Grays Harbor Headwaters originate from Olympic and Cascade mountains Rainfall driven Estuary comprised of low gradient mudflats 37 mi 2 at MLLW 90 mi 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Advertisements

Workshop: Monitoring and Evaluation of Harvest on Columbia River Salmonids July 31- August 1, 2007.
NWS Spokane Fire Weather
Passive Fish Capture.
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
Best Fishing Practices Fish Friendly Workshop Please sign the attendance sheet.
Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries and Beyond Oregon and Washington Agency Analysis and Recommendations.
Chinook Salmon Chinook Salmon, also called King Salmon, inhabit the White River. Construction of the flood-protection structure Mud Mountain Dam formed.
Salmon Species Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Management strategies for balancing hatchery functions with natural fish protections Brad Cavallo.
Environmental Factors Affecting Salmon Production Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Science Division Dave Seiler.
Information from Archival Tags on Salmon in the Bering Sea, Robert Walker, Kate Myers, Nancy Davis School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University.
Washington County & the Tualatin River: Geography & Climate Geography The Tualatin River Watershed is a low elevation, low gradient drainage area that.
Earth & Space Science Unit 12: Rivers & Groundwater PPT #1.
© Luonnonvarakeskus Results of a questionnaire Recreational fisheries in the coastal areas of the Baltic Sea Outi Heikinheimo, Antti Lappalainen and Jens.
Green- Duwamish River Watershed
History  Need to mark fish to get survival & exploitation rates for Treaty negotiations, to determine differential survival of various release strategies.
2014 Grays Harbor Fisheries Summary Fall Chinook Chehalis RiverHumptulips River NaturalHatcheryNaturalHatchery ForecastActualForecastActualForecastActualForecastActual.
A Climate Angle on Uncertainty in Salmon Recovery Scenarios Nate Mantua Ph D Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans University of.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
Spring and Fall Preemergence Weed Control Options for Turf Dr. Tim R. Murphy Extension Weed Specialist University of Georgia Griffin.
West Coast and Other Fisheries. West Coast Fishery Salmon is most important (400 times larger than Atlantic catch) Salmon is most important (400 times.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
bentler. us/washington-state/maps/img/washington-state-map
Pacific Fishery Management Council Jurisdiction –3 miles to 200 miles –4 states (includes Idaho) Members -- appointed –State governments –Federal Agencies.
Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluation of Alternative Commercial Fishing Gear in the Lower Columbia River, 2013: Behavior and.
1 Mainstem Passage Strategies In The Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill and Flow Augmentation Presented By: Albert Giorgi, Ph.D.
NON-NATIVE SALMOINDS IN LAKE SUPERIOR Don Schreiner, MNDNR Steve Schram, WIDNR Shawn Sitar, MIDNR Mike Petzold, OMNR.
ESA-listed Snake River Salmon: What’s the link to Snake River dams? John G. Williams NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center Seattle
By: Scott Rakes February 18, 2010 Endangered Species.
2013 Fishery Planning and Information Meeting Montesano City Hall 14 March – 8 pm 1.
Growth Trajectories of Wild California Steelhead Parr David Swank 1,2, Will Satterthwaite 1, Michael Beakes 1, Susan Sogard 2, Marc Mangel 1, Rob Titus.
Juvenile survival, travel time and the in-river environment Presenter: Steve Haeseker CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries and Beyond Oregon and Washington Staff Options for Initial Analysis.
We are seeing late summer flows that we normally see after Labor Day, and Summer has just begun… Mike Gallagher Water Resources Program – Southwest Region.
Harry Rukavina 1, Randy Johnson 2 and Harrison Hughes 1 1 Colorado State University, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture 2 USDA Forest.
1 State of San Lorenzo River Symposium Nicole Beck, PhD 2NDNATURE April San Lorenzo Lagoon A Decade of Dry Season WQ Monitoring.
Relative Abundance of Invasive Fish Species in Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Lake Erie Management Unit Assessment Programs Megan Belore, Larry.
February 5, 2003 Integrating Fisheries Management Into Comprehensive Recovery Planning Jeff Koenings, Randy Kinley Mike Grayum, Curt Kraemer, Kit Rawson.
Using PIT tags to evaluate the post- release survival of spring chinook salmon following their release from commercial nets C. E. Ashbrook, J. R. Skalski,
The relationship of Snake River stream-type Chinook survival rates to in-river, ocean and climate conditions Howard Schaller, USFWS * Charlie Petrosky,
Washington State Steelhead Stock Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING AMILEE WILSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 2004.
Pend Oreille Nonnative Fish Suppression Project Todd Andersen Jason Connor Kalispel Tribe of Indians Project Number January 18, 2012.
25 December Fraser Sockeye Life Cycle Diagram
2005 Subyearling Migration Fish Passage Center. Overview – summer migration Court ordered summer spill occurred from June 20 to August 31, 2005 Question.
Summary ADF&G is implementing a radio telemetry study on Yukon summer chum salmon Use drift gillnets to catch and tag 1200 chum salmon near Russian Mission.
Wild Winter Steelhead Run Timing How It Has Been Reshaped by Fisheries Management in Washington.
Scale Analysis Lisa Borgerson Kanani Bowden Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Hwy 34 Corvallis, OR (541) x232.
Navigation NAU 102 Lesson 28. Tidal Current The periodic horizontal flow of water accompanying the rise and fall of the tide.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
Chesapeake Bay
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.
1 Lisa Hutchinson-Scarbrough Division of Subsistence Alaska Department of Fish and Game Chignik Management Area Subsistence Salmon Fisheries Overview Chignik.
Klamath Fish Health Assessment Team Presentation to the Northwest Power & Conservation Council Regional Coordination Forum - May 12, 2016 Sara Borok &
Gill Nets and Unauthorized Interactions with Sea Turtles Overview of Events Feb. 18, 2010.
FALL SEMESTER 2015 DATES TO REMEMBER. DATES ACT Test DatesReg. Deadline September 12, 2015 August 7, 2015 October 24, 2015 Sept. 18, 2015 December 12,
Initial Assessment of Habitat Use by Stocked Lake Sturgeon in the Genesee River D. E. DITTMAN 1 and E. C. ZOLLWEG 2 1 Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science,
Chapter 1—Part 2 The global temperature record Summer heat extremes
Ocean Research & Conservation Society
Paul Hoffarth, Todd Pearsons, and Russell Langshaw
Adult Returns and Juvenile Outmigration Data
North Santiam Temperature Task Group W-FPOM
Albeni Falls Dam Operations
Effects of Water Temperature (Year), Sex and Domestication On In-river Migration and Survival of Adult Upper Yakima River Spring Chinook C. Knudsen,
Academic Assessment: Data Day May 7, 2015.
Fisheries Adventure Learning—Boise Watershed Luke Kolar and Lee Brown.
YRDFA Preseason Planning Meeting May 2, 2018 Anchorage
Presentation transcript:

Grays Harbor Headwaters originate from Olympic and Cascade mountains Rainfall driven Estuary comprised of low gradient mudflats 37 mi 2 at MLLW 90 mi 2 at MHHW Drainage area = 2,600 mi 2 1,391 streams with 3,353 linear stream miles Major Tributaries Humptulips River Hoquiam River Wishkah River Chehalis River Wynoochee River Satsop River Black River Newaukum River Skookumchuck River

Willapa Bay Headwaters originate from Willapa Hills, with exception of North River Rainfall driven Estuary comprised of low gradient mudflats Second largest estuary on West Coast 174 mi 2 at MLLW 260 mi 2 at MHHW Drainage area = 720 mi streams with 1,470 linear stream miles Major Tributaries Cedar River North River Willapa River Niawiakum River Palix River Nemah River Naselle River Bear River

Key Environmental Factors Grays Harbor – Weeks (October – November) – Temperature ( o C) October: =12.5, min=9.7, max=15.6 November: =9.5, min=5.4, max=11.8 – Salinity (psu) October: =19.5, min=0.2, max=29.1 November: =16.4, min=0.02, max=28.7

Key Environmental Factors Willapa Bay – Temperature ( o C) Mid-August through mid- September – August 15 th – 31st: =18.0, min=11.0 max=21.0 – September 1 st -15th: =17.0, min=7.5 max=20.6 Mid-September through end of October – September 16 th -31 st : =16.5, min=11.2 max=20.1 – October 1 st -31 st : =13.2, min=10.1 max=16.9 – Salinity (psu) Mid-August through mid- September – August 15 th – 31st: =28.0, min=2.8 max=32.7 – September 1 st -15th: =28.3, min=7.5 max=32.3 Mid-September through end of October – September 16 th -31 st : =28.0, min=7.9 max=32.7 – October 1 st -31 st : =26.6, min=0.9 max=32.4

Current rates used – Chinook Gill net: 45% From Ashbrook et al 2004 Tangle net: 25% From TAC (14.7%), with buffer – Coho Gill net: 45% - From Chinook

2013 Regulations Grays Harbor – 2A/2D: 45 min soak, recovery box required, release unmarked Chinook 1 day 4.25” tangle net 9 days 5-6.5” gill net – 2C: 4 days 5-8.5” gill net

2013 Regulations Willapa Bay – Aug. 12 – Sept. 13: 21 days 5-9” gill net Release wild Chinook, 45 minute soak, recovery box required – Sept. 15 – Sept. 22: 8 days 5-6” gill net Release wild Chinook, 45 minute soak, recovery box required – Sept. 23 – Oct days 5-6.5” gill net Release wild Chinook, 45 minute soak, recovery box required – November 6 – days 5-6.5” or 9” minimum gill net

Fishery LocationTime PeriodGear Grays Harbor (areas 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D) Weeks Gillnet, 6 1/2” maximum mesh Grays Harbor (areas 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D) Weeks Tangle net, 4 ¼” maximum mesh Willapa Bay (areas 2M- 2T) Mid-August through mid-September Gillnet, 9” maximum mesh Willapa Bay (areas 2M– 2T) Mid-September through October 31 Gillnet, 6 ½” maximum mesh Table 1. Fishery locations, time periods, gear, and WACs for consideration by the IFSP.

Grays Harbor 6.5” Gill Net Weeks – October through November

Grays Harbor, 6.5” Gill Net, Oct-Nov – Columbia River, 2001 & 2002, Long Term Mortality = 45% – Effect on Mortality: Grays Harbor versus Columbia Species: – Chinook: Lower (Fall vs. Spring– maturation) – Chum: Temp: No significant difference ( o C vs. 9 o C) Salinity: Higher (estuary transition zone vs. river) Mesh: No significant difference (6.5” vs 5.5-8”) Migration Duration: Lower (30d versus 180d) Soak Time: Lower (23 min vs. 39min) – 45 minutes by regulation, 2C no maximum soak time Recapture: No significant difference?, except 2A Higher (confined river vs. large open river)

Grays Harbor, 6.5” Gill Net, Oct-Nov – Willapa Bay, 2000, Immediate Mortality = 20.5% – Effect on Mortality: Grays Harbor versus Willapa Bay Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Lower ( o C vs o C) Salinity: Higher? (20 ppt vs. 28 ppt) Mesh: No significant difference (6.5” vs 7.25”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: Lower (23 min vs. 32min) Recapture: No significant difference – Coho also examined, Immediate mortality = 24.5%

Grays Harbor, 6.5” Gill Net, Oct-Nov – Willapa Bay, 2001, Immediate Mortality = 12.8% – Effect on Mortality: Grays Harbor versus Willapa Bay Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Lower ( o C vs o C) Salinity: Higher? (20 ppt vs. 28 ppt) Mesh: No significant difference (5.75” vs 5.75”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: No significant difference (23min vs. 28min) Recapture: No significant difference

Grays Harbor, 6.5” Gill Net, Oct-Nov – Willapa Bay, 2003, Immediate Mortality = 15% – Effect on Mortality: Grays Harbor versus Willapa Bay Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Lower ( o C vs. ~15.5 o C) Salinity: Higher? (20 ppt vs. 28 ppt) Mesh: No significant difference (5.75” vs 5.75”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: Higher (23min vs. 13min) Recapture: No significant difference – Also examined coho, Immediate Mortality = 10.9%

Grays Harbor 4.25” Tangle Net

Grays Harbor, 4.25” Tangle Net, Oct-Nov – Columbia River, 2003, Long Term Mortality = 15.6% Revised by TAC to 14.7% – Effect on Mortality: Grays Harbor versus Columbia Species: – Chinook: Lower (Fall Chinook vs. Spring Chinook – maturation) – Chum: Temp: No significant difference ( o C vs. 9 o C) Salinity: Higher (estuary transition zone vs. river) Mesh: No significant difference (4.25” vs ”) Migration Duration: Lower (30d versus 180d) Soak Time: Higher (45min vs. 34min) Recapture: No significant difference?, except 2A Higher (confined river vs. large open river)

Grays Harbor, 4.25” Tangle Net, Oct-Nov – Willapa Bay, 2000 & 2001, Immediate Mortality = 5.9 % (8.1 & 3.7) – Effect on Mortality: Grays Harbor versus Willapa Bay Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Lower ( o C vs. ~13.5 o C) Salinity: Higher? (20 ppt vs. 28 ppt) Mesh: Higher (4.25” vs 3.5”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: Lower (23min vs. 30min) – 45 min by regulation Recapture: No significant difference – Coho also examined in 2001, Immediate Mortality = 19.9%

Grays Harbor, 4.25” Tangle Net, Oct-Nov – Willapa Bay, 2003, Immediate Mortality = 3.7 % – Effect on Mortality: Grays Harbor versus Willapa Bay Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Lower ( o C vs. ~13.5 o C) Salinity: Higher? (20 ppt vs. 28 ppt) Mesh: Higher (4.25” vs 3.5”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: Higher (23min vs. 14min) – 45 min by regulation Recapture: No significant difference – Coho also examined in 2001, Immediate Mortality = 11.3%

Willapa Bay 9” Gill Net

Willapa Bay, 9” Gill Net, Aug 16 – Sept. 15 – Columbia River, 2001 & 2002, Long Term Mortality = 45% – Effect on Mortality: Willapa Bay versus Columbia River Species: – Chinook: Lower (Fall Chinook vs. Spring Chinook – maturation) – Chum: Temp: Higher (17-18 o C vs. 9 o C) Salinity: Higher (estuary transition zone vs. river) Mesh: Higher (9” vs 5.5-8”) Migration Duration: Lower (30d versus 180d) Soak Time: Lower (30min vs. 39min) – 45 min by regulation except late November Recapture: No significant difference?, except 2U Higher (confined river vs. large open river)

Willapa Bay, 9” Gill Net, Aug 16 – Sept. 15 – Willapa Bay, 2000, Immediate Mortality = 20.5% – Effect on Mortality: Current versus 2000 Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Higher (17-18 o C vs o C) Salinity: No significant difference Mesh: Higher (9” vs 7.25”) Migration Duration: No significant difference Soak Time: No significant difference(30min vs. 32min) – 45 min by regulation except late November Recapture: No significant difference – Coho also examined, Immediate mortality = 24.5%

Willapa Bay, 9” Gill Net, Aug 16 – Sept. 15 – Willapa Bay, 2001, Immediate Mortality = 12.8% – Effect on Mortality: Current versus 2001 Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Higher (17-18 o C vs. 13 o C) Salinity: Salinity: No significant difference Mesh: Higher (9” vs 5.75”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: No significant difference (30min vs. 28min) – 45 min by regulation except late November Recapture: No significant difference

Willapa Bay, 9” Gill Net, Aug 16 – Sept. 15 – Willapa Bay, 2003, Immediate Mortality = 15% – Effect on Mortality: Current versus 2003 Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Higher (17-18 o C vs. ~15.5 o C) Salinity: No significant difference Mesh: No significant difference (6.5” vs 5.75”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: Higher (30min vs. 13min) – 45 min by regulation except late November Recapture: No significant difference – Also examined coho, Immediate Mortality = 10.9% (only time)

Willapa Bay 6.5” Tangle Net

Willapa Bay, 6.5” Tangle Net, Sept. 16 – Oct. 31 – Columbia River, 2003, Long Term Mortality = 15.6% Revised by TAC to 13.7% – Effect on Mortality: Willapa Bay versus Columbia Species: – Chinook: Lower (Fall Chinook vs. Spring Chinook – maturation) – Chum: Temp: Higher ( o C vs. 9 o C) Salinity: Higher (estuary transition zone vs. river) Mesh: Higher (6.5” vs ”) Migration Duration: Lower (30d versus 180d) Soak Time: No significant difference (30min vs. 34min) – 45 minutes by regulation except late November Recapture: No significant difference?, except 2U Higher (confined river vs. large open river)

Willapa Bay, 6.5” Tangle Net, Sept. 16 – Oct. 31 – Willapa Bay, 2000 & 2001, Immediate Mortality = 5.9% (8.1 & 3.7) – Effect on Mortality: Current versus 2000 & 2001 – Species: – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum: Temp: Higher ( o C vs. ~13.5 o C) Salinity: No significant difference Mesh: Higher (6.5” vs 3.5”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: No significant difference(30min vs. 30min) – 45 min by regulation except late November Recapture: No significant difference – Coho also examined in 2001, Immediate Mortality = 19.9%

Willapa Bay, 6.5” Tangle Net, Sept. 16 – Oct. 31 – Willapa Bay, 2003, Immediate Mortality = 3.7 % – Effect on Mortality: Current versus 2003 – Chinook: No significant difference – Chum : Temp: Higher( o C vs. ~13.5 o C) Salinity : No significant difference Mesh: Higher (6.5” vs 3.5”) Migration Duration: No significant difference (30d versus 30d) Soak Time: Higher (30min vs. 14min) – 45 min by regulation except late November Recapture: No significant difference – Coho also examined in 2001, Immediate Mortality = 11.3%

Other Miscelleneous Data Baranski 1980: Reports higher mortality rates for Skagit River Chinook caught in lower river (98%) versus upper river 1 month later (<5%) Zajec: Reports immediate mortality rates for Chum in Quilcene Bay of 26% and 10% Baker et al. 2013: found evidence for delayed or inhibited maturation in fish with disentanglement injuries

Immediate versus Long Term Only Studies are Columbia River – Ratio is 7X to 65X – Is 7X the minimum value? Mortality versus time – What is shape of function? – Hooking mortality, most mortality is within first few days