Pulsed Flows Along a Cusp Structure Observed with SDO/AIA B. J. Thompson 1, P. Démoulin 2, J. K. Edmondson 3, C. H. Mandrini 4, M. L. Mays 1, L. Ofman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Active Region Upflow Plasma and its Possible Contribution to the Slow Solar Wind J. L. Culhane 1, D.H. Brooks 2, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi 1,3,4, P. Démoulin.
Advertisements

Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Trend of the magnetic helicity flux during the formation and the destabilization of flux ropes F. Zuccarello 1, S.L. Guglielmino 1, P. Romano 2 and F.P.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.
Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.
Low-Energy Coronal Sources Observed with RHESSI Linhui Sui (CUA / NASA GSFC)
Erupting flux rope, rising X-ray source and CME on 16 April 2002 C. Goff 1, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi 1,2,3, L. K. Harra 1, S. A. Matthews 1, and C.H. Mandrini.
Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Non-Equilibrium Ionization Modeling of the Current Sheet in a Simulated Solar Eruption Chengcai Shen Co-authors: K. K. Reeves, J. C. Raymond, N. A. Murphy,
General Properties Absolute visual magnitude M V = 4.83 Central temperature = 15 million 0 K X = 0.73, Y = 0.25, Z = 0.02 Initial abundances: Age: ~ 4.52.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [session no.]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization.
Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Nonlinear Force Free Field Models for AR J.McTiernan, H.Hudson (SSL/UCB) T.Metcalf (LMSAL)
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection in Coronal Mass Ejection Current Sheets Crystal L. Pope Elmhurst College Advisors: Nick Murphy & Mari Paz Miralles Harvard-Smithsonian.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Coronal holes as seen in soft X-rays H. S. Hudson (UCB and SPRC) SOHO-11, Davos, March 13, 2002.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Kinematics and coronal field strength of an untwisting jet in a polar coronal hole observed by SDO/AIA H. Chen, J. Zhang, & S. Ma ILWS , Beijing.
High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.
Intriguing Observations of a Failed Eruption? We present observations of a (partially) failed eruption of a magnetic flux rope following an M9.3 flare.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
Newark, Wiegelmann et al.: Coronal magnetic fields1 Solar coronal magnetic fields: Source of Space weather Thomas Wiegelmann, Julia Thalmann,
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated decimetric/metric radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
AGU Dec 2000 The Structure and Evolution of a Sigmoid Observed During Whole Sun Month 3 Lyndsay Fletcher Sarah Gibson, and the WSM3 sigmoid structure working.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
The Solar Wind.
Analysis Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares: the Importance of Spines and Separators Angela Des Jardins 1, Richard Canfield 1, Dana Longcope 1, Emily.
1 SPD Meeting, July 8, 2013 Coronal Mass Ejection Plasma Heating by Alfvén Wave Dissipation Rebekah M. Evans 1,2, Merav Opher 3, and Bart van der Holst.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
1 Interplanetary Magnetic Flux Enhancements as seen by STEREO C.T. Russell, L.K. Jian and J.G. Luhmann 18 th STEREO Science Working Group April Meudon,
The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.
White light coronagraph showing prominances and streamers The Coronal Magnetic Field.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
IMAGING AND SPECTOROPIC INVESTIGATIONS OF A SOLAR CORONAL WAVE: PROPERTIES OF THE WAVE FRONT AND ASSOCIATED ERUPTING MATERIAL L OUISE K. HARRA AND A LPHONSE.
Moving Magnetic Features (MMFs) Jun Zhang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators: Sami Solanki and Jingxiu Wang.
Pulsed Flows Along a Cusp Structure Observed with SDO/AIA B. J. Thompson 1, P. Démoulin 2, C. H. Mandrini 3, M. L. Mays 1, L. Ofman 4, S. L. Savage 1,
Jet Phenomena in the Solar Atmosphere with Rotational Eruption or Spinning Motion; Observation associated with Our MHD numerical Simulations 2004 年 4 月21日.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
1 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; K. E. J. Huttunen, Y. Li, J. Luhmann, B. Lynch, UCB/SSL; Angelos Vourlidas & R. A. Howard, NRL;
Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Three-Dimensional Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections From LASCO Polarization Measurements K. P. Dere, D. Wang and R. Howard ApJL, 620; L119-L
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Zurab Vashalomidze (1) In collaboration with
Sun: General Properties
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Direct Observations of the Magnetic Reconnection Site of an Eruption on 2003 November ,ApJ, 622,1251 J. Lin, Y.-K. Ko, L. Sui, J. C. Raymond, G.
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Correlation between halo coronal mass ejections
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
Presentation transcript:

Pulsed Flows Along a Cusp Structure Observed with SDO/AIA B. J. Thompson 1, P. Démoulin 2, J. K. Edmondson 3, C. H. Mandrini 4, M. L. Mays 1, L. Ofman 5, S. L. Savage 1, L. Van Driel-Gesztelyi 6, N. M. Viall 1 1 NASA GSFC, 2 Observatoire de Paris, Meudon, France, 3 University of Michigan 4 Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, FCEN-UBA, Argentina, 5 NASA GSFC/Catholic University, 6 Konkoly Observatory of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary

We present observations of a cusp-shaped structure that formed after a flare and coronal mass ejection on 14 February Throughout the evolution of the cusp structure, blob features up to several Mm in size were observed flowing along the legs and stalk/spine of the cusp. The flows were observable in multiple AIA EUV wavelengths, but they were most distinct in the 171 and 304 Å bandpasses. The tracked flows had projected speeds ranging from 50 to 200 km/sec, but the cusp structure was oriented out of the plane of the image, so the actual speeds were closer to 75 to 250 km/sec. We were able to track the flows of dozens of blobs from their origin along one of the legs of the cusp. Flows at that location were divergent from an apparent "X-point." Over time, the X-point moved to the opposite leg of the cusp.

The feature of interest formed at the site of a major (M2.2) flare and a fast (1250 km/sec) CME. The cusp-shape was visible in all of the AIA EUV wavelengths, but overall the loop structure was most easily seen in the hotter lines, and the blobs/flows were easiest to see in the cooler lines.

There were many eruptions and flares that came from this region over the course of several days, and the cusp-shape reformed several times. The event described here contains the most long-lived flows.

On February 14, 2011 an M2.2 flare occurred, beginning at 17:20 UT and peaking at 17:26 Signs of the accompanying CME, including "raining" cool material, were observable over much of the visible disk of the Sun. A "two-tiered" cusp formed, with the stalk of the primary cusp extending from the point marked "A." The secondary cusp is marked at point "B." A B 14 February 2011 AIA 335 Å

Over time, the topology evolved from a "two-tiered" cusp to a simpler structure.

A

A B A C B D Flow plots To track the many flows along the complex structure, five points were identified to "characterize" the evolution: A) The junction point of the primary cusp B) The junction point of the secondary cusp C) An elbow bend along the right branch of the cusp leg D) A point far along the cusp stalk/spine (difficult to see sometimes) The coordinates for points A – D were tracked and interpolated in time, so that the flows along the lines AB, AC and AD could be compared. 335 Å 07:41 UT A C B D 171 Å 18:00 UT

Flows along the cusp spine (defined by the line connecting points A and D) were observed in multiple wavelengths, but 171 and 304 Å were clearest. The y-axis of the plot below shows the the maximum emission along the line AD obtained by sampling five pixels perpendicular to the line. The x-axis is time. In general, the slope decreased over time, indicating that either the flow speeds were decreasing, or that the orientation of the cusp spine was becoming increasingly radial. Flow plots D A D A

B C A B From 17:45 UT to around 18:20 UT, blobs moving along the line defined by points A and B were observed flowing in both directions. A clear "herringbone" structure, with dozens of ribs, is visible for much of the time. The speeds of the blobs flowing from the "X" point ranged from 75 – 120 km/sec, while the flows along the stalk were typically closer to 150 km/sec. If the direction of motion was 40 degrees out of the plane of the sky, that gives 80 – 230 km/sec. "X" A B C Arrows denote 100 km/sec

The cusp feature was located slightly southwest of solar disk center, but the feature pointed to the northeast. Therefore, the feature was inclined far from the radial direction. Similar-looking cusp features were observed after other flares. An attempt was made to determine the angle of the cusp feature using tomography, assuming that the cusp features had similar orientations. However, this was not successful. A similar-looking cusp formed after the C7.1 flare at 3:24 UT on 2011 February 14. A radial feature was observed in STEREO EUVI-A images around the time of the cusp flows discussed in this paper, and it is possible it was the same feature as seen in the AIA images. If that is so, than the radial feature was inclined approximately 40 degrees from the plane of the sky. What is the angle of the cusp stalk relative to the plane of the sky?? STEREO EUVI-A 195 Å 17:55 UT

Magnetic field structure of flaring/erupting region MDI_mag_ _ MDI_mag_ _17-35 Emergence The active region (AR) was the site of significant flut emergence, resulting in two dozen flares and multiple CMEs over the course of a couple of days. The two-lobe cusp and spine configuration with the appearance of a pseudo-streamer (drawn in yellow) formed on the NE side of the AR centered over the positive polarity of an emerging bipole (indicated in red). 14 February :39 UT 14 February :35 UT Location of primary cusp and spine

The field lines from the +ve polarity connect the to the opposite (-ve) polarity of the emerging bipole. However, connections to other pre- existing –ve polarities within the AR, as well as towards the quiet-sun, also develop. This forms a partial “anemone”. Above the center of the anemone, a spine field line extends upward. This magnetic configuration is present for long time, but it only becomes visible after the coronal mass ejections, which appear to come primarily from the East side of the active region near the emeging flux and anemone structure. The expanding CME compresses the magnetic configuration, resulting in heating and an increase of densities in the loops it contains, consequently the structure brightens. After the CME is gone, the brightness is decreasing as the cusp-spine structure relaxes. The brightening of the cusp-spine structure (which is a 3D enveloping structure of the anemone) is dominantly due to compression-heating by the CME, which erupted 10 minutes earlier. Flows seen along the cusp structure can be due to compression (squeezing material out) as well as cooling downflows and magnetic reconnection. The flows are probably driven by a combination of mechanisms. Magnetic field structure of cusp structure

Vector extrapolations (Xudong Sun)

MHD simulations of recurrent jet activity Edmondson movie Edmondson et al., 2012

The CME is gone away Well before (~ 17:30), a small ejection, say CME, was ejected from this region (emerging region), and it moves in region 1 It compress the surrounding fields, in particular region 2. The boundary between the two regions (pseudo streamer) was compressed and shows of. Probably reconnection was also involved. At the time of the image the CME is far away. The magnetic pressure in region 1 has decreased (magnetic shear/ twist was transported away), So now it is region 2 which is in overpressure compared to region 1. pseudo-streamer Region 1 Region 2

Region 2 is in overpressure compression Current sheet formation Motion due to compression with a plausible contribution of reconnection (still your movie is showing a current sheet growing so it is more building up than reconnecting). These flows are likely more due to reconnection than compression

Current sheet Simplified magnetic configuration - - +

The speeds of the blobs flowing from the "X" point ranged from 75 – 120 km/sec, while the flows along the stalk were typically closer to 150 km/sec. If the direction of motion was 40 degrees out of the plane of the sky, which gives 80 – 230 km/sec.

Speeds of blobs ranged from 50 – 150 km/sec, typically closer to 150 km/sec. If the direction of motion was 40 degrees out of the plane of the sky, that gives 80 – 230 km/sec. Seriously, I need help with the orientation of the structure!! Typical size of blobs in the plane of the sky is 5-10 Mm, 7-15 Mm when assuming the feature is moving 40 degrees out of the plane. Clusters of blobs were spaced 30 – 60 seconds apart.

2011/02/13 17:28:00 17:38:00 17:30:00 M6.6 CME PA = 86 MaxV = /02/13 20:42:00 20:47:00 20:45:00 B /02/13 21:17:00 21:22:00 21:20:00 C /02/13 21:26:00 21:31:00 21:29:00 B /02/14 01:31:00 01:48:00 01:37:00 B /02/14 02:35:00 02:46:00 02:42:00 C /02/14 03:24:00 05:08:00 04:48:00 C /02/14 04:29:00 05:09:00 04:49:00 C /02/14 06:51:00 07:03:00 06:58:00 C /02/14 08:39:00 09:04:00 08:49:00 C /02/14 11:51:00 12:26:00 12:00:00 C /02/14 12:41:00 12:58:00 12:45:00 C /02/14 13:47:00 14:42:00 14:27:00 C /02/14 16:48:00 16:57:00 16:53:00 B /02/14 17:20:00 17:32:00 17:26:00 M /02/14 19:23:00 19:36:00 19:30:00 C /02/14 23:14:00 23:26:00 23:19:00 C /02/14 23:40:00 23:57:00 23:46:00 C /02/15 00:31:00 00:48:00 00:38:00 C /02/15 01:44:00 01:56:00 01:45:00 X /02/15 04:27:00 04:37:00 04:31:00 C /02/15 10:02:00 10:16:00 10:07:00 C /02/15 14:32:00 14:51:00 14:44:00 C /02/15 19:30:00 20:53:00 20:33:00 C6.7