MANJUL BAJPAI Indore – 19.12.2009 “DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
Advertisements

Interim measures in Russian courts in support of international arbitration: principles, procedure and the range of remedies available BRLA seminar 25 January.
Sales Contracts.  Sale – Contract in which ownership of goods transfers immediately from the seller to the buyer  Ownership – Collection of rights that.
What Regulations apply? The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulation, 2004 amended eight times till date. Which.
COMMENCEMENT OF ARBITRATION PROFESSOR JOSEPH MBADUGHA.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
Best international practices – the ICC model contracts and changing circumstances.
Stake Holders Broadcasters Multi System Operators (MSO) Franchisees/cable Operators (LCO) End Subscribers TRAI /Government.
Chapter 18 – The Judicial Branch
Legislative Changes to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (AB 340 and AB 197) Presented by: Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association.
Dispute Regulation OBE-118, Section 3 Fall 2004 John McKinsey U.S. Civil Court system and how individuals use it to (hopefully) resolve their dispute and.
Jurisdictional problems regarding disputes arising in the context of contracts of sale The recent case law of the EC Court of Justice on Article 5.1, Brussels.
AGENCY IN LIBYA OVERVIEW.  In1971, the Agency Law permitted the Libyan nationals to carry out activities of commercial agency  In 1975, the Libyan government.
WTO FORUM: ARTICLE 25 OF THE DSU Christian Albanesi Managing Counsel ICC International Court of Arbitration.
Efficacy Of Dispute Resolution in Broadcasting & Cable Sector © & Presented By: Ashok Nambissan Note: Views expressed are those of the author alone.
The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) made simple Western Suburbs Law Association Tuesday 4 June 2013 Michael Heaton.
Cable TV Industry – INDIA
PRESENTATION ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND PROTECTION OF CONSUMER RIGHTS IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS UPAMANYU HAZARIKA Advocate HYDERABAD.
Hüseyin Arslan, LLM Legal Counsel ERGO Turkey. Hüseyin Arslan, LLM. “Insurance Arbitration [Turkish Practice]”  Insurance litigation in Turkey has long.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
TDSAT Seminar- Guwahati, Dec of 15 Status of Disputes Settlement Mechanism in Telecom & Broadcasting Sectors in India Association of Unified Telecom.
Agency AUTHORITY OF AGENTS (1) Where an agent acts in the name of a principal, the rules on direct representation apply. (2) Where an intermediary acts.
Revenue Enforcement Legal Strategies Lawrence K. Nodine Ballard Spahr December 16, 2009.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
MANJUL BAJPAI GOA EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
MSO and the Regulatory Framework. TRUTH AT THE GROUND LEVEL  The charges payable by MSOs to broadcasters are fixed on mutually agreed / lump–sum amounts.
Service of documents within European Union Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
DAS - THE FUTURE REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS IN DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS (DAS) KUNAL TANDON ADVOCATE.
TDSAT SEMINAR Chennai 30 th August 2008 “Dispute Resolution Scenario in Telecom and Broadcasting Sector” Venue : Hotel Park Sheraton.
Jump to first page MANJUL BAJPAI M U M B A I – DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Introduction The Consumer Protection Act was enacted in Amendments were made in The Act applies to the whole of India except the State of.
Wang Jing & Co. 敬海律师事务所 WANG JING & CO. Mr. WANG Jing 王敬 Managing Partner 管理合伙人 October 2013 Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in.
Indian Partnership Act 1932 Definition Sec 4 – “Partnership is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of business carried.
What Is Employment? Compare employee with agent and independent contractor Differences: Control test - Degree of control exercised over an employee is.
 Three things are necessary in order for there to be a contract: an offer, acceptance and consideration  Consideration is something promised mutually.
Introduced some basic knowledge of the contract First, what is the contract? Contract, also known as contract. China's definition of the contract, the.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD – “REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM, BROADCASTING AND CABLE SERVICE SECTORS”
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
MANJUL BAJPAI Mumbai – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
BY Suhail Anjum Siddiqui,Advocate B.com.(Hons)LL.B(Hons.) MBA.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: 25 Years 4 June 2010 “The Influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law in Hong Kong and China”
 Negotiation  Conciliation / mediation  Arbitration  Litigation.
ARBITRATION ACT. Challenge of arbitrator The appointment of an arbitrator may be challenged on the issues of – (i) impartiality, – (ii) independence,
AMINZ Conference August 2009 AMINZ Conference 2009 Sally Fitzgerald Partner Russell McVeagh THE ROLE OF THE AMINZ ARBITRATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL.
Variation By Agreement: UCC Article 9 © Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. All rights reserved.
Procedure and application.  Before the enactment of the consumer Protection Act,1986 a person aggrieved by the defective goods or deficiency in service.
DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS Vibhav Srivastava Advocate
Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012 Class III
Dispute Settlement Scenario in Telecom Sector By S C Khanna Secretary General Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India 15 th May 2010.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Prof. Giorgio F. COLOMBO. Lesson n. 4  Art. 7 CISG  (1) In the interpretation of this Convention, regard is to be had to its international character.
Eastern Mediterranean University
Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
MANJUL BAJPAI Lucknow –
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
MANJUL BAJPAI CHANDIGARH –
The Federal Court System
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCENARIO IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS
Adjudication, Regulation, Telecommunication
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
Arbitration and Procedures. Default (rule 2 (d)) Means failure on the part of any person, to repay to the financing bank or to any other society a loan.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
Legal English and the Common Law AY 2017/2018
The State Court as Appointing Authority
Legal Environment for Business in Nepal 26 February 2017
The Federal Court System (ch.18)
Presentation transcript:

MANJUL BAJPAI Indore – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”

»Inter-active monologue »Know about TDSAT »Question – Answer Form §Question 1: §Who / what is TDSAT? §Answer 1: §Statutory Body under TRAI Act, since year §Jurisdiction over all telecom disputes. §Jurisdiction extended to Cable and Broadcasting in January, §Exclusive jurisdiction over telecom matters §Court of first instance - wide powers – any dispute §Both Appellate and Original jurisdictions.

§Question 2: Can I file a petition / case in civil courts? §Answer 2: No. Civil Court’s jurisdiction is expressly barred. §Question 3: Can I file a petition / case in TRAI? §Answer 3: No. §Question 4: Can I file a petition / case in High Court? §Answer 4: High Court has writ jurisdiction but generally they send telecom cases to TDSAT. §Question 5: Can I get my dispute settled through an Arbitrator, if my License issued by the Government / Interconnect Agreement provides for an arbitration clause? §Answer 5: No.

§Question 6: Can I approach TDSAT if I am an individual Subscriber? §Answer 6: No – Not as an individual Subscriber. But as a Group – You can approach TDSAT. §Question 7: Can I challenge the orders of TRAI? §Answer 7: Yes – 30 days limitation apply. §Question 8: Can TDSAT entertain issues relating to Restrictive Trade Practice etc? §Answer 8: Express exclusion in TRAI Act – but TDSAT can entertain disputes based on rights and liabilities arising out of TRAI Act / Regulations, even if such Regulation incidentally trenches on the subject of RTP or MTP.

§Question 9: Can I approach TDSAT if an MSO or a Broadcaster is not providing me signals to start service? §Answer 9: Yes. You can. §Under 'Must provide clause‘ - every Broadcaster has to provide its TV signals to MSOs and every MSO has to provide its TV channels to Cable Operators, on non-discriminatory terms. §If you are a new signal seeker, then you have to apply to MSO /Broadcaster and provide the details like: §(i)Your Registration Certificate with the Post Office under the Cable Act; §(ii)The Service Area within which you intend to provide service, expected Subscriber numbers etc.; §(iii)And in case of Cable Operator-provide SLR, where exists otherwise negotiate subscriber base on the basis of evidence of both the parties including base of similarly placed Cable Operators and local survey. §(iv)And in case of MSO-provide List of cable operators within their subscriber base. §Within 60 days the MSO / Broadcaster has to provide signals on mutually agreed terms or refuse, with reasons. Upon refusal you can approach TDSAT.

§Question 10: §Whether this Interconnect Agreement can be oral or should be in writing? §Answer 10: §Earlier TRAI’s Regulation recognized both oral and written agreements. §Recently in March 2009 TRAI has prescribed that the Subscription Agreement must be in writing. §It is now mandatory for MSO to hand over a copy of signed Interconnect Agreement to Cable Operator and obtain an acknowledgement within 15 days from the date of signing. §Similarly, Broadcasters are also obliged to follow the same procedure for agreements with MSOs.

§Question 11: Can I approach TDSAT if an MSO or a Broadcaster is threatening disconnection on grounds like under-declaration, non-payment of Subscription Fee etc? §Answer 11: Yes. you can. §Rule is that normally the agreed subscribers base will remain fixed except in exceptional circumstances and in such cases Service Provider seeking a change in the subscribers base has to provide reasons and accompanying evidence including local survey. §Before disconnection the MSO / Broadcaster has to follow the rules like: §(i)give a public notice in Newspapers; and §(ii)give a specific Notice to you. §Notices have to be of 21 days - counted from the date of the latter Notice. §Similarly, if a Cable Operator wants to stop re-distributing channels of an MSO to its subscribers, he is also obliged to follow the same rules. §But if you have defaulted in your payment, then you can’t take the benefit of 'Must Provide clause'. §Also if you demand Carriage Fee from a Broadcaster, then also you can’t take the benefit of 'Must Provide clause‘.

§Question 12: Can I approach TDSAT if an MSO or a Broadcaster alleges that I am pirating their signals? §Answer 12: Yes. But only if you are not pirating. §you have to operate only in Service Area mentioned in your Agreement. §If you wish to operate beyond that Area, then you need to negotiate with the Broadcaster / MSO regardless of the fact that you may be holding postal Registration for a larger area / new area. §Subscription Fee has been agreed / fixed on the basis of agreed Service Area also. §So if you wish to serve in larger area, then the Subscription Fee has to be re-negotiated.

§Question 13: §Can my Broadcaster pressurize me to take signals from my competing MSO in the same Service Area? §Answer 13: §In this context, the Supreme Court has opined that: §If the MSO-Agent is a Commercial Agent only for collection of subscription fee, data etc., the agency is valid under the Regulation; §If the MSO-Agent of the Broadcaster itself is the Service Provider and that the feed is given to the Signal Seeker through the network of that MSO- Agent, the same is violative of the Regulation. §In other words, as long as the feed comes directly from the decoders, even though decoders are provided through the MSO-Agent, it is valid in law.

§Question 14: TRAI Regulation provides that the terms of the contract should be reasonable, but who has to decide the reasonableness of the terms? §Answer 14: Reasonableness of terms has to be decided by an authorized forum like TDSAT and not by any single party to the contract. §Question 15: In case of a dispute re non- provision of signals, which party should file a petition in TDSAT? §Answer 15: Operator seeking signals should negotiate with supplier of signals and in case negotiations fail, then the signal Seeker has to approach TDSAT.

§Question 16: Can I be penalized, if I violate TDSAT’s Orders? §Answer 16: Yes. §On willful failure to comply with order of TDSAT, you are liable to pay fine upto one lakh rupees. It increases in case of subsequent / continuing defaults. § Question 17: Can TDSAT pass an Interim Order? §Answer 17: Yes. §Question 18: Is there an Appeal against the Order of the TDSAT and where? §Answer 18: Appeal from TDSATs Final Orders lie directly to Supreme Court. §But only on substantial Questions of Law. §No appeal can be filed against interim Orders of TDSAT.

§Question 19: Whether “Level Playing Field” is my right? §Answer 19: Yes. Article 21 of the Constitution refers to “right to life”. It includes “opportunity”. When Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution confers fundamental right to carry on business to a company, it is entitled to invoke doctrine of "Level Playing Field".

SOME SUGGESTIONS UTo maintain the advantages of a Specialised Tribunal, continuity in the knowledge and expertise gained during litigation needs to be passed on to the succeeding Chairperson and Members UTo avoid plethora of litigation, important aspects of telecom issues should be codified with clarity to avoid ambiguity and uncertainty

THANK YOU