Comparison of LISA and Atom Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Astronomy in Space Peter L. Bender JILA, University of Colorado and NIST 46 th RENCONTRES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Measurement of the Gravitational Time Delay Using Drag-Free Spacecraft and an Optical Clock Neil Ashby, Dept. of Physics, UCB 390, University of Colorado,
Advertisements

1 Feasibility of measuring the Shapiro time delay over meter-scale distances Peter Shawhan (University of Maryland), Stefan Ballmer (LIGO - Caltech), Szabolcs.
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
 In our analysis of the double slit interference in Waves we assumed that both slits act as point sources.  From the previous figure we see that the.
1 Measurement of the Gravitational Time Delay Using Drag-Free Spacecraft and an Optical Clock Neil Ashby, Dept. of Physics, UCB 390, University of Colorado,
Millimeter Wave Sensor: An Overview
Towards a Laser System for Atom Interferometry Andrew Chew.
Prospects for gravitational wave detection with atom interferometry
LIGO-G W "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) LIGO for Chemists Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Gravitational Physics using Atom Interferometry
L06Uaecho-based range sensing1.
Light and Telescopes Chapter 5. Radio Interferometry The Very Large Array (VLA): 27 dishes are combined to simulate a large dish of 36 km in diameter.
Louis J. Rubbo Neil Cornish and Olivier Poujade. The LISA Simulator Capabilities –Valid for an arbitrary gravitational wave at any frequency in the LISA.
Using Atomic Diffraction to Measure the van der Waals Coefficient for Na and Silicon Nitride J. D. Perreault 1,2, A. D. Cronin 2, H. Uys 2 1 Optical Sciences.
Louis J. Rubbo, Neil J. Cornish, and Olivier Poujade Support for this project was provided by the NASA EPSCoR program.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
LumiCal Alignment System Status report Leszek Zawiejski, Tomasz Wojtoń, Arkadiusz Moszczyński Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Cracow 25th FCAL Collaboration.
Search for the Gravitational Wave Memory effect with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Jingbo Wang 1,2,3, Hobbs George 3, Dick Manchester 3, Na Wang 1,4 1.
Laser System for Atom Interferometry Andrew Chew.
H. J. Metcalf, P. Straten, Laser Cooling and Trapping.
Jason Hogan May 22, 2014 LISA Symposium X Single-arm gravitational wave detectors based on atom interferometry.
Current progress of developing Inter-satellite laser interferometry for Space Advanced Gravity Measurements Hsien-Chi Yeh School of Physics Huazhong University.
Katrin Dahl for the AEI 10 m Prototype team March 2010 – DPG Hannover Q29.1 Stabilising the distance of 10 m separated.
LISA STUDIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO Michael J. Nickerson, Ellery B. Ames, John L. Hall, and Peter L. Bender JILA, University of Colorado and NIST,
Einstein gravitational wave Telescope Next steps: from technology reviews to detector design Andreas Freise for the ET WG3 working group , 2nd.
1 Martin L. Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Holger Mueller Physics Department, University California-Berkeley Talk.
08/31/2006 ~ Mission specific challenges: Data Analysis GRS Interferometry.
Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
 a mathematical procedure developed by a French mathematician by the name of Fourier  converts complex waveforms into a combination of sine waves, which.
Characterising exoplanetary systems with space-based Bracewell interferometers ARC meeting Denis Defrère Liege, 19 February 2009.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission April 2008 Joel Johnson, IEEE GRSSSlide 1 Coexistence Issues for Passive Earth Sensing from GHz Notice: This.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
02/6/ jdr1 Interference in VLBI Observations Jon Romney NRAO, Socorro ===================================== 2002 June 12.
3 3 What is gravity? _______ is an attractive force between any two objects that depends on the _______of the objects and the ________ between them.
Bridging the Gap between Terrestrial Detectors and LISA Elba 2002 May 24, 2002 Seiji Kawamura National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
GW Workshop - Linthicum, MD Dec No ITAR protected information Group 4: Alternative Measurement Concepts RFI Assessment Summary Evaluation Team:
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Testing the slow roll inflation paradigm with the Big Bang Observer
Relativistic Quantum Theory of Microwave and Optical Atomic Clocks
Thermoelastic dissipation in inhomogeneous media: loss measurements and thermal noise in coated test masses Sheila Rowan, Marty Fejer and LSC Coating collaboration.
Gravitational Waves.
Comparison of Laser Interferometry and Atom Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Observations in Space Peter L. Bender JILA, University of Colorado Boulder.
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
Surface Layer SLODAR J. Osborn, R. Wilson and T. Butterley A prototype of a new SLODAR instrument has been developed at Durham CfAI and tested at the Paranal.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
Laguerre-Gauss Modes for Future Gravitational Wave Detectors Keiko Kokeyama University of Birmingham 2 nd ET Annual Erice, Sicily, Italy
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Super resolving pupils: beyond the diffraction limit * Anedio Ranfagni, Daniela Mugnai, Rocco Ruggeri In an attempt to transfer the results obtained with.
Deci-hertz Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (DECIGO) 7th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop December 17, International Institute.
The Planck Mission: Looking into the Past to Learn about Our Future Courtney Nickle, Stephanie Clark and Taylor Phillips Astronomy, Spring 2011 Abstract.
Space Gravitational Wave Antenna DECIGO Project 3rd TAMA Symposium February 7, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Japan Seiji Kawamura National.
Mike Cruise University of Birmingham Searching for the fifth dimension using gravitational waves.
GSFC  JPL Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) Time-Delay Interferometry with Moving Spacecraft Arrays Massimo Tinto Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
Signal Propagation Basics
Where is the change in refractive index of the glass, and is the change in temperature due to heating. The relative phase change due to asymetric heating.
Optical Sciences CenterThe University of Arizona ERROR ANALYSIS FOR CGH OPTICAL TESTING Yu-Chun Chang and James Burge Optical Science Center University.
LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: The Mission Mike Cruise For the LISA Team.
The search for those elusive gravitational waves
Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland GW Astronomy, Korea August, 2016
PROBING the MYSTERY: THEORY & EXPERIMENT in QUANTUM GRAVITY
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Asantha Cooray (Caltech) Based on Seto & Cooray, PRL, astro-ph/
Mach-Zehnder atom interferometer with nanogratings
Instrument Considerations
Antenna Efficiency Optimization in Coherent Lidar Systems   Sammy Henderson, Pat Kratovil, and Charley Hale Beyond Photonics beyondphotonics.com.
Laser Interferometry for a future GRACE follow-on mission
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of LISA and Atom Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Astronomy in Space Peter L. Bender JILA, University of Colorado and NIST 46 th RENCONTRES DE MORIOND Gravitational Waves and Experimental Gravity March 20 – 27, 2011, La Thuile, Valle d’Aosta, Italy

REFERENCES Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor Savas Dimopoulos, 1,* Peter W. Graham, 2,† Jason M. Hogan, 1,‡ Mark A. Kasevich, 1,§ and Surjeet Rajendran PHYSICAL REVIEW D 78, (2008) Comment on “Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor” Peter L. Bender PHYSICAL REVIEW D, accepted for publication An Atomic Gravitational Wave Interferometric Sensor in Low Earth Orbit (AGIS-LEO) Jason M. Hogan, David M. S. Johnson, Susannah Dickerson, et al. arXiv: v1, 14 Sep 2010

FIG. 11. The proposed setup for the AGIS-Sat. 3 experiment. Two satellites S1 and S2 house the lasers and atom sources. The atoms are brought a distance d ~ 30 m or 130 m from the satellites at the start of the interferometer sequence. The dashed lines represent the 100 m paths traveled by the atoms during the interferometer sequence. Continuous Laser Beam Pulsed Laser Beam

Parameters for Proposed AGIS- Satellite 2 GW Sensor S. Dimopoulos et al., Phys. Rev. D 78, (2008) Parameters:Satellite separation:L = 1 × 10 3 km Atom cloud path length:I L = 200 m Atom cloud temperature:θ = 100 pK Atom thermal velocity:V = 1 × m/s Separation of Raman pulses:T = 100 s Repetition rate:1/s Sensitivity, to 0.5 Hz:h = 2 × /√Hz Est. Parameters:Atom cloud radius:b = 5 mm Laser beam radius:a = 500 mm

Assumed AGIS-Sat. 2 Mission Design The mission characteristics given in Table III of Dimopoulos et al. (2008) are assumed, where they differ from those given in the text. Confocal laser beams are transmitted between the telescopes, as recommended in the AGIS-LEO paper. The beams have to be apodized to reduce Fresnel ripples. Successive stimulated Raman transitions based on many added  pulses are used to produce 400 photon momentum splittings. This approach is discussed by McGuirk, Snadden and Kasevich in PRL 85, 4498 (2000):

Overlooked Error Sources in the AGIS-Sat. 2 and 3 Proposals The laser beam from one end will be on continuously and serve as a phase reference. However, there will be some fluctuations in its wavefront aberrations over the 100 s intervals between the  /2, , and  /2 pulses from the other laser. These aberration fluctuations will have more effect on the laser phase seen by the near atom clouds than those for the far atom clouds because of the small atom cloud radius, the long laser path, and diffraction. The laser wavefront aberration fluctuations would have to be attenuated to a level of 2×10 -8 wavelengths in order to achieve the quoted gravitational wave sensitivity for the Sat. 2 proposal, and 10 times better for Sat. 3. Because of the 100 s time between pulses for the Sat. 2 and 3 proposals, the atom cloud temperature would have to be stable to less than 2 pK from cloud to cloud.

Specific Problems with the AGIS-Sat. 2 Proposal The authors say the paper gives “The details of our proposal for an atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor (AGIS).” However, no sketch or description of what the satellites might look like has been given. There is no mention in the 2008 paper of needing mode-cleaner cavities after the lasers, even though large mode-cleaner cavities are included in discussions of ground-based laser gravitational wave detectors. A possible rough design for the mode-cleaner cavities is needed in order to permit consideration of the impact on the satellite design. A requirement on the temperature fluctuation between atom clouds is not given. It is stated that telescopes with about 1 meter diameter and 1 Watt of laser power would permit operation over 1,000 km baselines. However, such operation with 200 atom clouds in the interferometer at the same time, as specified, does not seem possible.

COMPLEXITY Even without much tighter requirements on wavefront aberration noise mitigation and cloud temperature fluctuations: The proposed AGIS-Sat. 2 mission is far more complex than LISA! The statement that, compared with LISA, the proposed AGIS missions would be able to reach the suggested sensitivities “with reduced engineering requirements” is not supported by anything in the published paper. With the much tighter requirements: It seems unlikely that the suggested sensitivity could be achieved in an affordable mission.

Parameters for Proposed AGIS-LEO GW Sensor J. Hogan et al., arXiv: v1, 14 Sept Parameters:Satellite separation:L = 30 km Atom cloud path length:I L = 15 m Separation of Raman pulses:T = 4 s Repetition rate:20/s Satellite altitude:1000 km Sensitivity, 0.07 to 10 Hz:h = 3 × /√Hz Est. Parameters:Atom cloud radius:b = 5 mm Laser beam radius:a = 150 mm

Issues Concerning the AGIS-LEO Proposal The laser wavefront aberration fluctuations would have to be attenuated to a level of 2×10 -8 wavelengths in order to achieve the quoted gravitational wave sensitivity. None of the gravitational wave sources shown in the sensitivity figure for AGIS-LEO have a reasonable probability of being observable during a mission lifetime. Operation at 1000 km altitude in Earth orbit appears to complicate the mission operations seriously. At 1000 km altitude, it does not appear possible to obtain any new information about time-variations in the Earth’s mass distribution. Possible operation only when in Earth shadow is suggested to avoid the need for large sunshields over the atom interferometers, but would substantially interfere with the scientific objectives.

Does the AGIS-LEO Proposal Discussion of Wavefront Aberration Noise Mitigation Help the AGIS-Sat. 2 Proposal? The need for “A high-finesse mode-scrubbing optical cavity” after the laser to reduce the laser wavefront aberration noise is recognized. However, no estimate of the amplitude of this noise is given, and the required performance level of the mode-cleaner cavities is not discussed. Use of an “extra propagation segment” to reduce wavefront aberration noise does not seem practical. Effects due to atom spatial distribution variations and atom velocity variations also are discussed. They are much less for AGIS-LEO than for AGIS-Sat. 2 because the pulse separation time T is 4 s rather than 100 s. But the suggested use of spatially resolved detection of the atoms in the cloud does not appear to help.

Summary The following two issues need to be addressed: – The wavefront aberration noise level from lasers with adequate output power levels – The design and performance level of mode-cleaner cavities that can handle the required laser power levels. A modified version of the AGIS-Sat. 2 proposal with a reduced time T between pulses seems more realistic to pursue. However, it still would be much more complex than LISA. Studies of an AGIS-LEO mission appear to be considerably less attractive than studies of a modified AGIS-Sat. 2 mission. This is partly because the design problems for operation in Earth orbit are more severe, and partly because the science justification given so far appear to be very weak.