A Community Idea For A Better Future: The Pulaski County Commission on Children and Families John Bumgarner Project Associate, Institute for Policy Outreach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Prevention and Early Intervention. PEI’s Function and Purpose Texas Family Code Sec PREVENTION AND EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES DIVISION. "Prevention.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
OSCODA COUNTY Ending The School to Prison Pipeline.
Purpose of Project  To assess the state of oral health within Douglas County  To develop a strategic plan, utilizing the data obtained from the assessment,
An Introduction to Project NO REST February 11, 2015
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Recruiting Foster Families A Summary of the Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT May, 2002 National Resource Center.
Georgia: Improving Outcomes for Children through Data Sharing Presenter: Sharon L. Hill, PhD Director, Georgia Division of Family & Children Services Presentation.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES. BACKGROUND New category of funding in the FY13 Harold Rogers Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Official title is “Category 3:
Bureau of Indian Education Coordinated Services Plan Sue Bement Sally Hollow Horn.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Providing leadership in the development of services and supports for persons with disabilities. Patricia A. Moss Interim Director.
“Wraparound Orange”- Addressing the Children’s Mental Health System of Care December 1, 2009.
Preventing Family Crisis Finding the Assistance that your Family Needs.
ORIENTATION SESSION Strengthening Chronic Disease Prevention & Management.
Building Tribal programs that invest in children, youth, and families, while preserving tribal cultural values and traditions. Hankie P. Ortiz,Deputy Bureau.
Intern Orientation and Training. Welcome Mission The Council's mission is to provide leadership for community-based planning and mobilization of resources.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
COMMUNITY Needs Assessment Overview
The mission of the Bucks County Workforce Investment Board is to promote, drive, and ensure an effective workforce in Bucks County aligned with economic.
Affordable Care Act Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program Health Resources and Services Administration Administration for Children.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
USING MEDICAID AND BIRTH DATA FOR EVALUATION OF PERINATAL ORAL HEALTH INITIATIVE IN THE HUSKY PROGRAM PRESENTATION TO OVERSIGHT COUNCIL ON MEDICAL ASSISTANCE.
1 Issues in Preparing and Supporting the Workforce to Implement the Part C Referral Requirements of CAPTA Cordelia C. Robinson, Ph.D., RN Departments of.
Making RBS Happen in the Bay Area Establishing a Regional Child and Family Reconnection Resource.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
Uganda Health Information Strategy Eddie Mukooyo, MD, MSc Assistant Commissioner Health Services Dublin, Ireland 13 th September 2010.
Department of Human Services
State and Regional Approaches to Improving Access to Services for Children and Youths with Epilepsy Technical Assistance Conference Call Sadie Silcott,
“From White Paper to Present” West Virginia’s Effort for Improvement Educational Success for Children in Out-of-Home Care Rebecca Derenge, McKinney-Vento.
PUTTING PREVENTION RESEARCH TO PRACTICE Prepared by: DMHAS Prevention, Intervention & Training Unit, 9/27/96 Karen Ohrenberger, Director Dianne Harnad,
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
CSEFEL State Planning Rob Corso. CSEFEL  National Center focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children.
Jenkins County Family Enrichment Commission Non-Profit Organization Presentation Debra Herrmann Submitted to Dr. Jerry Merwin PADM 7040 Non-Profit Management.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
New Hampshire Mental Health TA Project IDEA Partnership National Community of Practice on Collaborative School Behavioral Health Share Fair Presentation.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVES Community Collaboratives around the state were an outgrowth of recommendations in the state report Mental Disability Prevention.
April 2016 CSA Conference How to Use the Family and Children’s Trust Fund (FACT) Research Portal to Identify and Target Program Needs.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Effective Practices for a Successful Standards Review.
Chippewa County Department of Human Services 2014 Budget Summary State of Wisconsin Joint Finance Action Health & Human Service Board.
1 Bring (& Keep) the Kids Home (BTKH) An update related to Education February 2009 A collaboration of Department of Health and Social Services, Alaska.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Presentation transcript:

A Community Idea For A Better Future: The Pulaski County Commission on Children and Families John Bumgarner Project Associate, Institute for Policy Outreach

The Assessment  The Assessment of the Child and Family Service Array in Pulaski County, Virginia  Conducted on October 21, 2005  Reported Back on January 12, 2006

Indicators on the Well-Being of Children and Families Pulaski County Rates of Abuse and Neglect Time PeriodPer 1,000 ChildrenRank in Virginia FY th FY nd FY rd FY th FY th Virginia Department of Social Services—CPS Statistics

Indicators on the Well-Being of Children and Families  2003—SAIPE, Census Bureau  Age 0-17 in Poverty  19.3% in Pulaski County  13.5 % in Virginia  17.3% in United States

Indicators on the Well-Being of Children and Families Office of Comprehensive Services Statistics

Indicators on the Well-Being of Children and Families

Additional Indicators  The Low Utilization Rates of a Number of Prevention/Early Intervention Services  The Lack of Coordination and Integration of Service Provision and Prevention Efforts to Children and Families  The Dramatic Rate of Staff Turnover within Pulaski County Department of Social Services  Data Accumulated by PCPC in its Endeavors on Substance Abuse by Youth in Pulaski County  Lack of an Intensive Out-Patient Substance Abuse Treatment Program for Youth

Additional Indicators  The problematic (and extremely expensive) increase in the utilization of out-of-home residential and therapeutic foster care placements due to the lack of proactive intervention through community-based services and the severe shortage of “regular” foster care families in the New River Valley.  The lack of a mechanism for the community to systemically measure progress and outcomes and take “stock” of its past efforts and future endeavors.

Next Step: Resource Development Plan  Pulaski County’s Resource Development Plan for Child and Family Services  April 28, 2006—Revealed to Community  28 Strategies to Address Identified Issues  Most Important Strategy  Pulaski County’s Commission on Children and Families

Mission of the Commission  Identifying community needs, resources, and trends related to local children and families;  Planning and facilitating community strategies for improving child and family outcomes;  Implementing coordinated initiatives to address identified needs in targeted areas;  Increasing access to information on local conditions and services pertaining to children and families; and  Recommending the investment of state and local resources.

Structure of the Commission  The Commission would certainly include:  County Administrator, Pulaski County  Director, Pulaski County Department of Social Services  Director, 27th District Court Services Unit  Executive Director, New River Valley Community Services  Representative, Pulaski Community Partners Coalition  Superintendent, Pulaski County Public Schools  Other additional commissioners could be:  Representative, New River Valley Community Action  Representative, New River Valley CARES  Representative, Private Vendor  Representative, Pulaski County Recreation Department  Representative, Radford University School of Social Work  Representative, Other Volunteer Organizations  At-Large Appointed Citizens

Structure of the Commission  Work Process  Commission Establishes “Work Groups”  Provides “Work Groups” with Assigned Tasks  “Work Groups” Report Back to Commission with Information and Recommendation  Commission Makes Decisions and Takes Action  Commission Reports Back Regularly to Board of Supervisors on Activities and Initiatives

Capacity-Building of Commission  Must Have Capacity to Meet the Mission  Work to Occur:  Planning and coordinating Commission activities, such as “work groups”;  Facilitating brainstorming sessions to implement the resource development plan;  Gathering data and information; analyzing data and information;  Preparing written and oral reports or presentations;  Developing and submitting appropriate grant applications;  Assisting with program evaluation; and  Assisting with other such tasks related to assisting the Commission carry out their mission.

Overall The Commission would be a collaborative mechanism to provide integrative leadership to plan, coordinate, monitor, and evaluate a community- wide system for child and family services through providing (1) up-to-date information on the well-being of children and families, (2) the development of an outcome measurement system to understand the impact of County and State investments, and (3) addressing future needs of the community, BUT

Without the creation of the capacity to administer, coordinate, and facilitate the activities of the Commission, the Commission will NOT be able to successfully fulfill its intended purposes as outlined in Pulaski County’s Resource Development Plan.