AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 1 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Part III cabling + weight S. Di Falco, M. Incagli, F. Pilo, F. Spinella, G. Venanzoni.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Calorimeter Trigger to L1-Board data transmission Umberto Marconi INFN Bologna.
Advertisements

M. Noy. Imperial College London Calice MAPS Adapter Card Review M. Noy 26 th June 2007.
3 rd Angle Projection A 3 rd Angle projection is a 2D drawing of a 3D object. It shows three views the side, plan and end view. The side view is drawn.
ESODAC Study for a new ESO Detector Array Controller.
Ecal Connection board and Motherboard design. Connection Board Motherboard.
CMS WeekDec 2002E. Hazen HF Electronics Status Report E. Hazen, J. Rohlf, E. Machado Boston University.
CPR2 Optical Cables Joey Huston Michigan State University …taking optical signals from edge of CPR/crack detectors to PMT boxes mounted on back of wedges.
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams Michele Faucci Giannelli.
7/13/ EE4271 VLSI Design VLSI Routing. 2 7/13/2015 Routing Problem Routing to reduce the area.
E. Hazen, Boston University BU Meeting, Apr. 6, 2001 Front-end Readout of the CMS Hadronic Forward Calorimeter (HF) Conceptual Design (Summary) by Eric.
Chamber PCB s, FEB s, Cooling, HV/LV Distribution 1)PCB designs-track widths, track to track distances … 2) Double sided and Multi layer, modular approach.
Year 8 Mathematics Area and Perimeter
C-Card and MMFE using the BNL Peak Finding ASIC (VMM1) Ken Johns, Joel Steinberg, Jason Veatch, Venkat Kaushik (U. Arizona)
Choosing the right preamplifier/discriminator comparing advantages and drawbacks : NL-277-L (Nanometrics), ASD-8 (Cern) and MAD4 (INFN Italy) Our favorite:
The High Voltage, Monitoring and Control systems of the Hadronic and Electromagnetic calorimeters are essentially slow control based, and therefore are.
AMS Cabling CERN Prevessin 893-1D020 December 6, 2006 Agenda 1) Brief overview -Show Plumbing and VC ring-mounted-hardware -AMS overall -Common.
ROSIER Ph End cap – TPC - LC DRAFT Definition of the front-end electronics and its cooling in the Alice TPC experiment Page 1A The Alice TPC.
1 E906 Pre-Amplifier Card 2009/10/07. 2 E906 Wire Chambers Station1 MWPC: –build a new E906 MWPC. –4500 channels in total. Station2 DC: –recycle old E866.
Structures 7 Decision Maths: Graph Theory, Networks and Algorithms.
ENGR 214 Chapter 17 Plane Motion of Rigid Bodies:
LNL 1 SLOW CONTROLS FOR CMS DRIFT TUBE CHAMBERS M. Bellato, L. Castellani INFN Sezione di Padova.
HBD FEM the block diagram preamp – FEM cable Status Stuffs need to be decided….
Update on the HBD Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting June 8, 2005.
HBD FEM Overall block diagram Individual building blocks Outlook ¼ detector build.
8/9/2000T.Matsumoto RICH Front End RICH FEE Overview PMT to FEE signal connection Trigger Tile Summation of Current RICH LVL-1 Trigger Module1,2 What is.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
Towards a final design of LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
SPD cabling issues I.Cable status II.Cabling inside VFE box III.Cable through chains (Gael) IV.Data spare cables V.Control bundles VI.Information for cabling.
Specifications Asic description Constraints Interface with PDM board Schedule Summary.
Graphs of Linear Equations. 1)Copy and complete the ordered pairs using the equation y = 3x + 2 (-4, -10) (-2, ? ) (0, ? ) (2, ? ) (4, ? ) 2) Graph each.
CLAS12 Trigger System part1: Level1 EC Revision 1, Feb 7, 2007.
Connector Differential Receiver 8 Channels 65 MHz 12 bits ADC FPGA Receive/buffer ADC data Format triggered Events Generate L1 Primitives Receive timing.
Assumptions: Cockcroft-Walton photomultiplier bases are the same for all ECAL sections Digital to analog converters are installed on the distribution boards.
9/18/2003Safety Review Electronics Electronics design LV, HV power supply Fusing Heat.
CALO DCS upgrade A. Konoplyannikov, M. Soldatov, A. Ostankov, Yu. Guz (IHEP, Protvino) V. Kudryavtsev (BINP, Novosibirsk)
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Plans and Progress on the FPGA+ADC Card Pack Chris Tully Princeton University Upgrade Workshop, Fermilab October 28, 2009.
AMS Software Review ACC DAQ Monitoring Ch Chung, A. Goerres, Th. Kirn I. Phys. Institute B, KSC, 31st January 2011.
ALGEBRA READINESS LESSON 8-4 Warm Up Lesson 8-4 Warm-Up.
Problem A 25- g steel-jacket bullet is fired horizontally with a velocity of 600 m/s and ricochets off a steel plate along the path CD with a velocity.
1 Timing of the calorimeter monitoring signals 1.Introduction 2.LED trigger signal timing * propagation delay of the broadcast calibration command * calibration.
EE4271 VLSI Design VLSI Channel Routing.
Mauro Citterio Milano, PP2/Services - an update - Mauro Citterio INFN Milano Type II cables  Layout in progress  Duplication of VVDC wires.
05/07/2010P. LamareBackbone dry solution Dry backbone requirements.
Specifications Asic description Constraints Interface with PDM board Planning Summary.
2 March 2012Mauro Citterio - SVT Phone meeting1 Peripheral Electronics Some updates Mauro Citterio INFN Milano.
21 November 2003Jacques Lefrancois1 HOSTING ELECTRONICS AND CONNECTIVITY Role of calorimeter system: Level 0 trigger +  reconstruction +e/  id. Level.
Central Tracker Cabling and Mechanics Paola Gianotti26/4/111.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
2 Dec 1998F Harris LHCb Trigger Meeting L0 Trigger - ‘Real Estate’ Considerations Current thinking for the size and location of L0 trigger electronics,
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
D. Breton, S. Simion February 2012
Service channels between Tracker and PP1
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Update on ‘Real estate’ for Level-0
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
First of all we will remind some numbers:
Front-end electronic system for large area photomultipliers readout
HERD Tracker Layout Considerations
Conceptual design of STK Readout electronics
Dr. Pierluigi Paolucci - INFN di Napoli
Vereinfachung der CBM TRD Elektronik
Final Design CGEM Workshop HIEP, 14/03/2017 M. Melchiorri - INFN FE.
Dr. Pierluigi Paolucci - INFN di Napoli
Route Inspection Which of these can be drawn without taking your pencil off the paper and without going over the same line twice? If we introduce a vertex.
EE4271 VLSI Design, Fall 2016 VLSI Channel Routing.
The LHCb L0 Calorimeter Trigger
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
SALTRO16 activities in Lund
Dr. Pierluigi Paolucci - INFN di Napoli
Presentation transcript:

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 1 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Part III cabling + weight S. Di Falco, M. Incagli, F. Pilo, F. Spinella, G. Venanzoni

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 2 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Trigger Cabling Drawings from R.Becker Two solutions studied: –horizontal EIB (rowwise) : each EIB reads out 9 PMTs –vertical EIB (columnwise) : each EIB reads out 4 or 5 PMTs

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 3 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Rowwise – scheme of principle In this scheme the EIB communicates with the trigger card through the EDR (backplane) 6 EDR + 1 ETRG X view 6 EDR + 1 ETRG Y view X view and Y view completely separated (from trigger point of view) to JLV1 9 PMTs cables below ECAL

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 4 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Rowwise – scheme of principle Only layers 2-7 are used by the trigger (6 out of 9  2/3) Each EDR has 2 active and 1 inactive EIBs 2 inactive EIBs from Y view are connected to the X view sector in order to have 18 EIBs per crate Y view X view

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 5 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling EIB – EDR connection X view  8 – 2 – 2  8 – 4 – 4  9 – 6 – 6 Y view  1 – 3 – 3  1 – 5 – 5  9 – 7 – 7 Number of wires which converge to each of the 2 ECAL trigger boards through backplane: 9  2  6 = 108 signal 2  2  6 = 24 DAC (9 PMT signals + 2 DAC setting/reading) x 2 connectors x 6 EDR Using I 2 C protocol saves pins and lines on the backplane (factor 4 for the MAX5980)

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 6 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling To evaluate cable length I assume that all cables converge to the calorimeter corner and then follow the diagonal support for 325 mm Along the crate I consider an average length of 425 mm  The total average length from the connection point btwn ECAL and ISS is 750 mm  220 mm  325 mm

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 7 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling An average length of 250 mm has been considered, per each EIB, to reach the connection point btwn the ECAL and the ISS structure X view Y view 36 mm connection point 200 mm

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 8 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling A length of =1000mm to be added to each cable “Diagonal” paths have not been considered L = ECAL side = 640 mm X1 = 0x 4= 0 X2 = 320x 4= 1280 X3 = 640x 4= 2560 X4 = 960x 4= 3840 Y4 = 320x 1= 320 Y3 = 640x 1= 640 Y1 = 0x 5= 0 Y2 = 320x 5= 1600 Y3 = 640x 4= 2560 Y4 = 960x 4= 3840 X1X2 X3X4 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 9 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Weight : cables Total cable length including path to crate is : L TOT = 1664cm + 24  100cm = 4064 cm Note that EDR-EIB data connection, for a readout of 9 PMTs, needs 40 wires, therefore data+trigger=51 wires 90g/m Considering a linear density of 90g/m, for a 51 wires flat cable, the weight is : total:4064cm  0.90gr/cm = 3658 gr data:3658gr  (40/51) = 2869 gr trigger:3658gr  (11/51)  (2/3) = 526 gr unused: 3658gr  (11/51)  (1/3) = 263 gr

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 10 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Weight : total 51 pin connectors: 5.35 gr Excluding the unused cable the total weight is : W = 2869gr + 526gr + (5.35gr  36) = 3588 gr datatriggerconnectors

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 11 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Columnwise Also in this case I consider 1 cable per EIB (data+trigger) and I sum the distances to reach the EIB close to the corner To this number I add the same offset to go from the ECAL corner to the crate The result is : L TOT =2462cm+100cm  18  cm  18  2 =11966cm D = 36 mm D z x

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 12 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Columnwise : total weight In this case, however, one needs only 35(data)+3(TRG)+2(trig DAC)=40 wires : W cab = 11966cm  0.90gr/cm  (40/51) = 8447 gr W con = 5.35gr  72 = 358 gr W TOT = W cab + W con = 8805 gr The contribution of the trigger to the total is 5/40 : W TRG = 8447gr  (5/40) = 1056 gr

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 13 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Cable length: a final remark The cable length for the columnwise scheme is determined by the routing which separetes X view and Y view (1) Using a different routing for data signals (2), for a 37 wires cable and 37 pin connector the algorithm gives: L TOT =2462cm+100cm  18  4 =9662cm  W = 9662cm  0.90gr/cm  (37/51) + 3.5gr  72 = 6561 gr excluding the trigger cables (1) (2)

AMS - ECAL Feb 17 th, 2003 Page 14 M. Incagli - INFN Pisa Part III cabling Summary of part III Trigger signals go to EDR and, thru backplane, to ETRG  no cables directely to ETRG Trigger signals to ETRG : 108. Some extra input signals are needed to set external values (e.g. angular coefficients) or to mask input channels. Using a horizontal scheme the total cable length/weight (including connectors) is: –L TOT = 41 m –W TOT = 3.6 kg In the vertical scheme(s) : –L TOT = 111m (96m) –W TOT = 8.8kg (6.5kg)