Center to Center or Non-center Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Unweighted Membership Category K: Center to Center Vocational and Dual Enrollment Students, Unweighted

Hazardous Walking: K-6 Elementary only students eligible under HW Location must be inspected by district and road jurisdiction District and road jurisdiction must agree it meets HW criteria District must submit an updated HW Locations report via web-based system for each survey District or charter school must document qualifying conditions, including speed limits, traffic counts, and the condition of roads, walking surfaces, intersections, and traffic controls. FDOE checklist available District must request a projected completion date for correcting hazard

Ensuring HazWalk Accuracy DOE post-survey analyses to reconcile web-based and Student Database data Intent is to ensure that hazards are reviewed at least each five years AND, Ensure local interagency efforts to correct hazards, if possible, OR, Review periodically to verify feasibility (or lack thereof) of correcting hazards

Audit Documentation: Ensure retention of records to document student’s home address at the time of the scheduled survey Prevent duplication of students and counting of any individual student on more than one bus or mode during survey week 4. For each student document the eligibility category. Edits may be implemented to cross- check against school record.

Ridership and Surveys For each eligible student district or charter school must verify the specific bus (or other vehicle) and the days during the survey week (or preceding six days) when student rode, or at least the first day. Must be signed and initialed by driver and dated as a source document. Sample Ridership Worksheet for Bus Operators is available. This “roll call” sheet must provide information needed to support the following required elements of the Student Transportation Reporting Format:  District Number, Current Instruction/Service  Student Number Identifier, Florida  Survey Period Code  Fiscal Year  Year-Round/Extended School Year FTE Indicator  Days In Term (For FTE Purposes)  Transportation Membership Category  Vehicle Category  Bus Number  Bus Route Number  Transaction Code  District Number, Current Enrollment  Hazardous Walking  Student Number Identifier, Local  Error Codes

Bus Operator Worksheets Although hardcopies of driver worksheets with original signatures and initials are preferred, school districts who maintain scanned, electronic student database reports may use similar approved reporting formats for transportation record keeping. These formats must be coordinated with the district MIS.

Summer School If the July or June summer school or SAI period is scheduled so that it takes place outside the regularly scheduled survey week window, a separate survey week must be established to cover these students. The middle day or middle week of the summer period should be used as the basis for establishment of the survey week. This effort must be coordinated with the district FTE administrator so that the same survey week is established for both FTE and Transportation reporting.

Session Crossing Survey Years Whenever the summer session crosses two fiscal years (as in the example above), students must be reported in two separate surveys, one for June and one for July, with different term lengths, as applicable to the portion of the summer school session that takes place in each month. The middle day or middle week of the period should be used as the basis for establishment of the survey week. Please coordinate this effort with the district FTE administrator. Documentation of the term length for each student claimed must be maintained.

Approved Conveyances Districts and charter schools must maintain vehicle inventory records and written contracts or agreements to verify that vehicles claimed in daily service are one of the following:  B: School buses meeting Florida School bus Specifications  E: Passenger car or allowable multipurpose passenger vehicle (MPV) owned, operated, or contracted by the school board, transporting fewer than ten students  P: Privately owned motor vehicle or boat (for disabled or isolated students only)  G: General purpose transportation (city buses, trains, etc.) For General Purpose transportation, a list identifying students who are provided city bus passes, train vouchers, etc., must be maintained, along with other records to verify ridership and dates. For students claimed riding in private passenger cars or boats, the district or charter school must maintain board minutes reflecting mileage to the bus route or school, names of the students, and school attended, pursuant to Rule 6A (11), FAC.

FDOE Post-survey Reviews EIAS prepares reports following each survey comparing current and prior surveys’ data for each district’s:  Adjusted Base FTE students transported  Adjusted ESE FTE students transported  Buses in daily service  Resulting funding calculation 46

FDOE Post-survey Reviews EIAS report identifies variations in these data of > 5 percent FDOE Offices (EIAS, OFFR, STMS) contact respective local district counterparts Variations are outlined; explanations are requested and documented 47

FDOE Post-survey Reviews Variations due to inaccuracy of reported data are corrected by districts Variations that are valid are documented as to causes Overall goal (and result) is accuracy of reporting and improved timeliness Process ensures accountability to Legislature and others 48

Finance MIS Transportation FUNDING NIRVANA!!!

Transportation Reporting Contacts 50 Chris Sanchez or Lee Davis Office of Funding & Financial Reporting (850) Charlie Hood or Jamie Warrington School Transportation Management (850) Ruth Jones Education Information & Accountability Services (850)