US Bracket Support for Stave D. Lynn (BNL), LBNL Mechanical Meeting, Sep 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICE Collaboration meeting at RAL 26 th Oct ~ 29 th Oct, 2004 Wrap up on Radiation Shielding Module Design Stephanie Yang 26 th October, 2004.
Advertisements

31 août 2011 Didier Laporte – LPNHE Paris 1 IBL Integration Stave Review Université de Genève.
Stave # 1 Metrology Eric VIGEOLAS, WG2 July the 12th 2011.
G.Barber 28 Oct Construction/Refurbishment Of The Tracker Prototype Contents:- Welcome Back Plans Layout Things to be addressed New Schematic.
QA during Stave Core Assembly Stephanie Qing Yang (Oxford) 25 th Sept 2014 WP4 f2f meeting at RAL.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Recent Study Topics Full length model with wafers, hybrids and cable as dead weight.
Stave core assembly Stephanie Yang WP4 face to face meeting, Lancaster University 20 Feb 2014.
Vertex Detector Mechanics Bill Cooper Fermilab VXD.
IBL Mock Up IBL Mock Up MANUFACTURING 2011/04/29 François-Xavier NUIRY Maxence CURDY Andrea CATINACCIO CERN PH/DT/PO 1.
Engineering Division 1 Mechanical and Integration CD0 Walkthru, 19-Dec, 2007 Eric Anderssen, LBNL.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
ATLAS SLHC UPGRADE ENGINEERING – LIST OF DECISIONS which will affect the design of auxiliary systems layout and routing BASIC LAYOUT FOR BARREL and WHEELS.
Recent Mechanical Barrel Stave Development BNL; S. Duffin, A. Gordeev, D. Lynn, G. Mahler: LBNL; C. Haber, M. Gilchriese: Yale; W. Emmett, A. Martin, P.
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Example Barrel Structures- Disk Primary FEA of Disk Frame Supports FEA of Disk Frame Supports –Structure 2m long with two end plates.
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
26 April 2013 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Overview.
Some Recent BNL, LBNL and Yale Work 1.Honeycomb flatness from manufacturer 2.Commercially fabricated C-channel 3.VCR Fittings 4.BN powder thermal evaluations.
Progress on staves – mechanical & thermal. Core and materials.
US Stave Core Production D. Lynn (BNL), LBNL Mechanical Meeting, Sep
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
1 IBL Integration & Testing activities University of Geneva: G.Barbier, F.Cadoux, A.Clark, D.Ferrère, C.Husi, M. Weber  Preliminary definition of Integration.
May 17, 2005Wednesday Experiment Meeting BNL, Upton Acceleration beyond 100 GeV  Goal To evaluate the spin dynamics beyond 100 GeV  What’s the impact.
CONSTRUCTION Andrea d'AURIA PH / DT-DI / GAS.
ACFA-7; Taipei, Nov 2004 H.Weerts status Si licon D etector Status H.Weerts Fermilab/Michigan State Univ. (Progress on Si-tracker layout)
M. Gilchriese Module Assembly and Attachment at LBNL M. Gilchriese for F. Goozen April 2000.
L0 and L1 Structure Deflections During Installation of Silicon Sensors C H Daly 8/24/2003.
DOE Rev of Run IIb Sep 24-26, Detector Production WBS James Fast Fermilab.
M. Gilchriese Sectors, Rings, Frame Assembly and Installation July 18.
Close Coupled Bullieds
Strip Stave cores Stephanie Yang ATLAS upgrade Oxford activities, January 2015.
Open Midplane Dipole (OMD) Design for Dipole First Layout R. Gupta (BNL), N. Mokhov (FANL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
SVD Mechanics Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna) BPAC, 26 October 2015.
Tilt angles reloaded, and status of some other things.
Capstone Design Team. CHI-A 정준영 전우준 김건식 김병찬 한일환
Dean Hackett Structures Week 2. Dean Hackett In previous sessions… Brief review of previous learning: –Types of motion –Classes of lever –Turning moments.
End-of-stave region. 2 Space Z-dimension is critical –Keep gap small (might help getting rid of stubs) Edge of last barrel silicon (at corner) is 1277.
QA: BNL Measurements D. Lynn (BNL), LBNL Mechanical Meeting, Sep
Local Supports to IDR Discussion ATLAS Upgrade Week November 2014.
Setting up correctly Different types and their use
December 1999 Frame and Assembly Planning Status E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese and F. Goozen LBNL W. Miller Hytec, Inc.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford ILC VD Workshop, Menaggio 22 April 2008 SiD Vertex Detector.
Workshop 2 Steel Bracket Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K. Goyal Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Puerto Rico at.
A hollow stave Ian Wilmut – August LBL stave At the March UG week LBL showed a prototype asymmetric stave. This prompted consideration of the strip.
Building LEGO Robots For FIRST LEGO League By Dean Hystad
Mechanics R&D Ian Wilmut. Talk Scope This talk is to provoke conversation – not to direct activities. The slides should do no more than start the conversation.
SLHC Stave Wire-bonding Clearances (Tim) WP4 Glasgow (13 th June 2011)
Some Comments on the Use of CGL for the Foam-Pipe Interface 1 D. Lynn (BNL), LBNL Mechanical Meeting, Sep 2012 We have been using CGL exclusively in the.
1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber G. Viehhauser (Oxford) C. Haber (LBNL) T. Hurteau, W. Emmet (Yale) R. Rurns, D. Lynn (BNL)
Stavelet 09 and Storage/Assembly/Survey Frame Progress Report Brookhaven National Laboratory David Lynn, Susan Duffin, Anatoly Gordeev, Ken Sexton Yale.
Stave #12 This stave core was built together with William Emmet, Tom Hurteau, and Jeffery Ashenfelter from Yale University in the week of November.
15th January 2014 WP4 Meeting Oxford1 EoS PCB Mike Dawson University of Oxford.
Eric Vigeolas, July the 3 rd Status The IBL detector construction already started and the components assembly (flex, modules, stave loagin) will.
Year 8 Fuse Tester Design & Technology PCB Information Fixed value resistors 470R = Yellow, Purple, Brown This component is soldered directly onto the.
Progress on Stave assembly tooling Stephanie Yang (Oxford) WP4 meeting at Liverpool University, 13 th November 2014.
Potting Bench Plans Matt Howell Brooks County High School ___, Georgia Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office, August, 2004.
Strip Stave Status & Plans at Yale Yale: Paul Tipton, Will Emmet, Tom Hurteau.
Sébastien MICHALMarch Sébastien MICHALMarch 2009 EES 1 GROOVE EES 1 laid on table to be milled EES 1 laid on table to be milled –Move horizontally.
24 September 2012 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Status of Mechanics PXD-SVD Meeting Göttingen.
Session 1: Drills; Saws, Part 1 Session One Objectives When trainees have completed this session, they should be able to do the following: 1.Identify.
Potting Bench Plans Matt Howell Brooks County High School Quitman, Georgia Quitman, Georgia Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office, August, 2004.
What is Stave Carrier Frame Required to Do?
Mechanics: (Tim).
WP9 ITS Mechanics and Cooling
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
HB RM prototypes Ianos Schmidt Aug 17, 2017.
Services Layout – Update
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Kimberly Gonzalez United Engineering & Technology Magnet
Anthony Keene Kristin LaForge CIVE 717 Spring 2018
Presentation transcript:

US Bracket Support for Stave D. Lynn (BNL), LBNL Mechanical Meeting, Sep

2 Peek Flex-Edge Peek Z-Support Peek Rigid-Edge CF composite beam Bracket Design Main idea behind this approach is that the Rigid-Edge serves as the fiducial edge. The Flex-Edge pushes stave against fiducial Rigid-Edge. End insertion is very simple.

13 degree Support; CORE = 1.3 mm. 3 CF Ribs

Detector Envelope and Lorentz Angle With above detector envelope can probably do about 13 degrees Lorentz angle. May go lower depending upon final envelope, but 10 degrees is probably not possible 4

Prototype I Carbon Fiber/Peek Bracket Prototypes Recently Built Spring 2012 CF/Peek design is radiation hard. Peek creep shown not to be an issue. Insertion tests with 1.3 m stave are very smooth as hoped. Have iterated design (Prototype II) of flex part of bracket to keep stave in brackets should large (accidental) normal force be applied to stave. Prototype I brackets were sent to the UK for evaluation. 5

6 Prototype I and Prototype II Flex Performance Prototype I (now in UK) Prototype II (just now being finished) I II Prototype I Prototype II After initial testing, modified design to prevent stave from popping out Prevents stave from falling down

Deflection as a function of force tests Peek Flexible brackets were machined at Yale; production brackets to be injection molded. However, excellent uniformity among brackets 2-4, and surprisingly close to Anatoli’s design point. The surprise is due to our not knowing beforehand the modulus of our peek. D. Lynn talk, Oxford, Feb 2012, discusses dependence of peek young’s modulus with annealing history. Note here that brackets 2-4 were annealed at Yale, bracket 1 was not! 7

Need line and two extra points circled in red when we measure next set of brackets Need also to determine if there is a bow in CF piece Circles provide collinearity measurement A B E O D C Yale OGP Measurements of Prototype I Measurements were quickly done at Yale “Constellation” plots revealed more variation than desired Yale has improved its assembly tooling for prototype II Yale will more carefully make OGP measurements of prototype ii as they will have more time Height variations larger than desired Bracket Constellation Plot 8

9 Brackets should push resonant frequency higher (but have only measured with frame mimicking brackets up to now) Measure frequency response to impulse. Compare frequency response of simple end support (lowest stave frequency) and frame support, where frame support mimics US style brackets with elastic peek brackets. First resonant frequency with end support is 18 Hz (14 Hz is simulation value). First resonant frequency jumps to 156 Hz with frame (5 brackets) support. End SupportFrame Support 18 Hz 60 Hz108 Hz156 Hz Impact Response with Stave in Frame

New baseplate for DC-DC stave assembly will also include bracket mounting holes for bracket mount testing 10

New baseplate for DC-DC stave assembly will also include bracket mounting holes for bracket mount testing 11

12 Locking Ideas We have not pursued a locking mechanism design pending a decision on where the fixation point should be. Choices are at z = 0 or z-outer (depends upon stave length). Note large active area gap between +/- z staves due to detector dead space shown below. Likely a z-outer fixation can be developed that increases the gap by an amount that is small compared to the naturally existing one. The LSWG can be of benefit by working toward settling this issue. Z fixation serves two purposes 1.Define fixed point for thermal contractions (or CME??). 2.Protect stave during services installation. Maybe have z = 0 fixation for point 1 and a temporary fixation point at z-outer for services installation? Approx 1.3 mm dead space on detector Old Slide (LSWG June 2011) but still relevant

Locking Ideas Drawing from R. Nickerson’s SLAC 2012 Talk Hopefully can demonstrate pipes need not bend under EOS Z-fixation pin and Services strain relief (don’t over-constrain in x and y) Separate bracket function from z-fixation/services relief function Idea derived from UK drawing below 13

14 Radiation Length Prototype I Radiation Length Maybe be able to reduce by making width of brackets less (width in z direction).

Final Notes Need to understand what region at z = 1.3 m looks like in terms on interconnect between barrels and services to decide how to lock in z and protect stave during services installation…are interlinks the default??? With prototype II brackets and new baseplate we will measure profile of 1.3 m standard stave both warm and cold (have not done cold up till now) What else needs to be addressed? 15