Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Advertisements

Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006.
UNEP Advisory Group Meeting Geneva, Switzerland December 12, 2014
Richard A. Becker, Ph.D., D.A.B.T American Chemistry Council Arlington, Virginia Comments on “Dose Setting” EDMVS Meeting July 23-24, 2002.
1 SESSION on Risk Characterization. Session 5-2 Risk Characterization David Miller Chemist (USPHS) Health Effects Division Office of Pesticide Programs.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
1 Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division Sheryl K. Reilly, Ph.D. Chief, Biochemical Pesticides Branch
CONFERENCE ON “ FOOD ADDITIVES : SAFETY IN USE AND CONSUMER CONCERNS“ JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY NAIROBI, 24 JUNE 2014.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Cumulative Risk Assessment for Pesticide Regulation: A Risk Characterization Challenge Mary A. Fox, PhD, MPH Linda C. Abbott, PhD USDA Office of Risk Assessment.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Exposure Assessment Thanks to Marc Rigas, PhD for an earlier version of this lecture Much of the materials is drawn from Paustenbach, DJ. (2000) The practice.
Copyright 2002 Marc Rigas Issues in Exposure Assessment Marc L. Rigas, Ph.D. National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Issues in Harmonizing Methods for Risk Assessment Kenny S. Crump Louisiana Tech University
Risk Assessment II Dec 9, Is there a “safe” dose ? For effects other than cancer:
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: Chapter 4 O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry,
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceutical Mixtures: - empirical knowledge, gaps and regulatory options Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg
Criteria for Screens— Review of the EDSTAC Recommendations Presentation to the EDMVS July 23, 2002.
EU Framework Programme 6, Priority 5: ”Food Quality and Safety”,Topic 41: “Human health implications of exposure to chemical residues in the environment”
Environmental Risk Analysis
Food Advisory Committee Meeting December 16 and 17, 2014 Questions to the Committee Suzanne C. Fitzpatrick, PhD, DABT Senior Advisory for Toxicology Center.
Meta Analysis MAE Course Meta-analysis The statistical combination and analysis of data from separate and independent studies to determine if there.
INTEGRATED INFORMATION E & H Action Plan Implementation.
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
INTRODUCTION TO TOXICOLOGY SIDNEY GREEN, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE HOWARD UNIVERISTY.
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Compliance Timing, Procedural and Legal Issues Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
Sixth Framework Programme Priority 5 “Food Quality and Safety” Callum Searle Research Directorate-General Directorate E Biotechnology Agriculture.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
Copyright © 2002 University of Maryland School of Nursing. All rights reserved. Comparison of Pharmacology and Toxicology This material was developed at.
New or increasing occupational exposure to chemical and biological agents Gérard Lasfargues Deputy Director General, Anses.
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
Tribal Science Council Regaining and Protecting “Regaining and Protecting Tribal Culture through Science Tribal Culture through Science” 6th Annual New.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NE-SRA June 19, 2007 Why are Kids Different? Underlying Biological and Physiological Characteristics.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 by: Bjorn Bookser period 2.
Regulatory Processes for Pesticides Mark Hartman Antimicrobials Division (AD) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances United States Environmental.
International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2009 Endocrine Workshop The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: What Can Screening Results.
Health Risk from Consuming POC-Contaminated Fish: Part II. Risk Analysis and Prevention Strategies Michael H. Dong, MPH, DrPA, PhD October, 2007 Readings.
Public Health Assessment Process Jack Hanley, M.P.H. Environmental Health Scientist Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Introduction to Session II: Incorporating Existing Data into the EDSP Erik R. Janus Director, Human Health Policy CropLife America.
Risk Assessment.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
NUATRC/TCEQ Air Toxics Workshop October Air Toxics Air Toxics: What We Know, What we Don’t Know, and What We Need to Know Human Health Effects –
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Session VII WEIGHING IN ON MICROBIOLOGICAL ADI: EXPERIENCES AND PERSPECTIVES Introduction October 26, 2012.
October 4, Microbial Risk Assessment Frameworks, Principles, and Approaches Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH Department of Environmental and Occupational.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.
Michael P. Holsapple, PhD, Fellow ATS HESI Executive Director Future of Chemical Toxicity Testing in the US Monday, 21 June 2010 National Press Club, Washington,
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Risk assessment with regard to food and feed safety Risk analysis Why risk assessment in the.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Cumulative Risk Assessment: A Critical Step Forward in Human Health Protection Deborah A. Cory-Slechta Department of Environmental Medicine University.
Considerations for Developing Alternative Health Risk Assessment Approaches for Addressing Multiple Chemicals, Exposures and Effects External Review Draft.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
Combination effects of chemicals
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
Risk Assessment Dec 4 -6, 2006.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
A Short Update on Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS)
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
Regulatory Sciences and Government Affairs
13-15 June 2016, Zhujiang Hotel, Guangzhou, China
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
Strategies for Integrated Human and Ecological Assessment
Pesticides & Children: Ten Years After FQPA
FQPA: “It’s a Good Thing” (for Kids)
Presentation transcript:

Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30 – 10:30 Point – Counterpoint: “Techniques For Assessing Endocrine Cumulative Risk” Bob Golden “Limitations of EDSP Data For Assessing Cumulative Risk” Chris Borgert 10:30 11:45 Panel Presentations and Discussion “Perspectives” Tim Pastoor “Perspectives” Jane Ellen Simons Panel Discussion: Chris Borgert, Bob Golden,Tim Pastoor, Jane Ellen Simons, 11:45- 12:30 Lunch (Included with Registration)

Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances What is cumulative risk and why is it of interest? What do we know about physiology and pharmacology of the endocrine system that can inform approaches to cumulative risk evaluations? What’s known about responses to mixtures that can be applied to endocrine active substances?

In the broadest sense “Cumulative risk” means “the combined risks from aggregate exposures to multiple agents or stressors.” Not single chemicals or stressors May be biological or physical agents or activities, direct or indirect effects Requires combining effects; not necessarily ‘adding’ A ‘cumulative risk assessment’ need not be quantitativeA ‘cumulative risk assessment’ need not be quantitative U.S. EPA, Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington. EPA/630/P-02/001F. Cumulative Risk: What Is It?

December 2008, National Research Council report “Science Policy and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment” Panel proposed cumulative risk assessment be defined as “evaluating an array of stressors (chemical and non-chemical) to characterize – quantitatively to the extent possible – human health or ecological effects taking account of such factors as vulnerability and background exposures.” Cumulative Risk: What Is It?

December 2008, National Research Council report “Science Policy and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment” With respect to cumulative risk overall – not phthalate specific -- the Panel recommended that the focus for cumulative risk assessments in general should be on health outcomes, not only on mechanism. They point out that many mechanisms can lead to the same outcome. They use the term “common adverse outcomes” to describe the method they recommend. Cumulative Risk: What Is It?

Cut & Pasted from: Jerry Heindel Ph/D. NIEHS EED Gordon Conference June 2008 Allegations of Effects Concerns for Health Effects from Mixtures

Silva E, Rajapakse N, Kortenkamp A, Something from "nothing" - Eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (8): APR Charlees G et al. Analysis of the interaction of phytoestrogens and synthetic chemicals: An in vitro/in vivo comparison Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Volume 218, February 2007, Pages

Operational Definitions Aggregate Risk: FQPA amendments of FFDCA directed OPP to consider “aggregate exposure” in its decision-making. “Aggregate exposure” refers to the combined exposures to a single chemical across multiple routes (oral, dermal, inhalation) and across multiple pathways (food, drinking water, residential). Cumulative Risk: For pesticide tolerances, FQPA amendments of FFDCA directed OPP to “…assess the risk of the pesticide chemical residue based on… available information concerning the cumulative effects on infants and children of such residues and other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity”

Cumulative Risk: What Is It? OPP’s Guidance for Pesticide Actives 1.Begins with the identification of a group of chemicals – the common mechanism group - induce a common toxic effect by a common mechanism of toxicity 2.Dose-response analysis on each member to determine its toxic potency for the common toxic effect 3.For estimating toxic potency – needs to be be conducted on a uniform basis (i.e., same measure of potency, for the same effect, from the same test species/sex using studies of comparable methodology) 4. Use of dose addition for determining the combined risk

At doses near the NOAEL, Cumulative Effects reported in animals for: Anti-androgenic endpoints Estrogenic endpoints Immune endpoints At up to 100X environmentally relevant concentrations, No Cumulative Reproductive Effects found for complex mixtures of ground water contaminants Can we accurately/confidently predict cumulative Adverse Effects based on presumed modes of action within EDSP (EAT) at doses that greatly exceed human exposures? Cumulative Risk: Is It Relevant for Endocrine Active Substances?

Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30 – 10:30 Point – Counterpoint: “Techniques For Assessing Endocrine Cumulative Risk” Bob Golden “Limitations of EDSP Data For Assessing Cumulative Risk” Chris Borgert 10:30 11:45 Panel Presentations and Discussion “Perspectives” Tim Pastoor “Perspectives” Jane Ellen Simons Panel Discussion: Chris Borgert, Bob Golden,Tim Pastoor, Jane Ellen Simons, 11:45- 12:30 Lunch