ARIN-2014-20 Transfer Policy Slow Start and Simplified Needs Verification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
62 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements.
Advertisements

1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
ARIN Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or.
Draft Policy Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer and Chris Grundemann.
Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language. Problem Statement Current policy prevents an organization that receives BLOCK A in the previous 12 months from.
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfer of ASNs.
Advisory Council Shepherds: Scott Leibrand & Stacy Hughes Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer.
Open Policy Hour. Overview 1.Preview of Draft Policies on ARIN XXV agenda 2.Policy Experience Report 3.Policy Proposal BoF.
ARIN Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers Dan Alexander- Primary Shepherd David Farmer- Secondary Shepherd.
2010-8: Rework of IPv6 Assignment Criteria David Farmer ARIN XXVI.
Draft Policy ARIN : Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments.
Update on RIPE NCC Inter- RIR Transfer proposal Adam Gosling APNIC 38 Policy SIG Meeting 18 September 2014.
Policy Implementation and Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
Policy Experience Report Richard Jimmerson. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Policy Proposal 109 Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements ARIN XXV 18 April, 2010 – Toronto, Ontario Chris Grundemann.
Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services.
ARIN Update Aaron Hughes ARIN Board of Trustees Focus Increased focus on customer service – Based on feedback and survey Continued IPv4 to IPv6.
Open Policy Hour Einar Bohlin, Policy Analyst. OPH Overview Draft Policy Preview Policy Experience Report Policy BoF.
Draft Policy ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements.
POLICY EXPERIENCE REPORT Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Getting Internet Number Resources from ARIN Community Use Slide Deck Courtesy of ARIN May 2014.
1 APNIC allocation and policy update JPNIC OPM July 17, Tokyo, Japan Guangliang Pan.
Draft Policy Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements ARIN XXVI 6 October, 2010 – Atlanta, Georgia Chris Grundemann.
Life After IPv4 Depletion Leslie Nobile. Overview ARIN’s current IPv4 inventory Trends and observations Ways to obtain IP addresses post IPv4 depletion.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. The PDP Cycle Need Discuss Consensus Implement Evaluate
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
PROP Leif Sawyer. Draft Policy ARIN Eliminating Needs-based Evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 Netblocks Author:
ARIN Modify section 8.2 to better reflect how ARIN handles reorganizations.
Erik Bais, May 13 th 2015 PP – unassigned yet General Transfer Policy Presenter : Erik Bais –
John Curran APNIC 29 5 March 2010 ARIN Update. 4-byte ASN Stats In 2009 – Received 197 requests for 4-byte ASNs – 140 changed request to 2-byte – ARIN.
Draft Policy Transfers & Multi-National Networks Kevin Blumberg.
Advisory Council Shepherds: Marc Crandall & Scott Leibrand Combined M&A and Specified Transfers.
Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
ARIN Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
ARIN Update RIPE 66 Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services.
ARIN Update Aaron Hughes ARIN Board of Trustees Focus Increased focus on customer service – Based on feedback and survey Continued IPv4 to IPv6.
Overview of Policy Proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 31 August 2011.
1 Life After IPv4 Depletion Jon Worley –Analyst Leslie Nobile Senior Director Global Registry Knowledge.
Registration Services Department Trends, Observations & Statistics Leslie Nobile.
Draft Policy ARIN Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients) Authors: David Huberman and Tina Morris AC Shepherds: Cathy Aronson and.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Specified Transfer Listing Service (STLS) Service provided to facilitate NRPM Section 8.3 “Transfers to Specified Recipients” NRPM 8.3 transfers (“policy”)
Draft Policy LIR/ISP and End-user Definitions.
IPv4 Countdown Plan Leslie Nobile. Phased Approach Phase 1 – Current phase, initiated with ARIN’s last /8 from IANA Phase 2 – Begins when 3 /8 equivalents.
Draft Policy Merge IPv4 ISP and End-User Requirements 59.
Políticas en discusión en otros RIRs Juan Alejo
Draft Policy ARIN Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients) Presented by Chris Tacit.
1 Madison, WI 9 September Part 1 IPv4 Depletion Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services.
60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24.
60 Draft Policy ARIN NRPM 4 (IPv4) Policy Cleanup.
Whois & Data Accuracy Across the RIRs. Terms ISP – An Internet Service Provider is allocated address space by an RIR for the purpose of providing connectivity.
ARIN Update John Curran President and CEO, ARIN Focus IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Awareness – Targeting ISPs and Content Providers Continued enhancements.
Policy Implementation Report Leslie Nobile. Purpose Update the community on recently implemented policies Provide relevant operational details.
ARIN Alignment of 8.3 Needs Requirements to Reality of Business.
Draft Policy ARIN Christian Tacit. Problem statement Organizations that obtain a 24 month supply of IP addresses via the transfer market and then.
Policy Experience Report
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN David Farmer
Policy Text Insert new section to NRPM to read as follows:
Draft Policy ARIN Amy Potter
ARIN Scott Leibrand / David Huberman
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Post-IPv4-Free-Pool-Depletion Transfer Policy Staff Introduction.
Draft Policy ARIN Cathy Aronson
ARIN New MDN allocation based on past utilization
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Eliminate HD-Ratio from NRPM
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8
ARIN Inter-RIR Transfers
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Modify 8
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Transfers for new entrants
Presentation transcript:

ARIN Transfer Policy Slow Start and Simplified Needs Verification

Problem Statement As IPv4 depletion occurs, it will become difficult for organization to get IP addresses. This will impact an organization as follows: 1. New organizations will have difficulty qualifying for the initial slow start as it may become difficult to get IP space from an upstream provider 2. New organizations that are growing rapidly will have difficulty growing by doubling under slow start, because it will require a succession of many transfers, and hence many commercial agreements (each with its own financial overhead), and finding the right succession of ever increasing block sizes.

Problem Statement (cont’d) 3. Existing organizations with regular growth may have difficulty getting the right sized block to transfer, and may require multiple transfers to meet their needs, making justification and deployment challenging. 4. Existing organization with an unprecedented growth rate have a similar challenge to new organizations with rapid growth where they will need to double, and therefore require a succession of many transfers, and hence many commercial agreements (each with its own financialoverhead), and finding the right succession of ever increasing block sizes.

Policy Statement Replace the following section 8.3 text: “The recipient must demonstrate the need for up to a 24- month supply of IP address resources under current ARIN policies and sign an RSA.” with "Recipients will be subject to current ARIN policies and sign an RSA for the resources being received" Remove the following section 8.4 text: “Recipients within the ARIN region must demonstrate the need for up to a 24-month supply of IPv4 address space.” Add: New ORGs

Policy Statement End-Sites End-user organizations which do not currently hold IP addresses, and can demonstrate 50% immediate utilization by currently held equipment, will immediately qualify for a non-M&A transfer between the minimum assignment size and a /24, inclusive ISPs ISP organizations which do not currently hold IP addresses, and can demonstrate 50% immediate utilization by currently held equipment, current customers, or customer orders will immediately qualify for a non-M&A transfer between the minimum allocation size and a /21, inclusive Existing ORGs Minimum requirements Prior to qualifying for non-M&A address transfers, an organization must demonstrate an average of 80% utilization, as measured under section 4, across the aggregate of all addresses that are currently allocated, assigned, reallocated, or reassigned to, or otherwise in use by, the organization.

Policy Statement Transfer Approval An organization which qualifies for transfers under one of the criteria in shall be approved for the transfer in of an aggregate amount of address space as determined by the relevent section. An organization with such an approval may then complete one or more transfers, with a cumulative total not exceeding the approved amount, without submitting additional justification. An organization will be ineligible for additional non-M&A transfers until it can again demonstrate that it meets the minimum requirements in section Qualifying Criteria Stable Growth Organizations may be approved for the non-M&A transfer of additional address space equal to the amount of address space they were holding at the time of approval Rapid Growth Organizations may be approved for the non-M&A transfer of additional address space equal to 24 times the organization’s calculated monthly average use rate.

Policy Statement Calculation of Monthly Average Use Rate An organization may choose a look-back window of any number of months between 3 and 12, inclusive, from the date of the current request. ARIN will calculate the total amount of new addresses acquired, during the look-back window, by the organization from non-M&A transfers, direct allocations or assignments from ARIN, or reallocations or reassignments from an ISP. That total will be divided by the number of months in the look-back window to calculate the organization’s monthly average use rate Returned IP space If addresses are returned or transferred out within the look-back window, then those addresses will be subtracted from the total amount of new addresses acquired for the purposes of the monthly average use rate calculation M&A activity If M&A transfer activity occurs during the look-back window, the addresses acquired through M&A transfers will only be counted in the total amount of new addresses acquired if the pre- M&A organization had acquired the resources during the post-M&A organization’s look-back window Same text as 8.3.1

Discussion Do you support decoupling 8.3 and 8.4 transfers from 4.x IPv4 requirements? Which sections do you support or object to in the current text? Questions, Comments?