Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components Model includes bracket conducting path on back of PPs Disruption cases: Mid plane fast disruption (1 ms)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Lenzs Law. Minus Sign There is a minus sign in Faradays Law. There is a minus sign in Faradays Law. Relates flux change to polarity of emfRelates flux.

Advertisements

Ss Hefei, China July 19, 2011 Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering Center for Plasma-Material Interactions Contact: Flowing.

Thermal Load Specifications from ITER C. Kessel ARIES Project Meeting, May 19, 2010 UCSD.

Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear.

-Generators -Motors -Eddy Currents -Maxwell’s Four Equations AP Physics C Mrs. Coyle.

NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses

Chapter 27 Sources of the magnetic field

L I M I T Liquid Metal Illinois Toroidal Test Facility Toroidally Symmetric Liquid Metal J X B Experiments David N. Ruzic, J. Norman, J.P. Allain, M. Boaz,

Lecture 20 Discussion. [1] A rectangular coil of 150 loops forms a closed circuit with a resistance of 5 and measures 0.2 m wide by 0.1 m deep, as shown.

AT Pilot Plant EM and Structural Studies P. Titus.

Dielectrics Experiment: Place dielectrics between plates of capacitor at Q=const condition Observation: potential difference decreases to smaller value.

Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Update on Thermal Loads during disruptions and VDEs A. Loarte.

Principles of Electromechanics Electricity  Motion Electricity  Motion: Motor Motion  Electricity: Generator  Magnetic Field & Faraday’s Law.

Physics 121 Practice Problem Solutions 10 Magnetic Fields from Currents (Biot-Savart and Ampere’s Law) Contents: 121P10 - 1P, 5P, 8P, 10P, 19P, 29P,

Magnetism Any time electrical power is moving through a wire magnetism is created Any time magnetism moves past a wire electrical power is created.

Use of Simple Analytic Expression in Tokamak Design Studies John Sheffield, July 29, 2010, ISSE, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Inspiration Needed.

Magnetic Field Generator: Toroid. Example: Force Between Parallel Currents Four long wires are parallel to each other, their cross sections forming the.

TSC time dependent free-boundary simulations of the ACT1 (aggr phys) plasma and disruptions C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Jan 23-24, 2012, UCSD.

Eddy Current Testing This method is widely used to detect surface flaws, to measure thin walls from one surface only, to measure thin coatings and in some.

Today’s Concept: Faraday’s Law Lenz’s Law

ASIPP EAST Overview Of The EAST In Vessel Components Upgraded Presented by Damao Yao.

NSTX/MAST Engineering Workshop C. Neumeyer National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) NSTX Design Overview NSTX/MAST Engineering Workshop C. Neumeyer

NSTX CSU Preliminary Assessment of PFCs Art Brooks December 8,

NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Requirements & Design Point C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.

ARIES AT Project Meeting - Princeton, NJ 18 Sept 00 1 ARIES-AT Toroidal Field (TF) and Poloidal Field (PF) Coils Tom Brown, Fred Dahlgren, Phil Heitzenroeder.

Magnetic quasi-static simulation

NSTXU-CALC Vessel Port Rework for NB and Thomson Scattering

2-d Insulation Analysis of Clamp / Vacuum Vessel Insulation crushing

Fluid, 90% iron solidified iron km ,00012,000 Mg(Fe) silicates phase changes basaltic-granitic crust chemical stratification and differentiation.

1 CHAPTER-23 Gauss’ Law. 2 CHAPTER-23 Gauss’ Law Topics to be covered  The flux (symbol Φ ) of the electric field  Gauss’ law  Application of Gauss’

 Prepared by:  Jignesh k patel  Roll no:17  1 st year B.E, Electrical  Enroll : Guided by: Latesh Patel Piyush Patel Laxmi Institute of.

Systems Code – Hardwired Numbers for Review C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, July 29-30, 2010.

NSTX NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Ensure fatigue resistant Welds: minimum # of locations shown, could be more. Various Weld Reinforcements & Hardware Replacement.

1 R D Pillsbury Sherbrooke Consulting, Inc. OPERA Analyses of the In-vessel Coils for the IDR In-Vessel Coil System Intermediate Design Review –

Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components Summary: 1.Plasma shape from square to close to circular 2.Matched conductivity in brackets and bolts with.

OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.

August 7, 2003K. Chow, LHC Luminosity Detector Thermal Analysis1 Analysis cases Approach: Start simple to get information— with speed with confidence that.

Plasma Facing PFA Antenna Group POLITECNICO DI TORINO 19 Topical Conference on Radio Frequency Power in Plasmas June 1-3, Newport 1 Mitigation of.

Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.

ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders A Brooks July 27, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_353BL2.

Efremov Research Institute Russia, St. Petersburg, FAX: (812) ,

Heat Loading in ARIES Power Plants: Steady State, Transient and Off-Normal C. E. Kessel 1, M. A. Tillack 2, and J. P. Blanchard 3 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.

NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus April 14, 2010 PF4/5 Terminal Stress Existing PF4/5 Support Weld Algorythm Moment Influence.

INDUCED ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE group 4 1.Firdiana Sanjaya Ana Alina

1 Association Euratom-CEA P. Libeyre Pioneering superconductivity 23rd SOFT, Venice 21 September 2004 PIONEERING SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS IN LARGE TOKAMAKS.

MHD Issues and Control in FIRE C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop on Active Control of MHD Stability Austin, TX 11/3-5/2003.

HQM01 Test Summary Outline -Magnet Instrumentation and Shim System -SG Data -Short Sample Limits -Quench Training at 4.6 K and 2.2 K -Ramp rate and Temperature.

NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus Sept 1, 2010 Status of Disruption Simulations.

Induced current produces a secondary magnetic field that is always opposed to the primary magnetic field that induced it, an effect called Lenz’s law.

A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.

Structure of Earth as imaged by seismic waves

Analysis of TF Load Paths and Vacuum Vessel Loading H. M. Fan Jan. 22, 2009.

A PROPOSED TF JOINT DESIGN FOR THE NSTX CENTERSTACK UPGRADE Robert D Woolley 25 February 2009.

Recent Disruption Studies in NSTX S.P. Gerhardt. Four Destructive Phenomena Associated With Disruptions Thermal Quench –Extremely Rapid (

Chapter 30. Induced Current/induced emf/Induction Experiment 1.

Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field Ampère’s Law Example 28-6: Field inside and outside a wire. A long straight cylindrical wire conductor of radius.

Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components. Opera 3D Model – Transient ELEKTRA Solver Fast mid-plane centered disruption 2 MA/ms Back ground field.

Faraday’s Discovery Faraday found that there is a current in a coil of wire if and only if the magnetic field passing through the coil is changing. This.

Eddy Current Inspection

Effects of Magnetic Fields and Producing Current

Electromagnetism.

Andrew H. Gosline, Gianni Campion, and Vincent Hayward

Which way is the force acting?

Energy in a capacitor is stored

C. E. Kessel1, M. S. Tillack2, and J. P. Blanchard3

Magnetostatics.

First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:

What I have learned from EAST experiments 胡友俊

دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده

Dielectrics Experiment: Place dielectrics between

Presentation transcript:

Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components Model includes bracket conducting path on back of PPs Disruption cases: Mid plane fast disruption (1 ms) VDE (P1 to P5 plasma center translation) and quench fast quench at P5 (1 ms) slow quench at P5 (40 ms - slow VDE in Titus’ case) worst case?

Conductivity (S/m)Skin depth Passive Plate5.07x10 7 (85% Cu)2.25 mm Bracket1.389x10 6 (SS)13.7 mm VV1.389x10 6 (SS)13.7 mm CS Casing0.7576x10 6 (SS)13.7 mm Electrical conductivity and skin depth (1ms disruption) Skin Depth at Fast Disruption The skin depth of copper passive plates is only ~2-2.5 mm during 1 ms plasma disruption Br (T)Bz (T) Without plasma With plasma t= End of disruption Background fields at center of lower PPPs (1.2, 0.72, -0.8) m Fast mid-plane centered disruption 2 MA/ms Back ground field OH, TF and PF coils (#79)

Eddy Current - Mid-plane Fast Disruption color – eddy current density arrow – eddy current flow

Eddy Current – P1-P5 VDE and Fast Disruption color – eddy current density arrow – eddy current flow

Eddy current at end of disruption Eddy Current in Front Face of PPs – Mid-plane Fast Disruption skin depth

Eddy current at end of disruption Eddy Current in Front Face of PPs – P1-P5 VDE then Fast Disruption skin depth No loop is observed

Eddy current at end of disruption Eddy Current in Back Face of PPs – Mid-plane Fast Disruption

Eddy current at end of disruption Eddy Current in Back Face of PPs – P1-P5 VDE then Fast Disruption

Eddy Current in Brackets – Mid-plane Fast Disruption

Total Toroidal Current Induced during Fast Disruption Lower PPP centerBr (T)Bz (T) coil background field (#79) with plasma at = with plasma at 1ms X (m)Y (m)Z (m) Background fields at center of lower PPPs (1.2, 0.72, -0.8) m Center of lower PPPs

Disruption Loads on PPPs – Mid-plane Fast Disruption X (m)Y (m)Z (m) Moment center of lower PPPs

Disruption Loads on PPPs – P1-P5 VDE then Fast Disruption X (m)Y (m)Z (m) Moment center of lower PPPs

Disruption Loads on PPPs – P1-P5 Slow VDE (40 ms Disruption) X (m)Y (m)Z (m) Moment center of lower PPPs

Mid Disruption Analysis of Upper PPs

Mid Disruption Analysis of Lower PPs

Mid Disruption Analysis of Upper PPs

Disruption Analysis of Upper PPs