Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-label, Pharmacokinetic, Safety, Tolerability, and Antiviral Activity Study of Dolutegravir (DTG), a Novel Integrase Inhibitor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Advertisements

Once-Daily Regimen of FTC, DDI, EFV in ARV Therapy- Naïve Children PACTG 1021.
20th International AIDS Conference; July 20-25, 2014; Melbourne, Australia DTG-Based Regimens Are Active in INI-Naive Patients With a History of NRTI Resistance.
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT-1 and HIV Coinfection NIAID ERADICATE Trial Phase 2a Treatment Naïve and Treatment.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT1 or GT4 and HIV Coinfection ION-4 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced.
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) when combined with Atazanavir 8.11 D Prelutsky 1, P Salvato 2, R Falcon 3 1. Washington University School.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Clinical Aspects of Treatment with Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Impact of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy on the Incidence of HIV- encephalopathy among perinatally- infected children and adolescents. Kunjal Patel,
IAC 2006 Abs# THLB0214 Potent Antiretroviral Effect of MK-0518, a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, as part of Combination ART in Treatment -Naïve HIV-1.
Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV-Infected Subjects on HAART: Prevalence and Associations Kevin Robertson *1, Kunling Wu 2, Thomas Parsons 1, Ron Ellis.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
The Effectiveness of generic Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy for the treatment of HIV infected Ugandan children Presenter: Linda Barlow-Mosha MD,
ALLY-2  Design  Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, in treatment-naïve genotype 1 treated for 12 weeks DCV + SOF 400 mg QD DCV + SOF.
Poster # 873 *Sharon Nachman SUNY Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY Background: RAL is a potent selective HIV-1 integrase inhibitor.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Brett-Smith, ATAC, 2/24/02 Stavudine Extended Release (Zerit ® XR; d4T XR) Stavudine Prolonged Release Capsules ATAC Meeting 2/24/02.
Reesink H, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/28/09.
PO 2726; IAS; Vicriviroc (formerly SCH ): Antiviral Activity of a Potent New CCR5 Receptor Antagonist D. Schuermann, C. Pechardscheck, R. Rouzier,
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg BID –RBV.
Overview of Drug Interactions Between Brecanavir (BCV) and Other HIV Protease Inhibitors (PIs) M Shelton, S Ford, M Anderson, S Murray, J Ng-Cashin XVI.
Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects
IMPAACT P1066: Raltegravir (RAL) safety and efficacy in HIV infected (+) youth 2 to 18 years of age through week 48 S. Nachman 1, E. Acosta 2, N. Zheng.
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
SAILING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment- experienced INI-naïve patients DK/DLG/0041/14c September 2015.
1/11/01 Pediatric trials for ARV experienced children Coleen K. Cunningham Epidemiology of treatment experience in pediatrics How does the smaller number.
Long-Term Comparison of Nevirapine Versus Efavirenz When Combined with Other Antiretroviral Drugs in HIV-1 Positive Antiretroviral-Naïve Persons- The NNRTI.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Raltegravir.
FLAMINGO Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects SE/HIV/0023/14c January 2014.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
#AIDS2016 Dolutegravir (DTG) plus Rilpivirine (RPV) in Suppressed Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Patients A. Díaz, J.L. Casado, F.
Genotype-directed dosing for Efavirenz
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Emory University School of Medicine Department of Medicine
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
undetectable (undetectable-6.25)
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Dolutegravir + ABC-3TC and CSF HIV-1 RNA Levels ING Study
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
Presentation transcript:

Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-label, Pharmacokinetic, Safety, Tolerability, and Antiviral Activity Study of Dolutegravir (DTG), a Novel Integrase Inhibitor, in Combination Regimens in HIV-1 Infected Infants, Children, and Adolescents: P1093 Rohan Hazra, Rolando Viani, Edward Acosta, Nan Zheng, Carmelita Alvero, Ellen O’Gara, Elizabeth Petzold, Barb Heckman, Debra Steimers, Ivy Song, Steve Piscitelli, Andrew Wiznia, on behalf of the P1093 Study Team July 24, 2012

Key Characteristics of DTG Once-daily, unboosted integrase inhibitor Low to moderate PK variability 1 Few drug interactions requiring dose adjustment Rapid and durable virologic response in adults 2 –10-50 mg DTG doses studied –50 mg QD selected for phase 3, integrase inhibitor-naive subjects –Phase 3 treatment naïve adult data to be presented on Thursday (SPRING-2) 3 1. Song et al. 13th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy 2012; Barcelona, Spain. Abstract O_ Stellbrink et al. CROI 2012; Seattle, WA. Abstract K Raffi et al. IAC 2012; Washington, DC. Abstract LBB04.

P1093 Study Design Phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label, noncomparative study of HIV-1 infected infants, children, and adolescents aged ≥6 wk to <18 y, of DTG when administered both prior to starting and in combination with OBT –Cohort 1: 12 to <18 y –Cohort 2: 6 to <12 y –Cohort 3: 2 to <6 y –Cohort 4: 6 mo to <2 y –Cohort 5: 6 wk to <6 mo

Enrollment Criteria INI-naïve HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/mL ARV treatment experienced –On ART Unchanged, failing regimen at least 8 wk –Off ART Off treatment 4 wk Must have at least 1 fully active drug for the OBT

P1093 Study Design Day 1 Week 4 (PK and safety) Day 5-10 Intensive PK visit Functional monotherapy or monotherapy phase Optimize therapy continuation phase 48 wk DTG + OBT Cohort 1: 12 to <18 y Intensive PK group n=10

Primary Objectives Select DTG dose that achieves similar exposure as the adult dose (AUC (0-24) as primary endpoint and C 24 as secondary endpoint) Determine short- and long-term safety and tolerability Evaluate steady-state PK of DTG in combination with other antiretrovirals (OBT) Protocol-Defined Targets AUC (0-24) (µg*h/mL)C 24 (µg/mL) Targets46960 Target range Lower limit25500 Upper limit92NA

Baseline Characteristics Cohort 1 (n=10) Age (y), median (range)13.5 (12-17) Gender, n (%) Male3 (30) Female7 (70) Race, n (%) Black or African American6 (60) White4 (40) Plasma HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL), n (%) 5000 to <10,0001 (10) 10,000 to <25,0003 (30) 25,000 to <50,0003 (30) 50,000 to <100,0001 (10) ≥100,0002 (20) CD4 + cell count (cells/mm 3 ), median543 CD4 + percent, median22 Time on prior ART (years), median12.8

Prior Antiretroviral Therapies ART class n (%) NRTI10 (100) PI9 (90) NNRTI4 (40) Triple class experienced4 (40) To minimize the potential impact of drug-drug interactions on PK variability, use of ATV, NVP, ATV/r, EFV, FPV, FPV/r, and TPV/r was not allowed PRIOR to the initial PK evaluation but could be added as part of optimized background therapy

P1093 Dosing Table for Cohort 1 (Tablet Formulation) Dose range Weight range (kg) Dose (mg)nDTG tablets taken DTG dose in mg/kg for lower- weight subjects DTG dose in mg/kg for upper- weight subjects 15 to <20200Two 10 mg tablets to <30250One 25 mg tablet to <40351One 10 mg tablet AND one 25 mg tablet ≥40509One 50 mg tablet 1.25≤1.25

Mean (SD) plasma DTG concentration (ng/mL) Adult Time (h) PK Result: DTG Exposure in Cohort 1 (12 to <18 y) is Similar to Adults Adult profile is based on pooled data from Study ING and SPRING-1: Min et al. AIDS. 2011; 25(14): Stellbrink et al. CROI 2012; Seattle, WA. Abstract K van Lunzen et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(2):

DTG exposure in Cohort 1 (12 to <18 y) achieved target exposure for both AUC (0-24) (37-67 µg*h/mL) and C 24 ( µg/mL) PK Result: DTG Exposure in Cohort 1 (12 to <18 y) is Similar to Adults Mean (SD) plasma DTG concentration (ng/mL) Adult P1093 Cohort 1 Stage 1 Time (h) PK parameter, mean (CV%)Cohort 1 AUC (0-24) 46.0 µg*h/mL (43%) C µg/mL (58%) Adult profile is based on pooled data from Study ING and SPRING-1: Min et al. AIDS. 2011; 25(14): Stellbrink et al. CROI 2012; Seattle, WA. Abstract K van Lunzen et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(2):

Safety at Week 4 DTG was generally well tolerated –No discontinuations –No drug-related AEs –No grade 3 or 4 clinical or laboratory events –No trends in lab abnormalities

HIV-1 RNA Results at Week 4 Outcomesn/NPercent (95% CI) HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL7/1070 (34.7, 93.3) HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL9/1090 (55.5, 99.8) Achieved at least 1 log 10 drop in HIV-1 RNA or HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL 10/10100 (69.1, 100) Median change from baseline was -2.8 log 10 copies/mL (95% CI: -3.1, -2.6)

Conclusions DTG achieved mean AUC (0-24) and C 24 within target range in children aged 12 to <18 y –PK/safety/tolerability data support dose selection of 50 mg in children aged 12 to <18 y weighing ≥40 kg –Supported further enrollment in remainder of this cohort (now n=22) –Data support further DTG initiation in the younger pediatric cohort (6 to <12 y) DTG plus OBT was well tolerated and potent through Week 4 Development of pediatric formulation is ongoing

Acknowledgments Thanks to IMPAACT investigators and all of the participants and their families! Sites: – UCSF – Chicago Children’s – Children’s Hospital of Boston – Jacobi Medical Center Funding: – IMPAACT is funded by NIH, NIAID, NICHD, and NIMH – Shionogi-ViiV Healthcare LLC P1093 Rolando M. Viani, MD, MTP Andrew Wiznia, MD Rohan Hazra, MD Paul Palumbo, MD Edward P. Acosta, PharmD Ellen Townley O'Gara, MSN, FNP Elizabeth Petzold, PhD Terence Fenton, EdD Carmelita Alvero, MS Nan Zheng, MA Barbara Heckman, BS Katherine Shin, PharmD Linda Barlow-Mosha, MD, MPH Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi, MD Derek Weibel Jennifer Bryant, MPA Linda Lambrecht, MS Sherene Min, MD, MPH Debra McCarty-Steimers, BS Ivy Song, PhD Stephen Piscitelli, PharmD