24/7 SOBRIETY OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL LARRY LONG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 26, 2013 Jeff Bechtel, Senior Consultant Medicaid Capacity Access Analysis.
Advertisements

Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
Continuous Alcohol Monitoring and the SCRAM System Greater Littleton Youth Initiative September 11, 2009.
Criminal Justice Sentencing Reform Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
OHSO Impaired Driving Forum Gary L. Ackley Assistant District Attorney Office of the District Attorney for Oklahoma County Norman, OK 3/21/2013 Breakout.
1 The Importance of Successful Reentry to Jail Population Growth Presented by: Allen J. Beck, Chief Corrections Statistics Program Bureau of Justice Statistics.
879 Productions Presents Copyright 2000 Alcohol, Drugs & Driving with Officer Darin “Crash” Leonard.
Re-Entry and Recidivism
DWI/DUI. Ultimate Goal Increase DWI deterrence and decrease alcohol related crashes deaths and injuries.
SMART JUSTICE SYMPOSIUM Lt. Joanne Lake Spokane County Sheriff’s Office Detention Services Assistant Facility Commander-Geiger.
An approach for the judicial system to reduce the influence of drug and alcohol abuse on crime.
THE 24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT. Origins Created by South Dakota Created by South Dakota Has existed since 2005 Has existed since 2005 Now in use in 57 of 66.
BOPPPS W&M Presentation - 1 Key Performance Measure #1 Parole Recidivism  Percentage of Matrix Inmates (applies to offenders whose crime(s) were.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
National Partnership on Alcohol Misuse and Crime Alcohol Monitoring Technologies Breath Alcohol Detection November 10, 2009.
Measuring Cohort Change in South Dakota Counties Eric Guthrie 2014 Applied Demography Conference San Antonio, Texas.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL LARRY LONG.
UCLA Drug Abuse Research CenterForever Free Evaluation Forever Free Substance Abuse Treatment Program Outcomes Study Michael Prendergast, Ph.D., Principal.
The end of the line…. Who decides?  After the jury returns a verdict of guilty either…guilty The judge determines the sentence Or the jury gives a recommendation.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
The Effects of Time in Prison on Male Felons’ Employment and Earnings Haeil Jung University of Chicago 2007 Crime and Population Dynamics Summer Workshop.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008.
South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)
Housing Ex-Offenders: Identifying Barriers and Proposing Solutions Angela Lee ODRC Reentry and Family Program Administrator.
REALIGNMENT RESEARCH UPDATE January 24, Realignment Research Group Charter  Define a Data Governance Processes  Make recommendations for a county-wide.
Ursula Hill February 2012 Notre Dame-AmeriCorps Mid-Year Conference.
Blame it on the ALCOHOL. Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) amount of alcohol in your system based on a test of your breath, blood or urine. illegal to.
Criminal Sentencing in N.C.. Structured Sentencing In 2011, N.C. passed the Structured Sentencing law to organize the punishment of criminals. – Sentencing.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Probation Effectiveness
Drug Abuse Trends in the State of California Presented to: CA Association for Criminal Justice Research March 17, 2005 Presented by: Kiku Annon, MA, WestEd.
Crime and Criminal Justice Trends in Virginia Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission September 21, 2015.
Comparative Perspectives on Sentencing Severity and Sentencing Alternatives Richard S. Frase University of Minnesota Symposium on Alternatives to Incarceration.
The criminal justice system in America was created to keep communities safe, to respect and restore victims, and to return offenders who leave prison.
Prop. 47 Criminal Sentences. The Question Should the penalties for certain offenders convicted of non-serious, nonviolent crimes be reduced from felonies.
© 2004 by David T. Olson Sample - Not for Public Use1 A Sample Presentation of The State of the Church in South Dakota and the Sioux Falls Metro Area
The end of the line…. Who decides?  After the jury returns a verdict of guilty either…guilty The judge determines the sentence Or the jury gives a recommendation.
Important Terms DUI- driving under the influence of a substance that alters the brain. Can be alcohol or drugs. Both prescription and non-prescription.
Legal Consequences Illegal Drug Possession And Underage Drinking Presented by Mrs. Noël.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse ProgramsForever Free Evaluation Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs for Women Laurie Bright, National Institute.
Corrections May 5, United States World Leader The United States has the largest prison system in the world with 2.2 million prisoners behind bars.
Recidivism Rates for DCJ Offenders Exiting Residential Treatment June 2007 Kim Pascual Research & Evaluation.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
- No taxing authority - Income from enterprise operations and - Grants and/or - Kindness of county governments.
Marijuana Most Commonly Detected Drug Among Male Arrestees Tested by ADAM II in Five U.S. Sites CESAR FAX U n i v e r s i t y o f M a r y l a n d, C o.
South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)
South Dakota: Criminal Justice Reform
Corrections GOVT 2306, Module 10.
Copyright 2011 Curriculum Technology, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Corrections May 4, 2017.
Racial injustice in the criminal justice system
Summit County Probation Services
California State Association of Counties
Beyond the referral Presented by:
POD Jurisdictions D D C A D D D D A D A B B A AA D C D D B 4A B D C C
The State of the Church in South Dakota
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
The State of the Criminal Justice System in Kansas
Presentation transcript:

24/7 SOBRIETY OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL LARRY LONG

DWI DWI DWI Vehicular Battery Vehicular Homicide TOTALS FY99 FY07 Convictions FY99-FY07 ALL FELONY CONVICTIONS 24,640 DUI FELONIES were 34.9% of all felony convictions DUI FELONIES FY 99- FY07

OTHER FELONIES Possn. of Cont. Subst A- 17(1) Grand Theft Forgery rd Degree Burglary Aggravated Assault FY99-FY06 Convictions 5,9183,3371,651 1,3621,104 FY99-FY06 Percentage 27.2%15.3%7.5%6.2%5.1% DUI and controlled substances felonies total 59.9% 15% of state prison population are DUI felonies

ALCOHOL/DRUGS IN SOUTH DAKOTA PENITENIARY Alcohol Dependent: –72% of men –66% of women Meth Dependent: –27% of men –45% of women Combined: –87% men –91% women

GOAL Defendant sobriety- 24/7 Target group- anyone arrested for DUI with prior conviction in last 10 years

BOND CONDITIONS No alcohol No bars Breath test- 7am and 7pm If you skip or fail you go to jail

BENEFITS Mom and kids are safer Public is safer Defendant will spend less time in jail Treatment prospects improve Defendant’s employer happy ALMOST NO COST TO TAXPAYER

Butte Custer Corson Bennett Tripp Stanley Sully Potter Edmunds Faulk BrownPerkins Jerauld Aurora Marshall Day BrookingsKingsbury Minnehaha Deuel Gregory Todd Yankton Harding Pennington Lawrence Meade ZiebachDewey Haakon CampbellMcPherson Walworth Spink Roberts Grant ClarkCodington Hamlin HydeHand Beadle BuffaloSanborn Miner LakeMoody Brule DavisonHansonMcCook Lyman Charles Mix DouglasHutchinsonTurnerLincoln Bon Homme Clay Union Jones Mellette Hughes Jackson Fall River Shannon UPDATED 12/31/ Participating Counties SOUTH DAKOTA 24/7 PROJECT

AGE GROUPS/ OFFENSES 48% of program participants have 3 or more DUI Offenses

NUMBER OF TESTING DAYS Comparing first test date to last test date yields an average of days of participation in the program.

NUMBER OF SHOW AND FAILS 680 (66.6%) never failed a test 175 (17.1%) failed only one test 100 (9.7%) failed only twice

PBT STATS January 2005 through May 31, ,956 participants (active and completed) 2,087,390 total tests 2,079,359 (99.6%) passed tests 14,207 (.4%) failed tests or no show

A Continuous Alcohol Monitoring System

SCRAM STATS Nov 6, 2006 through May 31, 2009 –1,383 participants –163,773 days for an average of 111 days per participant –261 participants had some type of violation –781 (or 74.9%) completed participants had no violation

DRUG URINALYSIS Detection of drugs through urine test Detectable drugs –Cocaine –Opiates –Amphetamines –Marijuana –Oxycodone –PCP –Antidepressants –Ecstacy

URINALYSIS STATS 1,261 participants 17,730 number of tests administered 17,294 (97.6%) passed tests 436 tests failed 56 no shows July 2007-May 31, 2009

DRUG PATCH Detection of drugs through sweat Patch lasts for 7-10 days Drugs detected from 1-2 days before patch applied and up to 24 hours prior to removal Detects –Cocaine –Opiates –Amphetamines –Marijuana –PCP

DRUG PATCH STATS July 2007-May 31, participants 415 number of tests administered 335 (92.8%) passed tests 23 tests failed or no show

SERVICES AVAILABLE – JULY 1, 2007 –Twice per day alcohol testing Counties with a jail Some others –Drug Urinalysis- Counties with high volume Need both male and female staff –SCRAM Small counties No jail Defendant has odd situation –Drug Patch Small Counties Counties without female staff $2.00 per day $5.00 per test or $10 per week $5.00 per day $40.00 per patch or $4.00 per day

APPLICABILITY- ALL CRIMES  Pre-trial  Bond conditions  Post conviction  Conditions of suspended sentence  Parole  Parole Board imposed  A & N Children  Testing imposed upon adults in household as condition of return of children to homes

DOC Prison Population FY 1996 –Inmate population 1908 FY 2006 –Inmate population 3428 –1520 or 152 annually FY 2007 –Inmate population less inmates FY 2008 – Inmate population 3344 – -34 less inmates

Analysis Methods and Explanation The following analysis compares 24/7 Participants who participated in the 24/7 program with twice a day testing (PBTx2) to controls (non- 24/7 participants) The comparison analysis is presented on the following three levels –Any 24/7 participation –24/7 participants with at least 30 days of consecutive testing on the program –24/7 participants with at least 90 days of consecutive testing on the program Recidivism comparisons are made for recidivism based on arrest to future arrest at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years Controls are drawn from the South Dakota Unified Judicial System database under a data use and confidentiality agreement Recidivism data is cut as of 12/31/2008 (latest data available for analysis)

*Caution in interpretation is advised because of the sample size. Trends are heading in right direction.

Summary of Findings Compared to non 24/7 participants, arrest to arrest (next DUI offense) recidivism is substantially lower for 24/7 participants at 1, 2 and 3 years. Even lower rates are documented for individuals that have 30 and 90 days of consecutive twice a day testing on the program. Note: The small sample size available for analysis at 2 and 3 years should be considered for PBTx2 30 and 90 consecutive days and the rates may change as more data is available for inclusion in the analysis.

All PBTx2 Participants PBTx2 with at least 30 consecutive days of tests PBTx2 with at least 90 consecutive days of tests One Year Controls DUI Levelnn recid% recid nn recid% recid n n recid% recid n n recid% recid % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 50 Two Year Controls DUI Levelnn recid% recid nn recid% recid n n recid% recid n n recid% recid % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 20 Three Year Controls DUI Levelnn recid% recid nn recid% recid n n recid% recid n n recid% recid % % % 400.0% % % % % % % % % % % % % % 500.0% 30 10