©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Food and Agriculture.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy Priorities Sara Pinheiro European Commission DG Home Affairs.
Advertisements

DISASTER PLANNING: Do it Before Disaster Strikes Community Issues Satellite Workshops Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity.
Constellation/Automated Critical Asset Management System (C/ACAMS)
Minnesota Port and Waterway Security Working Group Meeting April 12, 2012.
Department of Homeland Security Site Assistance Visit (SAV)
The CTCN Services UNEP – March 5th, 2014, Nairobi, Kenya.
DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES (DSCA)
S3-1 © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University OCTAVE SM Process 3 Identify Staff Knowledge Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh,
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Idaho Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Protection Program and Fusion Center Brief.
Protected Critical Infrastructure Information (PCII) Program
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Houston UASI and RCPI A local-regional approach to THIRA
National Infrastructure Protection Plan
S2-1 © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University OCTAVE SM Process 2 Identify Operational Area Management Knowledge Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon.
Networked Systems Survivability CERT ® Coordination Center Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA © 2002 Carnegie.
DHS, National Cyber Security Division Overview
National Protection and Programs Directorate Department of Homeland Security The Office of Infrastructure Protection Cybersecurity Brief [Date of presentation]
Session 6 Integrated Emergency Management. Objectives of the Session Students will be able to 6.1 Define the principle of integration. 6.2Discuss the.
National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Federal Advisory Board DHS Challenges & Opportunities Captain Curtis Dubay, P.E. Department.
William A. Wallace  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute CHC-R 5 th Annual Meeting January 31-February 1, Infrastructure Modeling: Decision Technologies.
29 May 2006RNSA Workshop 1 Social Implication of National Security RNSA Workshop The risk of public data availability on critical infrastructure protection.
Community Planning & Capacity Building Recovery Support Function Presented By: Michelle Diamond Community Planning & Capacity Building Coordinator FEMA.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Development Principles PHIN advances the use of standard vocabularies by working with Standards Development Organizations to ensure that public health.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Resiliency Rules: 7 Steps for Critical Infrastructure Protection.
Working Group 4: Urban Governance for Risk Reduction: Mainstreaming Adaptation into Urban Planning and Development Chair: Prof. Shabbir Cheema Rapporteurs:
Session 5Slide 5-1 Risk Management In the Private Sector Session 5 Slide Deck.
Horizon 2020 Secure Societies Security Research and Industry DG Enterprise and Industry 2013.
Food and Agriculture Sector Coordinating Councils John L. Williams, DVM U.S. Department of Agriculture AFDO Annual Conference Kansas City, MO June 7, 2005.
Session 16: Distribution of Geospatial Data 1 Distribution of Geospatial Data in the Public Environment Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
Part of a Broader Strategy
Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
Lessons Learned in Smart Grid Cyber Security
Network Security Policy Anna Nash MBA 737. Agenda Overview Goals Components Success Factors Common Barriers Importance Questions.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
RCPG Project Update 2013 Whole Community Conference November 22, 2013.
Hazard Resilient Coastal Community Index Keelin Kuipers WAS*IS Workshop II March 13, 2006.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) Sector Specific Plan (SSP) AFDO Annual Meeting June 7, 2005 LeeAnne Jackson, Ph.D. Center for Food Safety.
Food and Agriculture Sector Update NASDA Food & Agriculture Security Task Force February 19, 2009.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Program Overview
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Information Sharing Challenges, Trends and Opportunities
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Critical Infrastructure Protection Private Sector Programs April 7, 2005 Rod Nydam, JD, GMU Law School Private Sector.
Daniel Kull Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) World Bank Geneva, 19 November, 2012.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
The information supply chain FDIC XBRL International Conference Mr. Inscoe.
Food and Agriculture Sector A Collaborative Path to Agriculture Security and Food Defense LeeAnne Jackson, HHS/FDA Multistate Partnership Meeting Madison,
CI/KR Public-Private Partnerships Overview March 2010 Prepared By: Thomas DiNanno International Assessment and Strategy Center.
1 Washington State Critical Infrastructure Program “No security, No infrastructure” Infrastructure Protection Office Emergency Management Division Washington.
Governor’s Office of Homeland Security & Emergency Preparedness LOUISIANA BANKERS ASSOCIATION 2010 Louisiana Emergency Preparedness Coalition Meetings.
Business Crisis and Continuity Management (BCCM) Class Session
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 1 National Critical Infrastructure Prioritization Program Tier 1 and Tier 2 Program Overview Office of Infrastructure Protection.
Agriculture in Australia Agriculture in Australia utilises a large proportion of the country’s natural resources. Agricultural activity is undertaken on.
1 Iowa Emergency Management Association Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Department Emergency Management Program Development Course EMERGENCY.
INFORMATION SECURITY IN ARMENIA: PRESENT STATUS AND TASKS
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
California Cybersecurity Integration Center (Cal-CSIC)
Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy Priorities
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cybersecurity ATD technical
Emergency Management and Utilities
Energy Statistics Compilers Manual
Presentation transcript:

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Food and Agriculture Sector Criticality Assessment Tool; Current Use and Future Significance Shaun Kennedy National Center for Food Protection & Defense Kate Leese Burgers, MPH James Lee Witt Associates

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. What is critical within the food and agriculture sector?

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Food and Agriculture as Critical Infrastructure Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) 7, Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources HSPD-9, 2004 Defense of U.S. Agriculture and Food Every year DHS Homeland Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis Center (HITRAC) collects information on critical components to build a National CIKR risk profile

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Challenges Government and private sector are jointly responsible for protecting the vital components of CIKR Private sector not generally included in prior assessments Private sector understandably concerned about sharing sensitive data Food system is not suited for asset and facilities based approach Very few individual assets comprise a critical element Systems and their impact on systems more relevant

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Challenges (continued) No quantitative way to compare criticality of one subsystem vs. another with existing tools No consistent data from state to state No means of incorporating systems that cross state or country boundaries Criteria for critical infrastructure designation did not fit this sector so food and agriculture ineligible from the start

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Food and Agriculture Sector Criticality Assessment Tool Subsystem level assessments vs. looking at proprietary information on assets and facilities Standardizes threat and consequence terminology All hazards approach Downstream consequences incorporated

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Assessment Process Identify the food system for evaluation Identify public, private and academic experts associated with the system Bring the group together to work through an evaluation – Relationship building is an intended outcome Share the results among participants for their use

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD.

Multi-State Partnership for Security in Agriculture FAS-CAT Project Training and assessment workshops in 10 states Over 50 subsystems assessed Diverse subject matter expertise Adapted to changing DHS criteria and versions of the tool

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Takeaway themes Essential to bringing all players to the table Strong public-private partnerships Third party facilitation Process as valuable as the product Targeted risk reduction / mitigation strategies Using FAS-CAT as the basis for submissions successful

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Successful Submissions Nationally Food and agriculture submissions from >25 states Over 120 subsystems accepted as Level 2 Subsystems represent >1,000 assets Every state that submitted an assessment resulted in at least one subsystem accepted as Level 2

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD.

FAS-CAT Already Done Web based version Transportation system documentation Economic data by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code at the county level – Employment and income – Household and government consumption

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. FAS-CAT 3.0 Still To Come Integration with ACAMs and IDCA Integrate IndustryDIR roles and function capabilities into critical sub-system contacts Align FASCAT with new DHS version 4 taxonomy requirements Facilitate FASCAT deployment to all 50 states including training modules

1.Systems based approach to document and prioritize supply chain sub/systems and components* 2.Employs comparative risk analysis of characteristics, potential threats and event consequences 3.Facilitates socialization and networking of sector specific SME’s 4.Enables Standardization of analytic methodology, vocabulary/ taxonomy, and definitions 5.Provides for documentation and understanding of the entire commodity supply chain 6.Correlates economic and employment data to subsystem/components for modeling system impacts PCII protected documentation and GIS of National CIKR assets FASCAT ACAMS IDCA LENS *This is a first as this never been attempted on a national basis Supporting the Data Call

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. 20 The Linking Encrypted Network System (LENS) LENS is a data warehouse and suite of data collection applications supporting DHS activities, primarily Infrastructure review and assessment. LENS information is used to support Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-7, Critical Infrastructure Protection. LENS provides IP detailed authoritative vulnerability information for physical security, security force, security management, interdependency, protective measures, and mitigation. LENS

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Automated Critical Asset Management System (ACAMS) ACAMS - Provides a mechanism to deliver tailored infrastructure information to State and local users for prevention, protection, response and recovery. ACAMS - is PCII protected documentation and provides for GIS of National CIKR assets PCII - The Protected Critical Infrastructure Information Program is an information- protection program that enhances information sharing between the private sector and the government. ACAMS

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Automated Critical Asset Management System (ACAMS) The Protected Critical Infrastructure Information (PCII) Program protects shared data from:  The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)  State and local disclosure laws  Use in civil litigation.  PCII cannot be used for regulatory purposes and can only be accessed in accordance with strict safeguarding and handling requirements ACAMS

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Infrastructure Data Collection Application (IDCA)  Supports data collection for IP mission partners, State, and Sector Specific Agency (SSA) submission and nominations to the NCIPP Annual Data Call  Provides data for supporting nominations and justifications of Level 1-4 Critical Infrastructure IDCA

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. FASCAT - Supporting the States Web Based FASCAT Tool State FASCAT Data File Training & Exercises Prioritized Vulnerability Assessments Response Planning Modeling Tools Operational Decision Support Revised Taxonomy

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. FASCAT Going Forward Web Based FASCAT 3.0 Web Based FASCAT 2.0 Revised Taxonomy 2010 Data Call Lessons Learned

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. After Deploying FAS-CAT State and regional utility a key aspect of why to go through the process – Emergency management planning – State mitigation efforts – Building public/private relationships Solution for how to invest in food and agriculture still to be developed – Focus of the session 10/21

©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Questions? Shaun Kennedy NCFPD Kate Leese Burgers Witt Associates Associates.com