Can partial harvesting in boreal mixedwoods maintain processes and fungal communities associated with coarse woody debris? Manuella Struckelj Hedi Kebli.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Riparian Thinning: Logic Paths for Silvicultural Prescriptions
Advertisements

Modelling stand dynamics after partial harvesting in eastern Canadian boreal mixedwoods Arun K. Bose, Brian D. Harvey, Dave K. Coates, Suzanne Brais, Yves.
Effects of Forest Thinning on CO 2 Efflux Peter Erb, Trisha Thoms, Jamie Shinn Biogeochemistry 2003: Block 1.
Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
Reserves and Density of Organic Carbon in Russian Forests Anatoly Utkin, Dmitry Zamolodchikov, Georgy Korovin and Olga Chestnykh 4. C phytomass and forest-forming.
An Envirothon Primer Glenn “Dode” Gladders
Fungal feedbacks on global change Kathleen Treseder Jennifer Lansing Nathan Choi Univ. of California Irvine.
FACTS: TYPES OF FORESTS: Soft wood 66% of Canada’s forest cover Fir, Pine, Spruce Hard wood 12% of Canada’s forest cover Poplar, Maple, Birch The other.
By Dr. Connor, Dr. Clarkey, Dr. Alex, and Fez. General Information 30% Foresters manage forests through forestry. Boreal forests are everywhere!
Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Québec Canada SPRUCING UP EASTERN CANADIAN MIXEDWOODS: Do white spruce.
Stand Structure and Ecological Restoration Charles W. Denton Ecological Restoration Institute John D. Bailey, Associate Professor of Forestry, Associate.
Growth and yield Harvesting Regeneration Thinning Fire and fuels.
Managing forests for carbon storage Bill Keeton Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont.
Community Dynamics. Colonization  ARRIVAL  ESTABLISHMENT.
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. USDA Forest Service GTR NE-343.
Can Clearcutting Replace Stand-Replacing Fire? Impacts on soil characteristics over time and future management implications Kerry Malm GEOG 5401 Soils.
Effect of silvicultural and prescribed fire treatments on coarse woody debris dynamics in a sierran old growth mixed-conifer forest. Jim Innes and Malcolm.
Fall River Long-term Productivity Study : Predictions of Pre-harvest Biomass and Nutrient Pools K. Petersen, B. Strahm, C. Licata, B. Flaming, E. Sucre,
Dynamics of the Northern Hardwood Ecosystem Yuqiong Hu, Jeff Plakke, Sharon Shattuck, Erin Wiley.
Readings Chapter 11 textbook
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
FOREST MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
The use of dendrochronology to detect spruce budworm outbreaks Group Leader: Cornelia Krause Mathieu Bouchard Mariano Morales Kathie Weathers.
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
Forest Inventory Methods and Carbon Analysis Linda S. Heath Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station In Support of the United.
Effects of Forest Management on Carbon Flux and Storage Jiquan Chen, Randy Jensen, Qinglin Li, Rachel Henderson & Jianye Xu University of Toledo & Missouri.
EFIMOD – a system of models for Forest Management A.S. Komarov, A.V. Mikhailov, S.S. Bykhovets, M.V.Bobrovsky, E.V.Zubkova Institute of Physicochemical.
Structure And Biodiversity In Managed And Unmanaged Mixed Beech Forests: A Comparison Based On The Strict Forest Reserves Network In France.
Pour mieux affirmer ses missions, le Cemagref devient Irstea Thomas Bourdier, Thomas Cordonnier, Georges Kunstler & Benoit Courbaud 9th IUFRO.
1 Lecture 11 Implementation of Ecosystem Management: Case Studies Kevin Crowe FORE November, 2004.
FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS Project Level Carbon Accounting Toolkit CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products Department of Forestry, Australian National University.
PERD POL Toronto Jan. 23, 2003 Estimating the effects of climate change on large scale natural disturbances, and their impact on biomass productivity.
John L. Willis, Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Michael B. Walters, Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Carbon Flux and Storage in Mixed Oak Forests of the Ozarks MDC Project Leader: Randy Jensen Principal Investigator: Jiquan Chen Team Members: Qinglin Li,
Effects of Forest Management Practices on Carbon Storage Coeli M. Hoover USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Forest PLUS, Washington DC December.
Objective: Have a working knowledge of the relationship between the vegetative cover in a watershed and water yield and water quality.
Forestry and Resource Management
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
THINKING beyond the canopy Removing technical barriers to include tropical peatlands in the REDD+ mechanism Daniel Murdiyarso, Kristell Hergoualc’h and.
Significance of Dead Wood for Biodiversity Conservation and Close to Nature Forestry Peter Zach, Ján Kulfan Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
The Influence of Natural and Anthropogenic Perturbations on Lake Riparian Forest and Coarse Woody Debris Modeling Linkages Between Aquatic and Terrestrial.
Overstory Vegetation Overstory Vegetation 2008 MOFEP PI Meeting John Kabrick and Randy Jensen.
Testing alternative indicators for biodiversity conservation in old- growth boreal forests: ecology and economics Artti Juutinen 1 & Mikko Mönkkönen 2.
Revisiting the CFIRP : Assessing long ‐ term ecological value and characteristics of snags created for wildlife J.W. Rivers & J. Hagar.
Experimental gaps and biodiversity responses in the Vermont Forest Ecosystem Management Demonstration Project Bill Keeton Graduate student contributors:
Estimating fuel loading under various disturbance regimes and vegetation types in Northern Wisconsin forest landscape Class presentation, Mar Soung-Ryoul.
Carbon, mushrooms, and timber – what more could you want
Silviculture in the Face of Global Change: Overview of UMN Silviculture Program Tony D’Amato Dept. of Forest Resources University of Minnesota.
Feeding Across the ESN: Studying Herbivore-Ecosystem Interactions Following Fire in Black Spruce Forests Characterizing and inferring patterns and processes.
Scott Saleska (U. of Arizona) Lucy Hutyra, Elizabeth Hammond-Pyle, Dan Curran, Bill Munger, Greg Santoni, Steve Wofsy (Harvard University) Kadson Oliveira.
FOREST MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Learning Goal: to be able to use appropriate terminology relating to forestry practices.
Carbon Dynamics in Coarse Woody Debris Pools at the Tapajos National Forest in Brazil Hudson Silva Patrick Crill Michael Keller.
Silvicultural Systems for Mixedwood Management Phil Comeau Dept. of Renewable Resources University of Alberta.
Disturbance -Based Management Landscape-Level – Pattern and complexity – Stand age class distributions – Patch distributions: type, size, – shape, and.
Mistra Council for Evidence-based Environmental Management
Fire in the boreal mixedwood: highlights for mixedwood managers.
How dominant tree species abundance relate with biotic, abiotic and disturbance factors in a dry Afromontane forest, Northern Ethiopia? Mekdes Ourge Ethiopia.
MWMA Summary.
Succession of saproxylic beetles associated with decomposition of white spruce logs in the boreal forest Seung-Il Lee¹, John R. Spence¹,
Soil Biological Communities and Aboveground Resilience
Land Management, Mycorrhizal Diversity, and Soil Carbon Sequestration
Raisa Mäkipää Natural Resources Institute Finland
Species Richness and Clear Cut Age
Shelterwood and clearcut
Jing Hu University of Queensland
Mass and Nutrient Loss in Decaying Hardwood Boles at Hubbard Brook
Dr. Han Chen Office: BB-1009F Phone:
Single Tree Selection.
Writing Manuscripts for Publication
Presentation transcript:

Can partial harvesting in boreal mixedwoods maintain processes and fungal communities associated with coarse woody debris? Manuella Struckelj Hedi Kebli Suzanne Brais

Acknowledgements

Presentation plan Why deadwood? Hypotheses The Canadian boreal mixedwoods The SAFE project Methods Deadwood dynamics and C pools Wood-inhabiting fungal community Conclusion

Why deadwood?  Supports more heterotrophic biomass and diversity than live trees;  Scarcity of dead organic matter in managed forests is the leading cause of decreases in species diversity  Contributes to the structural heterogeneity of the forest floor.  Long-term pool of carbon and nutrients.

Hypotheses  Partial harvesting will maintain C pools and dynamics within the limits of those of natural stands.  By maintaining higher substrate availability, partial harvesting will mitigate the negative effects of harvesting on saproxylic fungal species richness and species composition.

The Canadian boreal mixedwoods  Boreal mixedwoods are highly productive  More diverse than Fennoscandian boreal forests  Human impact relatively recent

Harvey et al fire intolerant hardwoodsmixed stands softwood dominated stands Insect outbreak insect outbreak fire Time since last stand-replacing fire pionneer species hardwoods mixed stands softwood dominated stands clear cut partial cut clear cut partial cut selection cut even-aged silviculture uneven-aged silviculture

Ecosystem-based silviculture in aspen- dominated stands (SAFE 1) Control burn Clear cut Control Low thin 31 % BA High thin 60 % BA

Monitoring C pools and fluxes

191 logs (aspen) 48 snags (aspen) DNA extraction, cloning and sequencing Snag and log characteristics Stand deadwood volume Characterisation of wood-inhabiting fungi community

Effects of partial and clear-cut harvesting on aboveground C pools associated with trees, snags, and downed logs. Live treesSnagsLogs Time since harvesting

Nine year cumulative C fluxes to dead organic matter associated with leaf litterfall and tree death.

Effects of partial and clear-cut harvesting on decomposition of leaf litter and wood of trembling aspen.

Effect of partial and clear-cut harvesting on C pools over a 9-year period following harvesting

Harvesting prescriptions modified deadwood characteristics Small logs Mid-decayed logs Well decayed logsLarge logs

Fungal communities on aspen snags and logs 35 different operational taxonomic units (OTU) were found on logs, 31 on snags. Mean number of OTUs per log = 5.5 (maximum of 20) Mean number on snags = 5.4 (maximum of 12) Resinicium bicolor and Phialophora sp. were found predominantly on snags Athelia neuhoffii, Phellinus cinereus, Calocera cornea on logs

Fungal richness on deadwood is linked to both log/snag and stand characteristics Effect of stand and log characteristics on richness (number of OTUs). Model averaged estimates and unconditional standard errors were obtained from linear mixed multimodel inference. Explanatory variable Model averaged estimate Unconditional SE Type of deadwood Logs Small fresh logs Large fresh logs SnagsFine woody debris volume

Large logs had the highest rrichness and the effect was more pronounced in highly disturbed stands Independent of harvesting intensity, large well-decayed logs (>10 cm) had the highest richness.  + nearly 2 OTUs (10%) compared to small mid-decayed logs OTUs (7.5%) compared to large, mid-decayed logs Negative values indicate that fungal species richness was higher on small logs while positive values indicate that more OTUs were found on large logs.

Conclusion  Carbon dynamics after partial cutting conserved many characteristics of natural stands  Partial harvesting prescription has incidence on deadwood abundance and recruitment  Wood inhabiting fungal community responds to changes in deadwood abundance and size distribution. The most severe disturbances affect fungal species richness  Specific objectives (recruitment, abundance, size) can be incorporated into partial harvesting prescriptions  Large logs can buffer adverse environmental conditions following disturbance