Travel to and from Canada on Amtrak Transportation Border Working Group Winnipeg – October 28, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Border Working Group
Advertisements

STATE OF NEW YORK Andrew M. Cuomo Governor New York State DOT Joan McDonald Commissioner Presentation by NYSDOT to the Transportation Border Working Group.
Underground Railroad Traveling along the Underground Railroad.
Canadian Train tours By Region. Trans Canadian Luxury Tour  10 nights/12 days  Departure cities  Toronto, ON  Ottawa, ON  Destination city – Vancouver,
Trans. Action Ontario1. 2 Toronto-Detroit Road Trip Quiz Only one entry per person No use of electronic aids Enter travel distance to nearest.
Pacific Corridor Enterprise Council K. David Andersson President February 16, 2006 Presentation Vancouver Cross Border Regions Roundtable.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
Section 209 Activity Report September 12, 2011 Federal Railroad Administration.
An International Team Effort – In addition to Amtrak:
Cross Border Rail Passenger Corridor Development Transportation Border Working Group November 1, 2011 – Niagara Falls, ON.
1 Amtrak’s Vision for the Northeast Corridor PRIIA 305 Annual General Meeting – June 14 th, PRIIA305 DMU Approval Meeting Andrew Wood Chief, Next.
Oregon Passenger Rail EIS Project Leadership Council Hal Gard, Rail Administrator, ODOT John Sibold, Cascade Rail Corridor Director, WSDOT Salem, OR June.
Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. The Train Is Part of the Vacation Experience The Amtrak Experience.
CE 515 Railroad Engineering Passenger Rail-Intercity and Commuter Rail Source: AREMA Ch. 10, REES Module 5 “Transportation exists to conquer space and.
Passenger Rail Discussion Group April 17, 2012 Seattle, Washington Cross Border Passenger Rail: A Canadian Perspective.
1 Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach 2009 Ark-La-Tex Rail Summit May 9, 2009 – Marshall, TX Joe Adams, Vice President – Public Affairs.
BC / WA J OINT T RANSPORTATION M ANAGEMENT F RAMEWORK Paula J. Hammond, P.E. Washington State Department of Transportation Secretary & Executive Council.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
An Action Plan for the Restructuring and Rationalization of the National Intercity Rail Passenger System Briefing by the Amtrak Reform Council February.
High Speed Rail on the Horizon State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Westin Hotel, Seattle, WA August 3 - 5, 2010 Paula Hammond Secretary.
Market Research and Analysis Demand Forecasting Overview May 30, 2013 Agenda Overview of Demand Forecasting Model Demand Forecasting.
Randy Wade TRB Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Tuesday January 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
Contracting Services for Intercity Passenger Rail
Cross Border Rail Passenger Progress Report Transportation Border Working Group April 17, 2012 – Seattle, WA.
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.

Cross Border Rail Passenger Service Transportation Border Working Group Buffalo, New York – April 8, 2014.
US Amtrak Network Major Josiah Pickett Captain Philip Zlatsin Lieutenant Brett Robblee 1.
Midwest High Speed Rail Case StudySeptember 29th, 2004 Andy Inserra, Kristin Thompson, T.J. Thurlow, Natalie Villwock.
Streamlined Border Flows Streamlined Border Flows (cont’d)) Efficient Access Efficient Access (cont’d) Distances to U.S. Markets are Very Short Distances.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
1 National Perspective FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION April 17, 2012 Canada-United States Transportation Border Working Group - Spring Plenary Cross-Border.
Actions identified in Winnipeg 1.Clarify the mission: make very plain that the involvement of states and provinces is why the TBWG can expect to be effective.
EXAMPLE 1 Use a formula High-speed Train The Acela train travels between Boston and Washington, a distance of 457 miles. The trip takes 6.5 hours. What.
Northern Lights Express High Speed Rail: MN APA Conference September 2011.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
Amtrak Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads SCORT, September 13, 2011 Paul Vilter AVP Host Railroads, Amtrak.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
1 Freight Performance Measurement Presented to Transportation Border Working Group on 7 June 2006.
Ch. 19: The Growth of Industry
A State Perspective on Infrastructure Challenges and Opportunities Presentation to The Council of State Governments Eastern Regional Conference Halifax,
Cooperative Research Programs Transportation Research Board 1 Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Rail Research Program AASHTO Standing.
EXAMPLE 1 Use a formula High-speed Train The Acela train travels between Boston and Washington, a distance of 457 miles. The trip takes 6.5 hours. What.
PRECLEARANCE Progress Update 1. Preclearance at 8 major Canadian airports Pre-inspection in the rail and marine environments in British Columbia PRECLEARANCE.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Michigan Accelerated Rail Service Passenger & Freight Director Kirk T. Steudle, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation Faster, Better, Cheaper, Safer,
October 23rd 2013 Ministère des Transports du Québec (MTQ) involvement at the Canada / United States border Transportation Border Working Group.
Standard 3 Objective 2 TRAVEL BY RAIL TRAIN HISTORY Fred Harvey contributed to the railroads by setting up at each stop Harvey Houses to provide fresh.
Amtrak: America’s Railroad Todd Stennis, Director Government Affairs, South.
Transportation and Areal Specialization The main role of transportation is to connect places and move things and people (and ideas) from place to place.
Transportation Border Working Group (TBWG)
Amtrak Gov’t Affairs October 19, 2007 Amtrak Key Facts Summary November 12, 2007.
Ron O’Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617) Session 3 Multi-Modal Transportation Projects Moderator: Peter Clary.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Travel by Rail Standard 3 Objective 2
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
Travel by Rail Standard 3 Objective 2.
OVERVIEW: POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (ptc)
Cultural Geography of the USA & Canada
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
Hospitality and Tourism Standard 3:
Vancouver’s Dominance of Trade & Travel Through the Cascade Gateway
Travel by Rail Standard 3 Objective 2.
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Travel to and from Canada on Amtrak Transportation Border Working Group Winnipeg – October 28, 2009

2 Overview of Amtrak Began operations May 1, 1971 Took over the deficit passenger businesses of more than (then) 20 private railroad companies 21,000 mile nationwide route system 28.7 million passengers carried in million passengers carried in 2009 More than 300 intercity trains per day –Northeast Corridor (High-Speed) –State Corridors (Include all services to Canada) –Long Distance System

3 Amtrak Services to Canada Current: –Portland – Seattle – Vancouver “Amtrak Cascades” and Thruway buses –New York – Toronto “Maple Leaf” (A VIA Rail Canada train when in Canada) –New York – Montreal “Adirondack” Discontinued –Chicago – Toronto “International” –Washington – Montreal “Montrealer” –New York – Detroit “Niagara Rainbow”

4 Current Route System

5 Amtrak Ridership to and from Canada “Amtrak Cascades” - Vancouver –FY 2007 – 66,175 –FY 2008 – 67,179 –FY 2009 – 74,566 “Maple Leaf” - Toronto –FY 2007 – 59,459 –FY 2008 – 66,275 –FY 2009 – 46,575 “Adirondack” – Montreal –FY 2007 – 63,229 –FY 2008 – 71,599 –FY 2009 – 66,008

6

7 Customs and Immigration Processes – “Amtrak Cascades” Current northbound –All customs and immigration done entirely in Pacific Central Station Current southbound –Immigration pre-clearance - Pacific Central Station –Customs – On board trains stopped at Blaine WA Amtrak recommendation in PRIIA Section 406 report to Congress –All customs and immigration in both directions to be done entirely at Pacific Central Station with closed door train operations in Canada –TSA, USCBP, CBSA plus local and Amtrak police participated in developing these recommendations

8 Customs and Immigration Processes - “Maple Leaf” Current Northbound –CBSA screens passengers on board in Niagara Falls ON station. The “Maple Leaf” becomes a VIA Rail Canada train at the border. –“Persons of interest” receive secondary screening off board –USCBP may do an outbound screening for a person of interest leaving the U.S. Current Southbound –USCBP screens passengers on board in Niagara Falls NY Station. The “Maple Leaf” becomes an Amtrak train at the border. –“Persons of interest” receive secondary screening off board in station including all third country nationals receiving biometrics evaluation Pending possibility – All passengers disembark with luggage for processing off-board in new consolidated customs and immigration facilities on both sides of the border and then re-board trains Requested – Continue current process or, preferably, develop a way to process passengers enroute with the train underway

9 Customs and Immigration Processes – “Adirondack” Current northbound –Passengers screened on board with train stopped at Lacolle QC –Persons of interest taken to nearby highway border crossing for secondary screening Current southbound –Passengers screened on board with train stopped at Rouses Point NY –Persons of interest taken to nearby highway border crossing for secondary screening Pending possibility – All passengers disembark with luggage for processing off-board in new consolidated customs and immigration facilities on both sides of the border and then to re-board trains Recommendation – Replicate Vancouver proposal with all customs and immigration in both directions done entirely at Montreal with closed door train operations in Canada, discontinuing the current stop at St. Lambert QC

10 USDOT High Speed Rail Corridors

11 Possible Future Border Crossings All three current locations between: –“Amtrak Cascades” between White Rock BC / Blaine WA –“Maple Leaf” between Niagara Falls ON / NY –“Adirondack” between Lacolle QC / Rouses Point NY Plus possibly: –Boston – Montreal High Speed Corridor –Chicago – Michigan – Ontario – Quebec Very remote chance of reviving any discontinued crossings

12 Objectives and Issues Objectives from an Amtrak perspective –Increase cross border ridership –Link seamlessly with VIA Rail Canada –Maintain and improve passenger-friendly processes with minimal personal disruption –Achieve progressively faster trip times rather than border formalities routinely taking up to an hour … or more Issues –Conflict between the legitimate objectives of border security and higher speed rail service –Potential offloading of passengers with baggage for screening enroute would likely result in a two hour delay to trains for unloading, processing and reloading – particularly risky during inclement weather and / or among elderly passengers –Funding to achieve agreed objectives

13 Amtrak Preferences Where there are no stops in Canada – End point customs and immigration processing by CBSA and USCBP in Canada in both directions with closed door operation in Canada (as now northbound into Vancouver) Where end point processing is not practical due to intermediate stops in Canada – Continue current on-board screening at the border while evaluating requirements for processing passengers with the train underway