Accountability data overview August 2014. Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountability Reporting Webinar Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Determinations & Federal NCLB Accountability Status, State Accountability & Assistance.
Advertisements

Superintendent Melinda J. Boone Alumni Auditorium, North High School October 21, 2013 Worcester Public Schools State of the Schools Address.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
ESEA Flexibility C hanges to School & District Accountability and Assistance April 2012.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Why PARCC in 2015? Key Training and Decision Dates Field Test vs. Operational Test Holding Districts “Harmless” 2015 PARCC MCAS CHOICE.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.
REVIEW OF 2014 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY AND ACHIEVEMENT DATA, GOAL SETTING, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR 2014/2015 SAUGUS PUBLIC SCHOOLS CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 17 &
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
MCAS and PARCC Testing Franklin Public Schools School Committee January 29,
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
School & district accountability reporting Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
The Norwood Public Schools 2014 Accountability Overview and MCAS Results Dr. Alexander Wyeth Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, and.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO Assessment Presentation December 4, 2014.
2013 MASS Executive Institute. More Than a Decade of Progress: Grade 10 MCAS % proficient or higher 2.
Accountability Report Dedham Public Schools October 3,
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Back to Table of Contents DART for English Language LearnersAnnual SnapshotDART for English Language LearnersAnnual Snapshot DART for English Language.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
2015 State PARCC Results A webinar for school and district leaders Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator Wally McKenzie Edwin Analytics.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2015 Accountability Reporting Presentation to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary & Secondary Education December 15, 2015 Update on Overall District.
ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
AAAC January 13, 2016 Best Western, Marlborough. Agenda  Welcome from Council Chair  ESE updates  2015 accountability reporting  Holyoke Public Schools.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
2012 Accountability Determinations
Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability & Assistance System
2016 Accountability Reporting
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS and 2017 Accountability Results
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Presentation to the Board of Elementary & Secondary Education
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Watertown Public Schools School Committee Meeting November 13, 2017
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Accountability data overview August 2014

Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance Index (PPI)  School percentiles  Accountability & assistance levels  Reports  Resources & tools Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2

Highlights of ESEA Flexibility in MA  Goal: Reducing proficiency gaps by half by 2017  Accountability & assistance levels for schools & districts (Levels 1-5)  Progress & Performance Index (PPI) – a performance measure that includes student growth, science, & other indicators  School percentiles – representing performance relative to other schools of the same school type  “High needs” subgroup data reported  Low income students, students with disabilities, current & former English language learners Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 3

Description2012 & 2013 reporting2014 reporting Extra credit for reengaging dropouts N/AHigh schools that reengaged 2 or more dropouts in the school year will earn 25 extra credit PPI points (all students & high needs groups only) Weighting of growth and achievement in school percentiles Achievement – 80% Growth – 20% Non-high schools: Achievement – 75% Growth – 25% High schools: Achievement – 50% Growth – 25% High school indicators – 25% Methodology for identifying Commendation Schools Better alignment between Commendation School criteria and that of federal Blue Ribbon Schools program. Commendation Schools will be identified when official MCAS & accountability data are released in mid-September. Changes to 2014 accountability reporting 4 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Description2012 & 2013 reporting2014 reporting Accountability reporting for PARCC PBA field test schools with some students exempt from MCAS testing N = 89 N/A2014 PPI and school percentiles calculated using highest value for all MCAS results or MCAS results excluding PBA field test grades accountability & assistance level based on 2014 cumulative PPI and school percentile. Accountability reporting for PARCC PBA field test schools with all students exempt from MCAS testing N = 13 N/ANo 2014 PPI or school percentile accountability & assistance level held constant. Changes to 2014 accountability reporting 5 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Description2012, 2013, & 2014 reporting2015 reporting Persistently low graduation rates Any school with a graduation rate of less than 60% for four consecutive years is automatically placed in Level 3 Any school with a graduation rate of less than 67% for the most recent four-year graduation rate & 70% for each of the three prior five- year rates will be placed in Level 3. Implementation in 2015, but schools will be notified in 2014 if they would have been impacted by this change in Participation ratesSchools testing less than 95% of students in any group on any of the required statewide assessments are automatically ineligible for Level 1, & schools testing less than 90% of students in any group on any test are automatically ineligible for Levels 1 and 2. Current school participation consequences will also be applied at the district level. Implementation in 2015, but districts will be notified in 2014 if they would have been impacted by this change in Preview of changes to 2015 accountability reporting 6 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Reducing proficiency gaps by half by Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 7

8 Reducing proficiency gaps by half by

 The PPI is a measure of progress toward a group’s gap-narrowing goals  Annual PPI shows progress over two years  Cumulative PPI represents trend over time  Core indicators (up to 7)  ELA, math, & science proficiency gap narrowing (CPI)  ELA & math growth (SGP)  Annual dropout rate  Cohort graduation rate (4-and 5-year)  Extra credit  Reducing percentage of students scoring Warning/Failing &/or increasing percentage of students scoring Advanced (10 percent or more)  Reengaging dropouts (2 or more students) What are some key PPI concepts? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 9

Annual PPI = total points / # core indicators Cumulative PPI = (2011* * * *4) / 10 Core indicatorsUp to 700 points awarded 1. ELA proficiency gap narrowing0, 25, 50, 75, or Math proficiency gap narrowing0, 25, 50, 75, or Science proficiency gap narrowing 0, 25, 50, 75, or ELA growth0, 25, 50, 75, or Math growth0, 25, 50, 75, or Annual dropout rate0, 25, 50, 75, or Cohort graduation rate0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 Extra credit indicatorsUp to 175 additional points awarded ELA, math, science W/F reduction ELA, math, science ADV increase Dropout reengagement25 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 10

The PPI and the school percentile Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 11  PPI is a criterion-referenced measure of progress  Percentiles are relative, & help the state & districts focus supports on low-achieving students in low performing schools  Massachusetts uses school types (ES, ESMS, MS, MSHS/K-12, HS) to fairly compare the performance of schools serving the same or similar grades & distribute resources equitably  Every school’s percentile & PPI tells a different story  Schools with lower percentiles but higher PPIs for all student groups are showing improvement over time  Schools with higher percentiles but lower PPIs are high performing, but have more work to do to support student success

What are some key Level concepts? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 12  Schools & districts are classified into a level based on a four-year trend  The cumulative PPI for all students & high needs students is used to classify schools into Levels 1 & 2  School percentiles (1-99) represent performance relative to other schools of the school type, & are used to determine Level 3 schools (lowest-performing 20 percent per state law)  Districts are classified based on the level of lowest- performing school (exception for Board action)

13 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education How are schools classified?

Sample reports

Accountability reports  Layer 1:  Accountability & assistance level  Reason(s) for level designation  School percentile (schools only)  Determination of need for Special Education technical assistance or intervention (districts and single-school districts only)  Cumulative Progress & Performance Index (PPI) for all student groups  Summary of school accountability information (districts only)  Layer 2 (group-specific):  Annual & cumulative PPI figures  Points awarded for each indicator  Assessment participation data  Layer 3:  Detailed data for each indicator for all student groups 15 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Level 1 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 16

Level 1 school (second layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 17

Level 1 school (third layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 18

Level 2 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 19

Level 3 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 20

Resources & tools

Resources and tools Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 22

Gap-halving calculators Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 23

PPI calculator Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 24

District analysis, review, & assistance tools Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 25

District analysis, review, & assistance tools Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 26

Questions? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education