The WRF Model: 2012 Annual Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact of cumulus parameterization on motion, structure, intensity: preliminary results Robert Fovell and Yizhe Peggy Bu University of California, Los.
Advertisements

A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
UU Unitah Basin WRF Model Configuration (same as DEQ) See Alcott and Steenburgh 2013 for further details on most aspects of this numerical configuration:
Shortwave Radiation Options in the WRF Model
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
Hongli Jiang 1,3, Michelle Harrold 2,3 and Jamie Wolff 2,3 1: NOAA/ESRL/CIRA, Colorado State University 2: NCAR/Research Applications Laboratory 3: Developmental.
5/18/2015 Prediction of the 10 July 2004 Beijing Flood with a High- Resolution NWP model Ying-Hwa Kuo 1 and Yingchun Wang 2 1. National Center for Atmospheric.
Md. Mizanur Rahman Simulation of Seasonal Monsoon Rainfall over the SAARC Region by Dynamical Downscaling using WRF Model SAARC Meteorological Research.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
John J. Cassano - University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski -Naval Postgraduate School William Gutowski - Iowa State University Dennis Lettenmaier – University.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
Christa D. Peters-Lidard Head, Hydrological Sciences Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Workshop Objectives 1.Describe the LIS-WRF Coupled System.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
LAKE EFFECT SNOW SIMULATION John D McMillen. LAKE BONNEVILLE EFFECT SNOW.
WRF Physics Options Acknowledgements: Slides by Jimy Dudhia (NCAR) Dr Meral Demirtaş Turkish State Meteorological Service Weather Forecasting Department.
Tanya L. Otte and Robert C. Gilliam NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with U.S. EPA National Exposure Research.
WRF-VIC: The Flux Coupling Approach L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory BioEarth Project Kickoff Meeting April 11-12, 2011 Pullman, WA.
WRF namelist.input Dr Meral Demirtaş
Introduction to the Weather Research & Forecast (WRF) System, a High-Resolution Atmospheric Model Introduction to the Weather Research & Forecast (WRF)
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Summary of Boundary Layer, Microphysics and Cumulus Options Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
WRF Physics Options Part 2
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
November 1, 2013 Bart Brashers, ENVIRON Jared Heath Bowden, UNC 3SAQS WRF Modeling Recommendations.
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Improvements of WRF Simulation Skills of Southeast United States Summer Rainfall: Focus on Physical Parameterization and Horizontal Resolution Laifang.
By: Michael Kevin Hernandez Key JTWC ET onset JTWC Post ET  Fig. 1: JTWC best track data on TC Sinlaku (2008). ECMWF analysis ET completion ECMWF analysis.
Convective Parameterization Options
winter RADIATION FOGS at CIBA (Spain): Observations compared to WRF simulations using different PBL parameterizations Carlos Román-Cascón
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Operational Mesoscale Model History Early: LFM, NGM (history) Eta (mainly history) MM5: Still used by some, but.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Joe Klemp National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado Convection Resolving NWP using WRF.
Experiences with 0-36 h Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model Morris Weisman (Wei Wang, Chris Davis) NCAR/MMM WSN05 September 8, 2005.
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 3rd.
Ensemble Prediction with Perturbed Initial and Lateral Boundary Conditions over Complex Terrain Jinhua Jiang, Darko Koracin, Ramesh Vellore Desert Research.
WRF Problems: Some Solutions, Some Mysteries Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Tropical Transition in the Eastern North Pacific: Sensitivity to Microphysics Alicia M. Bentley ATM May 2012.
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 4th.
Are Numerical Weather Prediction Models Getting Better? Cliff Mass, David Ovens, and Jeff Baars University of Washington.
Research on the HWRF Model: Intensification and Uncertainties in Model Physics Research on the HWRF Model: Intensification and Uncertainties in Model Physics.
WRF Version 2: Physics Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting February , 2008 Boulder, CO.
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
Yuqing Wang and Chunxi Zhang International Pacific Research Center University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Cloud-mediated radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols simulated by newly developed two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ during 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS over the Gulf.
Evaluation of regional climate simulations with WRF model in conditions of central Europe Jan Karlický, Tomáš Halenka, Michal Belda, (Charles University.
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER DATA ASSIMILATION FOR THE MPAS SYSTEM So-Young Ha, Chris Snyder, Bill Skamarock, Jeffrey Anderson*, Nancy Collins*, Michael Duda,
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
11 Implementing a New Shallow Convection Scheme into WRF Aijun Deng and Brian Gaudet Penn State University Jimy Dudhia National Center for Atmospheric.
1 RUC Land Surface Model implementation in WRF Tanya Smirnova, WRFLSM Workshop, 18 June 2003.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
Consortium Meeting Feb 07, Our Audience, Hits: January 2013.
Diurnal Variations in Southern Great Plain during IHOP -- data and NCAR/CAM Junhong (June) Wang Dave Parsons, Julie Caron and Jim Hack NCAR ATD and CGD.
Impacts of Meteorological Conditions Modified by Urban Expansion on Surface Ozone over Yangtz River Delta and Pearl River Delta region, China Xuemei Wang,
Land-Surface evolution forced by predicted precipitation corrected by high-frequency radar/satellite assimilation – the RUC Coupled Data Assimilation System.
WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.
High-resolution numerical simulations of lake-effect snowstorms: Investigating physics sensitivity, multi-scale predictability, and model performance.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
University of Washington Ensemble Systems for Probabilistic Analysis and Forecasting Cliff Mass, Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
ASM Project Update: Atmospheric Modeling
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations and Analysis
Schumacher, R., S., and J. M. Peters, 2017
Characterizing the response of simulated atmospheric boundary layers to stochastic cloud radiative forcing Robert Tardif, Josh Hacker (NCAR Research Applications.
Xu, H., and X. Li, 2017 J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, 6004–6024
Presentation transcript:

The WRF Model: 2012 Annual Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM

WRF Community Model Version 1.0 WRF was released December 2000 Version 2.0: May 2004 (NMM added, EM nesting released) Version 2.1: August 2005 (EM becomes ARW) Version 2.2: December 2006 (WPS released) Version 3.0: April 2008 (add global ARW version) Version 3.1: April 2009 Version 3.2: April 2010 Version 3.3: April 2011 Version 3.3.1: September 2011 Version 3.4: April 2012

V3.3 Highlights (2011) Microphysics option: Stony Brook University (Lin and Colle) (mp_physics=13) CESM (Climate model) Physics: Zhang-McFarlane cumulus parameterization (cu_physics=7) Bretherton-Park (UW) PBL (bl_pbl_physics=9) Park-Bretherton (UW) shallow cumulus (shcu_physics=2) Radiation option: New Goddard longwave and shortwave (ra_lw_physics = 5, ra_sw_physics = 5) PBL option: TEMF (Angevine et al.) PBL (bl_pbl_-physics=10) Cumulus options: SAS added for ARW (cu_physics=4), NSAS (cu_physics=14), Tiedtke (cu_physics=6)

Other New Options in V3.3 New Kain-Fritsch trigger option Wind farm parameterization Stochastic KE backscatter perturbation method Idealized tropical cyclone case WRF-Chem options added to existing schemes Morrison microphysics RRTMG longwave and shortwave

Version 3.3.1 (Sept 2011) Regional climate diagnostics Provided by L.Fita, J. Fernandez and M.Garcia-Diez of U. Cantabria (Spain) output_diagnostics=1 wrfxtrm_d01 output file contains Surface max, min, std, mean at each grid point of 2m T, 2m Q, 10m wind, rainfall Output frequency could be chosen to be daily to give daily max, etc.

Hypsometric Option Vertical interpolation/integration method (Tae-Kwon Wee et al. 2012, MWR) hypsometric_option=2 (new default in V3.4) Up till now df/dp=-a is used to compute inverse dry density (a). This implicitly assumes a varies linearly with p. Option uses df/dlnp=-RT mathematically the same because a=RT/p but assumption that T varies linearly with ln p gives better consistency with operational height analyses such as GFS Also interp_theta=.false. in real.exe interpolates temperature with ln p rather than q (V3.4)

New in Version 3.4 NSSL microphysics (mp_physics=17) 2-moment, 4-ice scheme (adds hail) Also idealized CCN option (mp_physics=18) Provided by Ted Mansell (National Severe Storms Lab) Ref: Mansell. Ziegler and Bruning (2010, JAS) WENO advection (option 3): Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory method (also provided by Ted Mansell)

NSSL v Morrison MP 12 h rainfall starting 2010061100, 4 km RUC IC NSSL Obs (ST4) NSSL Morrison NSSL slightly more light rain

New in Version 3.4 Fu-Liu-Gu (FLG) radiation option (ra_sw_physics=7, ra_lw_physics=7) Simple SiB (SSiB) land-surface model (sf_surface_physics=8) from Y. Xue and F. de Sales (UCLA) Both from physics used in UCLA global climate model

New-physics tests 10 simulations from June 2010 over US at 20 km grid size Results show averages compared to standard options

Fu et al. (FLG) radiation Compared to RRTM and Goddard SW Less downward visible and IR Cooler surface and atmospheric temps

New in Version 3.4 New Version of QNSE PBL (bl_pbl_physics=4) Eddy-Diffusivity-Mass-Flux (EDMF) daytime convective BL method From Julien Pergaud (Numtech, France) Stable BL as in QNSE Old version kept temporarily as option bl_pbl_physics=94 but turning of EDMF reverts to old version

EDMF QNSE v YSU PBL Denver sounding: QNSE cooler at night

EDMF QNSE v YSU PBL QNSE moister except 18Z during day

EDMF QNSE v YSU PBL Norman sounding: QNSE cooler at night

EDMF QNSE v YSU PBL QNSE again moister except 18Z

New in Version 3.4 Noah MP (multi-physics) land-surface model (sf_surface_physics=4) Jointly developed at NCAR and Guo-Ye Niu (U. Texas/U. Arizona) Advanced snow model and other features seaice_albedo_opt=1 Allows variation of sea-ice albedo with T For Noah and Noah MP in new shared sea-ice module

NoahMP and SSiB v Noah LSM SSiB larger diurnal cycle, moister in daytime

New in Version 3.4 New version of surface-layer physics (sf_sfclay_physics=11) Modifies and cleans up sfclay option 1 code and should replace it in the future Ref: Jimenez et al. (2012, MWR) New option to improve topographic effects on surface wind (topo_wind=1) using sub-grid and resolved topography Ref: Jimenez and Dudhia (2012, JAMC)

New in Version 3.4 New version of surface-layer physics (sf_sfclay_physics=11) Modifies and cleans up sfclay option 1 code and should replace it in the future Ref: Jimenez et al. (2012, MWR) New option to improve topographic effects on surface wind (topo_wind=1) Ref: Jimenez and Dudhia (2012, JAMC)

topo_wind 1 and sfclay 11 Winds stronger over mountains, weaker in plains

topo_wind 1 and sfclay 11 Some warmer and cooler areas at night (sfclayrev)

Planned CESM microphysics Morrison-Gettelman (mp_physics=11) From CESM climate model Interacts with WRF-Chem Reflectivity output computed from each scheme’s microphysics parameters Hybrid eta-pressure vertical coordinate in ARW (pressure levels at top)

Contributions for next release New options for contribution should come to NCAR by October 2012 We may send test cases to developers Code freeze and final test phase starts December 2012 Release planned for April 2013

Thanks