Atmospheric Particulate Matter in Proximity to Mountaintop Coal Mines Allan Kolker 1, Mark A. Engle 1,2, William H. Orem 1, Calin A. Tatu 1, Michael Hendryx.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fills in Appalachia. Background Mountaintop coal mining is a surface mining practice used in the Appalachian states involving.
Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
WATER DEPTH, VEGETATION, AND POLLUTANT REMOVAL IN A CONSTRUCTED WETLAND TREATING AQUACULTURE EFFLUENT Brian E. Dyson, Kim D. Jones, Ron Rosati* Department.
Chemistry, Environmental Fate and Transport, Production and Uses Charge Question 2-1: Please comment on whether the information is used appropriately in.
Disposal of Unused or Expired Drugs Attorneys General Education Program Public Policy Conference THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: ECONOMICS, REGULATION, AND.
Update on PM 2.5 – The Scope of the Problem and Overview of Sources Matthew M. Russell, PhD ENVIRON International Corporation Los Angeles, California April.
SCR-15 Coal Slurry Underground Injection. SCR-15 “That the Department of Environmental Protection and the Bureau for Public Health shall jointly design.
P. D. Hien, V. T. Bac, N. T. H. Thinh Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission.
Commentary on the Critical Review Public Health and Components of Particulate Matter: The Changing Assessment of Black Carbon Michael T. Kleinman Department.
Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham.
Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Integrated Assessment of Particulate Matter Exposure and Health Impacts Sonia Yeh.
Weathering Sources in the Kaoping River Catchment, Southwestern Taiwan: Insights From Major and Trace Elements, Sr Isotopes and Rare Earth Elements C.-F.
VII. How might current analysis methods be enhanced or combined to obtain more information about the nature of OC, EC, and other carbon fractions in filter.
Personal Monitoring for Air Pollution Exposure Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Atmospheric Measurements Manager South Coast Air Quality Management District CAPCOA.
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Metric (Family Level) Standard Best Value (95 th or 5 th percentile) Worst Possible Value Expected Response to Degradation Total Taxa180 EPT Taxa120 %EPT91.90.
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
WEST VIRGINIA MINE DRAINAGE TASK FORCE SYMPOSIUM
Porewater Collection and Risk Evaluation 27 th Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, AL Jacob Gruzalski Environmental Standards, Inc.
Acknowledgements We would like to thank the University of Maine and Dartmouth for analyzing data that was imperative to the study. We would also like to.
1 Pollutants in air, soil, and living organisms Eiliv Steinnes Department of Chemistry Norwegian University of Science and Technology NO-7491 Trondheim.
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
1 Slurry pond Edge of mine Elementary School Coal processing plant.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Air Quality Laboratory St.Louis Supersite Project Update Meg N.S. Yu Professor Jay R. Turner Environmental Engineering Program Washington University in.
Structure and Reactivity of Dissolved Organic Matter in the Critical Zone Vicki Chu Jon Chorover, Leif Abrell Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
Mining And its environmental impact. What determines the type of mining? Underground v.s. Surface Mining v.s. Solution Underground v.s. Surface Mining.
Elemental composition of Tibetan Plateau top soils and its effect on evaluating atmospheric pollution transport Chaoliu Li, Shichang Kang, Qianggong Zhang,
Low-Wind/High Particulate Matter Episodes in the Calexico/Mexicali Region 1 The University of Utah 2 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 3 San Diego.
Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment Data Priorities and Recommendations Karla Poplawski, Eleanor Setton, Perry.
NTEC -- April 24, Utility Air Toxics Regulatory Finding National Tribal Environmental Council April 24, 2001 William H. Maxwell U.S. EPA OAQPS/ESD/CG.
Measurement of Airborne Particulates around Sand Mines and Processing Plants Jeron Jacobson  Zachary Kroening  Kimberly Shermo Dr. Crispin Pierce  Department.
USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Atmospheric Deposition Strategy Straw Proposal. What Pollutants Matter? Highest priority – known impairment AND air sources: Hg, dioxins Moderate priority.
Assessing changes in contaminant fluxes following removal of a dam in the Pawtuxet River Results and Discussion Methods and Approach Passive samplers (polyethylene;
Bourns College of Engineering – Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Evaluation of Emissions/Residue Testing.
Source waters and flow paths in an alpine catchment, Colorado, Front Range, United States Fengjing Liu, Mark W. Williams, and Nel Caine 2004.
Challenges of Conducting Analytical Chemistry in Environmental Matrices May 8 th 2006 Meg Sedlak and Don Yee San Francisco Estuary Institute Oakland, California.
Comments on the Research of Dr. Bob Musselman (Atmospheric Deposition Research) Allen S. Lefohn, Ph.D. A.S.L. & Associates Helena, Montana August 10, 2005.
Gradient flux measurements at Mace Head Darius Ceburnis, School of Physics, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland Marine submicron aerosol sources,
Lead NAAQS Review: 2 nd Draft Risk Assessment NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call August 8, 2007 Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar OAQPS.
KINETICS OF SURFACE-BOUND BENZO[A]PYRENE AND OZONE ON ORGANIC AND INORGANIC AEROSOLS N.-O. A. Kwamena, J. A. Thornton, J. P. D. Abbatt Department of Chemistry,
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography tom.h.wilson tom. Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
New findings concerning social status inconsistency (SSI) and health Richard Peter 1, Holger Gässler 1, Siegfried Geyer 2 1 Department of Epidemiology,
Study of ambient air particulates pollutants near Taichung airport sampling site in central Taiwan Journal of Hazardous Materials 144 (2007) 492–498 Student.
Mark J. Schultz, P.E. Chief, Environmental Assessment and Contaminant Control Branch Dust Division Mine Safety and Health Administration Pittsburgh Safety.
Variations of Elemental Concentration in PM 10 and PM June 2007,Colombo. M.C. Shirani Seneviratne Head, Nulear Analytical Services Sec. Atomic.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Scientific and technical issues: the role of the World Health Organization Michal Krzyzanowski WHO ECEH.
Biomonitoring of Heavy Metals in the Ambient Air Around International Bridges of El Paso TX/Juarez, Mex., Using Tumbleweed and Chelating Agents Jason G.
POMI kick-off meeting 7 March, 2008 Collaborative research project in support to the reduction of atmospheric pollution in REGIONE LOMBARDIA ( )
James River at Richmond, VA. Semi-Permeable Membrane Devices (SPMD’s) for Sampling Dissolved Organic Substances from Surface Waters Don Smith Virginia.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
Organo-Sulfur and Receptor Modeling Status/Challenges Christopher Palmer Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry.
Preliminary Analysis by: Fawn Hornsby 1, Charles Rogers 2, & Sarah Thornton 3 1,3 North Carolina State University 2 University of Texas at El Paso Client:
Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fills in Appalachia
Coal Refuse FirE and pollution emissions
And its environmental impact
Research led by dr. crispin pierce
Mining Wastes Wilbert Aureo.
 Environmental Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire 
Trace Elements in Dan River Sediment after the 2014 Coal Ash Spill Ricardo P. Fernandez, Caleb Shockley, and Madeline E. Schreiber Department of.
Dr. Tanveer Iqbal Associate Professor,
Association between PM-induced Reactive Oxygen Species and water-soluble elements of samples collected in Bucaramanga, Colombia Gabriela Saavedra, Kento.
Hold Your Breath—Ohio EPA’s TCE Initiative
Schematic framework of anthropogenic climate change drivers, impacts and responses to climate change, and their linkages (IPCC, 2007).
Title Why do we underestimate Elemental Carbon in PM?
Regional Environmental Health Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Atmospheric Particulate Matter in Proximity to Mountaintop Coal Mines Allan Kolker 1, Mark A. Engle 1,2, William H. Orem 1, Calin A. Tatu 1, Michael Hendryx 3, Michael McCawley 3, Laura Esch 3, Nick J. Geboy 1, Lynn M. Crosby 1, and Matthew S. Varonka 1 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA 2 The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA 3 West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Introduction Mountaintop mining (MTM) is a common method of coal extraction in parts of the U.S. Appalachian region. The method exposes coal for production by explosion and removal of non-coal bearing siliceous overburden. Past studies have primarily concerned the impact of overburden disposal in stream valleys on aquatic life. Recent epidemiologic work suggests disparities in the rates of some diseases between comparable MTM and non-MTM areas 1. 1 Hendryx et al., 2011, J. Community Health

Approach The present study considers the potential for human exposure to air- and water-sourced contaminants from MTM activities. Initial results from air sampling studies are presented here. Samples collected include: 1)High-volume 24-hour sampling of sized ambient particulate matter. Separate inorganic and organic sampling. 2)Geochemical window-wide samples for inorganic and organics. 3)Extended sampling on greased surrogate deposition surfaces. Study compares active MTM areas with internal (coal mining by other methods) and external (no coal mining) controls.

Study Area Study area in south central West Virginia (WV), USA. Control areas in southern WV (internal control) and southeastern WV (external control). Sampling in June, Aug., Dec., 2011; Feb., May, 2012 Results to date for PA OH VA MD WV

Sampling Activities MTM INT. CNTRL. EXT. CNTRL. Total suspended particulate (TSP) samplers Exposed TSP Filters

Sampling Activities Geochemical window wipesGreased surrogate deposition surfaces

Comparison of MTM Areas E and T with External Control (June, 2011) June, 2011 VAsCdAlGaRbCe E/EC fine T/EC fine E/EC coarse ND T/EC coarse ND Results indicate more pronounced enrichment in “crustal” elements (e.g. Al, Ga, Rb, Ce) in MTM areas E and T vs. external control (EC). Crustal Sources Anthropogenic Sources

Comparison of MTM Areas E and T with Internal Control ( August, 2011) Aug., 2011 VAsCdAlGaRbCe E/IC fine ND T/IC fine ND E/IC coarse ND T/IC coarse ND Results indicate similar enrichment in most “crustal” elements (e.g. Al, Ga, Rb, Ce) in MTM areas E and T vs. internal control (IC). Crustal Sources Anthropogenic Sources

Comparison of MTM Area S with Internal and External Controls ( December, 2011) Results indicate higher concentration of nearly all constituents in MTM area S vs. internal (IC) and external (EC) control sites. Crustal Sources Anthropogenic Sources Dec VAsCdAlGaRbCe S/IC fine S/EC fine S/IC coarse 25ND S/EC coarse 13ND

Comparison of Window- Wipe Samples in MTM Areas and Controls (June and August, 2011) VAsCdAlGaRbCe MTM Int. Cntrl Ext. Cntrl Results indicate enrichment in “anthropogenic” elements (Se, As, Bi, Cd, Ni, Sn) is less in MTM areas than internal control, consistent with dilution by “crustal” material in proximity to MTM operations. Crustal Sources Anthropogenic Sources

Window Wipe from MTM area GC-MS Total Ion Chromatogram Results for organics in MTM areas are dominated by alkylated low mol. wt. compounds and low mol. wt. PAH’s (circled) indicating contribution by a coal source, as opposed to coal combustion.

Hi-Vol Fine Air Filter from MTM Residential Property GC-MS Extracted Ion Chromatogram

Conclusions Proportions of crustal elements in MTM areas studied are greater than, or similar to, those in external and internal controls, respectively. Concentrations of anthropogenic elements derived primarily from combustion sources, are proportionally lower in MTM areas relative to control areas. These results are consistent with dilution of anthropogenic elements by locally-derived siliceous material. Organics are dominated by low molecular weight alkylated compounds consistent with derivation from coal itself rather than coal combustion.

Ongoing Work Integrate air- and water quality sampling. Further use of surrogate surfaces to obtain time-integrated particulate samples. Integrate environmental sampling with epidemiologic studies conducted by WVU. Focus environmental sampling on specific communities with evidence of health impacts.