August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
Centinela Valley UHSD BTSA Induction Overview September 16, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation Model
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Illinois Educator Code of Ethics Training
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Adapted from Growing Success (Ontario Schools) by K. Gibson
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1 for Districts & Schools for Educators.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
10/12/20151 Fillmore Middle School Fillmore Unified School District School Site Council (SSC)
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
1 Palo Verde Unified School District Curriculum & Instruction Department Malcolm Butler, Director of Curriculum & Instruction Single Plans for Student.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
UACT and CVUSD Certificated Employee Development and Evaluation Procedures For The School Year.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
What it means for New Teachers
TOPS TRAINING.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Dissemination Training
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark McLaughlin Instructional Accountability

 Local Educational Agency Plan / Single Plan for Student Achievement  Monitoring  Professional Development/Accountability  Observations & Evaluations  Coaching/Remediation Plan  Peer Assistance Review (PAR) Overview

 Educational Master Plan for the District addresses the academic and language needs of all students as defined in the State Standards  Data analysis identifies improvement needs  Plan of action to address academic and language needs developed by LEA Plan Task Force (certificated, classified, management, parents, community, students)  Board Approves Local Education Agency (LEA) Plan

 LEA serves as the Basic model to develop Single Plan for Student Achievement addressing student academic and language needs as defined in the State Standards  Data Analysis (district data as well as site specific data to provide supplemental services and trainings)  Site team develops the SPSA and approved by the School Site Council composed of site staff and parents.  SPSA then sent to School Board for approval From LEA to Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA)

 Administrators monitor instruction, implementation and fidelity of the core curriculum as well as the supplemental programs and services  Administrators analyze data to monitor the academic and language progress of students in State Standards  Administrators provide feedback to Teachers through coaching and evaluation process Monitoring

 Provide necessary training for Administrators and Teachers  Site Administrators and District Support serve as coaches for teachers to provide quality classroom instruction  Site Administrators hold teachers accountable to the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTPs) and use it as their evaluation tool to monitor increase in student achievement and the professional development of teachers Professional Development/Accountability

 The Evaluation Process is found in Article 9 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)  The Evaluations Process is a negotiated process and is an agreement between the Fontana Unified School District (FUSD) and the Fontana Teachers Association (FTA) Evaluation Process

 The basic purpose of the Evaluation Process is to  Establish the premise of continuous improvement to promote personal accountability  To encourage professional development  Provide for due process  Within this context, evaluation is:  A cooperative and continuous process aimed at improving and maintaining quality educational programs, while serving as an essential component in the professional development of certificated personnel. (CBA, 9.1) Evaluation Process

 What has a positive effect instruction and performance is the conversation between Administrators and Teachers on an ongoing basis throughout the school year.  This provides for proper accountability and conversations when needed and appropriate Evaluation Process

California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTPs)  Engaging and supporting all students in learning  Creating and maintaining effective environments for student learning  Understanding and organizing subject matter for student learning  Planning instruction and designing learning experiences for all students  Assessing student learning  Developing as a professional educator Evaluation Process In order to be in compliance with Education Code 44662(b) the governing board of each school district shall evaluate certificated employee performance as it reasonably relates to each of these standards:

 Non Permanent Teachers are to be observed no less than three (3) times per year and have two (2) evaluations. Non Permanent

 Permanent Teachers shall be formally observed and evaluated at least one (1) time every two (2) years.  Teachers have the ability to fall into a five (5) year cycle during the evaluation process  Administration always has the ability to evaluate Teachers as long as the timelines are meet to notify and the Standards and Key Elements meeting take place within the first four(4) weeks of school Permanent

 Notification for a Certificated Bargaining Unit member must be made in writing/ within the first two weeks of the school year or within the first two weeks of being hired. Notification

 California Standards for the Teaching Profession Objectives:  Prior to the end of the fourth (4 th ) week of school  Teachers meet with their evaluating administrator to complete their Standards and Key Elements.  The member is to indicate the resources and/or support needed and timeline for accomplishing each objective.  The evaluator shall acquaint Teachers with District philosophy, the CSTPs, goals, job descriptions, and additional District performance expectations. Standards and Key Elements

 The Classroom Observation will be used for the purpose of recording classroom observations as well as providing recommendations and commendations to the teachers.  Minimum of one formal classroom observation is required for permanent teachers  Minimum of three formal classroom observations is required for non-permanent teachers. Observation Process

 Summarize the effectiveness of the Teacher’s performance in reference to stated Standards and Key Elements within the CSTPs  The first evaluation is to be completed for non- permanent Teachers by December 14,  The second evaluation for non-permanent Teachers by April 4, 2013  Evaluation for permanent Teachers is to be completed by April 4, 2013 Teacher Evaluation

 Specific evidence for remediation from formal observation  Recommendations  District Assistance  Materials  Time Schedule  Communication Process Remediation Plan

 A Referred Participating Teacher is a teacher with permanent status who is referred for assistance to the PAR Program in order  To improve his/her instructional skills, classroom management, knowledge of subject, and/or related aspects of his/her teaching performance as a result of an overall unsatisfactory evaluation (CBA, ) Unsatisfactory PAR Referral

 A teacher with permanent status  Volunteers to participate in the PAR program to improve their educational practices  Peer assistance only Volunteer PAR Referral

 FUSD and FTA negotiated using 2009 CSTPs and updated and revised the evaluation document/rubric  New Evaluation Handbook was created by Human Resources  All Administrators who supervise Teachers participated in an Evaluation Training and had the opportunity to ask questions during the first six days of the school year  Administrators were provide all of the correct forms and documents that should be used during the Evaluation Process  Timeline memo was sent to ensure administrators meet all timelines listed within the CBA Update Information for