Slide 1 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 E VAPORATIVE E MISSIONS IN MOBILE6 L ARRY L ANDMAN MOBILE6 Workshop June 29 - 30, 1999.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Giorgos Mellios and Leon Ntziachristos.
Advertisements

Fuels and Emissions: Lessons Learned in the U.S. Lester Wyborny II U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
1 EVALUATION OF EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS FROM ONROAD MOTORCYCLES January 15, 2006.
Student CD for Commercial Refrigeration for A/C Technicians
Impact of MOVES2014 on Emission Inventories from On-road Mobile Sources Alexis Zubrow, Darrell Sonntag, Harvey Michaels, David Brzezinski, Alison Eyth.
Evaporative Emissions from Small Engines Harold Haskew July 2, 2003.
Off-Highway Recreational Vehicle Workshop 12/18/2012.
Garry Kaufman Deputy Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division June 6, 2014.
Implementing Soak-Time Distribution Models in a GIS Framework Aruna Sivakumar Department of Civil Engineering (Transportation) University of Texas at Austin.
Evaporative Emission Inventory Small Offroad Equipment November 2002.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Mobile Sources. Mobile sources Gasoline car: 4-strokes Diesel car Automobile : 4-strokes, 2-strokes.
World Health Statistics. Life Expectancy* The following charts are based on Disability Adjusted Life Expectancy (DALE) for which the World Health Organization.
ARB’s Intent to Establish Evaporative Emission Standards for Pleasure Craft NMMA/ARB Meeting Feb. 7, 2006.
Overview – Non-coincident Peak Demand
Initial NVFEL Evaporative Emission Test Results from Marine Fuel Tanks n Test Procedures n Baseline Emissions n Pressure Relief Valves n Limited Flow Orifices.
Evaporative Emission Control for Gasoline Boat Fuel Systems Mike Samulski U.S. Environmental Protection Agency International Boatbuilders’ Exhibition &
Demonstrating Ethanol’s Value Octane Value & Performance Blending Issues Today Pathway Forward Steve Vander Griend ICM Inc. 1.
B.H. Baek and Catherine Seppanen Institute for the Environment-UNC at Chapel Hill Allison DenBleyker, Chris Lindhjem and Michele Jimenez ENVIRON International.
MICHELLE WILSON ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 Stage II Vapor Recovery Update.
Stratification and Adjustment
Mobile Source Control Division November 13, 2002 Planning and Technical Support Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Proposed.
Dispersion of Air Pollutants The dispersion of air pollutants is primarily determined by atmospheric conditions. If conditions are superadiabatic a great.
1 Evaluation Of Evaporative Emissions From Pleasure Craft June 27, 2007.
Measures of Variability James H. Steiger. Overview Discuss Common Measures of Variability Range Semi-Interquartile Range Variance Standard Deviation Derive.
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
Driving Down GHG Emissions, Driving Up Fuel Efficiency: Coordinating a Groundbreaking National Vehicle Policy Kathryn Thomson Counselor to the Secretary.
Monitoring and Laboratory Division April 25, 2002 Planning and Technical Support Division Mobile Source Control Division California Air Resources Board.
1 Afton ESCIT Report An Analysis of Sequence IIIG Reference Oil Data Phosphorus Retention - and Volatile Phosphorus Throughput December 12, 2006.
AIR POLLUTION & EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS. Hydrocarbons Unburned fuel vapors When exposed to sunlight, chemical reaction occurs that produces ground-level.
Presents/slides/alison/awmapaper1.ppt Alison K. Pollack ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California Rich Wilcox U.S. Environmental Protection.
Volvo Technology AB / Volvo Technology Corporation Dept / UW / 03/11/2015 / page 1 Particulates, Lemnos, 2003 Deliverable 13 Effects on particulate.
Evaporative Emission Standards for Boats
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
FINAL1 Inventory, Emissions, and Population July 2, 2003 AIR, Inc.
1. 2 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
13/3/2010 Spark-Ignition Marine Engine Draft Proposal.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
GrocerSmart TM Energy Modeling Software -Revision Status Report- & -Request For Input- July 13, 2010.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Port Fuel Injection VS. Direct Fuel Injection The Basics of DFI The main focus of DFI is to effectively and precisely control the fuel-to-air ratio. To.
Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Project Monitoring and Laboratory Division June 28, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
1 Evaporative Emission Standards for Boats Office of Transportation and Air Quality IBEX Meeting October 2011.
Objectives: 1. TSWBAT analyze relationship between environmental factors and community health 2. TSWBAT compare fueling efficiency of different model cars.
1 Session IV: Onroad Mobile Sources Laurel Driver US EPA.
1 Setting Evaporative Emission Standards for Off Highway Recreational Vehicles (OHRV) March 23, 2006.
2006 Hurricane Preparedness June 5, 2006 Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc R. Ben Brickhouse: Director of Engineering & IT John J. LaSelva: Director of.
Best Operating Practices For Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
VOCs Emissions from Vehicle Evaporative Processes Take-home Messages: ( 1 ) Emission factor measurements : diurnal, hot soak, permeation, refueling regular.
AST Stakeholder Meeting California Air Resources Board Stakeholder Meeting February 17, th Street, Room :00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
November 16, Retrospective Analysis of Ambient and Emissions Data and Refinement of Study Hypotheses –Task 1: Review of Available Emissions Data.
22 nd CRC Real World Emissions Workshop March 2012 Constance Hart David Hawkins.
Michael St. Denis, D.Env., Joe Roeschen - Revecorp Inc. I/M Solutions May 20 – 24, 2012 Sacramento, California.
DKC Copyright MOBILE SOURCES 101 Presented by: Rob Klausmeier de la Torre Klausmeier Consulting, Inc Harold Garabedian Vermont Agency of Natural.
EVALUATION OF EVAPORATIVE AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM OFF-HIGHWAY RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (OHRV) September 06, 2006.
Status report / Activity Plan of Evap Task Force
Development of 2016 Alpha Onroad Mobile Emissions
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
PCV and EVAP Emission Control Systems
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
Evaporative Emissions due to EVAP System Malfunctions
Impacts of hydrogen pathways vs
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Boiling is a liquid-to-vapor phase change process just like evaporation, but there are significant differences between the two. Evaporation occurs at.
Review of the European test procedure for evaporative emissions
Engine Lubrication Systems
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 E VAPORATIVE E MISSIONS IN MOBILE6 L ARRY L ANDMAN MOBILE6 Workshop June , 1999

Slide 2 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Sources of Evaporative Emissions n Hot Soak Emissions n Crankcase Emissions n Refueling Emissions n Resting Loss Emissions n Diurnal Emissions n Running Loss Emissions

Slide 3 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Sources of Evaporative Emissions n Hot Soak Emissions n Crankcase Emissions n Refueling Emissions n Resting Loss Emissions n Diurnal Emissions n Running Loss Emissions

Slide 4 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Sources of Evaporative Emissions n Hot Soak Emissions n Crankcase Emissions n Refueling Emissions n Resting Loss Emissions n Diurnal Emissions n Running Loss Emissions

Slide 5 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Sources of Evaporative Emissions n Hot Soak Emissions n Crankcase Emissions n Refueling Emissions n Resting Loss Emissions n Diurnal Emissions n Running Loss Emissions

Slide 6 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Sources of Evaporative Emissions n Hot Soak Emissions n Crankcase Emissions n Refueling Emissions n Resting Loss Emissions n Diurnal Emissions n Running Loss Emissions

Slide 7 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Sources of Evaporative Emissions n Hot Soak Emissions n Crankcase Emissions n Refueling Emissions n Resting Loss Emissions n Diurnal Emissions n Running Loss Emissions

Slide 8 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Overview of This Presentation n Stratification » Of Analyses » Weighting Factors n Sources of Evaporative Emissions » Diurnal Emissions » Running Loss Emissions

Slide 9 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Overview of This Presentation n Stratification » Of Analyses » Weighting Factors n Sources of Evaporative Emissions » Diurnal Emissions » Running Loss Emissions

Slide 10 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Overview of This Presentation n Stratification » Of Analyses » Weighting Factors n Sources of Evaporative Emissions » Diurnal Emissions » Running Loss Emissions

Slide 11 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Overview of This Presentation n Stratification » Of Analyses » Weighting Factors n Sources of Evaporative Emissions » Diurnal Emissions » Running Loss Emissions

Slide 12 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Stratification Of Analyses

Slide 13 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Stratification for Each Source For each type of source, the evaporative emissions were estimated separately for each of the following four strata: n ALL “gross liquid leakers” n NOT “gross liquid leakers” » Passing both purge & pressure » Failing the pressure test » Failing only the purge test

Slide 14 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Stratification Weighting Factors

Slide 15 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Weighting Factors For each of the four strata, the incidence of its occurrence (frequency) is estimated as a logistic growth function of vehicle age.

Slide 16 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Weighting Factors For each of the four strata, the incidence of its occurrence (frequency) is estimated as a logistic growth function of vehicle age.

Slide 17 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 “Gross Liquid Leakers” The First of the Four Strata n Many vehicles may have leaks of liquid gasoline, but NOT all are “Gross Liquid Leakers” n Only the highest emitting of the leakers are “Gross Liquid Leakers” n Some vehicles may be “Gross Liquid Leakers” on only some of the tests

Slide 18 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 “Gross Liquid Leakers” These are vehicles with substantial leaks of liquid gasoline (as opposed to vapor leaks) and having: n Resting Loss Emissions > 2.0 grams/hr, or n Diurnal Emissions > 25.0 grams/day, or n Hot Soak Test > 10.0 grams/test, or n Running Loss Test > 7.0 grams/mile

Slide 19 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 “Gross Liquid Leakers” Frequency (From M6.EVP.009)

Slide 20 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 “Gross Liquid Leakers” Mean Emissions Mean emissions from each source are: n Resting Loss Emissions = 9.16 grams / hr n Diurnal Emissions = grams / day Running Loss Test* = grams / mile Hot Soak Test* » Carbureted = grams / test » TBI = grams / test » PFI = grams / test

Slide 21 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Weighting Factors Vehicles NOT “Gross Liquid Leakers” n Data Sources » I/M Lanes in Indiana and Arizona n Statistical Model » Logistic Growth Curves n Compare Purge/Pressure Strata

Slide 22 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Weighting Factors Compare Purge & Pressure Strata

Slide 23 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Sources of Evaporative Emissions Diurnal Emissions

Slide 24 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Diurnal Emissions n Full 24 - Hour Diurnal n Multi - Day Diurnals n Hourly Diurnals n Interrupted Diurnals

Slide 25 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Diurnal Emissions n Full 24-Hour Diurnal –1995 and Older Vehicles -- No Change from Previous Workshop –1996 and Newer Vehicles -- New n Multi-Day Diurnals n Hourly Diurnals n Interrupted Diurnals

Slide 26 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Diurnal Emissions n Full 24-Hour Diurnal –1995 and Older Vehicles -- No Change from Previous Workshop –1996 and Newer Vehicles -- New n Multi-Day Diurnals n Hourly Diurnals n Interrupted Diurnals

Slide 27 of 48 M6 Workshop June and Newer Vehicles (“Enhanced EVAP” Vehicles) n More Stringent Standards » Phasing-In Model Years » Fully Applicable 1999 and Newer n Expected Effects of Standards » On Weighting Factors » On Emission Levels

Slide 28 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Enhanced EVAP Vehicles Basic Assumptions (from Report M6.EVP.005 that is posted on website) : n Effects on Distribution of Purge/ Pressure Strata n Effects on Average (Mean) Emission Level of Each Strata

Slide 29 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Enhanced EVAP Vehicles Passing Both Purge & Pressure Tests

Slide 30 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Enhanced EVAP Vehicles Basic Assumptions (from Report M6.EVP.005 that is posted on website) : n Effects on Distribution of Purge/ Pressure Strata n Effects on Average (Mean) Emission Level of Each Strata

Slide 31 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Diurnal Emissions n Full 24-Hour Diurnal –1995 and Older Vehicles -- No Change from Previous Workshop –1996 and Newer Vehicles -- New n Multi-Day Diurnals n Hourly Diurnals n Interrupted Diurnals

Slide 32 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Multi-Day Diurnals Multiplicative factors (by strata) for second and third days. (Unchanged After Third Day) ( Report No. M6.EVP.003 )

Slide 33 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Multiplicative Factors Multi-Day RTD Tests n Fuel-Injected -- Passing Both » Day_2 = * Day_1 » Day_3 = * Day_2 = * Day_1 n Fuel-Injected -- Failing Either » Day_2 = * Day_1 » Day_3 = * Day_2 = * Day_1 n All Other Strata (i.e., Carbureted) »No Statistically Significant Changes from Day-to-Day

Slide 34 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Diurnal Emissions n Full 24-Hour Diurnal –1995 and Older Vehicles -- No Change from Previous Workshop –1996 and Newer Vehicles -- New n Multi-Day Diurnals n Hourly Diurnals n Interrupted Diurnals

Slide 35 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Hourly Diurnals Revised Approach Based On: n Purge / Pressure Strata n Fuel Delivery System (Carbureted versus FI) n Temperature Cycle n Fuel RVP n Report Number: M6.EVP New Version

Slide 36 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Diurnal Emissions n Full 24-Hour Diurnal –1995 and Older Vehicles -- No Change from Previous Workshop –1996 and Newer Vehicles -- New n Multi-Day Diurnals n Hourly Diurnals n Interrupted Diurnals

Slide 37 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Interrupted Diurnals n Situation in which the vehicle operation (driving) occurs after the daily temperature rise has already begun. n Calculations are based on ambient temperature at the time the diurnal emissions resume.

Slide 38 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Sources of Evaporative Emissions Running Loss Emissions

Slide 39 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Running Loss Emissions n Evaporative Emissions Produced During Vehicle Operation n To Calculate, Subtract Resting Loss Emissions From Running Loss Test Results n See Report Number : M6.EVP.008

Slide 40 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Running Loss Emissions n EPA’s Test Data Primarily Used for MOBILE5 n Additional Testing Run for CRC »200 Test Vehicles »Limited Range of Ambient Temperatures, Fuel RVP, and Driving Cycle

Slide 41 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Running Loss Emissions Comparing the predictions of resting loss from the MOBILE5 model (adjusted for new Purge and Pressure rates) to results from CRC’s 200-vehicle testing.

Slide 42 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Running Loss Emissions Mean Emissions of CRC Testing

Slide 43 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Running Loss Emissions Comparison Between CRC Data and M5

Slide 44 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Running Loss Emissions Removing “Gross Liquid Leakers” from CRC Data

Slide 45 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 Running Loss Emissions Proposals for MOBILE6 n For Vehicles Not “Gross Liquid Leakers,” Use MOBILE5 Predictions Within Each Purge/Pressure Stratum n Weight Those Three Strata With the New Stratum of “Gross Liquid Leakers”

Slide 46 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 References n M6.EVP “Evaluating Resting Loss and Diurnal Evaporative Emissions Using Real Time Diurnal Tests” n M6.EVP “Modeling Hourly Diurnal and Interrupted Diurnal Emissions Based on Real- time Data” n M6.EVP “Evaluating Multiple Day Diurnal Evaporative Emissions Using RTD Tests”

Slide 47 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 References (Continued) n M6.EVP “Update of Hot Soak Emissions Analysis” n M6.EVP “Modeling Diurnal and Resting Loss Emissions from Vehicles Certified to Enhanced Evaporative Standards” n M6.EVP “Estimating Weighting Factors for Evaporative Emissions in MOBILE6”

Slide 48 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 References (Continued) n M6.EVP “Hot Soak Emissions as a function of Soak Time” n M6.EVP “Estimating Running Loss Evaporative Emissions in MOBILE6” n M6.EVP “Evaporative Emissions of Gross Liquid Leakers in MOBILE6”