2011-12 ALLOCATION OF FUNDS Presented By: Kelly Gallatin Federal Funds Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Advertisements

Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant Education Commission of the States.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Introduction to Title I October 23, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) January 2001 Re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
Rules and Regulations.  Requirements (Title I and Title III)  Notices  Timeline  Schools on Improvement  Use of Funds.
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS Presented By: Kelly Gallatin Federal Funds Manager.
 Census Data  Non-Census Data  State per-pupil expenditures  Amount appropriated  Hold-harmless guarantee  School Improvement allocations.
Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)
The Future for Rural Schools Mary Kusler Assistant Director, Government Relations American Association of School Administrators June 30, 2007 Rewriting.
Oklahoma’s Math and Science Partnership (Title 2 Part B) Gloria Bayouth Executive Director, Office of Federal Programs Jennifer Lamb Director of Elementary.
A Changing Metric: Low Income vs. Economically Disadvantaged Revised July 6, 2015.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Equitable Services for Private School Students March, 2012 Consultation Process & Meeting Agenda’s Marcia Beckman, Director Elementary & Secondary Education.
Title IA Eligible Attendance Areas Title IA Online Training
Section 1113 of NCLB, Title I Eligible School Attendance Areas (Does not apply to LEAs with fewer than 1,000 children)
Calculating Your Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE )….. General Selection Requirements 1.An LEA must rank all of its schools (from which the LEA draws its children)
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
ESEA Directors Institute 2014ESEA Directors Institute 2014 Title I Schools – Select / Rank / Serve.
Calculating Discounts Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland.
Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students (OELA) Presented by:Margarita.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Title 1, Part A Local Consolidated Plan (LCP) Application May 2009.
1 Determining Title IA School Allocations Title IA Online Training
1 Virginia Department of Education Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Consolidated Funding ApplicationConsolidated Funding Application ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 6-9, 2014October 6-9, 2014.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
WISCONSIN STATEWIDE TITLE I NETWORK CESA #2 AND THE WISCONSIN DPI Title I “Quick Start” Title I Quick-Start.
LCFF The LCFF is the largest change to California’s school finance model in almost 40 years with a planned eight-year transition period, beginning in
Planning Together to Improve Outcomes for All Students U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary & Secondary Education (OESE) Office of Special.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Coordinating Nonpublic School Services Jack Clark Allentown City School District Cindy Rhoads Regional Coordinator, DFP.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting San Diego Unified School District.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
Title I, Part A Program Title I, Part A provides educational services to schools with high percentages of children from low-income families by providing.
Title I, Part A 1.
Shelton School District Federal Programs Presentation to the School Board Federal & State Compensatory Program Overview April 23, 2013 Gail Straus Director.
FY17 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 27, 2016.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of Federal Educational Programs ECTAC ADMINISTRATOR’S MEETING SONYA G. MORRIS, BUREAU CHIEF MARCH 3, 2016.
College Community School District 4 Budget Calculations for General Fund Budget Year.
Comprehensive Continuous Improvement Plan(CCIP) Training Module 5 Title I Pages.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
Enhancing Education Through Technology ( EETT/Title II D) Competitive Grant Application Technical Assistance Workshop New York State Education Department.
Understanding the Title I Program. Renee Palakovic Director of Planning Division of Consolidated Planning & Monitoring (615)
PAPFC Annual Conference May 3-6, 2015 Presented By: Cindy Rhoads Division of Federal Programs Pennsylvania Department of Education.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.
Changes to the eGrants system 2017
Community Eligibility Provision and Title I
Introduction to Title I
Every Student Succeeds Act
Introduction to Title I
Title I and Prekindergarten
Community Eligibility Provision
General Rank Order Rules
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective
Title I Parent Meeting September 29, 2015
Federal Programs Public Hearing
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
Allocations and Calculations in ESSA
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
Community Eligibility Provision and Title I
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
DFP Allocations: Understanding My Award Amount
Presentation transcript:

ALLOCATION OF FUNDS Presented By: Kelly Gallatin Federal Funds Manager

Status of DFP Funds Funding Increases: –Title III, Language Acquisition (no change) –Rural & Low Income (no change) Funding Decreases: –Title I, Improving Basic Programs (-5.2%) –Title II, Improving Teacher Quality (-1.1%) –School Improvement Grant (-6.8%) –Title II, Math & Science Partnerships (-7.7%) –Title II, Educational Technology (-6.7%) PDE

Terminology The following terms are often confused but have three distinct applications: Census Poor (or Poverty Level) Formula Percent (or Percent of Formula Children) Percent of Free and Reduced Lunch PDE

Title I-A, Census Poor Census Poor –The number of children age 5-17 from families below the poverty level on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data (each person or family is assigned one out of 48 possible poverty thresholds). USDE

Census Info About census poverty: About school district info: About poverty data sources: about/datasources/ USDE

Title I-A, Formula Percent Formula Factors –Children to be Counted Census Poor TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) Foster Neglected All Updated Annually USDE

How Different is Census Poor from Free & Reduced Lunch? Students whose family income is up to 135% of the poverty level are eligible for Free lunch Students whose family income is up to 185% of the poverty level are eligible for Reduced lunch

How Different is Census Poor from Free & Reduced Lunch? Census Poor % is generally MUCH Lower School District NameCensus FRL Big Pine SD 25.74% 60.74% Smallville Area SD 23.84% 71.68% Valley Junction SD 11.07% 27.40%

Title I-A Allocations Eligibility – ( Formula vs population ) –Basic Grants 10 Formula Children; AND 2% Formula Children (Census, TANF, Foster & Neglected) –Concentration Grants 15% Formula Children OR 6500 Formula Children USDE

Title I-A Allocations Eligibility (Cont’d) –Targeted Grants 10 Formula Children; AND 5% Formula Children –Education Finance Incentive Grant (EFIG) 10 Formula Children; AND 5% Formula Children USDE

HOLD-HARMLESS GUARANTEE (at USDE Level) All 4 formulas provide for a variable hold- harmless guarantee for each LEA of 85%, 90%, and 95% of their previous year’s allocation The hold-harmless percentage depends on the percent of formula children for each LEA For Basic, Targeted, and EFIG, an LEA must meet the eligibility criteria in order for hold- harmless protection to apply For Concentration Grants, the hold-harmless provision applies to an LEA for four years even if it no longer meets the 15% eligibility criteria USDE

Title I, Part A Formula USDE Calculates LEA Estimates PDE Adjusts for Charter Schools –Total Enrollment from sending LEAs –Calculate Formula Children 4% School Improvement Set Aside 1% Administration Set Aside Achievement Awards (5% of PA gain) PDE

Title I, Part A Formula Hold Harmless Applied at These Levels –95% for 30% or More Formula Children –90% for >=15% but <30% Formula Children –85% for less than 15% Formula Children PDE

HOLD-HARMLESS GUARANTEE (at PDE Level) Variable hold-harmless guarantee for each LEA of 85%, 90%, or 95% based on the Total of their previous year’s state-determined allocation The hold-harmless percentage depends on the percent of formula children for each LEA PDE method helps lessen the degree of severity of abrupt losses in Targeted and EFIG funds in a single year that are not held- harmless at the USDE level PDE

Improving Teacher Quality Title II, Part A Formula Formula Factors –Hold Harmless –Census Poor –5-17 Population –Nonpublic Share PDE

Improving Teacher Quality Title II, Part A Formula Hold Harmless – Amount (or estimate for LEAs established after ) –LEAs AND IUs –Ratable Reduction if Insufficient Funds –Remaining Funds Allocated to LEAs PDE

Improving Teacher Quality Title II, Part A Formula Distribution of Remaining Funds 80% of Funds –Census Poor –% of the Whole 20% of Funds –5-17 population –% of the Whole PDE

Title II, Part A Nonpublic Intermediate Units Receive $$$ for Nonpublic Programs HH at Amount May Be Eligible for Additional $$$ From Public School Districts –Based on $ Spent on Professional Development –E-grants Calculates Additional Funds—If Any PDE

QUESTIONS ????????????????