WHY USE A STUDENT SURVEY? The survey is a unique form of actionable feedback that districts, schools and teachers can use to inform practice. Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
TEACHER EVALUATION IN NEW JERSEY: PREVIEW OF FINAL REPORT RUTGERS GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.
Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness Tulsa Public Schools Jana Burk.
Staff & Student Feedback The Role of Feedback in Educator Evaluation January 2015.
Why Student Perceptions Matter Rob Ramsdell, Co-founder April 2015.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Student Perception Survey Toolkit Colorado’s Student Perception Survey Planning Webinar for Districts.
This document is an editable template. Please make sure to customize it for your district before distributing. Copyright 2014 by The Colorado Education.
Session Materials  Wiki
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Assessing and Evaluating Student Learning UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓMA DE QUERÉTARO FACULTAD DE LENGUAS Y LETRAS Profesional Asociado Universitario en Enseñanza.
Chapter 13 Program Evaluation and Technology Integration Strategies.
Symposium 2001June 24, 2001 Curriculum Is Just the Beginning Chris Stephenson University of Waterloo.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Colorado’s Student Perception Survey. Agenda Why use a Student Perception Survey? What the Research Says Survey Overview Survey Administration Use of.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Scoring and Reporting of Results Teachers and School Leaders access reports online within 6 weeks of administration. Scoring based on % positive (Most.
GETTING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT’S BUY-IN: Target Language Only Mandarin Chinese Classes.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | The Next Horizon Incorporating Student Perception Surveys into the Continuous.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Summary of Findings: Reliability Student-Level Reliability (α) Grades 3-5 Grades 6-12 Overall Reliability (all items) Student Learning
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 11  What role will student feedback play in your district next year?
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Using Student Perception Survey Results A Training for Principals This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context.
Preparing for the NYCDOE Student Perception Survey Aaron FeuerEric Weisman CEO - PanoramaPartnerships Director- Panorama.
Welcoming, caring, respectful, and safe learning and working environments and student code of conduct A presentation for EIPS leadership, COSC, EIPS staff,
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
NC Digital Learning Competencies School Administrators and Classroom Teachers ****** Partnering for Education Impact April 19, 2016.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
The School Turnaround Group
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education
TKES and SLO assessments
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Presentation transcript:

WHY USE A STUDENT SURVEY? The survey is a unique form of actionable feedback that districts, schools and teachers can use to inform practice. Students are in a unique position to contribute to a comprehensive view of classroom practice because they experience it more than anyone else in the education system. Student perception data can offer a big-picture view of what is happening in classrooms as well as school- and district-wide trends. Building a Robust Student Perception Survey

WHAT THE RESEARCH SAYS… The Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) Project had two significant findings around student perception surveys:Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) Project –When student surveys are combined with observation and student growth data, these three measures tell us more and are able to predict future effectiveness better than any of them alone. –Student perception survey results are correlated to student achievement gains. The use of student feedback has also been shown to promote both reflection and responsibility on the part of the students. For more information, see our Research overview.Research overview Building a Robust Student Perception Survey Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (2012). Asking students about teaching: Student perception surveys and their implementation. (MET Project Policy and Practice Brief). Wiggins, G. (2011). Giving students a voice: The power of feedback to improve teaching. Education Horizons, 89(3),

Free and publically available 34-item survey about student learning experiences, mapped to the Colorado Teacher Quality Standards Two versions of the survey, grades 3-5 and 6-12 Developed by the Colorado Education Initiative Building a Robust Student Perception Survey COLORADO’S STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEY Link to the Full Technical ReportFull Technical Report

WHAT DOES THE SURVEY MEASURE? Survey does measure elements of student experience that have been demonstrated to correlate most closely to student growth. Survey does not measure whether or how much a student likes or dislikes a teacher. Building a Robust Student Perception Survey

WHAT DOES THE SURVEY MEASURE? Building a Robust Student Perception Survey Student Learning How teachers use content and pedagogical knowledge to help students learn, understand, and improve. Student-Centered Environment How teachers create an environment that responds to individual students’ backgrounds, strengths, and interests. Classroom Community How teachers cultivate a classroom learning community where student differences are valued. Classroom Management How teachers foster a respectful and predictable learning environment. See the full surveys for grades 3-5 and

Process/Survey Development TaskTimeline Construct definition & Item DevelopmentApril – May 2012 Item/Construct Review, including district/expert/teacher feedbackMay 2012 Psychometric Field Test – Establish baseline psychometric properties and refine instrument as needed before Use Pilot June 2012 Think-Alouds/Cognitive InterviewsAugust 2012 Fall Use Pilot – Administer the survey to integration and pilot districtsNovember 2012 Fall Pilot Analyses – Analyzed data to inform 2 nd round of instrument revisionsNov – March 2013 Teacher feedback survey – Administered to 12 of the participating districtsJanuary 2013 Teacher focus groups (Round 1) – Convened to discuss the instruments and recommended changes and preferences for reporting formats March 2013 Analyze & Finalize Results – Prepare reports and guidance documents regarding analysis/use of survey data with help of teacher focus groups Dec – April 2012 Spring Validation Pilot AdministrationApril – May 2013 Teacher focus groups (Round 2 & 3) – Convened to discuss pilot process, lessons learned, and future communication materials June & August 2013 Prep & Release Full Toolkit – free and publically-available toolkitMay – August 2013 SURVEY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT

Student Feedback Students participated in “think-alouds” where they talked through their responses to each question. Students responded thoughtfully. –In my class, we learn things that matter to me: “She made the people who speak Spanish feel more important because we participated… we could teach about our culture. [It] taught us to trust in ourselves.” –My teacher knows when we understand the lesson and when we do not: “I say most of the time… one of my friends didn’t understand and when she asked if we all understood, he didn’t say anything [and she didn’t know and kept on going]” Building a Robust Student Perception Survey

Teacher Feedback Over 1400 teachers provided input during the survey development process. –Focus groups, survey pre-piloting, online feedback forums We took feedback about the instrument very seriously. –Items were changed or eliminated for specific reasons. For example between the fall and spring administration: The item “I get bored in this class” was removed because many teachers found it troubling. “Schoolwork in this class is too easy” was removed because it was not related to students’ responses on other items. Building a Robust Student Perception Survey

Revisions to the Colorado SPS Removed all negatively-stated items –The fall 2012 instrument included a handful of negatively-worded items –All were removed from the final SPS instrument. Redefined organizing elements (four mapped to TQS) Included open-ended question Building a Robust Student Perception Survey

SPS RESULTS & EVALUATION RATINGS

Classroom CommunityClassroom Management Student-Centered Environment Student Learning SPS RESULTS & EVALUATION RATINGS

OPEN-ENDED RESULTS Analyzed 14,539 open-ended responses (3-5 and 6-12) We find that not only were the majority of students taking the survey seriously, but that many of the responses were specific and actionable in nature –98.6% (N=14,341) were considered substantive –66.3% (N=9,646) were coded as actionable –Moreover, although some subjects and grades were slightly more likely to garner actionable feedback, in general actionable responses came from students in all grades and subjects Building a Robust Student Perception Survey

WHAT STUDENTS ARE SAYING Building a Robust Student Perception Survey Link to Report on Open-Ended ResultsOpen-Ended Results

GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR ADMINISTRATION We know that teachers care about their practice and especially about their students. –They also may experience nervousness and anxiety about the surveys, and district and school leaders must address those fears. By itself, a reliable and valid instrument does not ensure that teachers will receive good feedback. Messaging matters! –Engage stakeholders early and often. –Make the process as transparent as possible. Give stakeholders real decision-making power. Building a Robust Student Perception Survey

HOW TO USE SURVEY RESULTS Considerations –“Hold-harmless” pilot year –Sharing teacher-level results Use of results –As a formative tool Reflect on individual practice Identify over-arching trends and create strategies to address them. –As a part of an evaluation Used as an artifact for determining ratings for professional practices Included as one of several multiple measures Building a Robust Student Perception Survey

Amy Farley, Director, Research & Impact

Questions? Elaine Allensworth, Consortium on Chicago School Research Amy Farley, Colorado Legacy Foundation Kendra Wilhelm, Denver Public #aypfevents