Argyle and Pecatonica School Districts The Fiscal Impacts of Consolidation Pecatonica Argyle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Debt. Budget Deficit – The amount by which expenditures exceed revenues (G>T) - $186.5 Billion (2007) Budget Surplus – The amount by which revenues.
Advertisements

Budget Workshop California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office College Finance and Facilities Planning Division.
The Long-Term Squeeze on Municipal Finances Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials Michael J. Widmer, President Massachusetts Taxpayers.
REFERENDUM 2014 Building Maintenance. Referendum 2014 Focused on providing a safe and healthy learning environment for students Fiscally responsible:
Tax Rate Adoption North East ISD August 11, 2008.
Detroit Public Schools FY 2005 Adopted Budget June 30, 2004.
Parkview School District Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Monday, August 18, :30 p.m. Parkview Jr./Sr. High School LMC Monday, August.
School Finance 101 by Ben Irwin Business Manager Parkview School District.
FAIR EDUCATION FUNDING: Recommendations of the Education Finance Working Group Tom Melcher Schools for Equity in Education Meeting November 30, 2012.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LEE COUNTY TENTATIVE BUDGET HEARING JULY 29, 2010 SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LEE COUNTY TENTATIVE BUDGET HEARING JULY 29, 2010.
Wisconsin Public Schools Revenue Limits. History 1949 –State adopted a system to address property- wealth differences among districts, which provided.
Local Taxes in New York: Easing the Burden Citizens Budget Commission Conference December 6, 2007 Held at the Rockefeller Institute, Albany, NY.
BOARD OF EDUCATION Finance Presentation Thursday, February 9, 2012.
Dr. John Augenblick Augenblick, Palaich and Associates.
Tough choices ahead Illustrating the choices and trade-offs in the next spending review Kayte Lawton and Amna Silim September 2012.
Operating Levy Renewal Levy versus Bond Levy = LearningBond = Building.
1 FY2008 Capital Budget Workshop July 10, 2007 Board of County Commissioners.
Supplemental Levy Election Tuesday, March 11, 2014.
Money makes the world... Wisconsin’s fiscal challenge About a lot more than budgets. |
SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE ON LEGISLATIVE ISSUES, DISTRICT INITIATIVES AND BUDGET PREPARATION March 29, 2011.
Public Hearing June 23, 2009 Berkeley County School District FY General Fund Budget.
Ridgeland School District Referendum. District 122 in Oak Lawn.
Shawano School District Annual Meeting Budget School Year July 23, 2008.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. State of Minnesota Economic Outlook: Implications for.
W elcome to The School District of Wabeno Area Two Cents Event March 2014.
Five Year Financial Forecast May Cleveland Municipal School District.
Lyme Central School District Budget Hearing May 7, 2015.
School Finance 101 Presented by Thomas E. White Michigan School Business Officials October 2004.
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues October 2012.
Understanding Your School District Budget  Annual Spending Plan  To provide quality instruction and educational programs  Ensures taxpayers’ money.
Davenport SD #207 M&O Planning Info Topics Local Effort Assistance Historical Review Levy Swap Summary.
IMPACT OF STATE BUDGET PROPOSAL ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
2006 – 2007 Budget Outline Keeping the promise by adjusting and aligning our budget.
Financial Presentation Five-Year Forecast October 17, 2005.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT JUNE 30, 2015 ISD #413 Marshall Public Schools HOFFMAN & BROBST, PLLP.
Financial Long Range Planning Dr. Bruce Capron Honeoye Falls – Lima Central School District Livonia Central School District.
A Report on District Finances: Past, Current and Future.
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST OCTOBER 2012 Cleveland Municipal School District The primary goal of the Cleveland Municipal School District is to become.
East Penn School District Budget Outlook May 23, 2011.
Jefferson City Revenue Forecast Staff Analysis. Accuracy in Estimates Important to Make Best Use of Tax Payer Money.
Five Year Financial Forecast October Cleveland Municipal School District.
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST MAY 2013 Cleveland Municipal School District The primary goal of the Cleveland Municipal School District is to become a premier.
Fulfilling the Education Promise Michael J. Borges, Executive Director, New York State Association of School Business Officials Joint Legislative Budget.
September 7, Agenda Recent funding history 11/12 budget Beyond Other issues.
Social Security: Challenges & Opportunities Jeffrey R. Brown January 13, 2005.
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST MAY Cleveland Municipal School District.
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST OCTOBER Cleveland Municipal School District.
East Lansing Public Schools Financial Strategies Past, Present and Future.
Role of the Property Tax in Pre K - 12 Education Funding Tom Melcher Education Finance Working Group July 31, 2012.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board November 4, 2011 Ben Ferrell, Jr., Executive Vice President, Finance & Administration Austin Community College.
BUDGET HEARING II Presented to the Board of Education MAY 10, 2016.
City of Sequim Long Range Financial Plan City Council Study Session June 27, 2011.
MCSD 5-YEAR FORECAST PRESENTED MAY 19, 2016 BY RANDY BERTRAM, TREASURER BOARD APPROVAL MAY 23, 2016.
Second Interim Financial Report
The Conundrum of School Finance 2017 Action Summit April 21, 2017
Winter School District
Annual School Board Budget Presentation to the Town Council
Blackhawk School District
Operating Budget Update—March 2016
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues
Castallo and Silky LLC Jessica Cohen and Alan Pole, Consultants
ABHOW Preliminary Planning Parameters – FY 2010 Budget
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Independent School District No. 318 December 3, 2018
Budget Report to NISD Board of Trustees
RIM OF THE WORLD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
7 Did The District’s Academic Rating Exceed Academically Unacceptable? WFISD rated Academically Acceptable 5/13/ Was The Three-Year.
Proposed Preliminary Budget
Budget Review – Special Meeting 3/27/19
Fiscal Year 2019/20 Budget Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Argyle and Pecatonica School Districts The Fiscal Impacts of Consolidation Pecatonica Argyle

Background ■ state budget allocated $250,000 to study consolidations ■ Argyle and Pecatonica approached WISTAX ■ Limited funds ($10,000 per study) – study fiscal implications

Strategy ■ Assumptions about school finance, enrollments, and property values ■ Fiscal future of individual districts ■ Comparison with new, combined district ■ State subsidies for consolidated districts ■ Cost savings from consolidation?

Assumptions - Enrollments ■ State: up 1.4% over 7 years (through ) ■ Argyle: decline from 335 to 291 (-13%) ■ Pecatonica: decline from 443 to 402 (-9%)

Assumptions – Equalized Values ■ Argyle and Pec value changes fluctuate widely ■ Growth forecasted slightly below state avg. ■ Effect of farmland valuation is hard to predict

Scenarios 1. No consolidation 2. Consolidation District does not spend incentives District spends incentives to reduce property taxes District spends some incentives to hold taxpayers harmless

1. No Consolidation: Revenue Limits ■ Revenue limits to grow < 2%/year ■ Costs growing 4% or more…spending cuts?

1. No Consolidation: Tax Rates ■ Rates depend mostly on prop. values and state aid ■ Rates will be higher if referenda needed & passed

Other Pecatonica Issues Hollandale School costs Heating system Roof New school? Other capital costs

Issues: Scale Economies I? ■ Examining district spending shows likely savings of 5%-10% Pecatonica Argyle Consolidated?

Issues: Scale Economies II? District savings estimates $480,000 teaching staff $165,000 administration $80,000 custodial $25,000 food service $45,000 in additional transportation costs $750,000 cost to remodel schools $705,000 operating savings (about 6%)

Issues: Consolidation Incentives I ■ State bumps aid factors 10% ■ Five years ■ Amount depends on spending ■ Estimated incentives average $621,000/year ($3.1 million total, 5 years)

Issues: Consolidation Incentives II ■ Total incentive is about 1/3 of consolidated revenue limit ■ Save it all – create endowment? ■ Spend a portion (earnings or earnings and some principal) – new programs or reduced property taxes? ■ Spend it all – buy down property taxes or spend on current/new programs Save it all? Save some, spend some? Spend it all?

Consolidation: Three Scenarios ■ Assume 5% (conservative estimate) cost savings due to scale economies District does not spend additional state aids (endowment?) District uses additional aids to reduce property taxes District uses some aids to hold taxpayers harmless

Consolidation: Revenue Limits ■ Revenue limits are the same under all scenarios Consolidate limit grows 1.2% per year Argyle/Pec revenue limit sums

Consolidation: Buildings ■ Under a consolidation, the Hollandale school would likely close ■ Approximately $750,000 needed to remodel current facilities ■ Could use part of the incentive aid, or borrow to fund (we assume borrowing; adds $0.10 to $0.15 to tax rate)

Tax Rates, Scenario 1: Endowment ■ With state incentive $$ invested, consolidated tax rate is average of Argyle and Pecatonica ■ Consolidated district puts $3.6 million in fund balance ($3.1 million incentive aid and $0.5 million from economies Argyle Pec. Consolidated

Tax Rates, Scenario 2: State Incentives Reduce Property Taxes ■ Lower property taxes in each of first five years ■ Incentive $$ “spent”, but district rolls over revenue cap space ■ $0.5 million in scale economies to fund balance Argyle Pec. Consolidated

Tax Rates, Scenario 3: Taxpayers held harmless ■ Argyle taxpayers no worse off; Pec taxpayers save ■ Some state incentive $$ spent, but district “saves” rev. cap space ■ Save $2.2 mil. in first 5 years; after 5 years, ?? Argyle Pec. Consolidated

Summary of Findings ■ Both districts face difficult decisions Costs growing faster than revenue caps Cut spending? Referendum? Repairs/new school (Pecatonica) ■ With consolidation, revenue caps still grow slower than costs (i.e., doesn’t solve declining enrollment) ■ Consolidation could generate cost savings (5% or more) ■ State provides $3 million + in additional aid ■ Hollandale likely closes under consolidation ■ Other issues (e.g., programming, transportation, etc.)?

Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance: 77 Years of Nonpartisan Research and Citizen Education

What if no scale economies (5% savings)? ■ More spending, more state general aid ■ Slightly more state incentive aid ■ No scale economy savings to fund balance ■ Same options as previously outlined, bottom line only slightly different