© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Suppliers Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
Advertisements

HACCP.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Control of Nonconforming Product.
ISO 9001 : 2000.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Facility Layout,
OHS Worksite Inspections February Health & Safety Systems > The goal of any health & safety system is to eliminate or reduce as far as is practicable.
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Facility Environment.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Pest Control.
BRC Storage & Distribution Safety and Quality Management System Training Guide
The ISO 9002 Quality Assurance Management System
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Control of Measuring.
11. Purchasing, new product development and quality control
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Management Responsibility.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Complaint Handling.
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Corrective Action.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Specifications.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Procedures FSKN.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Training Chennai,
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP – Introduction.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Staff Facilities.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Water Quality.
Support Programs version 2 March 2010 Cleaning and Sanitation
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Product Analysis.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Product Contamination Control.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Supplier Qualification.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Transport and.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Workshop Introduction.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Document Control.
Paul Hardiman and Rob Brown SMMT IF Planning and organising an audit.
AET0012PPT by Dr. Anwar El-Tawil Dr. Anwar El-Tawil Director ISO Programme for Developing Countries QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Traceability.
A FSP is a Program designed to identify and control hazards in order to establish and maintain food safety. (Based on HACCP principles) 1 version 2 Dec.2009.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Waste Management.
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
1 Quality Management Z SUZSANNA E SZTER T ÓTH R ITA D ÉNES Department of Management and Corporate Economics 1 March 2016.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Incident Management.
HACCP Principle 3 – Establish Critical Limits
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Suppliers Performance.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Food Defense.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Facility Environment 1.
Facility and Equipment Maintenance
UNDERSTANDING ISO 9001:2008.
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP).
The Risk Assessment in the Food Industry
HACCP Principle 5 – Establish Corrective Actions
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Food Production Systems
GFSI Certification What Top Management Needs to Know
Chemical Purchasing.
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Presentation transcript:

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Suppliers Performance Monitoring FSKN I 8 Chennai, India February 2-4, 2011

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA GFSI Intermediate Requirement The organization shall operate procedures for approval and continued monitoring of all its suppliers whose products or services may affect product safety. The results of evaluations and follow-up actions shall be recorded.

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Why Manage and Monitor Supplier Performance Managing and monitoring a supplier’s performance is one of the tools that can be used to provide assurance of the safety of raw materials, ingredients and additives. Monitoring a supplier’s performance will provide verification of continued compliance product specifications. Monitoring a supplier’s performance will provide an indication of changes within the suppliers systems and procedures that could lead to potential issues

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Why Manage and Monitor Supplier Performance Effective supplier performance monitoring and management strategies have significant benefits:  Reduction of food safety problems associated with purchased items.  Contributes to effective risk management of food safety hazards  Contributes towards the development of strategic relationships with suppliers.  Assists in developing supplier capability and knowledge  Assists in development of supply chain management strategies  Improves supplier and purchasing performance  Promotes continual improvement.

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA The Product Supplier Performance Monitoring Process There shall be a defined program for all product suppliers after the supplier has gained approval to supply There should be a program which may consist of supplier audits, product inspection, product analysis and customer complaint review The program should be based upon risk assessment, which could be revised in view of review of performance, for example if a series of microbiological results confirms low levels of indicator bacteria, the frequency of testing should be considered Risk is determined by product risk ( likelihood to cause harm to health) and supplier technical competence (knowledge and ability to continuous meet requirements) Product risk will rarely change however supplier technical competence can be measured by performance and can change

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Example : Risk Assessment Supplier Performance Program Product Risk Supplier Technical Competence High Low Highly CompetenceLow Competence

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Example-Supplier Auditing Product Risk Supplier Technical Competence Audit supplier every six months Audit supplier once per year or receive copies of certified audits Audit supplier every two years or receive copies of certified audits

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Example – Raw Material Testing Program ProductProduct Rating SupplierSupplier Rating Intake Check Frequency & Level Microbiological Analysis Chemical Analysis Frozen Cooked Chicken Meat 5Smith4Temp-Every delivery 3 points in vehicle Bone Fragment – Every delivery 10 kg sample Every Delivery- 3 samples TVC Coliforms E.Coli Salmonella Every Delivery- 3 samples Meat Content Chilled Cooked Chicken Meat 5Jones1Temp-Every delivery 3 points in vehicle Bone Fragment – One delivery per month 10 kg sample One Delivery per month- 3 samples TVC Coliforms E.Coli Salmonella One Delivery-every six months 3 samples Meat Content Fresh Herbs3Harris2Temp- Every delivery Foreign Body/Stalk One delivery per month 5 kg One Delivery per month- 3 samples TVC Coliforms One Delivery per year Pesticide Residues Full screen Dried Herbs2Hany4Foreign Body/Stalk Every Delivery-10kg One Delivery per year – 3 samples Coliforms One Delivery per 6 months Pesticide Residues Full screen

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Record Keeping All records should be retained for a defined period of time Collate records by supplier and product type which will allow effective trend analysis and provide valuable information on supplier competence/performance and product risk Where changes to product or supplier competence rating is made this is done with the authority of the food safety team leader and the reasons for the changes shall be recorded

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Supplier Feedback Suppliers need to be made aware from outset that their performance will be assessed and recorded. They must be advised of the performance criteria, how they will be measured, how performance assessment will be recorded and who will have access to such information. Suppliers should be advised of the results of testing and product inspection on an ongoing basis Results of technical audits shall be made known on the day of the audit and any actions agreed and confirmed Share feedback with the person in your company responsible for product purchase

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Internal Feedback and Review Commitment from product buyers to act upon the results of the supplier monitoring program is essential to ensure the safety of product is compromised A good working relationship and understanding between the product purchasing department and the food safety department should be encouraged by senior management Where problems are experienced these should be dealt with quickly and any corrective action taken. Changes to the monitoring program should be considered and, if appropriate, revised The supplier performance monitoring program must be undertaken in accordance with resource availability and should be included within the Management Review

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Service Supplier Performance Monitoring The monitoring of the performance of company providing services which could impact of food safety is also required Performance should be undertaken to assess compliance with contract or service agreements, for example pest control, waste disposal, the supply of transportation and supply of utilities such as water Monitoring should be undertaken at regular intervals and always prior to, and immediately after, the issue or renewal of contracts

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA Acknowledgements This material was developed with financial support from the: United States Agency for International Development – Michigan State University – Indian Horticulture Development Alliance (IHDA) project, and Italian Development Cooperation under the project UE/GLO/09/017 Establishment of an Agribusiness Solutions, Traceability and Upgrading Excellence Centre in Egypt.

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization; Original at CC-BY-SA License to Reuse © 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at licensed using Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-SA). To view a copy of this license, visit or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.